Instilling rigor and imagination in analysis Analyst’s Roadmap Katherine Hibbs Pherson Mary C. Boardman 23 May 2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Common Core Standards (What this means in computer class)
Advertisements

Conducting Research Investigating Your Topic Copyright 2012, Lisa McNeilley.
Data Quality Considerations
The Historical Investigation The York School
Screen 1 of 20 Reporting Food Security Information Reporting for Results Learning Objectives At the end of this lesson you will be able to: understand.
Working with the Teachers’ Standards in the context of ITE. Some key issues for ITE Partnerships to explore.
Preparing Bad-News Messages
Counting Down the Top Ten List for Proposal Writing Royal Roads University Office of Research February 26, 2010.
1 Commonwealth of Virginia 2012 Strategic Planning Workshop The Executive Progress Report and National Rankings September 17 and 27, 2012 Office of the.
The Systems Analysis Toolkit
©2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
PPA 502 – Program Evaluation Lecture 10 – Maximizing the Use of Evaluation Results.
Writing Reports: Identify these stages I) Obtaining a clear specification II) Research & preparation III) Report writing.
EEN [Canada] Forum Shelley Borys Director, Evaluation September 30, 2010 Developing Evaluation Capacity.
Discipline Based Panel for Critical Thinking Syracuse April 28, 2005.
WRITING A RESEARCH PROPORSAL
Chapter One of Your Thesis
Learning Outcomes from Report-Writing Unit
Effective proposal writing Session I. Potential funding sources Government agencies (e.g. European Union Framework Program, U.S. National Science Foundation,
Faculty Senate Writing Skills Committee Scott Lazerus, ChairChristy Jespersen Jessica YoungJoAnn Arai-Brown Nancy GaussAnne Ryter Julie LukengaCourtney.
Learning Objectives LO1 Describe the role of professional judgment in achieving the overall objectives of the independent auditor in conducting an audit.
Writing a Research Proposal
Technician Module 2 Unit 8 Slide 1 MODULE 2 UNIT 8 Prevention, Intelligence & Deterrence.
1 DEVELOPING ASSESSMENT TOOLS FOR ESL Liz Davidson & Nadia Casarotto CMM General Studies and Further Education.
Reporting & Ethical Standards EPSY 5245 Michael C. Rodriguez.
Argumentation in Middle & High School Science Victor Sampson Assistant Professor of Science Education School of Teacher Education and FSU-Teach Florida.
EMPRICAL RESEARCH REPORTS
January 29, 2010ART Beach Retreat ART Beach Retreat 2010 Assessment Rubric for Critical Thinking First Scoring Session Summary ART Beach Retreat.
Monitoring through Walk-Throughs Participants are expected to purpose the book: The Three-Minute Classroom Walk-Through: Changing School Supervisory.
© 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. 1 Part Four: Implementing Business Ethics in a Global Economy Chapter 9: Managing and Controlling Ethics.
Ensuring the quality of Qualitative Data Presented by Lorie Broomhall, Ph.D. Senior HIV/AIDS Advisor Nigeria Monitoring and Evaluation Management Services.
2010 Pherson Associates, LLC Proprietary 1. PHERSON ASSOCIATES IS LOCATED IN RESTON, VIRGINIA AND IS HOME TO “THE FORUM”, A STATE-OF-THE-ART TRAINING.
Standards! What are we writing? What are we practicing?
Mission and Mission Fulfillment Tom Miller University of Alaska Anchorage.
4/00/ © 2000 Business & Legal Reports, Inc. BLR’s Human Resources Training Presentations Effective Communication Skills.
Pristina, February  unidisciplinary  issue exploring  comprehensive  neutral  time uncritical  substantiated  as long as possible 
“Say something worth saying about something worth saying something about.” Dr. Richard Paul & Dr. Linda Elder, “How to Write a Paragraph” 2007.
Systematic Review Module 7: Rating the Quality of Individual Studies Meera Viswanathan, PhD RTI-UNC EPC.
© Prentice Hall, 2007 Business Communication Essentials, 3eChapter Writing and Completing Reports and Proposals.
Personal Statement: How to write a personal statements for scholarships.
1 Designing Effective Programs: –Introduction to Program Design Steps –Organizational Strategic Planning –Approaches and Models –Evaluation, scheduling,
Strategic communication model Analyze the environment (target audience, your objectives) Consider your options (how, by whom and when message should be.
VELS The Arts. VELS (3 STRANDS) Physical, Personal and Social Learning Discipline-based Learning Interdisciplinary Learning.
Introduction to Earth Science Section 2 Section 2: Science as a Process Preview Key Ideas Behavior of Natural Systems Scientific Methods Scientific Measurements.
Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2008 Intelligent Consumer Chapter 14 This multimedia product and its contents are protected under copyright law. The following.
The Research Process Chapter 4. The Process Explore Propose Prepare Execute Analyse Publish.
Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.
Developing a Framework In Support of a Community of Practice in ABI Jason Newberry, Research Director Tanya Darisi, Senior Researcher
Critical Essays National 5. Purpose of the Critical Essay A DISCURSIVE essay on a text Presenting an ARGUMENT – clear line of thought which is linked.
FEMS Microbiology Ecology Getting Your Work Published Telling a Compelling Story Working with Editors and Reviewers Jim Prosser Chief Editor FEMS Microbiology.
© BLR ® —Business & Legal Resources 1408 Effective Communication For Supervisors.
Writing Informative Grades College and Career Readiness Standards for Writing Text Types and Purposes arguments 1.Write arguments to support a substantive.
Communicating Marketing Research Findings
WRITING A RESEARCH PROPORSAL
Effective Communication for All Employees
Argumentative Writing Grades College and Career Readiness Standards for Writing Text Types and Purposes arguments 1.Write arguments to support a.
Understanding the Report Process and Research Methods Business Communication, 15e Lehman and DuFrene Business Communication, 15 th edition by Lehman and.
Introduction to Law Elements of an Office Memorandum.
TC176/IAF ISO 9001:2000 Auditing Practices Group.
Performance Evaluation Policy Macon County. Performance Appraisal is a process... Not a form or document.
Chapter 2: Thinking and Reading Critically ENG 113: Composition I.
Report writing skills A Trade union training on research methodology, TMLC, Kisumu, Kenya 6-10 December 2010 Presentation by Mohammed Mwamadzingo,
Writing a sound proposal
INTERNAL AUDIT REPORTS
BCOM 7 7 Delivering Bad-News Messages LEHMAN/ DUFRENE
Chapter 2: Mapping and Assessing Career Readiness Policies, Programs, and Industries May 2017 Copyright © 2017 American Institutes for Research. All rights.
UNCLASSIFIED Intelligence Community Professional Education - The Canadian Perspective.
Prevention, Intelligence
Designing & Conducting Formative Evaluation
Presentation transcript:

