Continued improvements of air quality forecasting through emission adjustments using surface and satellite data Georgia Institute of Technology Yongtao.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Development and Application of PM2.5 Interpollutant Trading Ratios to Account for PM2.5 Secondary Formation in Georgia James Boylan and Byeong-Uk Kim Georgia.
Advertisements

Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory, Atmospheric Modeling and Analysis Division Changes in U.S. Regional-Scale Air.
Source Apportionment of PM 2.5 in the Southeastern US Sangil Lee 1, Yongtao Hu 1, Michael Chang 2, Karsten Baumann 2, Armistead (Ted) Russell 1 1 School.
Georgia Chapter of the Air & Waste Management Association Annual Conference: Improved Air Quality Modeling for Predicting the Impacts of Controlled Forest.
Georgia Institute of Technology Evaluation of CMAQ with FAQS Episode of August 11 th -20 th, 2000 Yongtao Hu, M. Talat Odman, Maudood Khan and Armistead.
CLIMATE CHANGE IMPACTS ON US AIR QUALITY: EXAMINATION OF OZONE AND FINE PARTICULATE MATTER CONCENTRATIONS AND THEIR SENSITIVITY TO EMISSION CHANGES Tagaris.
Quantifying CMAQ Simulation Uncertainties of Particulate Matter in the Presence of Uncertain Emissions Rates Wenxian Zhang, Marcus Trail, Alexandra Tsimpidi,
Current Research in Smoke Modeling Scott Goodrick U.S. Forest Service Southern Research Station Athens, GA.
Talat Odman and Yongtao Hu, Georgia Tech Zac Adelman, Mohammad Omary and Uma Shankar, UNC James Boylan and Byeong-Uk Kim, Georgia DNR.
CMAQ Simulations using Fire Inventory of NCAR (FINN) Emissions Cesunica Ivey, David Lavoué, Aika Davis, Yongtao Hu, Armistead Russell Georgia Institute.
Georgia Institute of Technology Air Quality Impacts from Prescribed Burning: Fort Benning Case Study M. Talat Odman Georgia Institute of Technology School.
Talat Odman, Aditya Pophale, Rushabh Sakhpara, Yongtao Hu, Michael Chang and Ted Russell Georgia Institute of Technology AQAST 9 at Saint Louis University.
Operational Air Quality and Source Contribution Forecasting in Georgia Georgia Institute of Technology Yongtao Hu 1, M. Talat Odman 1, Michael E. Chang.
Simulating diurnal changes of speciated particulate matter in Atlanta, Georgia using CMAQ Yongtao Hu, Jaemeen Baek, Bo Yan, Rodney Weber, Sangil Lee, Evan.
Template Improving Sources of Stratospheric Ozone and NOy and Evaluating Upper Level Transport in CAMx Chris Emery, Sue Kemball-Cook, Jaegun Jung, Jeremiah.
Development of PM2.5 Interpollutant Trading Ratios James Boylan and Byeong-Uk Kim Georgia EPD – Air Protection Branch 2012 CMAS Conference October 16,
Sensitivity of top-down correction of 2004 black carbon emissions inventory in the United States to rural-sites versus urban-sites observational networks.
Simulating prescribed fire impacts for air quality management Georgia Institute of Technology M. Talat Odman, Yongtao Hu, Fernando Garcia-Menendez, Aika.
Comparison of NO X emissions and NO 2 concentrations from a regional scale air quality model (CMAQ-DDM/3D) with satellite NO 2 retrievals (SCIAMACHY) over.
Modeling biomass burnings by coupling a sub-grid scale plume model with Adaptive Grid CMAQ Aika Yano Fernando Garcia-Menendez Yongtao Hu M. Talat Odman.
Georgia Environmental Protection Division Uncertainty Analysis of Ozone Formation and Emission Control Responses using High-order Sensitivities Di Tian,
Supermodel, Supermodel, Can I Breathe Tomorrow? Talat Odman* and Yongtao Hu Georgia Institute of Technology School of Civil & Environmental Engineering.
INCORPORATING UNCERTAINTY INTO AIR QUALITY MODELING & PLANNING – A CASE STUDY FOR GEORGIA 7 th Annual CMAS Conference 6-8 th October, 2008 Antara Digar,
Evaluation and Application of Air Quality Model System in Shanghai Qian Wang 1, Qingyan Fu 1, Yufei Zou 1, Yanmin Huang 1, Huxiong Cui 1, Junming Zhao.
Preliminary Study: Direct and Emission-Induced Effects of Global Climate Change on Regional Ozone and Fine Particulate Matter K. Manomaiphiboon 1 *, A.
Source-Specific Forecasting of Air Quality Impacts with Dynamic Emissions Updating & Source Impact Reanalysis Georgia Institute of Technology Yongtao Hu.
Air Quality Effects of Prescribed Fires Simulated with CMAQ Yongqiang Liu, Gary Achtemeier, and Scott Goodrick Forestry Sciences Laboratory, 320 Green.
Assimilating AIRNOW Ozone Observations into CMAQ Model to Improve Ozone Forecasts Tianfeng Chai 1, Rohit Mathur 2, David Wong 2, Daiwen Kang 1, Hsin-mu.
2012 CMAS meeting Yunsoo Choi, Assistant Professor Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, University of Houston NOAA Air quality forecasting and.
New Techniques for Modeling Air Quality Impacts of DoD Activities Talat Odman and Ted Russell Environmental Engineering Department Georgia Institute of.
