HBT puzzle: from an ideal hydrodynamic point of view Tetsufumi Hirano RHIC/AGS user’s meeting, BNL, NY, June 21, 2005.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Huichao Song The Ohio State University Lawrence Berkeley National Lab Viscous Hydro +URQMD In collaboration with S.Bass, U.Heinz, C.Shen, P.Huovinen &

Advertisements

Effects of Bulk Viscosity on p T -Spectra and Elliptic Flow Parameter Akihiko Monnai Department of Physics, The University of Tokyo, Japan Collaborator:

Hadronic Rescattering Effects after Hadronization of QGP Fluids Tetsufumi Hirano Institute of Physics, University of Tokyo Workshop “Hadronization” in.

Hadronic dissipative effects on transverse dynamics at RHIC Tetsufumi Hirano Dept. of Physics The Univ. of Tokyo QM2008, Feb. 4-10, 2008 TH, U.Heinz, D.Kharzeev,

Collective Flow from QGP Hydro + Hadronic Cascade Tetsufumi Hirano Dept. of Physics The Univ. of Tokyo ISMD, Aug. 4-10, 2007 TH, U.Heinz, D.Kharzeev, R.Lacey,

Mass ordering of differential elliptic flow and its violation for  mesons Tetsufumi Hirano Dept. of Physics, The Univ. of Tokyo Matsumoto, Feb ,

K*(892) Resonance Production in Au+Au and Cu+Cu Collisions at  s NN = 200 GeV & 62.4 GeV Motivation Analysis and Results Summary 1 Sadhana Dash Institute.

Quantum Opacity, RHIC HBT Puzzle, and the Chiral Phase Transition RHIC Physics, HBT and RHIC HBT Puzzle Quantum mech. treatment of optical potential, U.

DNP03, Tucson, Oct 29, Kai Schweda Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory for the STAR collaboration Hadron Yields, Hadrochemistry, and Hadronization.

Hydrodynamic Approaches to Relativistic Heavy Ion Collisions Tetsufumi Hirano RIKEN BNL Research Center.

Statistical Models A. ) Chemical equilibration B

What can we learn from hydrodynamic analysis at RHIC? Tetsufumi Hirano Dept. of Physics, Columbia Univ. Workshop on Quark-Gluon-Plasma Thermalization August.

Recent Results from STAR Rene Bellwied, Wayne State, for the STAR Collaboration  Thermalization & Timescales  High pt physics  Fluctuations  130 to.

Flow and Femtoscopy from QGP Hydro + Hadronic Cascade Tetsufumi Hirano Dept. of Physics The Univ. of Tokyo WPCF, Aug. 1-3, 2007.

5-12 April 2008 Winter Workshop on Nuclear Dynamics STAR Particle production at RHIC Aneta Iordanova for the STAR collaboration.

Perfect Fluid: flow measurements are described by ideal hydro Problem: all fluids have some viscosity -- can we measure it? I. Radial flow fluctuations:

Perfect Fluid: flow measurements are described by ideal hydro Problem: all fluids have some viscosity -- can we measure it? I. Transverse flow fluctuations:

Toward understanding of Quark-Gluon Plasma in relativistic heavy ion collisions Tetsufumi Hirano Dept. of Physics The University of Tokyo.

S C O T T PRATPRAT MICHIGANMICHIGAN S T T E UNIVRSITYUNIVRSITY T H BTBT PUZZLE PUZZLE Z A N D E X T E N D I N G HYRODYNAMICS HYRODYNAMICS.

Perfect Fluid QGP or CGC? Tetsufumi Hirano Institute of Physics, University of Tokyo References: T.Hirano and M.Gyulassy, Nucl.Phys.A 769(2006)71. T.Hirano,

Particle Spectra at AGS, SPS and RHIC Dieter Röhrich Fysisk institutt, Universitetet i Bergen Similarities and differences Rapidity distributions –net.

Masashi Kaneta, LBNL Masashi Kaneta for the STAR collaboration Lawrence Berkeley National Lab. First results from STAR experiment at RHIC - Soft hadron.

Identified Particle Ratios at large p T in Au+Au collisions at  s NN = 200 GeV Matthew A. C. Lamont for the STAR Collaboration - Talk Outline - Physics.

May, 20, 2010Exotics from Heavy Ion Collisions KE T and Quark Number Scaling of v 2 Maya Shimomura University of Tsukuba Collaborated with Yoshimasa Ikeda,

Hydrodynamic Approach: Open Issues Tetsufumi Hirano Special thanks to Nu Xu, Miklos Gyulassy and Denes Molnar The Berkeley School, LBNL, CA, May 27, 2005.

