1 UWho and CRISP: Status Update for the Whois Task Force Andew Newton Mark Kosters VeriSign Labs August 20, 2002.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Mar Uwho Requirements Gathering Andrew Newton Mark Kosters Leslie Daigle VeriSign Labs APNIC 13, March 2002.
Advertisements

RPSLng, CRISP / Whois update Database SIG APNIC19 24 February 2005, Kyoto, Japan.
Technical update on ISO 9001:2015 Colin MacNee Duncan MacNee Limited
1 The Impact of IPv6 on Society ~ a Government Perspective ~ Kaori ITO Ministry of Public Management, Home Affairs, Posts and Telecommunications ( MPHPT)
1 ARIN: Mission, Role and Services John Curran ARIN President and CEO.
CcTLD IDN TF Report ccTLD Meeting, Rio de Janero Mar. 25, 2003 Young-Eum Chair, ccTLD IDN TF.
Mirjam Kühne 1 ETO, Oct The Internet Registry System presented by Mirjam Kühne.
Competition for the Management of NCAR Unidata Policy Committee September 7, 2006.
ACSP Report – Review of Open Suggestions Nate Davis.
IANA Governance Changes – NANOG 62 Lightning Talk John Curran, ARIN.
ICANN COMMUNITY STRATEGIC PLANNING DISCUSSION Brussels, June
1 Dr. Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond ISOC England Chapter Chairman ALAC Chairman at ICANN Presentation at 5th Ukraine Internet Governance Forum.
1 ICANN & Global Partnerships Baher Esmat Manager, Regional Relations Middle East ccTLD Training, Amman Nov, 2007.
NRO update LACNIC23, May 2015 Lima Peru To be the flagship and global leader for collaborative Internet number resource management as a central element.
FIPS Status and Schedules Allen Roginsky CMVP NIST September 28, 2005.
1 APNIC allocation and policy update JPNIC OPM July 17, Tokyo, Japan Guangliang Pan.
Regional Internet Registries Statistics & Activities IETF 55 Atlanta Prepared By APNIC, ARIN, LACNIC, RIPE NCC.
1 San Diego, California 25 February ARIN’s Policy Development Process Current Number Resource Policy Discussions and How to Participate Owen DeLong.
APNIC Annual Members’ Meeting Singapore, 6 March 1999 APNIC - Annual Report.
Mirjam Kühne 1 EC, Oct Policy Development in RIPE & the RIPE NCC Mirjam Kühne RIPE NCC.
WHOIS Next Steps Bruce Tonkin Acting Chair GNSO WHOIS Steering Committee.
June 6, CRISP Overview and Update Andrew Newton VeriSign Labs
IANA Stewardship Transition Process Session Update Izumi Okutani Chair, The CRISP Team.
NCRG Network Complexity Research Group Chairs: Michael Behringer, David Meyer 4 Mar 2014, London
NCIP Nanomaterial Data Curation Initiative Update & path forward Christine Ogilvie Hendren 5/29/2014.
Deployment of IDN In Korea Aug. 23, 2003 Korea Network Information Center.
APNIC Update Philip Smith Director of Learning & Development, APNIC ARIN st to 24 th April 2013.
NRO update RIPE 71, November 2015 Bucharest, Romania To be the flagship and global leader for collaborative Internet number resource management.
Internet Governance Forum Brazil, 2007 Workshop: “ Internet Users' Voices on Internationalized Domain Names ” Andrzej Bartosiewicz, NASK.
Deployment of IDN In Korea March 1, 2004 Korea Network Information Center.
JPNIC Update Izumi Okutani Japan Network Information Center APNIC19, NIR SIG.
North West Region Gas Regional Initiatives Regulatory Co-ordination Workshop 23 rd April 2007.
Tools Report Engineering Node March 2007
Mirjam Kühne. AfNOG Conference, 11 May Operational Co-ordination in the RIPE Region presented by: Mirjam Kühne RIPE NCC.
1 27Apr08 Some thoughts on Internet Governance and expansion of the Domain Name space Paul Twomey President and CEO 9 August 2008 Panel on Internet Governance.
A proposal for ….. Proposer name APNIC 39 Open Policy Meeting Fukuoka, Japan Thursday, 5 March 2015.
Regional Internet Registries Statistics & Activities IETF 57 Wien Prepared By APNIC, ARIN, LACNIC, RIPE NCC.
SIPPING Working Group IETF 67 Mary Barnes Gonzalo Camarillo.
Implementation Of Lame Delegation Policy
Jan 2016 Solar Lunar Data.
Two different issues ref. country codes
Transition Implementation Status Reporting
IEPG Minneapolis, March 1999
Partnership of Governments, Businesses and Civil Society: the ICANN example in coordinating resources and policy making Dr. Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond
Q1 Jan Feb Mar ENTER TEXT HERE Notes
Average Monthly Temperature and Rainfall
Broward County Consolidated Communication Committee Update
Update on New NSDS Guidelines

