Participation in the Process of Brownfield Regeneration Dagmar Petríková, Matej Jaššo „This project has been funded with support from the European Commission.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
2012 EUROPEAN YEAR FOR ACTIVE AGEING AND SOLIDARITY BETWEEN GENERATIONS.
Advertisements

EURADWASTE 29 March 2004 LOCAL COMMUNITIES IN NUCLEAR WASTE MANAGEMENT THE COWAM EUROPEAN PROJECT EURADWASTE, 29 March 2004.
INTERNATIONAL UNION FOR CONSERVATION OF NATURE. 2 Implemented in 12 countries of Africa, Asia, Latin America and the Middle East, through IUCN regional.
1 “Introduction to EU Trade Policy” – July 2008 How We Make Trade Policy n Contents n Part I: EU Trade Powers n Part II: The evolving scope of Trade Policy.
1 Strategic Environmental Assessment and SFs Operational Programmes: An assessment Jonathan Parker DG ENV ENVIRONMENT EUROPEAN COMMISSION Aarhus Workshop.
SUPPORTED BY THE EUROPEAN UNION’S OBNOVA AND PHARE PROGRAMMES EIA TRAINING RESOURCE MANUAL FOR SOUTH EASTERN EUROPE Scoping.
“Building Effective Public Participation in Environmental Impact Assessment in a Transboundary Context” in Bulgaria Institute for Ecological Modernisation.
1 CEER How to balance the public’s concerns and critical infrastructure construction Matti Vainio, Deputy HoU DG ENV – C.5, European Commission.
EU: Bilateral Agreements of Member States
EU: Bilateral Agreements of Member States. Formerly concluded international agreements of Member States with third countries Article 351 TFEU The rights.
Secretariat to the Espoo Convention and its Protocol on SEA
European Ombudsman Access to environmental information Task Force on Access to Information Geneva, 4 December 2014.
3 September UNDERSTANDING THE SEA 20 th May 2013 Presented by: K. Florence.
Implementing the Second Pillar of the Aarhus Convention: Problems Identified in the National Implementation Reports Magda Tóth Nagy, Senior Expert Geneva,
UNECE and OSCE joint event, Almaty, May 2012
საქართველოს მწვანეთა მოძრაობა / დედამიწის მეგობრები Greens Movement of Georgia / Friends of the Earth Implementation of Aarhus Convention in Georgia during.
The Aarhus & Espoo Conventions Making implementation work for stakeholders.
Measures to prevent and tackle bullying, based on children's opinions and involvement. The role of ombudspersons. George Moschos, Children’s Ombudsman.
Partnership as a tool to green regional development programmes Gottfried Lamers Federal Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry, Environment and Water Management.
Michalis Adamantiadis Transport Policy Adviser, SSATP SSATP Capacity Development Strategy Annual Meeting, December 2012.
EPHA EGM 2/12/2002 A definition of health A state of complete physical, mental and social well-being and not merely the absence of disease or infirmity.
TASK 10 Public awareness The role of the NGOs DAC PROJECT CAPACITY BUILDING IN BALKAN COUNTRIES IN ORDER TO DEAL WITH CLIMATE CHANGE Prepared by: Stelios.
Country Summary for Ukraine (part 1) status for Roman Volosyanchuk, IUCN CPC.
Action Plan Skills Building: Module 1 Getting Started: Preparatory Tasks and Considerations January 2013.
1 Workshop on the Directive 96/61/EC concerning (IPPC) Integrated pollution prevention and control INFRA Public participation & access to environmental.
1 Building the Privacy culture, starts with the youngsters and their education 20 th and 21 st June 2013 Zagreb, Croatia.
Jerzy Jendrośka Energy security and legal requirements for environmental protection, public involvement and transboundary co-operation Scientific support.
Legal Aspects Related to Brownfield Regenerations Prof. Maros Finka, M.arch., Ph.D. „This project has been funded with support from the European Commission.
State of implementation of the decision III/6f regarding Ukraine (MOP 2, June, , 2008, Riga, Latvia)
Capacity building workshop on environment and health Public participation and the right to know: Aarhus Convention and PRTR Protocol Monica Guarinoni Sofia,
Summary of Local Seminars & Focus Groups 20/06/ Athens WP8 – TESTING II coordinated by IFI.
GCM, Annecy – France Activity Report Piotr Grygier Vice President Multifunctional forest management and society matters.
Dr Elisabeth Helander Director Community Initiatives and Innovative Actions DG Regional Policy European Commission.