Spectra Physics at RHIC : Highlights from 200 GeV data Manuel Calderón de la Barca Sánchez ISMD ‘02, Alushta, Ukraine Sep 9, 2002.

Perfect Fluid: flow measurements are described by ideal hydro Problem: all fluids have some viscosity -- can we measure it? I. Radial flow fluctuations:

S C O T T PRATTPRATT M I C H I G A N STATESTATE U N I V E R S I Y T S U N A M I THETHE B T PUZZLEPUZZLE ANDAND T H E R H I C.

QGP hydro + hadronic cascade model: Status report Tetsufumi Hirano Dept. of Physics The Univ. of Tokyo RCNP, Oct , 2007 TH, U.Heinz, D.Kharzeev,

In-Kwon YOO Pusan National University Busan, Republic of KOREA SPS Results Review.

What can we learn from hydrodynamic analysis of elliptic flow? Tetsufumi Hirano Dept. of Physics, Columbia Univ. T.H. and M.Gyulassy, nucl-th/ T.H.,

Jaipur February 2008 Quark Matter 2008 Initial conditions and space-time scales in relativistic heavy ion collisions Yu. Sinyukov, BITP, Kiev (with participation.

Dynamical Modeling of Relativistic Heavy Ion Collisions Tetsufumi Hirano Workshop at RCNP, Nov 4, 2004 Work in partly collaboration with Y.Nara (Frankfurt),

Relativistic Ideal and Viscous Hydrodynamics Tetsufumi Hirano Department of Physics The University of Tokyo The University of Tokyo Intensive Lecture YITP,

Joint CATHIE/TECHQM Workshop, BNL, Dec 14-18, 2009 Huichao Song The Ohio State University Supported by DOE 12/14/2009 Lawrence Berkeley National Lab QGP.

Perfect Fluidity of QGP at RHIC? Tetsufumi Hirano Institute of Physics University of Tokyo Komaba, Tokyo , Japan 平野哲文东京大学 References: T.Hirano.

Helen Caines Yale University Soft Physics at the LHC - Catania - Sept Questions for the LHC resulting from RHIC Strangeness Outline Chemistry Yields.

LP. Csernai, NWE'2001, Bergen1 Part II Relativistic Hydrodynamics For Modeling Ultra-Relativistic Heavy Ion Reactions.

Does HBT interferometry probe thermalization? Clément Gombeaud, Tuomas Lappi and J-Y Ollitrault IPhT Saclay WPCF 2009, CERN, October 16, 2009.

Phantom Jets: the  puzzle and v 2 without hydrodynamics Rudolph C. Hwa University of Oregon Early Time Dynamics in Heavy Ion Collisions Montreal, July.

Perfect Fluid QGP or CGC? Tetsufumi Hirano* Institute of Physics, University of Tokyo References: T.Hirano and M.Gyulassy, Nucl.Phys.A 769(2006)71. T.Hirano,

Masashi Kaneta, First joint Meeting of the Nuclear Physics Divisions of APS and JPS 1 / Masashi Kaneta LBNL

Peter Kolb, CIPANP03, May 22, 2003what we learn from hydro1 What did we learn, and what will we learn from Hydro CIPANP 2003 New York City, May 22, 2003.

11/18/2003Tetsufumi Hirano (RBRC)1 Rapidity Dependence of Elliptic Flow from Hydrodynamics Tetsufumi Hirano RIKEN BNL Research Center (Collaboration with.

A Blast-wave Model with Two Freeze-outs Kang Seog Lee (Chonnam Nat’l Univ.)  Chemical and thermal analysis, done in a single model HIM

Perfect Fluid QGP or CGC? Tetsufumi Hirano Institute of Physics, University of Tokyo References: T.Hirano and M.Gyulassy, Nucl.Phys.A 769(2006)71. T.Hirano,

Scaling of Elliptic Flow for a fluid at Finite Shear Viscosity V. Greco M. Colonna M. Di Toro G. Ferini From the Coulomb Barrier to the Quark-Gluon Plasma,

Elliptic flow and shear viscosity in a parton cascade approach G. Ferini INFN-LNS, Catania P. Castorina, M. Colonna, M. Di Toro, V. Greco.

Perfect Fluid QGP or CGC? Tetsufumi Hirano Institute of Physics, University of Tokyo References: T.Hirano and M.Gyulassy, Nucl.Phys.A 769(2006)71. T.Hirano,

Heavy-Ion Physics - Hydrodynamic Approach Introduction Hydrodynamic aspect Observables explained Recombination model Summary 전남대 이강석 HIM

R. Lednicky: Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Dubna, Russia I.P. Lokhtin, A.M. Snigirev, L.V. Malinina: Moscow State University, Institute of Nuclear.