Classificatory performance evaluation of air quality forecasting in Georgia Yongtao Hu 1, M. Talat Odman 1, Michael E. Chang 2 and Armistead G. Russell.
Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory, Atmospheric Modeling and Analysis Division Using Dynamical Downscaling to Project.
Evaluation of Emission Control Strategies for Regional Scale Air Quality: Performance of Direct and Surrogate Techniques Presented at the 6 th Annual CMAS.
Evaluation of the VISTAS 2002 CMAQ/CAMx Annual Simulations T. W. Tesche & Dennis McNally -- Alpine Geophysics, LLC Ralph Morris -- ENVIRON Gail Tonnesen.
Continued improvements of air quality forecasting through emission adjustments using surface and satellite data & Estimating fire emissions: satellite.
Georgia Institute of Technology Assessing the Impacts of Hartsfield- Jackson Airport on PM and Ozone in Atlanta Area Alper Unal, Talat Odman and Ted Russell.
Georgia Institute of Technology Adaptive Grid Modeling for Predicting the Air Quality Impacts of Biomass Burning Alper Unal, Talat Odman School of Civil.
U.S. EPA and WIST Rob Gilliam *NOAA/**U.S. EPA
Post-processing air quality model predictions of fine particulate matter (PM2.5) at NCEP James Wilczak, Irina Djalalova, Dave Allured (ESRL) Jianping Huang,
GOING FROM 12-KM TO 250-M RESOLUTION Josephine Bates 1, Audrey Flak 2, Howard Chang 2, Heather Holmes 3, David Lavoue 1, Mitchel Klein 2, Matthew Strickland.
1 Aika Yano, Yongtao Hu, M. Talat Odman, Armistead Russell Georgia Institute of Technology October 15, th annual CMAS conference.
Georgia Institute of Technology Comprehensive evaluation on air quality forecasting ability of Hi-Res in southeastern United States Yongtao Hu 1, M. Talat.
Impact of the changes of prescribed fire emissions on regional air quality from 2002 to 2050 in the southeastern United States Tao Zeng 1,3, Yuhang Wang.
Robert W. Pinder, Alice B. Gilliland, Robert C. Gilliam, K. Wyat Appel Atmospheric Modeling Division, NOAA Air Resources Laboratory, in partnership with.
Georgia Institute of Technology SUPPORTING INTEX THROUGH INTEGRATED ANALYSIS OF SATELLITE AND SUB-ORBITAL MEASUREMENTS WITH GLOBAL AND REGIONAL 3-D MODELS:
Coupling a sub-grid scale plume model for biomass burns with adaptive grid CMAQ: part 2 Aika Yano Fernando Garcia-Menendez Yongtao Hu M. Talat Odman Gary.
Emission reductions needed to meet proposed ozone standard and their effect on particulate matter Daniel Cohan and Beata Czader Department of Civil and.
Georgia Institute of Technology Evaluation of the 2006 Air Quality Forecasting Operation in Georgia Talat Odman, Yongtao Hu, Ted Russell School of Civil.
Implementation of a direct sensitivity method into CMAQ Daniel S. Cohan, Yongtao Hu, Amir Hakami, M. Talat Odman, Armistead G. Russell Georgia Institute.
Fine Scale Modeling of Ozone Exposure Estimates using a Source Sensitivity Approach Cesunica E. Ivey, Lucas Henneman, Cong Liu, Yongtao T. Hu, Armistead.
12 th annual CMAS conference Impact of Biomass Burning Aerosols on Regional Climate over Southeast US Peng Liu, Yongtao Hu, Armistead G. Russell, Athanasios.
Applicability of CMAQ-DDM to source apportionment and control strategy development Daniel Cohan Georgia Institute of Technology 2004 Models-3 Users’ Workshop.
Georgia Institute of Technology Air Quality Impacts from Airport Related Emissions: Atlanta Case Study M. Talat Odman Georgia Institute of Technology School.
Smog “Trends” -- Atlanta and Elsewhere Annual Peak Observed Concentration, EPD, US EPA.
Daniel Tong NOAA Air Resources Lab & George Mason University
15th Annual CMAS Conference
Use of Satellite Data for Georgia’s Air Quality Planning Activities Tao Zeng and James Boylan Georgia EPD – Air Protection Branch TEMPO Applications.
RD Evaluation and Comparison OF Methods to Construct Air Quality Fields for Exposure Assessment haofei yu, jim mulholland, howard chang, ran huang,
SEMAP 2017 Ozone Projections and Sensitivities / Contributions Prepared by: Talat Odman - Georgia Tech Yongtao Hu - Georgia Tech Jim Boylan - Georgia.
1st HAQAST Stakeholder Meeting
2017 Annual CMAS conference, October 24, 2017
Forecasting the Impacts of Wildland Fires
2017 Projections and Interstate Transport of Ozone in Southeastern US Talat Odman & Yongtao Hu - Georgia Tech Jim Boylan - Georgia EPD 16th Annual.
Forecasting Exposures to Prescribed Fire Smoke for Health Predictions in Southeastern USA Talat Odman, Ha Ai, Yongtao Hu, Armistead.
Analysis of Vertical Fire Emissions Distribution in CMAQ
Sensitivity Analysis of Ozone in the Southeast
Yongtao Hu, Jaemeen Baek, M. Talat Odman and Armistead G. Russell
Fernando Garcia-Menendez
Georgia Institute of Technology
Presentation transcript:

Continued improvements of air quality forecasting through emission adjustments using surface and satellite data Georgia Institute of Technology Yongtao Hu 1, M. Talat Odman 1, Michael E. Chang 2 and Armistead G. Russell 1 1 School of Civil & Environmental Engineering, 2 Brook Byers Institute of Sustainable Systems Georgia Institute of Technology With thanks to Pius Lee and the NOAA ARL Forecasting Team 13 th Annual CMAS Conference, October 27 th, 2014

Objective Improve air quality forecasting accuracy using near real time measurements through dynamic adjustments of emissions inventories –Air quality forecasting is an integral part of air quality management. –With source impacts forecasting in addition to air quality forecasting, operational forecasting can provide more information critical for dynamic air quality management. –Current forecasting accuracy calls for improvement. Forecasting with 3-D models relies on accuracy of emissions. Emission inventories are typically at least 4 years behind and “growth factors” are outdated. Wildland fires are becoming an increasingly important contributor to PM and ozone. –Dynamic adjustments of emissions can help improve both air quality and source impact forecasting Ultimate goal is to provide better information for the purpose of dynamic air quality management Georgia Institute of Technology

Current Hi-Res Forecasting System Based on SMOKE, WRF and CMAQ models Forecasting ozone and PM 2.5 since hour forecast at 4-km resolution for Georgia and 12-km for most of Eastern US Used by GA EPD assisting their AQI forecasts for Atlanta, Columbus and Macon Potentially useful for other states Georgia Institute of Technology Hi-Res Modeling Domains

Georgia Institute of Technology Hi-Res performance during ozone seasons for Metro Atlanta Ozone PM 2.5 MNB20% MNE25% MNB-10% MNE32%

Newly Built Hi-Res2 Forecasting System Georgia Institute of Technology Forecasting Air Quality for CONUS ( to be open on November 28 th ) Updated base emissions to 2011NEI WRF3.6.1 and CMAQv5.02 used 72-hour forecasts at 4-km resolution for Georgia and surrounding states, 12-km for most of Eastern state and 36-km for the rest of CONUS

