GEPRISP Te Kotahitanga. GEPRISP GoalExperiencesPositioningRelationshipsInteractionsStrategiesPlanning GEPRISP A framework for Te Kotahitanga.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Te Kotahitanga What can we learn from it? A powerpoint presentation to SCT cluster by Mary Jamieson School Support Services School of Education University.
Advertisements

LITERACY IN THE MIDDLE YEARS OF SCHOOLING INITIATIVE
E.g Act as a positive role model for innovation Question the status quo Keep the focus of contribution on delivering and improving.
Competencies for beginning teachers
PORTFOLIO.
APS Teacher Evaluation Module 9 Part B: Summative Ratings.
The Main Influences on Māori Students’ Achievement The Narratives of Experience Te Kotahitanga Phase 5.
Who or what needs to be ready? Leaders Teachers Classroom support Administration Premises staff Children
7/14/20151 Effective Teaching and Evaluation The Pathwise System By David M. Agnew Associate Professor Agricultural Education.
Cooperating Teacher and Teacher Candidate Workshop
What should be the basis of
performance INDICATORs performance APPRAISAL RUBRIC
Matt Moxham EDUC 290. The Idaho Core Teacher Standards are ten standards set by the State of Idaho that teachers are expected to uphold. This is because.
Professional Growth Portfolio Your Name Here Date.
Teacher Performance Assessment (TPA). PlanningInstruction (Engaging students & supporting learning) AssessmentReflection Academic language Student Voice.
Tier 1: Core, Instructional Interventions All Students, All Settings Preventive, proactive support (e.g. school-wide behavior support, high quality.
Lesson Appraisal Guidelines (LAG). Criteria for the LAGs Coherence and Quality of Planning Management of Learning Environment Subject and Procedural Knowledge.
Constructive Alignment Towards a Learner-centered Undergraduate Education Edmond Ko City University of Hong Kong 26 March 2004.
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
Shared reading. Reading resources Working together to ensure that every day, in every classroom, every student is learning and achieving. Independent.
ASAP Introduction to Co- construction Meetings. Introduction to Co-construction Meetings In the setting up of ASAP co- construction meetings we should.
Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (INTASC)
Document Review STANDARDEVIDENCE Standard 1 - Professional KnowledgeDocumentation and Observation Standard 2 - Instructional PlanningDocumentation and.
© 2014 Texas Education Agency / The University of Texas System Explicit Instruction for Diverse Learners Foundations Adapted with permission from Anita.
The Framework for Teaching Domain 1 Planning and Preparation.
Teacher Keys Effectiveness System Forsyth County Schools Orientation May 2013 L.. Allison.
A big picture for Outstanding Citizenship. Three key questions 3 How well are we achieving our aims? 1 What are we trying to achieve? 2 How do we organise.
Instructional leadership: The role of promoting teaching and learning EMASA Conference 2011 Presentation Mathakga Botha Wits school of Education.
Te Kotahitanga Phase 5 The Genesis of Te Kotahitanga.
Reservoir Primary School Literacy Share Day
© 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved. Planning for Developmentally Appropriate Curriculum Chapter 3.
Improving relevant standards. Aims and objectives Familiarize ourselves with best practice standards of teaching To think about how we can implement the.
1 PROFESSIONAL LEARNING within a COLLABORATIVE INQUIRY FRAMEWORK The professional learning cycle: serves as a process for professional learning is driven.
Aims of Workshop Introduce more effective school/University partnerships for the initial training of teachers through developing mentorship training Encourage.
EdTPA Teacher Performance Assessment. Planning Task Selecting lesson objectives Planning 3-5 days of instruction (lessons, assessments, materials) Alignment.
Action research projects This sequence may help you when planning your case study What does the data identify about this target group? What will.
Understanding Teachers Standards. Objectives of the session To develop an understanding of the teachers standards To start thinking about the relevant.
Strengthening Student Outcomes in Small Schools There’s been enough research done to know what to do – now we have to start doing it! Douglas Reeves.
Poipoia te kakano kia puawai Nurture the seed and it will blossom A way into a culturally responsive inquiry ~ Alana Madgwick & Peter Boyle Secondary Literacy.
Student Name Student Number ePortfolio Demonstrating my achievement of the NSW Institute of Teachers Graduate Teacher Stage of the Professional Teacher.
Buckstone Primary School School Improvement Plan Summary A copy of the full Standards and Quality Report and the full Improvement Plan are available on.
NYC DOE – Office of Teacher Effectiveness B. Examining the Framework
Warilla Public School Journey of Literacy Development with Primary Students.
Doing Teacher Evaluation Right: 5 Critical Elements: Evidence.
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
Module 1 Peer Coaching on Paper Peer Coach Training.
Curriculum and Instruction: Management of the Learning Environment
The School Effectiveness Framework
The Genesis of Te Kotahitanga. 2001: The Scoping Exercise Research initiated by Professor Russell Bishop and Dr Mere Berryman with support from kuia and.
U of R Presentation January 25, The Government’s Vision “ … a strong and growing Saskatchewan, the best place in Canada – to live, to work, to start.
Activity 1 Stickies on the board Any unanswered questions so far Issues or challenges What do I want to know before the end of this session?
Development Team Day 5a October Aim To explore approaches to evaluating the impact of the curriculum on pupil learning.
MaORI STUDENTS Achieving EDUCATION SUCCESS AS MAORI Gabrielle Ashton Team Solutions September
1 Far West Teacher Center Network - NYS Teaching Standards: Your Path to Highly Effective Teaching 2013 Far West Teacher Center Network Teaching is the.
Leadership Meeting April 23, Clear Learning Goals: Use The Framework of Teaching in Domain 1 (Planning & Preparation) & Domain 4 (Professional Responsibilities),
Peer Coaching for Effective Professional Learning.
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
Using Student Assessment Data in Your Teacher Observation and Feedback Process Renee Ringold & Eileen Weber Minnesota Assessment Conference August 5, 2015.
Teaching and Learning Cycle and Differentiated Instruction A Perfect Fit Rigor Relevance Quality Learning Environment Differentiation.
ACS WASC/CDE Visiting Committee Final Presentation Panorama High School March
Classroom Management Cheryl Harvey, Secondary Facilitator Date: May 2011.
The main influences on Māori students’ achievement Te Kotahitanga The Narratives of Experience.
Addressing Diversity and Disparity through Teacher Education.
LSRN Discussion Workshop: 24 November 2016
OSEP Leadership Conference July 28, 2015 Margaret Heritage, WestEd
Iowa Teaching Standards & Criteria
Cooperating Teacher and Teacher Candidate Workshop
Teaching and Learning Guiding Principles
Kia ora koutou katoa Maori enjoying success as Maori
Ohio Standards for the Teaching Profession EHHS Conceptual Framework
Presentation transcript:

GEPRISP Te Kotahitanga

GEPRISP GoalExperiencesPositioningRelationshipsInteractionsStrategiesPlanning GEPRISP A framework for Te Kotahitanga

Goal To improve Māori students’ educational achievement Hui Whakarewa: 3 day induction hui Experiences of Māori students in education are examined and inform this process Positioning of teachers within agentic discourses is critical Relationships that exist in classrooms need to be examined and may need to change Interactions Current ways of interacting in classrooms may also need to change Strategies are introduced to create opportunities for different ways of interacting Plan We need to plan for all this to happen New strategies can be introduced Which support the use of different interactions Which develops new relationships ‘a pedagogy of relations’ Which continues to challenge teachers’ positioning and promote teachers’ agency Creating new experiences of Māori students being affirmed, valued and academically engaged. Cycle of in-class observations, feedback, co-construction meetings and shadow-coaching GEPRISP

EPRISPG The need to improve Māori students’ educational achievement The need to examine Māori students’ current experiences The need for agentic positioning The need for relationships of mutual trust and respect The need for a wide range of interactions The need for strategies that support discursive practices The need to plan for all this to happen Evidence needed to inform GEPRISP Measurable increase in Māori students’ educational achievement Measurable increase in positive experiences for Māori students Qualitative shifts in thinking from deficit to agentic Evidence of relationships of caring at three levels: Caring, Expectations and performance Shifts in interactions from traditional to discursive Evidence of increase in range and type of co- operative, dialogic and and interactive strategies Evidence of planning: in-class in-school whole school

GOAL: Measurable improvements of Māori students’ participation Māori student participation indicators may involve data from: Attendance records Suspensions and stand downs Retention Exemptions Referrals

GOAL: Measurable improvements within Māori students’ achievement Māori student academic achievement evidence may include: AsTTle results Departmental assessment tasks School-wide assessments Academic awards / distinctions National and international assessments Literacy and numeracy achievements Classroom assessments

Evidence about the current schooling experiences of Māori students. Evidence of Māori student’s improvements in morale, engagement and participation in learning. Use of this evidence in a systematic manner to inform a range of learning and professional outcomes. EXPERIENCES: Valuing and legitimating Māori students’ educational experiences

Teachers are able to identify their own positioning in relation to Māori students. Teachers reject deficit thinking as a means of explaining Māori students’ educational performance. Teachers reject the deficit thinking of others as a means of explaining Māori students’ educational performance. Teachers know and understand how to bring about change in Māori students’ educational performance. POSITIONING: Evidence of agency within teacher positioning

Evidence of the teacher: caring for Māori students as culturally–located individuals demonstrating high expectations for the learning performance of Māori students demonstrating high expectations for the behavioural performance of Māori students providing a well-managed learning environment providing culturally appropriate and culturally responsive contexts RELATIONSHIPS: Measurable evidence of relationships of mutual trust and respect

INTERACTIONS: Evidence of a wide range of teaching and learning interactions observed WholeIndividualGroup Culture Co-construction Feed forward academic Feedback academic Prior experience and knowledge Feed forward behaviour (+/-) Feedback behaviour (+/-) Monitoring Instruction

INTERACTIONS: Evidence of a wide range of teaching and learning interactions observed Evidence of changes in: Student engagement in learning Student work completion Student-teacher interactions Teacher location in terms of proximity Increase in the cognitive level of lessons Use of Māori students’ prior knowledge and experience Student involvement in co-construction/ power- sharing

Strategies may include: Cooperative learning Formative assessment and goal setting Student generated questioning Integrated curricula Critical reflection Ako / Reciprocal Learning Differentiated learning STRATEGIES: Evidence of the use of interactive and discursive strategies to create a culturally responsive context for learning

Evidence of goals and / or action plans at: an individual level a department level a school level Are goals / action plans Specific, Achievable and Measurable? Relevant and Time-framed? What evidence do we have of the relationship between evidence of outcomes for Māori students, planning and delivery? PLANNING: Evidence of planning to achieve the goal of raising Māori student achievement and participation