Roy A. Lacey, Stony Brook, ISMD, Kromĕříž, Roy A. Lacey What do we learn from Correlation measurements at RHIC.

Budapest, 4-9 August 2005Quark Matter 2005 HBT search for new states of matter in A+A collisions Yu. Sinyukov, BITP, Kiev Based on the paper S.V. Akkelin,

Strange Probes of QCD Matter Huan Zhong Huang Department of Physics and Astronomy University of California Los Angeles, CA Oct 6-10, 2008; SQM2008.

Hydrodynamic Analysis of Relativistic Heavy Ion Collisions at RHIC and LHC Tetsufumi Hirano The Univ. of Tokyo & LBNL Collaborators: Pasi Huovinen and.

Spectra and Flow from a Full 3D Hydro+Cascade Model Tetsufumi Hirano Institute of Physics, University of Tokyo References: T.Hirano and M.Gyulassy, Nucl.Phys.A.

Andras. Ster, RMKI, Hungary ZIMANYI-SCHOOL’09, Budapest, 01/12/ Azimuthally Sensitive Buda-Lund Hydrodynamic Model and Fits to Spectra, Elliptic.

Bulk properties at RHIC Olga Barannikova (Purdue University) Motivation Freeze-out properties at RHIC STAR perspective STAR  PHENIX, PHOBOS Time-span.

1 Space-time analysis of reactions at RHIC Fabrice Retière Lawrence Berkeley Lab STAR collaboration.

24 June 2007 Strangeness in Quark Matter 2007 STAR 2S0Q0M72S0Q0M7 Strangeness and bulk freezeout properties at RHIC Aneta Iordanova.

Japanese Physics Society meeting, Hokkaido Univ. 23/Sep/2007, JPS meeting, Sapporo, JapanShinIchi Esumi, Inst. of Physics, Univ. of Tsukuba1 Collective.

3-D Hydro: present and future Tetsufumi Hirano Columbia University Second RHIC II Science BNL, Probes of EOS.

Flow and Dissipation in Ultrarelativistic Heavy Ion Collisions September 16 th 2009, ECT* Italy Akihiko Monnai Department of Physics, The University of.

Helen Caines Yale University Strasbourg - May 2006 Strangeness and entropy.

Hadron Spectra and Yields Experimental Overview Julia Velkovska INT/RHIC Winter Workshop, Dec 13-15, 2002.

Duke University 野中千穂 Hadron production in heavy ion collision: Fragmentation and recombination in Collaboration with R. J. Fries (Duke), B. Muller (Duke),

Chiho Nonaka QM2009 Nagoya University Chiho NONAKA March 31, Matter 2009, Knoxville, TN In collaboration with Asakawa, Bass, and Mueller.

Hydro + Cascade Model at RHIC

Outline First of all, there’s too much data!! BRAHMS PHOBOS PHENIX

Effects of Bulk Viscosity on pT Spectra and Elliptic Flow Coefficients

Presentation transcript:

HBT puzzle: from an ideal hydrodynamic point of view Tetsufumi Hirano RHIC/AGS user’s meeting, BNL, NY, June 21, 2005

Outline The sQGP core and the dissipative hadronic corona picture T.H. and M.Gyulassy, nucl-th/ How good/bad is the agreement of ideal hydro results with HBT data? Summary

Not Only the sQGP But Also … nucl-th/

Differential Elliptic Flow is the Key PHENIX white paper, nucl-ex/ elliptic flow p T spectra p 

TcTc QGP phase Hadron phase  P artial C hemical E quilibrium EOS CLASS 2 Hirano & Tsuda; Teaney; Kolb & Rapp CLASS 3 Teaney, Lauret & Shuryak; Bass & Dumitru T ch T th H adronic C ascade C hemical E quilibrium EOS T th CLASS 1 Kolb, Sollfrank, Huovinen & Heinz; Hirano;… Ideal hydrodynamics T ~1 fm/c ~3 fm/c ~10-15 fm/c “No-Go theorem” for class 1  see our paper! Modeling of Hadron Phase and Freezeout

Cancel between v 2 and in chemical eq. hadron phase pTpT v 2 (p T ) v2v2 pTpT v 2 (p T ) v2v2 pTpT v 2 (p T ) v2v2 T th  Chemical Eq. Chemical F.O. Increase of with  is unrealistic from particle ratio point of view!

