The Next Generation Air Transportation System 8 June 2006 Doug Arbuckle, AATS IPT Director.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
By: Michael A. Cirillo, Vice President, Air Traffic Organization, System Operations Services Date:March 27, 2007 Federal Aviation Administration Performance.
Advertisements

1 Marinus C. F. Heijl Acting Director Air Navigation Bureau ICAO 30 March 2007 SYMPOSIUM OUTCOMES AND THE WAY FORWARD.
NextGen and Its Impact on Performance Worldwide Symposium on Performance of the Air Navigation System ICAO Montreal, Quebec, Canada March 26-30, 2007 Victoria.
Introduction ATMCP and Performance Dominique Colin de Verdière (CENA) Bernard Miaillier (Eurocontrol) TIM9 - ATMCP-RTSP May 2002.
Performance Requirements – Dynamic Density & Dynamic Resectorization Concepts Rich Jehlen Manager, Air Traffic Planning Division Toulouse June, 2002.
Federal Aviation Administration International Flight Inspection Symposium June 24, 2008 James H. Washington Vice President, Acquisition and Business Services.
Airside Capacity Enhancement
PETAL A major step Towards Cooperative Air Traffic Services Patrice BEHIER Manager of the Air/ground Co operative ATS Programme Directorate Infrastructure,
Air Traffic Management
Mission Trajectory Step 1 From planning to deployment.
International Civil Aviation Organization Trajectory-Based Operations(TBO) Saulo Da Silva SIP/ASBU/Bangkok/2012-WP/25 Workshop on preparations for ANConf/12.
NASA Aeronautics Airspace Systems Program Air Traffic Management Research for the National Airspace System Briefing to the IT Summit John A. Cavolowsky.
Continuous Climb Operations (CCO) Saulo Da Silva
1 NGATS Weather Concept of Operations JPDO Weather IPT.
SESAR and ASAS Opportunity
The Next Generation Air Transportation System “The Near Term and Beyond” Presented by Charles Leader, Director Joint Planning and Development Office.
Federal Aviation Administration Comparison of NextGen and SESAR Modernisation Initiatives ASAS TN2 Paris By: Don Ward Date: April 2008.
1 DLR/EEC Total Airport Management Christoph Meier & Peter Eriksen European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation.
CIVIL AVIATION BUREAU OF JAPAN Long term vision for Air Traffic Systems CARATS (Collaborative Actions for Renovation of Air Traffic Systems) CP01 /Ipxx.
Presented to: MPAR Working Group By: William Benner, Weather Processors Team Manager (AJP-1820), FAA Technical Center Date: 19 March 2007 Federal Aviation.
World Meteorological Organization Working together in weather, climate and water NextGen Update WMO; CAeMwww.wmo.int WMO.
Presented to: Aerospace Control and Guidance Systems Committee By: Stan Pszczolkowski, Manager, System Analysis Division Date: March 1, 2006 Federal Aviation.
ATN2001 Rev New Kent Fisher, Program Manager Boeing Air Traffic Management Kent Fisher, Program Manager Boeing Air Traffic Management.
. Center TRACON Automation System (CTAS) Traffic Management Advisor (TMA) Transportation authorities around the globe are working to keep air traffic moving.
1 NGATS Weather System Concept JPDO Weather IPT “Friends/Partners in Aviation Weather” Vision Forum FAA Headquarters – 800 Independence Avenue – Washington,
ATM Conference, Oslo May 19 th, 2015 ATM Master Plan 2015 Consequences for cost, safety, performance and environment.
1 Mapping of the Airspace Systems Program to the JPDO NGATS 2025 Capability Requirements Presentation to the ARAC Airspace Systems Program Subcommittee.
Next Generation Air Transportation System Institute 1500 K Street, NW – Suite 500 Washington, DC NGATS Institute 2007 Annual Meeting June 21, 2007.
The Next Generation Air Transportation System (NGATS) Bruce Carmichael Forecasting Team Co-lead Weather IPT
11 Aeronautical Information Exchange Model (AIXM) / Weather Information Exchange Model (WXXM) Conference Addressing the NextGen Challenge Charles A. Leader.
