Our life will make more sense We will discover the truth We will avoid being lied to or used by others.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Argument ad Ignorantiam
Advertisements

Academic Writing.
The Ultimate Proof That God Exists.
Value conflicts and assumptions - 1 While an author usually offers explicit reasons why he comes to a certain conclusion, he also makes (implicit) assumptions.
The ontological argument
Q3,J4 A) “Hitler was a vegetarian, therefore, I don’t trust vegetarians.” B) “You can’t prove that there aren’t Martians living in caves under the surface.
René Descartes ( ) Father of modern rationalism. Reason is the source of knowledge, not experience. All our ideas are innate. God fashioned us.
The Ontological Argument
 Assertions: unsupported declaration of a belief  Prejudice: a view without evidence for or against  Premises: explicit evidence that lead to a conclusion.
Introduction/Hume’s Problem of Induction Seminar 1: Philosophy of the Sciences 6 September
Lincoln-Douglas Debate An Examination of Values. OBJECTIVES: The student will 1. Demonstrate understanding of the concepts that underlie Lincoln-Douglas.
Critical Listening Does what the other person says make sense?
So far we have learned about:
BASIC CONCEPTS OF ARGUMENTS
Results from Meditation 2
Science and Intelligent Design. 1.Introduction This presentation describes: 1.the logic of science in relation to ontology (i.e. the study of reality),
Part 3 – REFUTING OPPOSING ARGUMENTS.  Before you start writing an argumentative essay, I strongly suggest you to prepare an outline and first, write.
Descartes’ First Meditation
Nature of Science & Scientific Investigations
Tactics : A Game Plan for Discussing Your Christian Convictions.
EGOISM AND CRITIQUE 8.5 Forensic Philosophy December 16, 2013.
Where questions, not answers, are the driving force in thinking.
PARTS OF THE ARGUMENT ESSAY INCLUDE…
Argumentation Models Toulmin, S. (1969). The Uses of Argument, Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press and
Chapter 1: Lecture Notes What Is an Argument? (and What is Not?)
MA 110: Finite Math Lecture 1/14/2009 Section 1.1 Homework: 5, 9-15, (56 BP)
Arguments The basics and beyond…. The the form of an argument A B A B In words: If A then B, A is true, Therefore B is true…
The Problem of Knowledge 2 Pages Table of Contents Certainty p – Radical doubt p Radical doubt Relativism p Relativism What should.
2012. You must assume that your reader will disagree with you, or be skeptical; therefore, your tone must be reasonable, professional, and trustworthy.
9/20/12 BR- Who are the 3 Argument Brothers (from yesterday) Today: How to Argue (Part 1) MIKVA!!
Circulus in Demonstrando (circular argument) and Petitio Principii (begging the question).. By: Ashley Lewis.
Nature of Science & Scientific Investigations. The Scientific Method “The Scientific Method” –FORGET IT!!! There isn’t ONE right way to do science! –The.
Breaking Down An Arguments Into Propositions
Ontological Argument. Teleological argument depends upon evidence about the nature of the world and the organisms and objects in it. Cosmological argument.
Lesson 2: Common Misconceptions. Misconception 1 “Christianity must be proven scientifically; I’ll accept Christianity when you prove it with the scientific.
INFORMAL FALLACIES The aim of this tutorial is to help you learn to recognize and resist fallacious arguments.
A Mickey Mouse Guide to the Ontological Argument
The construction of a formal argument
Methods of Proof for Boolean Logic Chapter 5 Language, Proof and Logic.
Katherine KlingseisDr. Charles Rice Logic helps you to think in an orderly way. Like all objects in our world, thought has a form and structure.
Anselm’s “1st” ontological argument Something than which nothing greater can be thought of cannot exist only as an idea in the mind because, in addition.
Sentence (syntactically Independent grammatical unit) QuestionCommandStatement “This is a class in logic.” “I enjoy logic.” “Today is Friday.”
TOK Mathematics Lesson 2: How do we justify mathematics? ? © Roy White, International College Hong Kong 2013.
COUNTERARGUMENTS (CAS). WHAT IS A COUNTERARGUMENT?  An argument or set of reasons put forward to oppose an idea or theory developed in another argument.
Giving good reasons. When listening to others, we cannot concentrate only on our own feelings and reactions We must listen to what they are saying.
2.3 Methods of Proof.
Argumentum Ad Hominem Attacking the person’s character or personal traits rather than the argument at hand Rejecting a claim based on the person defending.
 MYuE0IZQ34 MYuE0IZQ34.
Logical Fallacies A logical fallacy is an element of an argument that is flawed If spotted one can essentially render an entire line of reasoning invalid.
(not about ships this time)
Chapter 4: Logic as The Art of Arts By Kasey Fitzpatrick.
The Ontological Argument
Analyze Conditional Statements Objectives: 1.To write a conditional statement in if-then form 2.To write the negation, converse, inverse, and contrapositive.
The Copleston, Russell Debate Copleston’s Cosmological argument (1948 BBC radio debate)
The Ontological argument 2 This time it’s critical!
TOK: Mathematics Unit 1 Day 1. 2 – B 2 = AB – B 2 Factorize both sides: (A+B)(A-B) = B(A-B) Divide both sides by (A-B): A = B = B Since A = B, B+B=B Add.
PHIL102 SUM2014, M-F12:00-1:00, SAV 264 Instructor: Benjamin Hole
Reasoning and Proof Unit 2.
OA: Faith and Reason What difference does the argument make
The ontological argument
2.6 Prove Statements About Segments and Angles
The Ontological Argument
In pairs, write a list of all the reasons people believe in God.
Indirect Proofs.
The Ontological Argument
Describe this object: Does it help describe it further by saying it exists?
Class Greeting.
FCAT Science Standard Arianna Medina.
If there is any case in which true premises lead to a false conclusion, the argument is invalid. Therefore this argument is INVALID.
If there is any case in which true premises lead to a false conclusion, the argument is invalid. Therefore this argument is INVALID.
Presentation transcript:

Our life will make more sense We will discover the truth We will avoid being lied to or used by others

1. Terms - all the words used must make sense and be used correctly We should define words as carefully as we can and agree about their meaning before we discuss To find out, we should ask “What do you mean?” 2. Premises - each reason given must be true, which means it should match reality We should write each premise as a declarative sentence with a subject and predicate

We can simplify premises into one of the four forms: 1. All S are P. 2. No S are P. 3. Some S are P. 4. Some S are not P. To find out, we should ask “What is the point being made?”

To find out, we should ask “How do you prove it?”

Proving your point.

We can gain knowledge beyond our experience based on what we do know. All objects with great mass emit a gravitational pull, certain dark areas of the universal emit a gravitational pull, therefore these dark areas (black holes) must have mass.

“All human babies come from human mothers.”

The sum of all interior angles in a triangle is 180 degrees.

The premises are the evidence, reasons, or proof for an argument. The conclusion is what the argument is trying to prove.

Before the premises: Because Since For As If Follows from For the reason that Therefore Hence It follows that Consequently Which shows that So Then Before the conclusion:

An explanation simply gives the cause of something. An explanation does not try to prove anything, but only states what is the case.

Validity

1. Conclusions that do not follow. “It’s raining today, and I’m sad today, so the rain must make me sad.” 2. Assuming the conclusion before it is proven. “The accused will be given a fair trial before we execute him.” 3. Expecting a simple answer to a complex question. “Are you dumber today than you were yesterday?” 4. Arguing in a circle. “How do I know there’s a God?” “The Bible says so.” “How can I trust the Bible.” “Because God says it’s true.” 5. Contradicting yourself. “I will not tolerate intolerance!”

1. Claiming to refute an argument by refuting its conclusion. 2. Claiming that refuting an argument refutes its conclusion. 3. Ignoring an argument or answering a different argument. 4. Giving an explanation instead of proof. 5. Being cruel to our opponents in debate.