STEP-BY-STEP GUIDE VIU POLICY REVIEW PROCESS. STEP 1 SUBMISSION Scheduled Review  Every 5 years (at least) email to Executive Responsible  Delegated.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Standards Development and Approval Process Steve Rueckert Director of Standards Joint Guidance Committee WECC Leadership Annual Training Session Salt Lake.
Advertisements

Probe Process New Program Request Process Substantive Change February 1, 2012.
Rule-Making Book II EU Administrative Procedures – The ReNEUAL Draft Model Rules 2014 Brussels, May th Herwig C.H. Hofmann University of Luxembourg.
Localism & Community Rights Processes & Procedures for Hounslow Ian Duke Head of Policy & Scrutiny HCN 28 July 2013.
Pupil Accommodation Reviews 2011 An Overview Of The Process.
Financial Policies Training: Formulation and Issuance of University Financial Policies (2.1.9) Effective: October 1, 2008.
2009 Performance Assessment Member Representatives Committee Meeting October 28, 2008.
EADM 732 Maria E. Haigh Lupe Valdivia Marissa Fulache.
The Dissertation Process
3 Dec 2003Market Operations Standing Committee1 Market Rule and Change Management Consultation Process John MacKenzie / Darren Finkbeiner / Ella Kokotsis,
Office of the Faculty Secretary www:webs.uidaho.edu/facultycouncil Faculty Senate Website 8/10/09 1.
Letter of intent By to predefined format (Word file, see guidelines) Chair Scientific Committee Coordination EO To all members of.
Best Practices for Graduate Supervision December 10, 2014 Your Role in Graduate Studies.
Monash University Library Quality Cycle EXCELLENCE AND DIVERSITY and LEADING THE WAY Monash University’s strategic framework and overall directions MONASH.
Records Managers’ Forum 28 February Draft standard on the appraisal and disposal of State records Catherine Robinson Senior Project Officer, Government.
1 Phidisa: Regulatory and Ethics Operational Team Report Col. Xolani Currie, Chair Laura McNay, Co-Chair Ezekiel Emmanuel Patty Price-Abbott Anita Lessing.
Agency Drafts Statement of Scope Governor Approves Statement of Scope (2) No Agency Drafts: Special Report for rules impacting housing
Thurrock Education Services Web Portal Sarah Williams Web Communications Officer Heather Clark Senior Data Liaison Officer.
Coastal Georgetown AAUW Bylaws 2015 Update. CG AAUW Bylaws 2015 Update – Why We Did It 1.AAUW National mandated changes 2.AAUW National recommended changes.
GAC-GNSO Consultation Group On GAC Early Engagement in GNSO PDP London Progress Report 22/06/2014.
Grade Change & Incompletes Policy/ Procedure Auburn University Office of the Provost.
Institution program proposal is developed using campus processes (Review by department/division, university curriculum committee, faculty senate, dean,
Proposal Development by Faculty in an Academic Unit College, School, Department, or Program Proposal Preparation Office of Academic Programs, Assessment,
Penn State Electronic Theses and Dissertations Project Graduate Council Library Computing Services Graduate School University Libraries Center for Academic.
UPDATING RIGHT OF WAY MANUALS FLORIDA’S PROCEDURES.
FrontierCities – Grantee Mobilisation Bootcamp Funded by the Seventh Framework Programme of the European Union B-19 Country Club, Uccle, Brussels 22 nd.
ACP Finance DC FB 4.Appointment of Taskforce Team Taskforce Team 5.Environment Scanning Plan (ESP) 8.Potential & feasible? 7.Confirm the ESP Result 10.Detailed.
On Site Review Process. 2 Overview of On Site Review Materials and Process.
Limited Submissions NCURA Region III Spring Meeting.
Enterprise IT Decision Making Governance Amy Gee, Portfolio Manager, EITDM Office of the CIO.
Policy Lifecycle Policy Created Published & Communicated Periodic ReviewRevised or Retired 10/4/2010 Policy Development Process-v4.b.
Presented by Eliot Christian, USGS Accessibility, usability, and preservation of government information (Section 207 of the E-Government Act) April 28,
Compliance Program Update Lisa Milanes Manager of Compliance Administration.
Turnaround Planning: Parent and Community Input and Written Feedback REQUIREMENTS OF HB 1842 TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY.
CPA Consulting Services Pre-Bid Conference 11/28/2007 1:30pm Heartland Works Admin Office.
Proposal Development by Faculty in an Academic Unit College, School, Department, or Program Proposal Preparation Office of Academic Programs, Assessment,
Campus Turnaround Plan Webinar JANUARY 25, 2016 TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY.
The Committee will: Assess and report on technology resources, status and needs. Create concept papers in support of strategic directions approved by.
Office of Academic Programs tracks change(s); notifies Advisement; and sends copy of approved paperwork w/effective date to Registrar Office of Academic.
CURRICULUM-CHANGE APPROVAL PROCESSES
Academic Program Review
Tenure at McGill: Regulations and Procedures
New Program Proposal Workflow Chart
Submitting and reviewing promotion applications in Vibe
Promotion to Full Professor: Regulations and Procedures
The final steps to the HDA project
Stage 4: Implementation*
All Wales Safeguarding Procedures Review Project
Administrative Review Process
Solicitation Step by Step Process
Animal Utilization Protocol (AUP) Approval Process
ASSISTANCE DOGS INTERNATIONAL ACCREDITATION PROCEDURES 2018
Colorado state university-pueblo policy and administration (PA)
Substantive Change Full Category I Proposal Workflow
Extend an Existing Degree Program to a New Location
New Certificate Program
Terminate an Academic Unit
Reorganize (Merge, Split, Move) an Academic Program or Academic Unit
Life of a Dossier Redelegated Merit Non-Redelegated Merit
New Degree (Undergraduate, First Professional, Graduate) Program
Establish a New Academic Unit
Suspend a Degree or Certificate Program
Rename an Academic Program (Degree or Certificate) or Academic Unit
To achieve improvement through: Self assessment Benchmarking
THE FACULTY HIRING PROCESS
Animal Utilization Protocol (AUP) Approval Process
Promotion to Full Professor: Regulations and Procedures
STAGE - I PLANNING START
Budget and Legislative Request
Validation procedure Nat. Secretariat and MSG
Presentation transcript:

STEP-BY-STEP GUIDE VIU POLICY REVIEW PROCESS

STEP 1 SUBMISSION Scheduled Review  Every 5 years (at least) to Executive Responsible  Delegated to Admin Responsible to review and suggest revisions, rescission, or no action.  May be sent to Standing Committee for input  Submit Impact Statement ( reasons for changes or new policy). Revision submitted  Proponent (i.e. Dean, Dept. Head, Administrator, Committee) submits revised/new policy.  Impact Statement requested from proponent (reasons for changes or new policy). Revision submitted  Proponent (i.e. Dean, Dept. Head, Administrator, Committee) submits revised/new policy.  Impact Statement requested from proponent (reasons for changes or new policy). Suggestion submitted  Suggestion received from VIU Community member for revisions or for new policy.  If relevant, revised/ new policy created.  Impact Statement requested from proponent (reasons for changes or new policy). Policy review submitted via one of three avenues…. Draft documents revised and finalized through consultation with proponent and other stakeholders as identified on Impact Statement. Administrative Coordinator, Policies & Procedures

STEP 2 POLICY DEVELOPMENT WORKING GROUP (PDWG) Meets monthly Proponent invited Is policy relevant? Complies with University Act? Stakeholders? Procedure required? Categorize, format, wordsmith Liaise with Proponent re suggested changes Changes incorporated as directed by proponent Proponent may seek further input from Committees Administrative Coordinator, Policies & Procedures

STEP 3 ON THE REVIEW TRAIN PHASE 1 – ADMINISTRATIVE GROUPS Receive comments from Admin Groups. Liaise with proponent re suggested changes. Changes incorporated as directed by proponent. Proponent may seek further input information. Administrative Coordinator, Policies & Procedures Senior Management Group (SMG) Receive for notification only May have comments Provost’s Council Receive for Review or Information Council meets every 2 weeks Administration & Finance Committee (AFC) Receive for Review or Information Council meets 4 times per year – may review policy electronically

STEP 4 ON THE REVIEW TRAIN PHASE II – SENATE GOVERNANCE PRACTICES COMMITTEE (GPC) Review and recommend to Senate. May return to Proponent May refer to Standing Committee Administrative Coordinator, Senate SENATE “A” Policy – Review and Advise the Board “B” Policy – 1 st and 2 nd readings/Approval “C” Policy – Receive for Information

STEP 5 ON THE REVIEW TRAIN PHASE III – BOARD OF GOVERNORS POLICY DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE (PDRC) Review and recommend to the Board. Administrative Coordinator, Board BOARD of GOVERNORS “A” Policy – receive advice from Senate 1 st and 2 nd readings/Approval “B” Policy – Receive for Information “C” Policy – 1 st and 2 nd readings/Approval Finalize documents Post on web Advise Proponents and Stakeholders Archive file documents Notify VIU Community Administrative Coordinator, Policies & Procedures