FAA System-Wide Information Management Program Overview for SWIM-SUIT Public Lauch Donald Ward Program Manager FAA SWIM Program April 2007.
Performance Based Navigation (PBN) Canadian Implementation Presentation to Air Transport Association of Canada 9 November 2010.
Draft High Level Operational Concept V0.4 Mode of Operation for the Single European Sky Deployable from /11/04.
NAS-WIDE Simulation Workshop December 10, 2008 Interagency Portfolio & Systems Analysis Division Yuri Gawdiak.
ASIA PACIFIC Air Traffic Flow Management
Ames Research Center 1 FACET: Future Air Traffic Management Concepts Evaluation Tool Banavar Sridhar Shon Grabbe First Annual Workshop NAS-Wide Simulation.
Baseline Future Scenarios for JPDO Evaluation and Analysis March 18, 2005 (408) Matthew Blake.
Required Total System Performance (RTSP) Bernard Miaillier EUROCONTROL Agenda Item 3 EUROCONTROL.
A Vision Based on Achievable Expectations Jack Howell Director / Air Navigation Bureau Agenda Item 1.
1 Vince Galotti Chief/ATMICAO 26 March 2007 A PERFORMANCE BASED GLOBAL AIR NAVIGATION SYSTEM: PART I FITTING THE PIECES TOGETHER.
Aviation System Capacity Frank J. Aguilera National Aeronautics & Space Administration.
Federal Aviation Administration Presented to: Eurocontrol/SJU By: Mike Hritz Date: December 2009 System-Wide Information Management (SWIM) SWIM in General.
Joint Planning and Development Office (JPDO) Col Mark Weadon Air Force Weather Deputy for Federal Programs May 17 th,
By: R. Scott Stevens, ATO-P, Aviation Weather Office, Weather Policy & Requirements Group, WTIC Program Manager Date: October 9, 2008 Federal Aviation.
1 Overview of JPDO and the Weather IPT Mark Andrews Weather IPT Lead July 13 th, 2006.
NASA ARAC Meeting Update on Next Generation Air Transportation System May 3, 2005 Robert Pearce Deputy Director, Joint Planning & Development Office.
Presented to:GMU System-Wide Modeling Workshop By: Joseph Post, ATO NextGen & Ops Planning Date: 10 December 2008 Federal Aviation Administration FAA System-Wide.
ENAV S.p.A. 1 AENA / ENAV / DFS / LFV ASAS Thematic Network Workshop Malmoe, ASAS /ADS-B: SAMPLE ANSPs STRATGIES & EXPECTATIONS.
Next Generation Air Transportation System Presentation to the Commercial Space Transportation Advisory Committee (COMSTAC) May 26, 2005 Robert A. Pearce.
Joint Planning & Development Office Evaluations & Analysis Preliminary Scenario Analyses Strategy Assessment to Provide a Basis for Prioritizing Investments.
A Technology Partnership for the New Millennium Anne Harlan, Director William J. Hughes Technical Center 68th NASAO Annual Convention September 20, 1999.
DIRECTORATE GENERAL FOR ENERGY AND TRANSPORT Information Day 6th Framework Programme 1st Call for Proposals, 5 Feb. 2003, Brussels ASAS operational improvements:
International Civil Aviation Organization Overview of the Block Upgrades Concept Tai Feng Air Navigation Commissioner International Civil Aviation Organization.
1 EUROCONTROL S TRATEGIES FOR The ATM Strategy for the Years As from MATSE/6 decision (Jan. 2000): To cater for forecast increase in demand.
Federal Aviation Administration Integrated Arrival/Departure Flow Service “ Big Airspace” Presented to: TFM Research Board Presented by: Cynthia Morris.
SYMPOSIUM OUTCOMES AND THE WAY FORWARD
Workshop on preparations for ANConf/12 − ASBU methodology
ASBU Methodology Summary of Block 1 Modules Saulo Da Silva
Continuous Climb Operations (CCO) Saulo Da Silva
NextGen and Its Impact on Performance
Agenda Item 1 A Vision Based on Achievable Expectations Jack Howell Director / Air Navigation Bureau.
A PERFORMANCE BASED GLOBAL AIR NAVIGATION SYSTEM: PART I
Next Generation Air Transportation System
Continuous Climb Operations (CCO) Saulo Da Silva
Trajectory-Based Operations(TBO) Saulo Da Silva
FAA and JPDO ASAS Activities
ASBU Methodology Summary of Block 1 Modules Saulo Da Silva
Joint Planning and Development Office “Where new ideas are welcome”
Performance Framework Concept
Presentation transcript:

The Next Generation Air Transportation System 8 June 2006 Doug Arbuckle, AATS IPT Director

Future Environment and Demand Flights 1.4-3X Passengers X Baseline Values 2004 Baseline Current Flight Schedule Current Capacities 1X ~3X Shift in passengers per flight (e.g., A380, reverse RJ trend, higher load factor) 20?? ~2X Biz shift Smaller aircraft, more airports Note: Not to scale Terminal Area Forecast (TAF) Growth Projection 2014 and later Baseline analysis will use OEP & FACT Capacities TAF Growth Ratios, Higher Rate TAF Growth Ratios, Lower Rate 2014 Biz shift 2% shift to micro jets Increase of over 10 passengers per flight

Some JPDO Assumptions… Airspace is a National resource Government “mandates” are acceptable to meet “public good” objectives, but should be judiciously selected Free-market incentives should be used to improve ATM system performance wherever appropriate Today’s ATM system supports a wide range of aircraft capabilities and range of aircraft capabilities is expected to broaden even more in future ATM system should enable aircraft to use their capabilities as much as possible while meeting safety, security, and environmental requirements …

2025 NGATS Concept Net-Enabled Information Access Performance-Based Ops & Services Weather-Assimilated Decision Making Layered, Adaptive Security Broad-Area Precision Navigation Trajectory-Based Aircraft Operations “Equivalent Visual” Operations “Super Density” Operations Key Capabilities Operating Principles “It’s about the users…” System-wide transformation Prognostic approach to safety assessment Globally harmonized Environmentally compatible to enable continued growth For full version, see: jpdo.digiplaces.com/tech_hangar/

2025 NGATS ATM System View Key Capabilities Operating Principles “It’s about the users…” Prognostic approach to safety assessment Globally harmonized Environmentally compatible to enable continued growth “Super Density” Ops “Equivalent Visual” Ops Trajectory-Based Aircraft Ops Broad-Area Precision Navigation Layered, Adaptive Security Weather-Assimilated Decision-Making Net-Enabled Information Access (Comm, Surveillance) Performance-Based Airspace Operations & Services

Net-Enabled Information Access Global secure access, information handled according to “communities of interest” “Shared Situation Awareness”  Real-time free-flow of info from private, commercial, & government sources, integrated internationally  Tailored, responsive and secure  Push/pull processes  Common awareness of day-to-day ops, events, crises Aircraft are integral “nodes” in network Integrated cooperative air traffic and non-cooperative national security surveillance

Performance-Based Airspace Operations R P: the NGATS vision… CNS performance basis for operations (vs “equipment” basis)  Standards/requirements based on performance capability, not technology or equipment  Examples already exist (e.g., RNP-based operations)  Simplifies regulatory activities (cert, flt stds) in presence of technology proliferation  Opportunity to define “pre-approved” operations based on performance levels that are not yet obtainable with current technology (innovation incentive)  Min: Define level of {RNP, RCP, RSP} required to perform given operation in given airspace (approach type, separation standard, etc) Max: Explicit basis for trading off RxP for RyP to perform given operation

Performance-Based Airspace Services R P: the NGATS vision… Air traffic “service levels” aligned with specified aircraft CNS performance levels (Performance-Based Airspace Ops exist)  Services flexible to varying situations/needs  Operators free to choose CNS performance levels for their aircraft according to their needs  Replaces “binary access” and “first come, first served” with a flexible framework to segregate aircraft according to system needs  Developed by ANSP and airspace users in a public policy process  Opens opportunities trans-nationally and globally  Examples of use  Aircraft may be told: “To enter/transit this airspace/airportal at this time, you’ll need to achieve these values of RNP, RCP, and RSP or show that the combination achieves RTSP…”  Aircraft with lower levels of CNS capability may be moved to less efficient, less desirable flight paths

Aircraft Trajectory-Based Operations Adjust airspace configuration to meet user needs 4D trajectories (including taxi and roll- out) are basis for planning and execution Machine-based trajectory analysis and separation assurance Includes environmental performance throughout all phases of aircraft ops Airspace configuration driven by: DoD/DHS requirements, domestic & international user needs, requirements for special-use airspace, safety, environment, overall efficiency Airspace reconfigurable during day of operations

Aircraft Trajectory-Based Operations: Management-by-Trajectory Projected Profiles Planned Profiles Weather, Aggregate Flow, Airport Configuration/Infrastructure Agreement User Requested Profile Clearance Separation MgmtTacticalStrategic Airspace Organization and Management Airport Operations Demand & Environmental Performance Balancing ATM Service Delivery Management Key Issues are functional allocation between:  Automation and humans  Aircraft operators and service provider Information Management Airspace User Operations Conformance Monitoring

Equivalent Visual Operations Increasing capacity from today’s non-visual conditions Aircraft perform "equivalent visual" operations in non-visual conditions (achieve “VFR capacity” under these conditions) ATM provider delegates “maintain separation” responsibility to aircraft operators  Requires timely, high fidelity information on nearby aircraft, weather, etc System-wide availability at all air portals  With appropriately capable “landside” (including security) Greater predictability of operations at busy airports, including ground operations

Super Density Operations Peak performance for the busiest airports Reduce Runway Occupancy Time  Aircraft energy management during rollout coupled with optimum turnoff selection  Situational awareness of “nearby” surface traffic and intent for high-speed turnoff Simultaneous operations on single runway  Multiple aircraft operate on single runway when sufficient “separation” exists  High-update rate surveillance info available to all aircraft Incorporates required environmental performance during all operations Airport “landside” (including security) sized accordingly Maximized, environmentally acceptable runway capacity  Reduced arrival/departure spacing  Equivalent Visual capability  Predictable detection/integration of wake vortex hazards