‘Sujala’ Karnataka Watershed Development Programme Developing the Training Strategy Introduction for the “Brainstorming Workshop 1st of October 2003.
Access for Whom? The issue of Legal Standing Carol Hatton Solicitor, WWF-UK “Opening the doors to justice: the challenge of strenghthening public access”
OPTIONS AND REQUIREMENTS FOR ENGAGEMENT OF CIVIL SOCIETY IN GEF PROJECTS presented by Ermath Harrington GEF Regional Focal Point.
PPSD in specific sectors in Bulgaria - Regional Plans for Development National Programme for Ports Development (2006 – 2015) Vania Grigorova, Jacquelina.
The Principles Governing EU Environmental Law. 2 The importance of EU Environmental Law at the European and globallevel The importance of EU Environmental.
SUPPORTED BY THE EUROPEAN UNION’S OBNOVA AND PHARE PROGRAMMES Public Involvement EIA TRAINING RESOURCE MANUAL FOR SOUTH EASTERN EUROPE.
SEA in the Czech Republic Prague, 24 September 2008.
Brownfields in Baltic States - Lifelong Educational Project CZ/08/LLP-LdV/TOI/ Legal aspects of brownfield redevelopment in Latvia Edmunds Teirumnieks.
Enterprise education Guzmán García González-Posada.
Protocol on Water and Health: added value and challenges for public participation Tsvietkova Anna MAMA-86’s Water and Sanitation Program Workshop on Water.
Supporting policy development in the field of ICH in Africa CONCLUSIONS Constantine — ALGERIA 28 September to 2 October 2015.
Regional Policy EUROPEAN COMMISSION EN The Urban Dimension in Future Cohesion Policy Urban content of the regulations and the Community strategic guidelines.
Vienna Music Business Research Days The Proposal of the EU Commission for a Directive on Collecting Societies and Cultural Diversity – a Missed Opportunity.
REGIONAL POLICY EUROPEAN COMMISSION The contribution of EU Regional/Cohesion programmes Corinne Hermant-de Callataÿ European Commission,
DEVELOPING THE WORK PLAN
Multi-level governance – fostering participation in practice Gracia Vara Arribas Budapest, 23 March 2011 EIPA, 2011 ©
Manager ethics ETHICAL DECISION MAKING MODEL Slovak University of Technology Faculty of Material Science and Technology in Trnava.
Development and Cooperation - EuropeAid Discussion on the post Multiannual Financial Framework Structured Dialogue Budapest, May 18th 2011.
Ecologic.de Public Participation- Key element of EU Water Policy Nicole Kranz Ecologic - Institute for International and European Environmental Policy.
SUPPORTED BY THE EUROPEAN UNION’S OBNOVA AND PHARE PROGRAMMES EIA TRAINING RESOURCE MANUAL FOR SOUTH EASTERN EUROPE The role of EIA and decision-making.
Peter Lukáč Ministry of Environment of the Slovak Republic Department of Environmental Assessment.
FACULTY OF LAW, UNIVERSITY OF OSLO The principle of integration and its dilemmas Hans Chr. Bugge Professor of Environmental Law University of Oslo.
1 Legal Frameworks for Public and Stakeholder Engagement by Carl Bruch Asia Regional Workshop on Stakeholder Engagement in International Waters Management.
The Role of Public Participation in Advancing Environmental Justice.
THE ROLE OF COURTS AND TRIBUNALS IN ENHANCING ACCESS TO JUSTICE IN ENVIRONMENTAL LITIGATION SEVENTH ANNUAL COLLOQUIUM OF THE IUCN ACADEMY OF ENVIRONMENTAL.
TAIEX-REGIO Workshop on Applying the Partnership Principle in the European Structural and Investment Funds Bratislava, 20/05/2016 Involvement of Partners.
Public Participation in Biofuels Voluntary
Legal Aspects Related to Brownfield Regeneration
Overview of public participation in strategic decision-making in the UNECE area David Aspinwall.
Legal aspects related to regeneration of the industrial areas in Romania Mircea Grigorovschi „This project has been funded with support from the European.
Business environment in the EU Prepared by Dr. Endre Domonkos (PhD)
Nick Bonvoisin Secretary to the Convention on the
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA)
REGIONAL NETWORK FOR CIVIL ORGANIZATIONS ON MIGRATION – RNCOM
Meeting of PAP/RAC Focal Points, Split, Croatia, 8-9 May 2019
The Enter! Recommendation
Presentation transcript:

Participation in the Process of Brownfield Regeneration Dagmar Petríková, Matej Jaššo „This project has been funded with support from the European Commission. This publication [communication] reflects the views only of the author, and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein.“