Instilling rigor and imagination in analysis Analyst’s Roadmap Katherine Hibbs Pherson Mary C. Boardman 23 May 2012

9/11 Attack on World Trade Center o Failure of imagination Iraq WMD o Poor analytic tradecraft  Missing null hypothesis  Inadequate vetting of sources The Call for Analytic Rigor The Community has developed a series of guidelines to help analysts produce solid products and avoid the shortfalls of the past. Copyright 2012 Pherson Associates, LLC. All Rights Reserved. 2

Defines “core elements” for conducting evaluations of analytic production Mandates evaluation programs using the standards Allows for additional standards Foresees using them to assess performance trends and establish new training and development initiatives Copyright 2012 Pherson Associates, LLC. All Rights Reserved. 3

Intelligence Community Directive 203: Standards for Intelligence Analysis 1.Objectivity 2.Independent of Political Considerations 3.Timeliness 4.Based on All Available Sources of Intelligence 5.Exhibits Proper Standards of Analytic Tradecraft, Specifically: Properly describes quality and reliability of underlying sources Properly caveats and expresses uncertainties or confidence in analytic judgments Properly distinguishes between underlying intelligence and analysts’ assumptions and judgments Incorporates alternative analysis where appropriate Demonstrates relevance to U.S. national security Uses logical argumentation Exhibits consistency of analysis over time, or highlights changes and explains rationale Makes accurate judgments and assessments Copyright 2012 Pherson Associates, LLC. All Rights Reserved. 4

Consistent and structured sourcing Source reference statements (endnotes) that protect sensitive sources methods Source descriptors Source summary statements Copyright 2012 Pherson Associates, LLC. All Rights Reserved. 5

Know your customers and what they need Write for tailored reuse Products must be discoverable by those who need them Tradecraft essential, not expendable Timely electronic dissemination is always the goal Train to think of customers inclusively Copyright 2012 Pherson Associates, LLC. All Rights Reserved. 6

7

Similar, but Slightly Different 8 MessageAnalyticConvincingStructuredWell-Written Main Point Clear Judgments, Not Just Facts Evidence for Judgments Sections Advance Story Precise Language Beyond the Obvious Provide ContextNo Contradictions One Point per Section Concise “So What?” Anticipated Questions Explain Reliability Consistent Tics No Typos Note Changed Assessment Alternate Views Free of BiasNo Redundancy No Awkward Constructions Opportunities for the US Forward Looking Identify Gaps Graphics Aid Text Provide Warning Confidence Levels Key Essential Desired As Appropriate