1. Ideal hydrodynamics reproduce v 2 (p T ) remarkably well, but not HBT radii. TRUE FALSE 2. v 2 (p T ) is not sensitive to the late hadronic stage. TRUE FALSE TRUE: Ideal Hydrodynamics reproduces neither v 2 (p T ) nor HBT radii at RHIC. TRUE: v 2 (p T ) depends on thermal equilibrium, chemical equilibrium, and viscous effects in the hadron phase. Check Sheet for Prevailing Opinion X X

Nearly Perfect Fluid of sQGP Core and the Dissipative Hadronic Corona T.H. and M.Gyulassy (’05) ! Absolute value of viscosityIts ratio to entropy density Nearly perfect fluidity of the sQGP AND imperfect fluidity of hadrons are manifestation of deconfinement!? What makes this sudden behavior?

How good/bad is the agreement of ideal hydro results with HBT data?

R side, R out, R long from Ideal Hydro SIDEOUT LONG CE: Chemical Eq. PCE: Partial Chem.Eq. No resonance decays

Model PCE Model CE Contour(T=const.) T(  ) at origin T.H. and K.Tsuda(’02) (T th )  Lörstad and Sinyukov(1991) proper time  (fm/c) radius x (fm)

AzHBT Radii SIDE LONG OUT OUT-SIDE STAR, PRC71, (2005).

N part 1/3 scaling? LINE: AuAu200GeV PLOT: AuAu62.4GeV LINE: AuAu200GeV PLOT: CuCu200GeV For dN/d  and v 2 in CuCu collisions, see, T.Hirano et al.,nucl-th/

Dilemma between R side and R long SIDE LONG R side (K T =0) ~ 6fm (data) ~ 4fm (hydro) Source size may grow by resonances (  mesons?). Resonance decays also enhance R long !

Resonances Enhance HBT Radii          STAR Hydro(sQGP) +RQMD(hadron) (D.Teaney) Steal from S.Pratt’s talk at RIKEN BNL workshop(’03) See also, Soff, Bass, Dumitru Hydro+UrQMD

How to Get Large Radii without Spoiling Single Spectra? Blast Wave Model (M.Lisa & F.Retiere) R in-plane ~11 fm R out-of-plane ~12 fm J.Cramer & G.Miller R~12fm T.H. and K.Tsuda(’02) Partial Chemical Eq. Hydro cannot get such a gigantic source radius! T th and  are consistent with hydro. But… radius (fm) proper time  (fm/c)

V r vs. T th T.H. and K.Tsuda (’02) Hydro: Au+Au at sqrt(s NN ) = 130 GeV tau 0 = 0.6fm/c ReCo(Duke) 200GeV TcTc Single F.O. by Broniowski & Florkowski 130GeV Blast Wave by Burward-Hoy 130GeV Az Blast Wave by Lisa & Retiere (175,0.55) Note: F.O. parameter  A set of T th, , AND .

Initial Transverse Flow Hubble constant H = 0.25/fm Chojnacki et al.(2005) Positive correlation Hubble-like flow

Initial Transverse Flow and Spectra H = 0.02/fm << 0.25/fm Initial flow a.la. Kolb and Rapp(’02) Dissipation in hadron phase also makes p T spectrum hard. (Teaney(’02))  No room for initial flow!? T.H. (’05)  K p CAVEAT: total energy ~ 2*(collision energy) for H=0.25/fm

Initial Flow Effect on HBT Radii Hubble const. R out, R long R out /R side ~ 1 for H=0.25 fm -1 SIDE LONG OUT

Temperature Distribution at  =6.0 fm/c H=0.02/fm H=0.25/fm

Summary The HBT puzzle is still puzzling us (only me?)! Fitting the HBT radii is NOT the solution of the puzzle. Justify parameters after fitting spectra and HBT radii ! Especially, dynamical aspects such as radial flow, source size etc. Dissipative hadronic corona is important to reproduce elliptic flow. However, HBT radii cannot be reproduce by the hybrid model yet.

Fitting Parameters by Cramer&Miller Proton p T slope can be reproduced? J.G.Cramer et al.,PRL94,102302(2005)

Pion Chemical Potential Partial chemical equilibrium (PCE) T.H. and K.Tsuda(’02)  (T,   ) =(173,123)

BONUS SLIDES!

