Nikolas Jameson. The No Child Left Behind Act Is the biggest educational law passed in the history of American law Passed in 2001 by President George.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Journey – Improving Writing Through Formative Assessment Presented By: Sarah McManus, Section Chief, Testing Policy & Operations Phyllis Blue, Middle.
Advertisements

No Child Left Behind Adequate Yearly Progress Report July 22, 2009.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA September 2003.
Title I & Title III Annual Parent Meeting
School Accountability Ratings What Are Our District’s Accountability Ratings? What do they mean?
NCLB Margaret Werts, Ph.D. Appalachian State University.
Knowledge is Power Pitt County Schools Title I Workshop.
Education Reform Katherine Pang Ava Tompkins Ali Searle “An act to close the achievement gap with accountability, flexibility, and choice so that no child.
George W. Bush Provides public school choice and services for students in failing schools as early as the fall of Integrate scientifically based.
SAISD Board Report Office of Research and Evaluation
Kaitlin White Mark Sanders Megan Davenport Nicole Faulkner.
Catherine Cross Maple, Ph.D. Deputy Secretary Learning and Accountability
South Dakota Project Integrate Penguins Ignite 2010.
ESEA NCLB  Stronger accountability  More freedom for states and communities  Use of proven research-based methods  More choices.
Michigan’s Accountability Scorecards A Brief Introduction.
Torrance Unified School District Annual Student Achievement Dr. George W. Mannon, Superintendent Dr. E Don Kim, Senior Director of Elementary Education.
What is Title I? Prepared by the Fairfax County Public Schools Title I office and Lorton Station ES.
Timmerman Public Hearing September 16, :00-7:00.
Florida’s Implementation of NCLB John L. Winn Deputy Commissioner Florida Department of Education.
What is Title I ?  It is federal funding that is attached to NCLB/ESEA legislation  It is intended to help students who are falling behind.
Presentation on The Elementary and Secondary Education Act “No Child Left Behind” Nicholas C. Donohue, Commissioner of Education New Hampshire Department.
Title I Parent Information Session Applegate School Laura Donovan School.
Agenda (5:00-6:30 PM): Introduction to Staff Title I Presentation PTA Information Classroom visits (two 30 minute rotations)
1 Watertown Public Schools Assessment Reports 2010 Ann Koufman-Frederick and Administrative Council School Committee Meetings Oct, Nov, Dec, 2010 Part.
Department of Research and Planning November 14, 2011.
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
Timmerman Public Hearing September 16, :00-4:00.
Michigan Educational Assessment Program MEAP. Fall Purpose The Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) is Michigan’s general assessment.
Jackson Elementary School Title I Information
1 No Child Left Behind for Indian Groups 2004 Eva M. Kubinski Comprehensive Center – Region VI January 29, 2004 Home/School Coordinators’ Conference UW-Stout.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez September 10, 2007.
No Child Left Behind Education Week
N O C HILD L EFT B EHIND Jill Daignault ED 613 Unit III Assignment.
Drewry Mason Elementary Annual Title I Meeting 12:00-1:00, 3:00-4:00, 6:00-7:00 August 8, 2013.
State Assessment Parent Presentation. 05/14/03 Why is this in place? Federal legislation passed in 2001  No Child Left Behind Reauthorization of the.
Drewry Mason Elementary Annual Title I Meeting 12:00-1:00, 3:00-4:00, 6:00-7:00 August 9, 2012.
NCLB / Education YES! What’s New for Students With Disabilities? Michigan Department of Education.
Welcome to Abbett Elementary! Curriculum Night 2015.
Parents as Partners: How Parents and Schools Work Together to Close the Achievement Gap.
The Pros and Cons of Standardized Tests
Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System (MCAS) /22/2010.
No Child Left Behind Application 1 Title I, Part A Part 1.
On the horizon: State Accountability Systems U.S. Department of Education Office of Elementary and Secondary Education October 2002 Archived Information.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez January 2010.
University of Colorado at Boulder National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing Challenges for States and Schools in the No.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez September 1, 2008.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA May 2003 Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez for Riverside Feeder Data Days February.
No Child Left Behind (Because where would we put them all?) (Because where would we put them all?)
Aim: Does the US need to reform the educational system? Do Now: Make a list of the best aspects of the education you receive and make a list of the worst.
A GUIDE FOR CANTON PUBLIC SCHOOL DISTRICT’S PARENTS AND STAKEHOLDERS The Mississippi Literacy-Based Promotion Act
Breakout Discussion: Every Student Succeeds Act - Scott Norton Council of Chief State School Officers.
Standardized Testing By Tyler Ono English 100. Why is our society focused on standardized testing when it is biased and not helpful? Standardized tests.
THE NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND ACT (NCLB) & THE EVERY STUDENT SUCCEEDS ACT (ESSA) Transitioning from NCLB to ESSA: How School Counselors Can Help ROWLEY, 2016.
Beresford School District Report Card Data 16-17
Accountability in California Before and After NCLB
A Brief History Data-Based School & District Improvement
Welcome to our SCHOOL’S Parents Are Connected (PAC) Meeting
76% African American 14% Latino 9% Asian 1% White 51% Low-Income
Accountability System
Release of PARCC Student Results
UNION PARISH PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT COMMITTEE
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)
or How to get the school to send you to the movies
Analysis of No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB)
Tyler Nicole and Seth Hallett Ivy Tech Community College Dr. Coleman
Analysis and Reporting, Accountability Services
Title 1 Annual Parent Meeting
History of No Child Left Behind (NCLB)
UNION PARISH PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT COMMITTEE
Presentation transcript:

Nikolas Jameson

The No Child Left Behind Act Is the biggest educational law passed in the history of American law Passed in 2001 by President George W. Bush It aims to improve primary and secondary education

Goals and Main Points All students achievement must progress each year until 2014 By 2014 all students must be 100% proficient in math and reading To achieve this goal, the Act requires that states institute a statewide accountability system to test students This system uses standardized tests to test students on difficult math and reading standards

Goals and Main Points (cont.) After taking the tests students are split into three categories Elementary- grades 3-5 Middle School- grades 6-9 High School- grades Students and schools who are not meeting their categories requirements are subject to improvement courses The Act aims to increase schools’ accountability and intends to give more choices to parents

The Act Undermines teachers and Students in Public Schools Under the Act, teachers only teach to the standardized tests Students only memorize useless facts and test-taking skills, while they should be developing real learning skills

Who is hurt the most by the Act? Minorities, Economically disadvantaged, and English language learners They are then put in remedial classes in which they continue to fall farther behind their peers

Who is unfairly favored? White middle to upper class individuals Standardized testing favors white individuals They are put in advanced or gifted classes when they might not meet the requirements

Teachers Are Forced to Teach to the Test They lose their right to actually teach Teachers are quitting and/or not entering the teaching field due to the Act

How Well is the Act Working? Only two states are currently on target to meet the act’s goals It is nearly impossible to make one-hundred percent of our nation’s students proficient The federal government is not providing states with enough money to fund the No Child Left Behind Act Proficiency changes from state-to-state which means children are measured differently based on their state of residence

Standardized test are the Sole Benchmark of Students One test cannot be the basis for educational decisions Raising test scores is becoming the most important indicator of a school’s improvement

Standardized Tests are Unfair to Students and Teachers They give teachers false information about their students Multiple choice tests are not a fair way to assess students

USA is the Only Nation That Solely Uses Standardized Tests to Evaluate Students Other nations are catching up the United States academically

Works Cited Arce, Josephine; Luna, Debra; Borjian, Ali; Conrad, Marguerite. "No Child Left Behind: Who Wins? Who Loses?." Social Justice eLibrary. Proquest CSA. GETTYSBURG AREA HIGH SCHOOL. 30 Sep "Archived Summary of the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001." ED.gov. 10 Feb Departement of Education. 18 Oct Blanchard, Mark A.. Personal interview. Oct Caillier, James Gerard. "The No Child Left Behind Act: Are States On Target To Make Their Goals?." Journal of Negro Education eLibrary. Proquest CSA. GETTYSBURG AREA HIGH SCHOOL. 29 Sep "How Standardized Testing Damages Education." Fairtest. 20 Aug Fairtest- The National Center for Fair and Open Testing. 29 Sep "Whats Wrong With Standardized Tests?." Fairtest. 17 Dec Fairtest- The National Center for Fair and Open Testing. 30 Sep