1 Daya Bay Project Design Review Status Ralph L. Brown US Chief Engineer January 9, 2008.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
GLAST LAT ProjectLAT Engineering Meeting, April 1, 2003 GLAST Large Area Telescope: Performance & Safety Assurance Darren S. Marsh Stanford Linear Accelerator.
Advertisements

Daya Bay Muon Subsystem Review, 7/28-29/2007, IHEP, Beijing RPC Assembly Changguo Lu, Kirk McDonald, Bill Sands Princeton University (July 28, 2007)
©2011 Pacific Gas and Electric Company. All rights reserved. SmartMeter TM Steering Committee Update – April/May 2012.
Social Inclusion by Proactive Design InclusiveByDesign Second project meeting June 2001 Florence, Italy.
©2011 Pacific Gas and Electric Company. All rights reserved. SmartMeter TM Steering Committee Update – February 2012.
Michael P. Andrews NuMI Shutdown & Facility Coordinator LBNE Project ESH Manager AD ESH Special Projects Coordinator.
LSST Camera Performance and Safety Assurance Plan and Safety Overview Joe Kenny Camera Safety Manager LSST Safety Council Review 18 August 2015.
DOE Site Visit: Daya Bay7/18/20111 Daya Bay Steve Kettell BNL 1)Status 2)BNL roles.
1/18/2005Module 41 How the NCSX Project Does Business Work Planning & Design Review Processes.
From Research Prototype to Production
Executive Session Director’s CD-3b Review of the MicroBooNE Project January 18, 2012 Dean Hoffer.
Montgomery County, Maryland DTS CMMI Approach & Implementation Mike Knuppel 03/20/2006.
October 4-5, Status of ARRA funded AIPs Electron Lens Scope, Cost, and Schedule Wolfram Fischer October 4, 2010 Electron Lens.
1 Second Safety Council Meeting Tucson, AZ April 10-11, 2014 Name of Meeting Location Date - Change in Slide Master Safety in the Procurement Process Bill.
NCSX NCSX Design Review Guide May 27, 2005 Wayne Reiersen NCSX.
12/2/04Module 2D1 The NCSX Engineering Web – An Overview Part IV Engineering Management & Systems Engineering and Other.
G. Carboni – Muon Meeting – April 2002 Muon Meeting LHC schedule is now official (Council Committee) First protons (Pilot run) delayed to
PHENO 2010 Christopher White, IIT 1 The Daya Bay Reactor Antineutrino Experiment Christopher White 1.
Philip Burrows SiD meeting, Chicago 15/11/081 Progress on the LoI Philip Burrows John Adams Institute Oxford University Thanks to: Hiro Aihara, Mark Oreglia.
,,,,, The Daya Bay Reactor Neutrino Experiment Liangjian Wen On behalf of the Daya Bay Collaboration Institute of High Energy Physics Daya Bay Detectors.
1 US Cost & Schedule Summary W. R. Edwards US Project Manager CD-2/3a Review January 8, 2008 BNL.
TOF Preliminary Design and Safety Review Project Management Controls R. L. Brown.
1 Enzo Carrone 1 NEH Safety Systems NEH ARR 2009 NEH Safety Systems Enzo Carrone June 30 th, 2009.
GNSO/Council Restructure Enhance & Support SGs/Constituencies Improve Communications & Coordination Revise the Policy Development Process Adopt a WG Model.
©2011 Pacific Gas and Electric Company. All rights reserved. SmartMeter TM Steering Committee Update – December 2012.
September 10, FY 2003 Plans Bob Simmons. September 10, Introduction Overview of Project and Engineering Plans Project Plans Engineering Plans.
David M. Lee Forward Vertex Detector Cost, Schedule, and Management Plan Participating Institutions Organizational plan Cost Basis R&D Costs.
©2011 Pacific Gas and Electric Company. All rights reserved. SmartMeter TM Steering Committee Update – March 2012.
NCSX 21 March 2003 Reiersen - 1 PDR Preparations Wayne Reiersen NCSX Engineering Meeting 21 March 2003.
Linda Bagby - SBN Program Electrical Coordinator ICARUS Electronics Meeting 27 January 2016 SBN Program Operational Readiness Clearance.
GLAST LAT ProjectI&T&C Pre PDR Presentation– Oct 2, 2001 Darren Marsh1 I&T&C Organization Chart I&T&C Manager Elliott Bloom WBS I&T Engineer B. Grist.
BSBPMG501A Manage Project Integrative Processes Manage Project Integrative Processes Project Integration Processes – Part 2 Diploma of Project Management.
MQXF Workshop on Structure, Alignment, and Electrical QA – Feb 2-4, 2016 Requirements and feedback form LARP structure review Ruben Carcagno February 2,
GLAST LAT ProjectPeer Review & CDR Preparation Document: LAT-PR Preparation Schedule Subsystems Peer Reviews –ACD January 7-8, 2003 –CALMarch.
Collaborating for Quality Quality Assurance (QA) & Quality Control (QC) in the Accelerator Project (ACCSYS) Matthew Conlon ACCSYS QA/QC
Engineering Documentation
©2011 Pacific Gas and Electric Company. All rights reserved. SmartMeter TM Steering Committee Update – April 2013.
WP6 – Monitoring and Evaluation 17th November 2014 Rome.
GNSO Council Restructure Enhance & Support SGs/Constituencies Improve Communications & Coordination Revise the Policy Development Process Adopt a WG Model.
Collaborating for Quality through the Project Quality Plan Matthew Conlon ESS ACCSYS QA/QC Quality Learning & Planning.
Director’s Progress Review Closeout Meeting
Camera PDR/CD1 Planning 19 September 2008
2K CB FDR Overview:  Agenda, Charge, Review Process
LCLS Linac Technical Design Review Charge
Director’s Progress Review Closeout Meeting