ctclink Steering Committee
Gantt Chart Enter Year Here Activities Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug
Expedited Policy Development Process on the Temporary Specification for gTLD Registration Data Name of Presenter Event Name DD Month 2018.
The Current State of RDAP
Sanjaya, Project Manager, APNIC Secretariat
Exit Capacity Substitution and Revision

PARCA Timeline.
Two different issues ref. country codes
SC SC SC WS SC S HIS Background document Seminar document
Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3
Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3
Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3
Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3
Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3
Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3
Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3
Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3
Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3
Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3
Status Report on Policy Implementation at the APNIC Secretariat
Presentation transcript:

1 UWho and CRISP: Status Update for the Whois Task Force Andew Newton Mark Kosters VeriSign Labs August 20, 2002

2 UWhat?  Universal Whois –UWho is the name of the work VeriSign has committed to in agreement with ICANN (Appendix W.) –  Formal public consultations –business, intellectual property holders (Aug/01) –civil liberties, other ngo’s (Nov/01) –international input (Nov/01)  Informal public consultations/presentations –RIPE 40 (Oct/01) –NANOG 23 (Oct/01) –RIPE 41 (Jan/02) –NANOG 24 (Feb/02) –CENTR (Feb/02) –APRICOT 2002 (Mar/02) –APNIC 13 (Mar/02) –ARIN IX (Apr/02)

3 CRISP?  Cross Registry Information Service Protocol  IETF Applications Area Working Group –First meeting held at IETF 54, Yokohama, Japan, in July, –  What is VeriSign’s role here? –Appendix W. requires Universal Whois to be an open starndard. –VeriSign is contributing UWho work to the IETF as a starting point. –The IETF process is open and anybody can participate.

4 CRISP Goals  A better whois.  Not a science project.  “Universal” means distributed, not centralized.  Support policy decisions, not define them.  To be unencumbered by the shackles of port 43.

5 The Requirements Process  The process to refine the requirements: 1.Identify the community of users 2.Decide on scope 3.List needs 4.Determine features  The requirements are still being derived and participation is welcome.  draft-ietf-crisp-requirements-00.txt

6 The Benefits of Unity  While the data contained in the different registries isn’t the same, they all have common base requirements. –Data mining prevention –Need for machine consumable data –Access control –Etc…  One standard, not 3 or 4 or 5.  A common understanding.

7 The Benefits of An Open Standard  Provides a known direction for implementers.  Allows input from end-users.  Helps with the development of common code bases.  Encourages ideas not yet imagined.

8 The State of CRISP  CRISP is in the early stages.  Requirements draft in-progress. –draft-ietf-crisp-requirements-00.txt  Two protocol solutions submitted. –LDAP-Whois –IRIS (XML-based)  Early participation would be nice.

9 Conclusion  Your comments, opinions, and ideas are welcome. –CRISP web page: charter.htmlhttp:// charter.html –CRISP mailing list: –To subscribe: