Federal Interagency Floodplain Management Task Force.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Disability Inclusive Disaster Risk Reduction Recommendations for Integrating the Preparedness, Response, Recovery and Mitigation Needs of the Whole Community.
Advertisements

Raising the Standard for Improved Flood Risk Management in the Midwest Raising the Standard for Improved Flood Risk Management in the Midwest Interagency.
Detail actions necessary to implement the interim housing mission in the post-disaster environment Identify command and control structures at all levels.
The Role of Levees in the National Flood Risk Management Program Pete Rabbon June 19, 2008 Hazards Caucus Alliance.
Flood Risk Management Pete Rabbon Association of State
Jon Keeling, PE, CFM Carey Johnson, CFM ASFPM 2012 Conference May 22, 2012 The Mission of Dam Safety Hazard Mitigation – Kentucky’s Experience.
Watershed – Level Regional Flood Risk Management Team: Collaborative Risk Reduction Bruce A. Munholand P.E., PMP.
Using Mitigation Planning to Reduce Disaster Losses Karen Helbrecht and Kathleen W. Smith United States: Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) May.
Role of Government in Sustainable Disaster Recovery Matt Campbell, National Coordinator Community Planning and Capacity Building Federal Emergency Management.
> > > > Association of State Floodplain Managers.
Risk MAP and Discovery FEMA Region [#], [WATERSHED NAME] Watershed Discovery Meetings [DATE]
Flood Risk Management Program Ed Hecker, Chief, Office of Homeland Security National Levee Summit February 2008 St Louis, MO.
FEMA’s Role in National Water Policy Supporting National Water Resource Policy Introduction Sandra K. Knight National Waterways Conference September 22-24,
Introduction to the State-Level Mitigation 20/20 TM Software for Management of State-Level Hazard Mitigation Planning and Programming A software program.
Office of Science & Technology Policy Executive Office of the President The National Climate Assessment Version 3.0 Kathy Jacobs Assistant Director for.
New Directions in Water Policy: Environmental Perspectives on NFIP, Floodplain Mapping and Federal Water Resource Policies David R. Conrad Sr. Water Resources.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Missouri River Flood Task Force (MRFTF) Concept Briefing
Foster and sustain the environmental and economic well being of the coast by linking people, information, and technology. Center Mission Coastal Hazards.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Flood Risk Management Update Stephanie Bray 12/10/2013.
Flood Risk Management Program Rolf Olsen Institute for Water Resources U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.
National Disaster Recovery Framework. National Disaster Recovery Framework Reasons for establishing the Framework Past large-scale recovery efforts revealed.
Unit 1 Community Capabilities
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Flood Risk Management Approaches As Being Practiced in Japan, Netherlands, United Kingdom, and United States.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® North Atlantic Coast Comprehensive Study U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Coastal Storm Risk Management Planning.
Overview of NIPP 2013: Partnering for Critical Infrastructure Security and Resilience October 2013 DRAFT.
Community Resilience: It Takes A Village Civil Society Leadership Symposium December 8, 2009 Margaret A. Davidson NOAA’s Coastal Services Center.
N AVIGATING THE T URN : F LOOD R ISK A SSOCIATED WITH L EVEES Sam Riley Medlock, J.D., CFM Association of State Floodplain Managers May 2011.
Key Elements of Legislation For Disaster Risk Reduction Second Meeting of Asian Advisory Group of Parliamentarians for DRR 5-7 February, 2014, Vientiane,
Session 4Slide 4-1 Hazards Risk Management In the United States Session 4 Slide Deck.
An update from the National Committee on Levee Safety Presented to the TWCA by Karin M. Jacoby, PE, Esq. June 17, of 14An Involved Public and Reliable.
Dam Hazard Consequences Assessment
Risk Map Update FGCS Meeting Paul Rooney FEMA January 13 th, 2014.
Module 11 STEPS 4 & 5 Conduct Reconnaissance Study & Report Certification Civil Works Orientation Course - FY 11.
Doug Bellomo April 6, NFDA Retreat & Conference “Risk MAP--Foundation, Transition, Integration” Risk MAP: An Update to NFDA.
Oconee County Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Kickoff Meeting Brian Laughlin Hazard Mitigation Planner Georgia Emergency.
Relevant, Ready, Responsive, Reliable 1 Addressing the Flood Risk Challenge.
Hazard Mitigation Planning and Project Funding. Agenda Objectives Overview of Hazard Mitigation Hazard Mitigation Planning Mitigation Project Funding.
1 Slide1 THINGS WE NEED TO UNDERSTAND ABOUT LEVEES: CURRENT INITIATIVES AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS Presentation to Association of State Flood Plain Managers.
1 Environmental Planning in the Army Corps of Engineers Ch 2 Mod 5 Relationship of the NEPA to Principles & Guidelines
Texas Emergency Management Conference San Antonio April 3, 2012.
Developing a National Levee Safety Program Mike Stankiewicz - NCLS Arizona Floodplain Management Association November 3, Update on the National.
EPA and Flood Risk – Programs and Perspectives Rob Wood Acting Deputy Office Director Office of Wetlands, Oceans and Watersheds U.S. Environmental Protection.
Crosswalk of Public Health Accreditation and the Public Health Code of Ethics Highlighted items relate to the Water Supply case studied discussed in the.
Comprehensive Flood Hazard Management Plan PUBLIC MEETINGS April 5-7, 2010 Rochester, Montesano, and Chehalis.
Community Resilience Planning in Coastal North Carolina Sixth Annual Unifour Air Quality Conference June 15, 2012 Linda B. Rimer Ph.D. 10/20/20151 U.S.
ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE: FROM PLANNING TO PROJECT Ohio Planning Conference July 16, 2014.
1 Slide1 Examples in Communicating Flood Risk: National Flood Risk Management Initiative Presentation to National Flood Risk Management Policy Summit U.S.
The Status of NFIP Reform and Floodplain Mapping Mayors’ Water Summit December 8, 2010.
© 2009 Barnes & Thornburg LLP. All Rights Reserved. This page, and all information on it, is the property of Barnes & Thornburg LLP which may not be reproduced,
1 Status of AC Input from Last Meeting. 2 Overview  Input received on Strategic Planning Elements (Mission, Vision, Guiding Principles) & the 7 Key Content.
Environment SPC 24 th June 2015 Draft Dublin City Development Plan
Federal Interagency Floodplain Management Task Force.
Mississippi River Recovery Task Force Bob Hainly Task Force Member 2012 USACE Flood Risk Management Representing: and Silver Jackets Workshop USGS Water.
Catharine Cyr Ransom Principal The Accord Group. Stafford Act Structured approach to disasters Partnership between local, state, Federal governments Authority.
FEMA’s Federal Insurance and Mitigation Administration -- Leading the Nation to Build a Stronger, Smarter, Safer America MITIGATION WORKS Sandra K. Knight,
Life-Cycle Flood Risk Management
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Emergency Response Policy Revision Update ( ER & EP ) Jeffrey Jensen CECW-HS USACE Flood Risk Management.
USACE Flood Risk Management and Silver Jackets Workshop Sandra K. Knight, PhD, PE, D.WRE Deputy Associate Administrator for Mitigation, FEMA August.
Rebuilding the System Reducing the Risk California Water Plan Plenary Session October 22-23, 2007.
MEKONG RIVER COMMISSION PROGRAMMES FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT.
California’s Flood Future Recommendations for Managing the State’s Flood Risk Flood Risk Management & Silver Jackets Workshop August 21, 2012.
National Flood Risk Management Flood Risk Management Summit Cambridge, Maryland National Flood Risk Management Flood Risk Management Summit Cambridge,
BUILDING STRONG ® 1 Risk Management Center Silver Jackets Program Overview Jennifer Dunn USACE, Institute for Water Resources Silver Jackets Program Manager.
The NH Climate Action Plan and the need for Adaptation Sherry Godlewski NH Department of Environmental Services
Executive Order Environmental Stewardship and Transportation Infrastructure Project Reviews Priority Issues.
Environmental Planning in the Army Corps of Engineers Relationship of the NEPA to Principles & Guidelines 1 Ch 2 Mod 5
Silver Jackets Orientation
Overview Rationale Context and Linkages Objectives Commitments
Executive Order – The Basics
Overview Rationale Context and Linkages Objectives Commitments
Presentation transcript:

Federal Interagency Floodplain Management Task Force

Task Force Membership

Vision and Mission of the Task Force Vision That the economic, environmental, and societal values of floodplains are protected and flood-prone communities are resilient and sustainable Mission The Task Force will promote, support, and encourage agencies to formulate and implement programs and policies that: reduce the loss of life and property caused by floods protect and restore natural resources and functions of floodplains

1968 – National Flood Insurance Act, section 1302(c) specified that a “unified national program for floodplain management” be prepared and submitted to the Congress 1975 – US Water Resources Council establishes Federal Interagency Floodplain Management Task Force (TVA, Agriculture, USACE, Commerce, Energy, HUD, Interior, Transportation, EPA, FEMA with States represented by ASFPM as an observer) 1982 – OMB designated FEMA as lead for FIFM-TF 1976, 1979, 1986, & 1994 – TF released UNP reports A Unified National Program for Floodplain Management

Recent Federal Collaborations Pre-Katrina  Intergovernmental Flood Risk Management Committee (with ASFPM and NAFSMA)  Interagency Levee Policy Committee  Post Katrina – Ad-Hoc Coordination (FEMA – Corps) Post Disaster teams (Katrina; Midwest)  National Committee on Levee Safety  Silver Jackets/Recovery Task Forces  RiskMAP  Bi-lateral and tri-lateral Federal agency coordination  Informal re-activation of the Task Force (2008)

Why Reestablish the Task Force? Increasing flood losses in US and impacts on natural resources and functions of floodplains caused by population growth and development Provide a forum for Federal coordination on floodplain management issues Develop common objectives and approaches among Federal agencies when implementing water resource authorities and programs Improve communication across the whole community