Awareness What is public participation Who is the public What international documents are supporting it What are the rights of the public guaranteed by these documents What are the levels of public participation

Goals of the teaching unit Role and importance of public participation in brownfield regeneration Understanding of the rights of public participation in decision-making in environmental matters Participation and the quality of life for local communities Involvement of the public and stakeholders

Contents Participative planning culture Public participation process – duration and focus Stakeholders Public concerned International documents supporting public participation Good practice of public participation in brownfield regeneration

Participative planning culture Participative planning culture, based on the involvement of all relevant actors, stakeholders and target groups proved to be most successful in the process of sustainable brownfield redevelopment. Participative planning is able to overcome the lack of vision and certain fragmentation and disconnection among the actors and stakeholders, stressing the common goals and targets and facilitating the process of visioning and searching common identity.

Public Participation Process in which the opinions, attitudes and standpoints of all stakeholders – citizens, civic associations and initiatives, NGOs, business units, regional and local governments, professionals - are all integrated in the decision-making process. They all can get involved in community planning and actively take a part in the process of brownfield redevelopment.

Public Participation Process - duration Public participation process starts with the involvement of the stakeholders from the beginning of brownfield redevelopment plan making and can extend to implementation and at the same time focus on all aspects of brownfield redevelopment: – planning, – environmental issues, – social issues, – housing, – transport and others.

Public Participation Process - focus The process of public participation is focused on meeting the visions, needs and requirements of the stakeholders and as such contributes to fulfilling of social needs and social dimension of sustainable brownfield redevelopment. In the process of public participation various interests are confronted and consensus for acceptable solution is sought.

Stakeholders Stakeholders are people or organisations who have a real interest in the particular issue being considered, either because they could be directly affected by a planning decision or because they, (organisations), have been created for the purpose of influencing these types of decisions. The former are clearly the local residents, workers businesses etc., while the later includes organisations, which want to protect the environment, or associations of house-builders, or retailers.

Who is Public The whole population can be considered as the public and when national planning issued are being considered, it could be true. A person or a group of people who are interested to give the views, get involved and affect the decision. Most planning issues are of a much more local nature and public participation works most effectively when applied at smaller scale.

The public concerned It is a group of the public affected or likely to be affected or having an interest in the environmental decision-making procedures The concept of the concerned public varies in quantity and quality and depends on the plan/proposal under consideration.

International documents supporting public participation Aarhus Convention – European Convention on Human Rights (1998) EC Directive No. 35/2003 on Public Participation in respect of drawing up of certain plans and programmes relating to the environment – in effect since June 2005 for the EU member states These documents support the responsibility and transparency of decision-making processes at all levels as well as strengthen public participation in the environmental and social decision-making.

Three rights of public participation These documents grant three rights of the public for participation: The right to information - the access and right of the public to obtain information on the environment The right to participate - the right to participate in decisions that affect the environment The right to justice in environmental matters

The right to information Member States will ensure that relevant information about the preparation and modification or review of the plans and programmes is given to the public, including the information about the right to participate in decision-making and about the competent authority to which comments or questions may be submitted.

The right to participate Member States will ensure that the public is given early and effective opportunities to participate in the preparation and modification or review of the plans and programmes. The public is entitled to express comments and opinions when all options are open before decisions. In making the decisions due account shall be taken of the results of public participation and of information of the public on the reasons the decisions are based, including info about the public participation process.

The right to justice Member States will ensure the rights of appeal against decisions to refuse requests for information on the environment, against failures of law in decision-making processes, or against actions which are illegal under a country’s environmental laws.

Three levels of public involvement (OECD 2001)

Good Practice in Public Participation Good practice in public participation process would usually involve a detailed mapping of stakeholders to identify whom to include. Information as prerequisite of the process, inform as early as possible, inform truly and introduce a full and unbiased picture of the planned brownfield redevelopment. The basis for successful public participation is information of the citizens and other stakeholders, consultations and communication with the public, which leads to motivating, and involving the public.

Planning for Brownfield Regeneration Workshop Photos by: Michaela Bruehl, Copenhagen, Denmark

Photos by Michaela Bruehl, Copenhagen, Denmark

Conclusions Public participation is about the “public” becoming involved in the whole planning process, actively taking part in the process by which plans and redevelopment proposals are created. It is supported by the EU documents which are binding in the EU member states. Public participation is already an important part of planning, based on formal and informal approaches.

Thank you for your attention „This project has been funded with support from the European Commission. This publication [communication] reflects the views only of the author, and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein.“