Basis of the Announcement Integrated elliptic flow NA49(’03) PHENIX white paper Differential elliptic flow

T th <T ch Chemical parameters  particle ratio Thermal parameters  p t spectra Statistical model T ch >T th (conventional) hydro T ch =T th No reproduction of ratio and spectra simultaneously

Many people don’t know this… P.Huovinen, QM2002 proceedings

Extension of Parameter Space ii Introduction of chemical potential for each hadron! Single T f in hydro Hydro works? Both ratio and spectra?

Chemical Potential & EoS EOS Example of chem. potential Partial chemical equilibrium (PCE) Expansion dynamics is changed (or not)? T.H. and K.Tsuda(’02) 

Does Dynamics change? Model PCE Model CE Contour(T=const.) T(  ) at origin T.H. and K.Tsuda(’02) (T th ) 

p T Spectra How to fix T th in conventional hydro Response to p T slope Spectrum harder with decreasing T th Up to how large p T ? T th independence of slope in chemically frozen hydro No way to fix T th Suggests necessity of (semi)hard components Charged hadrons in AuAu 130AGeV C hemical E quilibrium P artial C hemical E quilibrium T.H. and K.Tsuda (’02)

Elliptic Flow T.H. and K.Tsuda (’02) Kolb and Heinz(’04) Is v 2 (p T ) really sensitive to the late dynamics? MeV 100MeV transverse momentum (GeV/c)

Mean p T is the Key Slope of v 2 (p T ) ~ v 2 / Response to decreasing T th (or increasing  ) v2v2 PCE CE v 2 / <pT><pT>    Generic feature!

Why behaves differently? Simplest case: Pion gas Longitudinal expansion  pdV work! dE T /dy should decrease with decreasing T th.  dN/dy should so. CFO: dS/dy = const.  dN/dy = const.  MUST decreases CE: dS/dy = const.  dN/dy decreases (mass effect)  can increase as long as dN/dy decreases. Result from the 1 st law of thermodynamics & Bjorken flow dE T /dy proper time ideal hydro

Are Hydro Results Consistent with Each Other? What does it mean? PHENIX white paper, nucl-ex/ elliptic flow p T spectra p 

Summary of Results Models for Hadron Phase v2(pT,m)v2(pT,m) p T spectra Yield or ratio Viscous effect Caveat Chemical Equilibrium Y es Y es *NoNo NoNo * P (Pbar) yields << exp. data Partial Chemical Equilibrium NoNo Y es *Y es NoNo *Only low p T for pions Hadronic Cascade Y es Y es * *Kinetic approach Boundary (QGP  hadron)

Finite Mean Free Path & Viscosity See, e.g. Danielewicz&Gyulassy(1985) For ultra-relativistic particles, the shear viscosity is Ideal hydro:  0  shear viscosity  0 Transport cross section

FAQ 1.We cannot say “Hydro works very well at RHIC” anymore?  Yes/No. Only a hydro+cascade model does a good job.  Nevertheless, HBT puzzle!  QGP as a perfect fluid. Hadron as a viscous fluid. 2. Why ideal hydro can be used for chemically frozen hydro?  We can show from AND.  One has to distinguish “chemical freeze out” from “chemical non-equilibrium”.

Large radial flow reduces v 2 for protons Radial flow pushes protons to high p T regions Low p T protons are likely to come from fluid elements with small radial flow Even for positive elliptic flow of matter, v 2 for heavy particles can be negative in low p T regions! High pT protons Low pT protons x y pTpT Blast wave peak depends on 

v 2 (p T ) Stalls in Hadron Phase? D.Teaney(’02) Pb+Pb, SPS 17 GeV, b=6 fm Hadronic rescattering via RQMD does not change v 2 (p T ) for  ! Solid lines are guide to eyes Mechanism for stalling v 2 (p T ) Hydro (chem. eq.): Cancellation between v 2 and  Effect of EoS Hydro+RQMD: Effective viscosity  Effect of finite

Summary What have we learned?What have we learned? From hydro+cascade analyses, viscosity is mandatory in the hadron phase: QGP as a perfect fluid and hadrons as a “viscous” fluid. v 2 is sensitive to the early stage of collisions, whereas v 2 (p T ) can also be sensitive to the late stage since v 2 (p T ) is manifestation of interplay between radial flow ( ) and elliptic flow (v 2 ). CommentComment Conventional (chem. equilibrium & ideal) hydro makes full use of neglecting chemical f.o. to reproduce v 2 (p T ) and p T spectra. Accidental reproduction!

QGP Fuzzy image if focus is not adjusted yet. QGP QGP Wanna see this? Fine-tune the “hadronic” focus! focus: hadron corona The importance of the dissipative hadronic corona to understand “perfect fluid” sQGP core!