California vs. Bakke Anessa,Tierra and Keanna. Facts Covered under the 14 th amendment Bakke, a white medical school applicant,was turned and his spot.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Constitution and the Branches of Government Landmark Civil Rights Cases.
Advertisements

 Review the first day power point!!  Know the different tests (strict scrutiny, middle level review, mere rationality review) and different classes (suspect,
Civil Rights in the Courts
■Essential Question ■Essential Question: –How did the decisions of the Supreme Court impact civil liberties in the 1960s & 1970s? ■Warm-Up Question: –?
Good Afternoon!! 1.NVC 2.HOT ROC: Quote Analysis 3.Snobfarm University: A Case Study 4.Affirmative Action: Yay or Nay? Essential Question: Is affirmative.
Regents of the University of California v. Allan Bakke 438 U.S. 265, 98 S.Ct Argued October 12, 1977 Decided June 28, 1978.
Employment Law Dessler Chapter 2. Agenda – 2/22/05 Reminder and Announcements Reminder and Announcements Questions and Comments Questions and Comments.
Dred Scott vs. Sandford Background Dred Scott was a slave who traveled with his master (a doctor) from Missouri (slave state) to Illinois (free state)
1. Issue: Can the press print articles that are against the government if the Information is true? 2. Case Summary: John Peter Zenger was charged with.
The Challenges of Ensuring Equality By: Becca W, Carolyn R, Melina M, Sage G, Lindsay G, Stephanie S, Cory E, and Kevin F.
Chapter 21: Civil Rights: Equal Justice Under Law Section 3
30.4 The Movement Continues. Civil Rights movement in trouble: SCLC workers were determined to continue King’s work so they went ahead with the Poor People’s.
BY: WILL CLAYTON & GRIFFIN SMITH.  Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens.
Women’s Liberation, Free Speech, Environmentalism, and the New Left.
Civil Rights Cases and Legislation Involving the 14 th Amendment (Begin with prejudice questionnaire)
Equality of Results vs Equality of Opportunity Andrew Adair x Michael Dotson.
Affirmative Action “Positive steps taken to increase the representation of women and minorities in area of employment, education, and business from which.
C IVIL R IGHTS AND P UBLIC P OLICY African Americans…
Margo Tillstrom Chris Makaryk Ariel Woldman Zach Morris.
[June 23, 2003] By Wayland Goode.   Historic injustices on minority groups promoted this state program.  It applies not only to college applications,
Civil Rights. Definition of Civil Rights Civil Rights – The positive acts of government that seek to make constitutional guarantees a reality for all.
Brown V. Board of Education (1954)
Block 2 Carl Turner. Regents of California vs. Bakke Argued on Wednesday, October 12, 1977 Decided on Monday, June 26, 1978.
Federal Civil Rights Laws Chapter 21 Section 3. Question As a Ten year old you bullied someone every day causing that kid great torment. Then you saw.
O UR E NDURING C ONSTITUTION Chapter 7. E SSENTIAL Q UESTIONS Did the Constitution and the Bill of Rights protect freedoms for all people? How have court.
THE UNFAIR TREATMENT OF MEMBERS OF MAJORITY GROUPS(WHITES) CAUSED FROM PREFERENTIAL POLICIES, AS IN COLLEGE ADMISSIONS OR EMPLOYMENT, PROPOSED TO HELP.
SUPREME COURT CASES AFFIRMATIVE ACTION. WHAT IS IT?? Affirmative action refers to policies that take factors including "race, color, religion, gender,
Objective 30D Understand the application and significance of the equal protection clause of the 14 th amendment, including its impact on legalized segregation.
Matt Selby. BROWN VS BOARD OVERVIEW Segregation was commonplace in many public areas in the United States in the 50s 12 parents filed a suit against the.
Regents of the university of California v. bakke
Objective 30d Understand the application and significance of the Equal Protection clause of the 14 th Amendment, including its impact on legalized segregation.
Chapter 7: Our Living Constitution. Our Living Constitution  Think of the Constitution as a “flexible document” that can be changed  What are some of.
Regents of The University of California v. Bakke By Alicia M.
Civil Rights Unit 7: The Judicial Branch, Civil Liberties, and Civil Rights.
Unit 3 Objectives 30d 30e 30f. 14 th Amendment No state shall make or enforce any law that shall abridge the privileges or immunities of the citizens.
Discrimination in Employment. Affirmative Action  Taking positive steps to remedy past and current discrimination in employment and education.
Regents of the University of California v. Bakke 1978.
NOTES: Landmark Supreme Court Cases Learning Target 3: Civil Rights Cases.
Ratifying the Constitution To ratify the Constitution, a battle would drag on for 2 years.
Gratz v. Bollinger (2003) Supreme Court Case Project Created by: Christina Dork.
Sources of our Rights 1.3. Essentials  Essential Standards   Evaluate the rights of individuals in terms of how well those rights have been upheld.
Section Outline 1 of 7 Our Enduring Constitution Section 2: A Flexible Framework I.The Role of the Supreme Court II.Equality and Segregation III.Equality.
Chapter 7 Section 2 A Flexible Framework. The Role of the Supreme Court Overturning a Decision – Court decisions set important precedents, but can be.
1. Circle the correct answer from the choices in the sentences below. a) The theory that Americans, even though we come from different backgrounds, come.
Sexual Harrassment & Affirmative Action
Supreme Court Activity: You Decide
Unit 7: The Judicial Branch, Civil Liberties, and Civil Rights
Important Court Cases of the 20th Century
Gov Review Video #48: Important Civil Rights To Know
Group Six Will Mason Tracy Epton Maile Kobayashi Susan Redick
Korematsu V. United States
Affirmative Action.
Equality before the Law
Bakke v. Board of Regents of California
Wygant v. Jackson Board of Education
New Approaches to Civil Rights Ch. 21 Sec. 4 Pgs
Civil Rights.
New Approaches to Civil Rights
Affirmative Action.
NOTES: Landmark Supreme Court Cases
Bakke v. The board of regents in california
Essential Question: How did the decisions of the Supreme Court impact civil liberties in the 1960s & 1970s? Warm-Up Question: ?
Essential Question: How did the decisions of the Supreme Court impact civil liberties in the 1960s & 1970s? CPUSH Agenda for Unit 14.4:  Important.
Essential Question: How did the decisions of the Supreme Court impact civil liberties in the 1960s & 1970s?
Agenda- 1/18 GRAB A CHROME BOOK AND THE WORKSHEETS!
Turbulent Times (The 1960s and 1970s
Essential Question: How did the decisions of the Supreme Court impact civil liberties in the 1960s & 1970s?
Diversity and Discrimination
Warm UP Is the Supreme Court a vehicle for change?
Essential Question: How did the decisions of the Supreme Court impact civil liberties in the 1960s & 1970s? Warm-Up Question: ?
Presentation transcript:

California vs. Bakke Anessa,Tierra and Keanna

Facts Covered under the 14 th amendment Bakke, a white medical school applicant,was turned and his spot given to a minority student with less qualification Cause upheld affirmative action but made reserve discrimination

Question & Answer Did the university of California violate the 14 th amendment’s equal protection clause, and the civil rights act of 1964, by practicing an affirmative action policy that resulted in the repeated rejection of bakke’s application for admission to its medical school …… yes and no

Conclusion They let Bakke join & the other person stay because they felt that they still needed affirmative action and also reversed the discrimination.