9 Copyright 2012 Pherson Associates, LLC. All Rights Reserved.

10

Getting to the “So What?” or “News that Can Be Used” What is new or different about an issue or event? Is it an indicator of significant change? Do you need to warn of an imminent or potential threat? Does the issue or event relate to your primary consumers’ interests or schedule? What can you add that will support your primary consumers as they respond to crises, make difficult decisions, attend meetings, or think about how to meet current or future challenges? Does the event or issue present opportunities or pitfalls for your organization’s programs, actions, or policies? Is the issue or event important your organization or U.S. national security? Copyright 2012 Pherson Associates, LLC. All Rights Reserved. 11

Copyright 2012 Pherson Associates, LLC. All Rights Reserved. 12

Analysts Are Not Only Awash in Data, but in Guidance and Requirements Copyright 2012 Pherson Associates, LLC. All Rights Reserved. 13

Analytic Best Practices Canada, Office of the Privy Council 1.Reflect on the problem, determining possible approaches 2.Be resourceful and systematic in collecting information, documenting sources, and noting caveats 3.Critically evaluate the quality of all information 4.Develop multiple hypotheses and explanations, show tolerance for uncertainties 5.Challenge mindsets, assumptions, and biases 6.Build collaborative networks 7.Use Structured Analytic Techniques 8.Write clear, concise, well-documented, and client- focused reports Copyright 2012 Pherson Associates, LLC. All Rights Reserved. 14

The Analyst’s Role in the Operating Environment Analyst Informs Decisionmaker Impacts Issue Interprets Source: Pherson, Katherine Hibbs and Randolph Pherson, Critical Thinking for Strategic Intelligence, Washington, DC: CQ Press, Jerry Ratcliffe has produced a similar model that better explains the specific components of the law enforcement model for Intelligence-Led Policing. Copyright 2012 Pherson Associates, LLC. All Rights Reserved. 15

Analyst’s Roadmap Key consolidated elements o Get your act together o Critical thinking o Analytic standards o Structured analytic techniques Based on questions asked by thousands of analysts in training classes. Based on what you do, but how you do it. Beta tested in government, private industry, and overseas. Copyright 2012 Pherson Associates, LLC. All Rights Reserved. 16

AIMSS: The Key to Conceptualizing Intelligence Products Audience Intelligence Question Message Storyline Standards Copyright 2012 Pherson Associates, LLC. All Rights Reserved. 17

18 Copyright 2012 Pherson Associates, LLC. All Rights Reserved.

19 Copyright 2012 Pherson Associates, LLC. All Rights Reserved.

Four Steps for Communicating with Analysts 1.Preparation Follow the Analyst’s Roadmap 2.Analytic Guidance Use the IC Standards 3.Evaluation against the Standards Adapt an Evaluation Form 4.Mentoring and Feedback Don’t skimp on tradecraft support for analysts 20 Copyright 2012 Pherson Associates, LLC. All Rights Reserved.

 Can DHS make a unique contribution?  Does the analysis highlight new information and further our understanding?  Can we deliver the analysis in time to make a difference?  Should an explicit warning message be delivered?  To whom should we reach out at each stage of the process? With whom do we need to coordinate?  Would the analysis benefit from structured analytic techniques?  Are key drivers and trend lines highlighted?  Did we identify contrary evidence, and information gaps?  Are analytic judgments and assumptions distinguished from the underlying intelligence?  Did we consider past customer feedback, explore opportunities, and assess both benefits and risks?  Is the writing clear, precise, and well- organized (is the bottom line up front)?  Is the credibility of the source(s) clearly articulated? Is denial or deception a possibility?  Are levels of confidence in the judgments and uncertainties clearly expressed?  Is the analysis free of bias, advocacy, and value laden terms?  Have we double- checked the facts?  Are the graphics consistent with the analysis?  Are key terms well- defined? Is a glossary needed?  Have grammatical errors, typographical errors, and misspellings been corrected?  Are classification markings correct and handling caveats prominent?  Do endnotes follow DHS guidelines?  Will the product go to all our key customers?  Who are the primary customer(s)? Will we publish at different classification levels?  What are the key intelligence questions?  What is the broader context for this topic or issue?  Have we identified and challenged my key assumptions?  Are we changing our overall analytic line? If so, did we explain why?  Can graphics be used to advance and define the message? Is the topic clearly relevant to the DHS mission? Is the topic clearly relevant to the DHS mission? Is the main point prominent and clearly stated? Did we identify alternative hypotheses and provide context? Is there sufficient reasoning and compelling evidence to support the judgments? Does each section, paragraph, and sentence advance the storyline? Do my titles and headings effectively capture the message? Are they in synch with the text? Analytic Manager’s Roadmap Best Practices for Applying Analytic Tradecraft Standards Task 1: Stop and Reflect Task 1: Stop and Reflect Task 2: Focus the Message Task 2: Focus the Message Task 3: Develop the Storyline Task 3: Develop the Storyline Task 4: Prepare the Draft Task 4: Prepare the Draft Task 5: Perfect the Presentation Task 5: Perfect the Presentation Critical Requirements Copyright 2012 Pherson Associates, LLC. All Rights Reserved. 21