Determinations Mischele McManus July 20, 2007

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Transition from Early Intervention RIDE Winter Leadership Conference February 2007.
Advertisements

Compliance Monitoring Orientation. Monitoring Components Focus Site Review/Fiscal Monitoring SPAM.
Updates on APR Reporting for Early Childhood Transition (Indicators C-8 and B-12)
Early Childhood Special Education Part B, Section 619* Part C to B Transition by Three Jessica Brady, Noel Cole Michigan Department of Education Office.
EARLY START Federal and State Requirements. What Is Early Start Frequently asked Questions Frequently asked Questions Which children are served? What.
Presentation to: Title I Program Conference & Annual Homeless Liaison Conference Presented by: Ruth Cantor, Program Consultant, Babies Can’t Wait Erica.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) Part C Michigan Electronic Grants System (MEGS) Application for Fiscal Year (FY) 2011.
From Here to Here Transition from Infant and Toddler Connection Programs to ECSE School Division Programs.
From Referral Through Exit
5/2010 Focused Monitoring Stakeholders May /2010 Purpose: Massachusetts Monitoring System  Monitor and evaluate program compliance with federal.
Transition from Part C to Part B in Louisiana (Session # S & 115)
Early Childhood Transition Forums Sponsored by the Massachusetts Department of Early Education and Care, Department of Elementary and Secondary Education,
Chapter 56 Workgroup Orientation Session The Road to Chapter 60 June 30, 2007.
Final Determinations. Secretary’s Determinations Secretary annually reviews the APR and, based on the information provided in the report, information.
1 Determinations EI/ECSE SPR&I Training ODE Fall 2007.
Early Intervention and Child Abuse & Prevention Act (CAPTA) Marina L. Merrill (ODE) Stephanie Stafford (DHS)
Correction of Non-Compliance Prior to Notification Monitoring and Supervision March 11, 2013.
Early Childhood Transition Presenters: Kimberly Mitchell Ginger Sheppard Jessica Spataro NOVEMBER 2011.
Potpourri: Summary of Important Points to Remember Presenters: Jill Harris Laura Duos NOVEMBER 2011.
Kathy T. Whaley, NECT AC Presentation for the Utah Special Education Law Conference August 2011 UPDATED January 2012.
Produced by NICHCY, 2013 D evelopment of the Transition Plan.
CHRISTINA SPECTOR WENDI SCHREITER ERIN ARANGO-ESCALANTE IDEA Part C to Part B Transition.
1 Overview of IDEA/SPP Early Childhood Transition Requirements Developed by NECTAC for the Early Childhood Transition Initiative (Updated February 2010)
Special Education Update Mississippi Department of Education Office of Special Education MASS Summer Conference 2013.
Presented by the Part C- Kristie Musick, Part C Coordinator Dr. Lesly Wilson, Part C Data Manager Part B- Lori James, Part B Data Manager Part C & B March.
Objectives: 1) Participants will become familiar with General Supervision Monitoring Plan Section of the Kansas Infant Toddler Services Procedural Manual.
Chase Bolds, M.Ed, Part C Coordinator, Babies Can’t Wait program Georgia’s Family Outcomes Indicator # 4 A Systems Approach Presentation to OSEP ECO/NECTAC.
Noel Cole, Coordinator Michigan Department of Education, Office of Early Childhood Education and Family Services.
OSEP National Early Childhood Conference December 2007.
Welcome to the Regional SPR&I trainings Be sure to sign in Be sure to sign in You should have one school age OR EI/ECSE packet of handouts You.
Sarah Walters - Part C Coordinator KDHE Tiffany Smith - Part B ECSE Coordinator KSDE 1.
Early Childhood Transition Data Reporting Reporting Site:
Infant & Toddler Connection of Virginia Results of FFY 2007 Monitoring Indicators For The Annual Performance Report & State Performance Plan.