2K Cold Box Cost, Schedule & FDR Summary
HMI Reliability Dale Wolfe Reliability Engineer LMSSC*ATC*LMSAL
This Presentation Pack is brought to you by
Wireless Local Number Portability Timeline - Phase 2
SmartMeterTM Steering Committee Update – February 2013
Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3
Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3
Ctclink executive leadership committee May 31, 2018
Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3
Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3
PSS verification and validation
1.
Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3
Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3
Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3
Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3
Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3
Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3
DOE Review of the LCLS Project October 2006
Rev. 2 Wireless Local Number Portability and Pooling Phase 2 Implementation Guideline INDUSTRY 2002 SERVICE PROVIDER JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP.
Wireless Local Number Portability Timeline - Phase 2
Proposed core price & service spec L1 product milestone 31 Dec 2019
Rev. 2 Wireless Local Number Portability and Pooling Phase 2 Implementation Guideline INDUSTRY 2002 SERVICE PROVIDER JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP.
Presentation transcript:

1 Daya Bay Project Design Review Status Ralph L. Brown US Chief Engineer January 9, 2008

2 Design review requirements for the Daya Bay Project are detailed in section (Design Reviews) of the TDR; Quality Assurance. All experimental components/equipment whether engineered or procured as turn-key systems require an engineering design review before procurement, fabrication, assembly or installation can proceed. For the Daya Bay project there will be a minimum of two engineering design reviews; Preliminary (PDR) and Final (FDR). –PDR takes place towards the end of the conceptual design phase when the subsystem has exhausted alternative designs and has made a selection based on value engineering. –FDR takes place before engineering drawings or specifications are released for procurement or fabrication. –Committee prepares a design review report which should include recommendations and action items to be addressed. Design Review Requirements

3 We have accomplished the following reviews to date: –PMT FEE PDR; Mar/07 –Trigger PDR; Jun/07 –Muon PDR; Jul/07 –AD PDR; Jul/07 –RPC FEC PDR; Jul/07 Design Reviews To Date

4 Accomplished to date: –AD SSV FDR; Oct/07 –RPC base-unit FDR, module & structure PDR; Oct/07 –LS Filling & Hall-5 PDR; Oct/07 –Muon water sys, pmt structure, pool liner PDR & support anchors FDR; Dec/07 –AD AV & SSV Lid FDR; Dec/07 –Electronics PDR; Dec/07 –PMT systems FDR; Dec/07 Design Reviews To Date (cont.)

5 Reviews planned for IHEP: –PMT Test Systems FDR. –Muon Pool Liner, water filtration and PMT support structure FDR. –RPC Mechanical Systems FDR –LS Hall and Gd Solids Production FDR. –AD Dry-Box, PMT Ladder FDR, Manual Calibration PDR. Design Reviews Remaining

6 Remaining reviews: –Surface Assembly Building (SAB) FDR; Feb/08 by video –RPC Gas System FDR; Feb/08 by video –Automatic Calibration FDR; Mar/08 by video –Installation and Test Plan PDR; Mar/08 by video –Transporter Vendor Design FDR; Apr/08 by video –PMT FEE FDR; Apr/08 by video –Installation & Test Plan FDR; Dong Guan –RPC Electronics FDR; Dong Guan –Slow Controls FDR; Dong Guan –DAQ & Trigger FDR; Dong Guan –Manual Calibration FDR; Dong Guan Design Reviews Remaining

7 The Daya Bay Project QA policy is defined in section 14 of the TDR based on LBNL/PUB-3111-Rev. 8 and BNL- QA-101. Defines a Quality Management Plan: –Minimize impact on ES&H. –Standardize processes. –Deliverables that meet specification. Use a graded approach based on activities potential to: –Create an ES&H hazard. –Incur a monetary loss. –Reduce availability. –Degrade data quality. –Unfavorable impact to stakeholders. Quality Assurance Policy

8 In addition the plan incorporates: –Design Codes and Standards Mechanical Standards Guidelines and Reviews (docdb # 877). QA Requirements for Electronics Design (docdb# 1713). –Drawing Exchange and Archiving Engineering document database. –Design Reviews Promote value engineering. Meet design standards and safety policies. Assure component Integration into overall installation and operation. –Test Plans; subsystem provides QA test plan for: Acceptance at vendor. Acceptance of deliverable. Acceptance during assembly. Acceptance for operations. Quality Assurance Policy (cont.)

9 We have developed a system of design reviews. We customize our charge and committee for each review. We bring in outside experts frequently when needed. We’ve targeted many reviews towards CD-3a items. Committees have provided lots of feedback and recommendations in the form of action items. Action items are tracked and responses approved prior to fabrication or procurement. Chief Engineers and L2’s sign off on drawings and specs. We have a QA plan that provides value to the project. Summary