Georgia Institute of Technology Forecasting Source Impacts at 4-km for Georgia ( to be open on November 28 th )

Georgia Institute of Technology E VOC Ozone -EA-EA  ∆C∆C EAEAEAEA CACACACA Brute Force vs. DDM-3D and HDDM-3D CBCBCBCB EBEBEBEB B A + + Forecasting Source Impacts using DDM-3D DDM-3D is just right for dynamic management purpose due to small adjustments from the current emission level

Uncertainties in Emissions hurt both air quality and source impacts forecasting! Georgia Institute of Technology

Currently working with PM 2.5 measurements at ~20 sites in Georgia An emissions and air quality auto-correction system utilizing near real-time satellite and surface observations Minimizes the differences between forecasted and observed concentrations (or fused concentrations with AOD and PM measurements) With minimum adjustment to source emissions Using impacts of emission sources calculated by CMAQ- DDM-3D –Source impacts can be used for dynamic air quality management.(e.g., traffic and fires) Georgia Institute of Technology Hi-Res2: Online Auto-Emissions-Adjustment Inverse Modeling Approach for Adjusting Emissions

Solve for R j that minimizes  2 Georgia Institute of Technology uncertainties number of obs number of sources DDM-3D calculated sensitivity of concentration i to source j emissions emission adjustment ratio weigh for the amount of change in source strengths Inverse Model Formulation L-BFGS algorithm is used for the optimization (R package nloptr)

Georgia Institute of Technology Example of selecting appropriate Г <- L-curve plot

Off-line tests using “real-time” PM 2.5 observations Surface PM 2.5 data from six sites in Atlanta –Direct use of satellite data (AOD) was problematic because of much larger uncertainties compared to surface data. –AOD will be “fused” to PM 2.5 concentration fields to provide “real-time” spatial patterns. Georgia Institute of Technology

DDM-3D sensitivities calculated for week1: Dec. 1-7, 2013 Georgia Institute of Technology SourceAreaOn-roadNon-roadPoint Dec. 1-7, Obtained emissions adjustments ratios (Rj) Shown for select day Dec. 2, 2013

Georgia Institute of Technology PM 2.5 Forecasting Performance for week 2: Dec , 2013 Obs (ug/m3)Sim (ug/m3)NFENFB Dec. 11, % Emis adjusted8.4524%2% Dec. 8-14, %85% Emis adjusted5.6254%39% without emissions adjustments Dec. 11, 2013 PM 2.5 Concentration with emissions adjustments Dec.11, 2013 PM 2.5 Concentration

DDM-3D sensitivities calculated for week1: Jul. 6-12, 2011 Georgia Institute of Technology Emission adjustments ratios (Rj) Shown for Jul. 11, 2011 SourceAreaOn-roadNon-roadPoint Jul. 6-12,

Georgia Institute of Technology PM 2.5 Forecasting Performance of week2: Jul , 2011 Obs (ug/m3)Sim (ug/m3)NFENFB Jul. 15, %-94% Emis adjusted7.2350%-40% Jul , %-44% Emis adjusted %7% without emissions adjustments Jul. 15, 2011 PM 2.5 Concentration with emissions adjustments Jul.15, 2011 PM 2.5 Concentration

Concluding Remarks Hi-Res2 is in operation with source impact forecasting –New in air quality forecasting practice –Promote dynamic air quality management through providing source specific information –Currently for traffic and power plant emissions only, can add more –Fire emission impact forecasts underway for dynamic prescribed-burn management Hi-Res2 is also in operation with dynamic adjustments of emissions –Performance evaluation is ongoing –Dynamic emissions adjustment dramatically improving PM forecast accuracy in off-line testing –Expansion to include other species measurements underway –Improved approach to assimilating AOD and PM measurements underway Georgia Institute of Technology

Acknowledgements NASA Georgia EPD Georgia Forestry Commission US Forest Service – Scott Goodrick, Yongqiang Liu, Gary Achtemeier Strategic Environmental Research and Development Program Joint Fire Science Program (JFSP) Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)

Georgia Emission Totals (tons/yr) Georgia Institute of Technology