School Improvement “Proper Prior Planning Prevents Poor Performance” February 2010 Detroit Public Schools Diane Fleming, Regional Superintendent Arveneda.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
2007 – 2008 Academic/Business Plan …a strategic initiative School District of Palm Beach County New Horizons for Student Success.
Advertisements

Michigan Department of Education School Improvement Plan SIP February 2011.
STRATEGIC PLAN Community Unit School District 300 7/29/
Campus Improvement Plans
System Accreditation. An international institution that brings together three of the largest U.S.-based accreditation agencies: Southern Association of.
Becoming a High Impact Board Susan Salter Director of Board Development Alabama Association of School Boards.
Service Agency Accreditation Recognizing Quality Educational Service Agencies Mike Bugenski
1 Program Improvement Update Foundations for writing the LEA Addendum.
1 Michigan Department of Education Office of School Improvement One Common Voice – One Plan Michigan Continuous School Improvement (MI-CSI)
FY 2010 UMMS Leadership Performance Management Process and Form
Webinar #1 The Webinar will begin shortly. Please make sure your phone is muted. (*6 to Mute, #6 to Unmute) 7/3/20151.
Schoolwide Planning, Part III: Strategic Action Planning
Self-Evaluation Training for Better School Improvement Developed by The North Carolina Department of Public Instruction Dr. Sherry Broome, Regional Lead.
Accreditation Engaging in Continuous Improvement.
Technology Use Plan Mary Anderson 7/29/08 EDTECH 571 click to go to each slide.
Michigan’s School Improvement Process Model Plan Study Gather Data Do Student Achievement.
1 School Improvement Plan - School Improvement Management System - Feb. 27, 2008 Albert Mayo (AdvancED)
1 Michigan Department of Education Office of School Improvement ISD/RESA Workshop February 26, 2008.
SAISD Federal Programs Department. Stage 1 of the Organization and Development Process Form the Planning Team 1 2.
District Improvement Facilitators Network January 30,
LEA Planning Cycle March 4, 2010 Office of Educational Improvement and Innovation and Office of Field Services.
Challenges Faced in Developing Audit Plans and Programs 21 st March, 2013.
Michigan Department of Education Office of Field Services LEA Planning Cycle 101 v. 2.
©2007 Dr. Karl Squier1 Toolkit 1 –Step 1b Understanding a Complete Planning Cycle.
Title I Schoolwide Program The Planning Year An Overview Thursday, September 20, 2012.
1 Michigan Department of Education Office of School Improvement One Common Voice – One Plan Michigan Continuous School Improvement (MI-CSI)
Maricopa Priorities Status Update Fall Maricopa Priorities Basics What it isWhat it’s not A regular, cyclical, bottom-up process to: ▫Evaluate everything.
11 One Common Voice – One Plan School Improvement Gather: Getting Ready Module.
Michigan Department of Education Office of Education Improvement and Innovation One Voice – One Plan Michigan Continuous School Improvement (MI-CSI)
Module IV: Implementing and Monitoring the LEA Plan Systemic Local Educational Agency (LEA) Plan Development.
One Voice – One Plan Office of Education Improvement and Innovation MI-CSI: Gather Stage Get Ready.
One Common Voice – One Plan School Improvement Module 2
1 Technology Review NCA CASI / MDE Spring School Improvement Conference Apr. 8, 2008 Albert Mayo (AdvancED,
From SEF to SIP March 24, Content Objectives Participants will 1. Understand SIP law 2. Explore the CNA 3. Explore the Plan-Do-Check-Act Model for.
Building and Recognizing Quality School Systems DISTRICT ACCREDITATION © 2010 AdvancED.
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
1 School Improvement Planning and your Title I, Part A Programs
Staying on Message in Changing Times Oklahoma Statewide System of Support (SSOS) January 7, 2011 Dr. Cindy Koss, Assistant State Superintendent Oklahoma.
Why Do State and Federal Programs Require a Needs Assessment?
Making Plans for the Future April 29, 2013 Brenda M. Tanner, Ed.D.
One Common Voice One Plan February 11, 2010 Office of Educational Improvement and Innovation and Office of Field Services.
Title I Schoolwide Mid- Year Review Melissa Moe and Kris Rangel January 24, 2013.
The Michigan Statewide System of Support for Title I Schools.
School Improvement Leadership: Developing the Action Plan CIA Team Denise Behrends Chad Dumas Beth McCracken February 23, 2012.
One Voice – One Plan Office of Education Improvement and Innovation MI-CSI: Study Stage Analyze Data.
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District School Facilitator Training October 7, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
Welcome to today’s Webinar: Tier III Schools in Improvement We will begin at 9:00 AM.
Ensuring Success For Each Student AdvancED District Accreditation Process Five-Year External Review March 13 – 16, 2016 Produced by Mr. Tony Pickett, Assistant.
SACS-CASI Accreditation and the Library Media Program in Public Schools Laura B. Page.
Hudson Area Schools - Lincoln Elementary School Improvement Professional Development Friday, February 26, 2010.
Presented By WVDE Title I Staff June 10, Fiscal Issues Maintain an updated inventory list, including the following information: description of.
1 46th Annual PAFPC Conference May 5, 2015 MARIA GARCIA Schoolwide Program Manager DIVISION OF FEDERAL PROGRAMS Title I Schoolwide Programs.
1 One Common Voice – One Plan School Improvement Module 3 Study: Analyze Data Set Goals and Measurable Objectives Research Best Practice.
August 2, Welcome Who is the TSD Continuous Improvement Team ? What is the work of the TSD Continuous Improvement Team? What is.
1 One Common Voice – One Plan School Improvement Stage 3 Plan: Develop School Improvement Plan.
What is Regional Accreditation? Regional Accreditation is a time-tested model of professional peer review that supports education excellence. Accreditation.
1 Monitoring and Revising the Title I, Part A, Schoolwide Plan Title I University March 11, 2015 Virginia Department of Education Office of Program Administration.
Building and Recognizing Quality School Systems DISTRICT ACCREDITATION GRAVES COUNTY SCHOOLS © 2010 AdvancED.
School Improvement Updates Accreditation (AdvancED) Process ASSIST Portfolio for Schools May 2016 Office of Service Quality Veda Hudge, Director Donna.
1 Monitoring and Revising the Title I, Part A, Schoolwide Plan Virginia Department of Education Office of Program Administration and Accountability Title.
Richard Woods, Georgia’s School Superintendent “Educating Georgia’s Future” gadoe.org Quality Comprehensive Improvement System Key School Performance Standards.
Federal Programs Department: Plan4Learning
Leaders Facilitate the Planning Process
Program Review For School Counseling Programs
Conceptual Model of Integrated Planning
DISTRICT ACCREDITATION QUALITY ASSURANCE REVIEW
Roles, Goals & Performance Expectations
Critical Element: PBIS Team
February 21-22, 2018.
Dean of Engagement Evaluation
Presentation transcript:

School Improvement “Proper Prior Planning Prevents Poor Performance” February 2010 Detroit Public Schools Diane Fleming, Regional Superintendent Arveneda McDonald, Program Supervisor

What is the Michigan School Improvement Process?

1.Conduct Comprehensive Needs Assessment (CNA) Gather / Study 2.Create School Improvement Plan Planning 3.Implement School Improvement Plan Do (doing what we said we would do in the plan) 4.Evaluate School Improvement Plan Gathering data to review results & plan for next steps What is the Michigan School Improvement Process Seems pretty simple, doesn’t it!? Let take a closer look...

Conducting the CNA The Comprehensive Needs Assessment (CNA) is a way of looking at the “current state” of your school in an organized / systemic fashion. The CNA will help a school align these system challenges with the student achievement goals the school will establish. Ensuring that your systems are aligned with the elements of effective schools, to support your instructional program goals and objectives, is the first step to establishing the continuous school improvement process. ~ Michigan Department of Education.CNA.SIP.Revised.v

In Michigan the CNA consists of 5 Components:  School Data Profile  School Data Analysis  School Process Profile - this component can be met by the completion of one of the following: - School process Rubrics (90) or - Education Yes! Subset (40) or - Standards Assessment Report (SAR) or - Self Assessment (SA)  School Process Analysis  Summary Report

Creating the School Improvement Plan The School Improvement Plan (SIP) has been designed to provide schools and districts with a common planning template that addresses student learning and system needs that have been identified through the schools' Comprehensive Needs Assessment. It has also been designed to address any federal, state and locally required elements that must be contained in a School Improvement Plan. Review your institution information. Complete the Vision, Mission, and Belief Statements for your institution. Review your institution's current goals. If necessary, click on "Manage Goals" to update the goals.

Creating the School Improvement Plan Goal Name Objective Strategy Activity Fiscal Resources

A well thought out plan can be your best ally in the future assisting you with making good decisions especially when it comes to deciding the how's, when's and where's of allocating your resources. It can also save you time and trouble in making “heat-of- the-moment” decisions in the mist of everything else going. Data-driven decision making / planning has already been done! Implementing the SIP

Your School Improvement Plan should be: Shared with all stakeholders – every staff person should have a copy The focus for all School Improvement Team Meetings (monthly?) A Major Area of interest during all Staff Meetings (weekly) The Guide during all Grade-level, Content-area, School Leadership, Cluster Meetings, etc. The Reference Manual for all your Budget / Administrative Meetings Did you bring your SIP with you today?

Evaluation Where are we now (status) and did we reach our goals? (Evaluation and Revisions) What do we want students to know and be able to do? What worked? Why? Do we need to continue this? What did not work? Why? How can we revise this? Do we need to continue this? WHAT ARE OUR NEXT STEPS IN OBTAINING OUR GOALS NEXT YEAR!?

Dates to Remember EdYes! (40) & SA (process profile) was due to DPS February 12, 2010 School Data Profile - (pages 1-28)* School Data Analysis - (pages 29-30)* Completed by March 26, 2010 School Improvement Plan - May 28, 2010