Induced Course Load Matrices An analysis of changes in course credit hour production by student source Brought to you by the fine folks of: The Office.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Understanding Your General Education Program Transfer Credit Evaluation James Madison University.
Advertisements

A Guide to Analyzing PrOF Instructional Data Packets CRC Research Office 2009.
ETSU Fall 2014 Enrollment Projections
June Role of Transfer in the Bachelor’s Degree at Public Baccalaureate Institutions Joint 2-Year - 4 -Year Study – Class of For More Information.
Highlights: First-Time Student Enrollment Board of Higher Education Meeting | October 6, 2009.
Update to the Strategic Enrollment and Retention Task Force April 29, 2010 Retention Subcommittee.
Successful Transitions : A Seminar Course for New Transfer Students Virginia Donnell Middle Tennessee State University Institute for the Study of Transfer.
Results of the Faculty Survey on Internationalization at Villanova: A Preliminary Report Prepared for the International Leadership Committee Prepared by.
Scorecard: How to Improve your CDCP Outcomes Rate Association for Community and Continuing Education 2014 Annual Conference Beverly Heasley Mt. San Antonio.
Instructional Measures: Data and Projections Maury Pearl Assoc. Dean, Institutional Research & Planning Los Angeles Mission College Overview of Data System.
Mission College and our Community Muslim Community Association May 2012.
Chabot College Students Fall 2007 Demographic, Educational & Psychographic Characteristics Dr. Carolyn Arnold Chabot College Institutional Research Office.
Summary of SILS Grading Practices April 28, 2010.
School dropouts: A framework for public policy analysis Joshua Hawley, The Ohio State University.
1 Budget Model Update #2 Resources Implementation Team.
T HE R ESEARCH U NIVERSITY A DVANTAGE Exploring the Pillars of Undergraduate Engagement: The Disciplines, Research, Civic Engagement, and Co-Curricular.
Adaptive Learning at Thomas Cavanagh, Ph.D. Associate Vice President, Distributed Learning.
From Recruitment to Retention: Focusing Campus Efforts to Promote Transfer Student Success National Institute for the Study of Transfer Students January.
BASIC STATISTICS WE MOST OFTEN USE Student Affairs Assessment Council Portland State University June 2012.
Engineering Education Pursuing an Engineering Doctorate: Exploring the Role of the Combined BS/MS Program Erin Crede Maura Borrego Department of Engineering.
CCSSE Houston Community College System Presented by Margaret Drain June 19, 2007.
MUS-DLI Data Link: What can it offer the STEM effort.
BCSSE 2013 Institutional Report Concordia University Chicago BCSSE 2013 Institutional Report Concordia University Chicago Elizabeth Owolabi, Ph.D. Director.
Equity Scorecard Update A presentation to the Madison College Board of Trustees February 09, 2011.
Dual Credit Get a head start your college career.
Comparing the bachelor’s completion rates of native and transfer students using multiple informational sources Eric Lichtenberger National Institute for.
Revisiting Retention: A Four Phase Retention Research Initiative 2012 SLOAN Conference October 10 th, 2012 Gary J. Burkholder, PhD Senior Research Scholar.
A Comprehensive Analysis of a PrOF Instructional Data Packet To illustrate the data analysis process CRC Research Office 2009.
1 Results for Students and Individuals with Disabilities September 2008.
ARCC Accountability Report for the Community Colleges Focus on Quality.
Serving Adult Students at a Distance New Ideas, New Approaches Brazil’s 16 th International Distance Learning Congress 31 August to 3 September 2010 Iguazu.
A project of the President’s Emerging Leaders Program in collaboration with the Administrative Services Task Force.
Faculty Council Presentation Monday, January 26, 2004.
Diana B. Carlin University of Kansas Chair, NAFSA Task Force on the Bologna Process,
TEMPLATE DESIGN © Challenges using IPEDS for examining the Early Childhood teacher preparation pipeline Abstract The purpose.
Tennessee Higher Education Commission Articulation and Transfer Report 2011 Tennessee Higher Education Commission Fall Quarterly Meeting November 10, 2011.
College Credit Transfer & Collaboration at York University Presentation to Student Pathways in Higher Education Conference – January 27, 2012 Glenn Craney.
1 System Level Accountability Measures Sept. 17, 2003.
SB1440 Implementation Duane Short San Diego Miramar College.
Low-income Adults in Profile: Low-income Adults in Profile: Improving Lives Through Higher Education Bryan Cook ACE Center for Policy Analysis.
Integrating EMGT into the General Education Curriculum: Jessica Jensen, Assistant Professor and Daniel J. Klenow, Professor and Head from North Dakota.
The Minnesota State Colleges and Universities System is an Equal Opportunity employer and educator. System Level Accountability Measures October 18, 2004.
Historical Overview of Strategic University Indicators Presentation to the University Faculty Senate March 2008.
AN INTRODUCTION FOR STUDENTS AND FAMILIES ROSSFORD HIGH SCHOOL COLLEGE CREDIT PLUS.
Fall 2010 Program Quality Improvement Report Cameron University Adult and Continuing Education Associate of Science IDS CIP Code: Program.
CCSSE 2012 Findings for Southern Crescent Technical College.
HELEN ROSENBERG UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-PARKSIDE SUSAN REED DEPAUL UNIVERSITY ANNE STATHAM UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN INDIANA HOWARD ROSING DEPAUL UNIVERSITY.
Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board Major Policy Discussion Achieving the Goals of 60x30TX: College Readiness and Dual Credit April 28, 2016 College.
Undergraduate Student Persistence & Graduation advisor UI/WSU Advising Symposium September 9, 2011 Joel Michalski, Ph.D. Candidate & Karla Makus, Academic.
Template provided by: “posters4research.com” Academic Performance and Persistence of Undergraduate Students at a Land-Grant Institution: A Statistical.
Crossroads Assessment: Spring 2013 JON GORGOSZ GRADUATE INTERN MASTODON ADVISING CENTER IPFW.
Course Substitutions & Course Waivers Proposed New Policy AGC 1 st Presentation September 08, 2015 Patti Trepkowski and Diane Patrick.
UC Transfer Pathways & C-ID Participation
A Statistical Analysis Utilizing Detailed Institutional Data
First-Year Experience Seminars: A Benchmark Study of Targeted Courses for Developmental Education Students.
Data Highlight: Student Debt
Shoumi Mustafa November 20, 2017
Pathways – an analytical structure & Transfer student graduation rates
Shoumi Mustafa November 20, 2017
Shoumi Mustafa October 16, 2017
Annual Report on Faculty to MCEF
2016 MI AIR Conference Holland Michigan Presenters:
AACRAO Transfer Conference July, 2013 Afet Dundar, PhD
UH Curriculum Benchmarks
SPRING ENTRY OPEN HOUSE.
Prior Educational Experiences Review
NCAA Division I Introduction to Progress Toward Degree
Driving Through the California Dashboard
USG Dual Enrollment Data and Trends
Predicting Student Enrollment Using Markov Chain Modeling in SAS
Presentation transcript:

Induced Course Load Matrices An analysis of changes in course credit hour production by student source Brought to you by the fine folks of: The Office of Information Management and Institutional Research Enrollment Management Council June 17, 2005

Overview  Self-administered quiz  Introduction to the ICLM  Finding the answers to the quiz  Focused Analyses  Sources of students  Trade balance: Credits taken v. credits taught  Appendices  Details on who is taking your courses  Details on what courses students are taking  for schools with multiple course disciplines  The role of the ICLM in enrollment planning and other uses  Discussion

The ICLM  Rows represent School course offerings  Columns represent enrolled students  Major School affiliation  Four versions provided  1. Number of credits  Row percentages (who is taking the courses)    4. Changes from to  Total (undergraduate and graduate combined)  Undergraduate and graduate separately

What to Look for in the ICLM  Percentage of your courses taken by your students (diagonal)  Major “feeders” of students, e.g., UC, Grad  Other Schools where your students take courses  Largest changes over last five years  Similar schools/similar patterns?

Special Analysis 1  Who is taking your courses?  Three major categories  “Own” students  Other Schools’ Students  UC (undergraduate) Grad School (graduate)  UC further delineated by Your “intended” majors Other School’s “intended” majors Undeclared/exploratory

Special Analysis 1 (cont.)  Distribution across source categories  , , change  Campus percentage benchmarks  Excludes Columbus, Grad, Cont. Studies, UC

What to Look For in SA1  How do your percentages compare to…  Campus benchmarks?  Other Schools you think are similar?  Dependence on University College  Role of “pre-own” majors  Changes over last five years

SA2: Trade Balance 1.How many credits do your students generate compared to how many credits are generated in your courses? 2.How many credits do your students generate in other Schools’ courses compared to how many credits other Schools’ students generate in your courses 3.Differences in undergraduate and graduate patterns 4.Changes over last five years

Appendices  Further detail on who is taking School courses  Source by Major Department within School  Available for all schools  Varying complexity  Further detail on what courses students are taking  Within school credits disaggregated by disciplines  Available only for schools that have multiple disciplines

ICLMs and Enrollment Planning  Model cost impacts of enrollment changes  Rather than School as source (or in addition to), use  Student entry status (new beginner, transfer, intercampus transfer, or returning)  Geographic origins (Marion, Surrounding Counties, Rest of State, Out-of-State, International)  Gender, race/ethnicity, age, etc.

ICLMs and Enrollment Planning  Part of the “big picture” forecasting model  Forecast how many new students will come and how many existing students will return by “category”  Use ICLM patterns from prior year by category to forecast where those students will generate credits  Adjust for known changes in curriculum or offerings  Explore inter-relationships to identify potential collaborations