Implications of and State Strategies for Addressing the Referral Provisions of the Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act of 2003 (CAPTA) Delaware’s.
Michigan State Plan for Early On ® February
1 Charting the Course: Smoother Data Sharing for Effective Early Childhood Transition Wisconsin’s Journey Lori Wittemann, Wisconsin Department of Health.
State Performance Plan (SPP) Annual Performance Report (APR) Dana Corriveau Bureau of Special Education Connecticut State Department of Education ConnCASEOctober.
2005 B. Mullins, D. Scheler 1 Movin’ On Up Effective Transition from Early Intervention into Preschool (Revised May 2005)
New Regulations: Questions and Answers Infant & Toddler Connection of Virginia Statewide Meeting September 25,
Aren’t they all the same? Differences Between Part B, Part C, and Michigan Mandatory Special Education (MMSE) Teri Johnson Assistant Director of Special.
Improvement Planning Mischele McManus Infant/Toddler and Family Services Office of Early Childhood Education and Family Services July 20, 2007
07/20/2007 State Performance Plan Indicators Jessica Wolf Infant/Toddler and Family Services Office of Early Childhood Education and Family Services Michigan.
CT Speech Language Hearing Association March 26, 2010.
1 Transition: Part C to Part B Infant & Toddler Connection of Virginia Spring/Summer 2007.
Presented by the Early Childhood Transition Program Priority Team August 11, 2010 Updated September 2010.
Using Data for Program Improvement State and Local Activities in Minnesota Lisa Backer: 619 Coordinator/Part C Data Manager Loraine Jensen: Part C Coordinator.
Early Childhood Transition Part C Indicator C-8 & Part B Indicator B-12 Analysis and Summary Report of All States’ Annual Performance Reports.
YEAR #2 DETERMINATIONS ISD Special Education Directors’ Meeting September 18, 2008.
Transitioning Children from Part C to Part B Toby Long, PhD, PT, FAPTA Rachel Brady, PT, DPT, MS January 14, 2011 Office of State Superintendent of Education,
What Parents Need to Know: The New Part C Federal Regulations and National Trends in Service Delivery Lynda Cook Pletcher May 10, 2012 Region 6 Parent.
Protection & Safety and Early Development Network.
Vanessa Winborne Kelly Hurshe Colleen O’Connor EARLY ON ® UPDATES.
Developing Strong Transition Protocols Infant Toddler Program, Head Start and Early Childhood Special Education Shannon Dunstan Idaho State Department.
Prevention Resource and Referral Services What is happening to the babies?
Regional Genetics Service Collaboratives; setting the context for analyzing the impact Sara Copeland, MD Chief, Genetics Services Branch September 11,
Early Intervention Colorado TA Call December 5, 2013 Annual Performance Report.
1 Early Intervention Monitoring Wyoming DDD April 2008 Training.
6/18/2016 DES / AzEIP 2011 Cycle Two Self Report Overview & Training Cycle Two Self Report Overview & Training.
What’s New for Transition to Special Education Services? Paula E. Goff, Part C Coordinator May 23, 2013.
Understanding the Data on Preschool Child Find and Transition Annual Performance Report Indicator 12 February, 2016
IFSP Aligned with the Early Intervention Data System
Service Coordinator Training
Sherry Franklin, North Carolina Part C Coordinator
Improving Data, Improving Outcomes Conference
Sherry Franklin, North Carolina Part C Coordinator
Early Childhood Transition APR Indicators and National Trends
Building Capacity to Use Child Outcomes Data to Improve Systems and Practices 2018 DEC Conference.
Researchers as Partners with State Part C and Preschool Special Education Agencies in Collecting Data on Child Outcomes Kathy Hebbeler, ECO at SRI International.
OSE-EIS MAASE Summer Institute 2010
Presentation transcript:

Determinations Mischele McManus July 20, 2007

OSEP Requirements IDEA 2004 Part B 616(a)(1)(C)(i) and (a):  States are required to make annual determinations on local programs.  States must use the same categories that OSEP uses.

OSEP Requirements, cont. States must follow the enforcement actions determined by OSEP, States must follow the enforcement actions determined by OSEP, Note: This applies to Part C also. Note: This applies to Part C also.

Compliance Indicator #1 The percent of children with Individualized Family Service Plans (IFSPs) who receive the early intervention services on their IFSPs within 30 days of parent consent.

Compliance Indicator #7 The percent of children who receive an evaluation, assessment, and an initial IFSP meeting within 45 days of referral.

Compliance Indicator #8 The percent of children exiting Part C who received timely transition planning to support the transition to other services including: IFSPs with transition steps and services, and notification to the Local Education Agency and a transition conference if the child is potentially Part B eligible.

Performance Indicator #2 The percent of children served primarily in the home or a community-based setting.

Performance Indicators #5 and #6 The percent of children in your service area birth to one with IFSPs, and The percent of children in your service area birth to three with IFSPs.

Determination Process Based on:  December 1, 2005 EETRK data  Self assessment data from June 30, 2006 application  June 1, 2006 and December 1, 2006 EETRK data  Existing, approved focused monitoring improvement plans

Sample Chart COMPLIANCEPERFORMANCE IND1IND7IND8IND2IND5IND6 Sub. Compl. Imp. Plan Trend Data TOTAL

Data Issues Self assessment – informal, no representative sample Self assessment – informal, no representative sample New indicators – new requirements New indicators – new requirements New indicators – need data system upgrades New indicators – need data system upgrades New needs for documentation New needs for documentation

Determination Levels Meets Requirements Meets Requirements Needs Assistance Needs Assistance Needs Intervention Needs Intervention Needs Substantial Intervention Needs Substantial Intervention

Meets Requirements 15 service areas 15 service areas Meet substantial compliance on all six (6) indicators, or meet substantial compliance on some indicators and show improving data on others Meet substantial compliance on all six (6) indicators, or meet substantial compliance on some indicators and show improving data on others No follow-up currently needed No follow-up currently needed Data will have to continue to improve towards compliance Data will have to continue to improve towards compliance

Needs Assistance 35 service areas 35 service areas Meet substantial compliance on some indicators, may show improving data on other indicators Meet substantial compliance on some indicators, may show improving data on other indicators Must contact EOTTA for guidance, and Must contact EOTTA for guidance, and Complete an improvement plan Complete an improvement plan Quarterly reporting Quarterly reporting

Needs Intervention Seven (7) service areas Seven (7) service areas Do not meet substantial compliance on most indicators Do not meet substantial compliance on most indicators Will receive either Focused Monitoring (FM) or a Compliance Visit (if they have had FM) Will receive either Focused Monitoring (FM) or a Compliance Visit (if they have had FM) Will then complete an improvement plan Will then complete an improvement plan Quarterly reporting Quarterly reporting

Needs Substantial Intervention State Interagency Coordinating Council: Process is too new to put anyone in this category this year State Interagency Coordinating Council: Process is too new to put anyone in this category this year Do not meet substantial compliance on most indicators Do not meet substantial compliance on most indicators Failure to substantially comply significantly affects the core requirements of Part C Failure to substantially comply significantly affects the core requirements of Part C State may recover or withhold funds State may recover or withhold funds

Improvement Plan and Quarterly Reports Electronic formats and submission Electronic formats and submission Reports due: December 1, March 1, Reports due: December 1, March 1, June 1, and September 1  Duration of reporting period: TBD

Determinations & CIMS Needs Intervention = Focused Monitoring Needs Intervention = Focused Monitoring Determinations, Focused Monitoring, and Service Provider Self Review all require Improvement Planning and Quarterly Reports Determinations, Focused Monitoring, and Service Provider Self Review all require Improvement Planning and Quarterly Reports All are also based on the same State Performance Plan indicators All are also based on the same State Performance Plan indicators