Oxypurinol for Symptomatic Gout in Allopurinol Intolerant Patients Lourdes Villalba, M.D. DAAODP, CDER, FDA Arthritis Advisory Committee Meeting June 2,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Oxypurinol for Gout Arthritis Drugs Advisory Committee June 2, 2004 Cardiome Pharma Corp Vancouver, BC Canada.
Advertisements

Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee
CBER Isolagen Therapy (IT) BLA FDA Clinical Review Agnes Lim, MD Yao-Yao Zhu, MD, PhD DCEPT/OCTGT/CBER, FDA October 9, 2009 Advisory Committee Meeting.
1. 2 The primary Objective of IDEAL LDL-C Simvastatin mg/d Atorvastatin 80 mg/d risk CHD In stable CHD patients IDEAL: The Incremental Decrease.
Prescribing Information is available at the end of this presentation NHS Surrey Lipid Guidelines Dr Adam Jacques Ashford & St.
TNT: Study Design Treating to New Targets 2 5 years 10,001 Patients Clinically evident CHD LDL-C 130  250 mg/dL following up to 8-week washout and 8-week.
Study by: Granger et al. NEJM, September 2011,Vol No. 11 Presented by: Amelia Crawford PA-S2 Apixaban versus Warfarin in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation.
Prepared by : Tamara Odeh Diana Jawhari Supervised by : Dr. Ola Ayesh.
Gout: Its not all crystal clear Robert L. Wortmann, M.D. Department of Internal Medicine The University of Oklahoma College of Medicine, Tulsa.
1 Uric acid and Gout James Witter MD, PhD Arthritis Advisory Meeting June 2, 2004.
Familial metabolic disease Characterized by : Acute arthritis Uric stones in the kidneys Hyperuricemia.
The Definitive Thrombosis Update
Presented by Martin H. Cohen, M.D. at the 27 July 2004 meeting of the Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee.
1 Tolvaptan for the Treatment of Hyponatremia Aliza Thompson, MD Medical Officer Cardiovascular and Renal Drugs Advisory Committee Meeting June 25, 2008.
Rapivab™ - peramivir injection
ASTEROID A Study To evaluate the Effect of Rosuvastatin On Intravascular ultrasound- Derived coronary atheroma burden.
Efficacy and Safety of Deferasirox (Exjade®) during 1 Year of Treatment in Transfusion-Dependent Patients with Myelodysplastic Syndromes: Results from.
0902CZR01NL537SS0901 RENAAL Altering the Course of Renal Disease in Hypertensive Patients with Type 2 Diabetes and Nephropathy with the A II Antagonist.
Comparison of NNRTI vs PI/r  EFV vs LPV/r vs EFV + LPV/r –A5142 –Mexican Study  NVP vs ATV/r –ARTEN  EFV vs ATV/r –A5202.
1 FDA Review of NDA Valganciclovir for the Treatment of CMV Retinitis in AIDS Joseph Toerner, MD Medical Officer DAVDP.
Phase III studies of Xeloda® in colorectal cancer (CRC)
DRAFT SLIDES FOR NDA ADVISORY COMMITTEE PRESENATIONS.
Avoiding Cardiovascular Events through COMbination Therapy in Patients LIving with Systolic Hypertension The First Outcomes Trial of Initial Therapy With.
TAP PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS INC. June 2, Arthritis Drugs Advisory Committee TAP Pharmaceutical Products Inc. June 2, 2004.
1 ENTEREG ® (Alvimopan) Special Safety Section Marjorie Dannis, M.D. Division of Gastroenterology Products Office of Drug Evaluation III CDER, FDA The.
Phase III Trial of Pazopanib in Locally Advanced and/or Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Sternberg CN et al. ASCO 2009; Abstract (Oral Presentation)
11 One vs Three Years of Adjuvant Imatinib for Operable Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor A Randomized Trial Joensuu H, Eriksson M, Sundby Hall K, et al.
VIOXX ™ Gastrointestinal Outcome Research (VIGOR) Arthritis Advisory Committee Meeting February 8, 2001 Lourdes Villalba, M.D. DAAODP, CDER, FDA.
Gout Familial metabolic disease characterized by : Acute arthritis Uric acid stones in the kidneys Hyperuricemia.
CE-1 IRESSA ® Clinical Efficacy Ronald B. Natale, MD Director Cedars Sinai Comprehensive Cancer Center Ronald B. Natale, MD Director Cedars Sinai Comprehensive.
HOPE: Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation study Purpose To evaluate whether the long-acting ACE inhibitor ramipril and/or vitamin E reduce the incidence.
C-BR- 1 Raptiva ™ (efalizumab) Benefit:Risk Assessment Charles Johnson, MB, ChB Senior Director Head of Specialty Biotherapeutics Genentech, Inc.