Goals and Objectives of the Task Force Goal 1: Public Safety Protect lives, property, and cultural assets through effective implementation of sound floodplain management programs and policies by all Federal agencies Objective 1.1: Further the implementation of risk reduction measures that minimize exposure and reduce flood losses in the floodplain Objective 1.2: Provide incentives and disincentives to motivate society’s participation in implementing risk reduction measures Objective 1.3: Encourage states to develop and implement floodplain management and hazard mitigation plans that include a full range of potential flood events

Goals and Objectives of the Task Force Goal 2: Sustain the Nation’s Floodplain Resources, Functions, and Services Protect and restore the natural resources and beneficial functions of floodplains, and the services they provide. Objective 2.1: Increase stakeholder awareness and understanding of the significant economic and environmental benefits that society derives from naturally functioning floodplains and associated natural resources Objective 2.2: Promote policies and programs that provide incentives for protecting and restoring the natural resources and functions of floodplains, and discourage policies and actions that degrade or destroy functioning floodplains Objective 2.3: Where development in the floodplain cannot be avoided, promote uses and development practices that: 1) are compatible with natural floodplain functions, 2) minimize adverse impacts on floodplain resources and services, and 3) do not increase flood risk

Goals and Objectives of the Task Force Goal 3: Economic Vitality Promote and sustain economic benefits of floodplains with minimal degradation to the natural environment while limiting flood risk Objective 3.1: Establish standards across the government for consistent valuations of environmental benefits and services Objective 3.2: Provide financial incentives to strive for minimal impact on the natural environment, both specifically in business practices and generally, to be mindful of the carbon/energy footprint on people, property, and plants Objective 3.3: Promote incentives for regional planning that incorporate low flood risk and sustainable development practices such as non-structural flood damage reduction

Work Plan Activities 1.Assess impacts and barriers of Federal programs with regard to achieving the goals of floodplain management 2.Conduct Foresight-style study 3.Assess value of environmental services 4.Review/update EO Review/update Unified National Program 6.Develop policy and guidance to encourage sustainable development 7.Conduct public listening session(s) on scope and focus areas 8.Coordinate Federal agencies ongoing collaborative efforts 9.Serve as a forum for inter-agency problem solving 10.Engage and coordinate on other Federal interagency efforts with a nexus to floodplain management

Recent Activities of the FIFM-TF Alignment of the Federal agencies Coordination Activities Federal Flood Policy Analysis Guidance for Federal agencies on unwise use of the floodplain

Recent Coordination Activities FIFM-TF member agencies identified program opportunities to increase federal interagency coordination and collaboration Examples of some of these initiatives include: Joint Memo to address FEMA’s requirements in NFIP regulations during planning of USACE FRM projects FEMA/USFWS collaborating to digitize CBRA maps Agencies collaborating on standards for LiDAR and stream gage data USACE/TVA developed working arrangement for NEPA reviews along the Tennessee River and tributaries

Federal Flood Policy Analysis Assess impacts and barriers of Federal programs with regard to achieving the goals of floodplain management FIFM-TF commissioned a study to review 69 Federal programs Determine how Federal programs support or interfere with sound floodplain management Results of investigation still being reviewed and considered by FIFM-TF FIFM-TF will consider set of recommendations for policy changes or other Federal actions

Study Recommendation Support the Silver Jackets Program FIFM-TF agencies recognize the contributions to FRM made by these state-led interagency teams FIFM-TF co-chairs have signed letter endorsing and supporting Silver Jackets concept Joint letter requested each agency provide POC to coordinate agency efforts with Silver Jackets teams Intent to ensure that full resources of the Federal Government are available to Silver Jackets teams

Study Recommendation Be a forum for inter-agency problem solving and alignment on current and emerging issues and opportunities Increase efforts! Nationally-significant issues or opportunities Use the FIFM-TF to help resolve Silver Jackets teams have significant role to help resolve and/or elevate inter-agency issues

Unwise Use of Floodplains Guidance For Federal Agencies Regulations, programs, policies, or practices may be considered an unwise use of the floodplain, if such actions are: Inconsistent with the provisions of the E.O and associated federal guidance; Unnecessarily increases or transfers flood risk geographically, governmentally, socioeconomically, or generationally; Fails to consider a systems approach; Disproportionately affects minority, low-income, or vulnerable populations; Fails to consider relevant current, future, and potential economic, environmental, and social risks, costs, impacts, and benefits Potential uses for the Unwise Use guidance Revision of Principals and Guidelines Development of corresponding individual agency guidance Future activities where a consolidated Federal perspective may add value

Discussion Questions 1. What is appropriate communication forum between the various levels of government? How would you like to communicate information to the Federal government? 2. What are barriers and opportunities (local, state, Federal) to sound flood risk management?

Requested Input If you have any questions or further comments for the Task Force, please do not hesitate to contact: Stephanie Bray or ) Thank you very much!