Endocrinologic & Metabolic Drugs Advisory Committee Meeting
Collaborative Atorvastatin Diabetes Study CARDS Dr Sachin Kadoo.
Lenalidomide Is Safe and Active in Waldenstrom Macroglobulinemia (WM) 1 Updated Results from a Multicenter, Open-Label, Dose-Escalation Phase 1b/2 Study.
Locatelli F et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 4378.
Angelo L Gaffo Kenneth G Saag Core Evidence 2009:4 25–36
4S: Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study
GIDEON (Global Investigation of therapeutic DEcisions in hepatocellular carcinoma [HCC] and Of its treatment with sorafeNib) second interim analysis in.
> 18 years Chronic HCV infection Genotype 1 Failure (relapse) to 4, 6 or 8 weeks of GZR/EBR + SOF in C-SWIFT Part A Compensated cirrhosis assessed by liver.
Manufacturer: Amgen Inc FDA Approval Date: August 27, 2015
1 Pulminiq™ Cyclosporine Inhalation Solution Pulmonary Drug Advisory Committee Meeting June 6, 2005 Statistical Evaluation Statistical Evaluation Jyoti.
C-SAF- 1 Raptiva ™ (efalizumab) Safety Richard Chin, MD Director of Clinical Research, Specialty Biotherapeutics Genentech, Inc.
Agency Review of sNDA SE-006 DOXIL for Ovarian Cancer Division of Oncology Drug Products Office of Drug Evaluation 1 Center for Drug Evaluation.
Alemtuzumab BLA committee CD52 Expression Leukocytes B- lymphocytes T- lymphocytes Monocytes Macrophages Thymocytes Granulocytes (
1 Daptomycin Safety Review Chuck Cooper, M.D. Medical Officer Division of Anti-Infective and Ophthalmology Products March 6, 2006 Advisory Committee Meeting.
C-1 Safety Results S. aureus Bacteremia and Endocarditis Study Gloria Vigliani, M.D. Vice President, Medical Strategy Cubist Pharmaceuticals.
1 Joint NDAC/EMDAC Meeting January 13, 2005 Mevacor TM Daily 20 mg Tablets Rx-to-OTC Switch Daiva Shetty, M.D. Division of Over-the-Counter Drug Products.
Manufacturer: AstraZeneca FDA Approval Date: December 22, 2015
DIABETES INSTITUTE JOURNAL CLUB CARINA SIGNORI, D.O., M.P.H. DECEMBER 15, 2011 Atherothrombosis intervention in metabolic syndrome with low HDL/High Triglycerides:
Colchicine: Colchicine: Effective & specific gout Rx, but less favored than NSAIDs because of slow onset of action & high incidence of side effects. Effective.
From: PLOS Neglected Tropical DiseaseJanuary 2014 Presented by Pavitra Charoensrisakkul and Peeraya Permkarnjaroen 3 rd year medical cadet Phramongkutklao.
Risk Factors for Linezolid-Associated Thrombocytopenia in Adult Patients Cristina Gervasoni Ospedale Luigi Sacco, Milano.
CHEST 2013; 144(3): R3 김유진 / Prof. 장나은. Introduction 2  Cardiovascular diseases  common, serious comorbid conditions in patients with COPD cardiac.
GASTROENTEROLOGY 2008; 134 :688–695 소화기내과 R4 이 재 연.
Telbivudine Versus Lamivudine in Chinese Patients with Chronic Hepatitis B: Results at 1 Year of a Randomized, Double-Blind Trial HEPATOLOGY 2008;47:
FOURIER Further Cardiovascular Outcomes Research With PCSK9 Inhibition in Subjects With Elevated Risk
OBJECTIVES and METHODOLOGY
Glecaprevir-Pibrentasvir in GT 1-6 with Renal Disease EXPEDITION-4
Everolimus-eluting Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease: ABSORB III Trial 2-Year Results Stephen G. Ellis, MD,
Daclatasvir + Sofosbuvir in Genotype 3 ALLY-3 Study
Effects of Uric acid- lowering therapy on renal outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis Nephrol Dial Transplant (2014) 29: Vaughan Washco.
HOPE: Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation study
The following slides highlight a presentation at the Late-Breaking Clinical Trials session of the American Heart Association Scientific Sessions, November.
The Hypertension in the Very Elderly Trial (HYVET)
Screening, Lipid Stabilization, and Placebo Run-in
These slides highlight a presentation from a Special Session of the Late-Breaking Clinical Trials sessions during the American College of Cardiology 2005.
Major classes of drugs to reduce lipids
Switch to ATV/r monotherapy
The following slides highlight a report on a presentation at the American College of Cardiology 2004, Scientific Sessions, in New Orleans, Louisiana on.
Presentation transcript:

Oxypurinol for Symptomatic Gout in Allopurinol Intolerant Patients Lourdes Villalba, M.D. DAAODP, CDER, FDA Arthritis Advisory Committee Meeting June 2, 2004

2 Goal –Clinical trial design for chronic gout –Data from a specific NDA as an example for discussion

3 Oxypurinol  Proposed indication: “Treatment of hyperuricemia in patients with symptomatic gout who are intolerant to allopurinol and have failed either rechallenge or desensitization with allopurinol”

4 Allopurinol  Effectively reduces serum uric acid (SUA) at doses 300 – 800 mg daily  Active metabolite is oxypurinol  Allopurinol T ½ < 2 hr.  Oxypurinol T ½ : hr.  Limited data on allopurinol/oxypurinol comparison

5 PK Study AAI-US-175  Open-label, dose linearity, fasted/fed, bioequivalence study (N=42)  Relative bioavailability of single dose of oxypurinol is about 30% of allopurinol  No data on multiple-dose conversion Oxy (mg) Allo (mg)

6 Allopurinol Safety  Hypersensitivity reactions (2-4%) –Skin (mild to severe; fatal) –Fever, hepatitis, nephritis, hematologic –AHS (allopurinol hypersensitivity syndrome) –Mechanism: type IV ?  Non-immunologic toxicity –renal, liver –animal toxicity: renal, liver, cardiac  Unclear whether hypersensitivity related to allopurinol, oxypurinol or other metabolite

7 Allopurinol Desensitization A&R 44(1): , 2001 For moderate skin intolerance –retrospective evaluation, N=32 –desensitization over one month, mean FU 32 m, mean creatinine 2.8 mg/dL –88% tolerated doses up to mg/d –13% developed skin reactions that required discontinuation –final SUA 5.3 mg/dL (10.4 start)

8 Oxypurinol Compassionate Use Program (CUP)  Open label, uncontrolled (N= 533) –data analysis plan written in  Less than optimal documentation of: –allopurinol intolerance before entry –efficacy and safety (clinical labs) –baseline and post-baseline data  SUA missing data  baseline (32%)  post-baseline (24%) –Patient disposition (28% lost to FU)

9 Oxypurinol Protocol (OXPL-213) Initiation: 2000  SUA as surrogate endpoint  Primary analysis: mean change of at least 2 mg/dL  Safety If study successful: post-marketing study for evaluation of meaningful clinical endpoints

10 OXPL-213 Study Design  Prospective, open-label, uncontrolled, dose-escalation –Base study (N=79) for 14 weeks  Extension (A4) (N=48, ongoing)  Entry criteria –Symptomatic hyperuricemia with documented allopurinol intolerance  Exclusion criteria: –Severe prior reaction to allopurinol –Diuretic and uricosuric agents –Creatinine ≥ 2 mg/dL, ALT ≥ 3x ULN

11 OXPL-213 Oxypurinol Treatment 100 mg/d x first wk, 200 mg/d x second wk and 300 mg/d wk 3 to 6 - If SUA change <2 mg/dL at wk 6, dose up to 600 mg/d - If SUA change < 2mg/dL at wk 9, dose up to 800 mg/d

12 OXPL-213 Endpoints  SUA level (no central lab) –Baseline (N=3) –Wk 6 –Wk 9 (only those with SUA drop < 2 mg/dL) –End of study (wk 12, 13 & 14)  Landmark analysis –Change from baseline in the ITT population –Decrease of at least 2 mg/dL (lower bound of 95% CI ≥ 2)

13 OXPL-213 Baseline characteristics  Mean age 61 yr (27 to 83)  52% male  Mean SUA 10.1 mg/dL (7.7 – 13.7)  Mean Creatinine 1.3 mg/dL (0.8 – 2.2)  Failed prior rechallenge or desensitization (N=26)

14 OXPL-213 Baseline characteristics  Concomitant medications at entry Colchicine 34 (43) Low dose ASA 5 (6) Diuretics 42 (53) NSAIDS/COX-2 39 (49) N (%)

15 OXPL-213 Baseline characteristics  History of prior allopurinol intolerance  Skin (63)  Hepatic (7)  Renal (4)  Malaise (6)  Hepatic, renal, malaise (1)  Fever (1)

16 OXPL-213 Results (SUA)  ITT analysis at wk 14 (N= 79) –Mean change from baseline  1.78 mg/dL (95% CI 1.47, 2.08)  p < (rejects null hypothesis that change = zero)  Completer analysis at wk 14 (N = 54) –Mean change from baseline  2.32 mg/dL (95% CI 2.07, 2.57)

17 OXPL-213 Results - Final mean SUA in ITT population: 8.0 mg/dL - Patients who achieved SUA of: ≤ 6 mg/dL ≤ 5 mg/dL ITT (N=79) 10 (13%) 2 (3%) Completers (N=54) 9 (17%) 2 (4%) - No evidence of dose response

18 OXPL-213 Results  Gouty flares: N=12 (15%) –5 during base study –4 during open extension –3 during both base and extension  Tophi complications (N=4) –infection, drainage, pain  Oxypurinol effect or spontaneous flare?

19 OXPL-213 Deaths Deaths (N=5) –1 during base study (pancreatic ca.) –4 during extension  1 end-stage liver disease  1 sudden death  1 GI/COPD  1 sepsis

20 OXPL-213 Serious Adverse Events (AEs) Base study (14 weeks) –7 events  2 MI  1 CHF (? MI) Extension (ongoing) –15 events  1 MI  1 unstable angina

21 OXPL-213 Base study Discontinuations N=25 –16 skin –1 liver –1 thrombocytopenia –1 pancreatic carcinoma (death) –1 protocol violator –5 miscellaneous

22 OXPL-213 Base study Discontinuations (cont’d) –Miscellaneous (N=5)  monitor decision (fever, chills, skin sensitivity, polyarthralgias, viral syndrome)  hypersensitivity NOS  fever, chills, allergic rhinitis  nausea/vomiting  elevation of ALT and BUN /protocol violator

23 OXPL-213 Base study Discontinuations Summary  70% skin intolerance  70% within first wk  Most same as prior intolerance  None of them considered serious

24 OXPL-213 Base and Extension Re-challenged patients (n=26) Discontinuations Hypersensitivity reactions (N=10, 40%)  7 base study (5 skin, 1 liver, 1 nausea)  1 after completion of base study (skin)  2 during extension (skin) Deaths (N=3)  1 base study  2 during extension (1 sepsis, 1 end stage liver disease)

25 OXPL-213 Summary  79 enrolled –54 completed Base study  48 entered open extension  37 available in safety population  10 and 2 patients achieved SUA ≤ 6 mg/dL and ≤ 5 mg/dL, respectively, at 14 wk  12 had gouty flares (8 in base study)

26 OXPL-213 Summary Adverse events in base study –No serious hypersensitivity –Similar to prior allopurinol intolerance –70% within first week (100 mg/day) –70% skin –Others: liver, thrombocytopenia, “viral syndrome” –Population: - no prior serious intolerance - excluded moderate/severe renal insufficiency

27 Oxypurinol Challenge Define a population for a favorable risk benefit: –Benefit: modest decrease in SUA –Risk: intolerance

28 Discussion Points  Value of SUA as a surrogate –change vs. target SUA level?  Additional endpoints: flares?  Eligibility –baseline SUA –concomitant medications/diet –renal insufficiency  Duration  Control group  Safety assessments