Evolutionary Characteristics of Magnetic Helicity Injection in Active Regions Hyewon Jeong and Jongchul Chae Seoul National University, Korea 2. Data and.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 A New Model of Solar Flare Trigger Mechanism Kanya Kusano (Hiroshima University) Collaboration with T.Maeshiro (Hiroshima Univ.) T.Yokoyama (Univ. of.
Advertisements

Estimating the magnetic energy in solar magnetic configurations Stéphane Régnier Reconnection seminar on Thursday 15 December 2005.
Nonlinearity of the force-free parameter over active regions. M.Hagino and T.Sakurai National Astronomical Observatory of Japan, Solar Observatory.
Energy and Helicity Budget of Four Solar Flares and Associated Magnetic Clouds. Maria D. Kazachenko, Richard C. Canfield, Dana Longcope, Jiong Qiu Montana.
Study of Magnetic Helicity Injection in the Active Region NOAA Associated with the X-class Flare of 2011 February 15 Sung-Hong Park 1, K. Cho 1,
1. Helicity: basic properties, open geometries 2. Observations of helicity and helicity flux 3. Twist and Writhe Mitchell Berger Review of Magnetic Helicity.
Active Region Evolution and the Removal of Magnetic Helicity by CMEs Len Culhane Mullard Space Science Laboratory University College London.
The Relation between Filament Skew Angle and Magnetic Helicity of Active Regions Masaoki HAGINO, Y.J. MOON (Korea Astronomy and Space Science Institute)
Using Feature Tracking to Quantify Flux Cancellation Rates Evidence suggests that flux cancellation might play a central role in both formation and eruption.
Energy and Helicity in Emerging Active Regions Yang Liu, Peter Schuck, and HMI vector field data team.
Inductive Flow Estimation for HMI Brian Welsch, Dave Bercik, and George Fisher, SSL UC-Berkeley.
Abstract Individual AR example: 8910 The only selection criterion imposed in this study is that the AR must be within 30 degrees of disk center to minimize.
Can We Determine Electric Fields and Poynting Fluxes from Vector Magnetograms and Doppler Shifts? by George Fisher, Brian Welsch, and Bill Abbett Space.
Ryan Payne Advisor: Dana Longcope. Solar Flares General  Solar flares are violent releases of matter and energy within active regions on the Sun.  Flares.
Using Photospheric Flows Estimated from Vector Magnetogram Sequences to Drive MHD Simulations B.T. Welsch, G.H. Fisher, W.P. Abbett, D.J. Bercik, Space.
Magnetic fields in the photosphere and heliosphere: structure, statistical parameters, turbulent state Valentyna I. Abramenko Big Bear Solar Observatory.
SHINE The Role of Sub-Surface Processes in the Formation of Coronal Magnetic Flux Ropes A. A. van Ballegooijen Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory.
HMI – Synoptic Data Sets HMI Team Meeting Jan. 26, 2005 Stanford, CA.
MSU Team: R. C. Canfield, D. W. Longcope, P. C. H. Martens, S. Régnier Evolution on the photosphere: magnetic and velocity fields 3D coronal magnetic fields.
Free Energies via Velocity Estimates B.T. Welsch & G.H. Fisher, Space Sciences Lab, UC Berkeley.
Magnetic Helicity • Magnetic helicity measures
Discussion Summary: Group B –Solar Active Regions And Their Production of Flares and Coronal Mass Ejections Discussion Leaders: George Fisher Hugh Hudson.
Dec. 2, 2008 Bangalore, India Active region emergence and its effect on the solar corona Dana Longcope Montana State University, Bozeman, MT Isaac Klapper.
POSTER TEMPLATE BY: Solar Flare and CME Prediction From Characteristics of 1075 Solar Cycle 23 Active Regions Determined Using.
Measuring, Understanding, and Using Flows and Electric Fields in the Solar Atmosphere to Improve Space Weather Prediction George H. Fisher Space Sciences.
Dr. Alexei A. Pevtsov Helicity on the Sun. If you worry about publicity Do not speak of Current Helicity Jan Stenflo.
On the Origin of Strong Gradients in Photospheric Magnetic Fields Brian Welsch and Yan Li Space Sciences Lab, UC-Berkeley, 7 Gauss Way, Berkeley, CA ,
Flows and the Photospheric Magnetic Field Dynamics at Interior – Corona Interface Brian Welsch, George Fisher, Yan Li, & the UCB/SSL MURI & CISM Teams.
February 26, 2007 KIPAC Workshop on Magnetism Modeling/Inferring Coronal And Heliospheric Field From Photospheric Magnetic Field Yang Liu – Stanford University.
Study of magnetic helicity in solar active regions: For a better understanding of solar flares Sung-Hong Park Center for Solar-Terrestrial Research New.
Distinguishing Eruptive from Non-Eruptive Solar Active Regions Manolis K. Georgoulis JHU/APL Johns Hopkins Rd., Laurel, MD Durham, NH, 06/27/06.
Space Weather Forecast With HMI Magnetograms: Proposed data products Yang Liu, J. T. Hoeksema, and HMI Team.
Using Photospheric Flows Estimated from Vector Magnetogram Sequences to Drive MHD Simulations B.T. Welsch, G.H. Fisher, W.P. Abbett, D.J. Bercik, Space.
The nature of impulsive solar energetic particle events N. V. Nitta a, H. S. Hudson b, M. L. Derosa a a Lockheed Martin Solar and Astrophysics Laboratory.
Active Region Flux Transport Observational Techniques, Results, & Implications B. T. Welsch G. H. Fisher
V.I. Abramenko, V.B. Yurchyshyn, H. Wang, T.R. Spirock, P.R. Goode Big Bear Solar Observatory, NJIT Crimean Astrophysical Observatory, Ukraine
B. T. Welsch Space Sciences Lab, Univ. of California, Berkeley, CA J. M. McTiernan Space Sciences.
EUV vs. B-field Comparisons Yingna Su Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory Coauthours: Leon Golub, Aad Van Ballegooijen, Maurice Gros. HMI/AIA Science.
Sung-Hong Park Space Weather Research Laboratory New Jersey Institute of Technology Study of Magnetic Helicity and Its Relationship with Solar Activities:
Summary of UCB MURI workshop on vector magnetograms Have picked 2 observed events for targeted study and modeling: AR8210 (May 1, 1998), and AR8038 (May.
Estimating Free Magnetic Energy from an HMI Magnetogram by Brian T. Welsch Space Sciences Lab, UC-Berkeley Several methods have been proposed to estimate.
The Occurrence and Speed of CMEs Related to Magnetic Helicity Injection in Their Source Regions Sung-Hong Park Solar and Space Weather Research Group Korea.
Comparison on Calculated Helicity Parameters at Different Observing Sites Haiqing Xu (NAOC) Collaborators: Hongqi, Zhang, NAOC Kirill Kuzanyan, IZMIRAN,
Quick changes of photospheric magnetic field during flare-associated surges Leping Li, Huadong Chen, Suli Ma, Yunchun Jiang National Astronomical Observatory/Yunnan.
1 Mei Zhang ( National Astronomical Observatory, Chinese Academy of Sciences ) Helicity Transport from the convection zone to interplanetary space Collaborators:
Coronal Mass Ejection As a Result of Magnetic Helicity Accumulation
Helicity as a Constraint on the Solar Dynamo Alexei A. Pevtsov If you worry about publicity Do not speak of Current Helicity Jan Stenflo.
Helicity Observations by Huairou Vector Magnetograph Mei Zhang National Astronomical Observatory, Chinese Academy of Sciences Plan of the Talk: 1.Huairou.
Practical Calculation of Magnetic Energy and Relative Magnetic Helicity Budgets in Solar Active Regions Manolis K. Georgoulis Research Center for Astronomy.
Conclusions Using the Diffusive Equilibrium Mapping Technique we have connected a starting point of a field line on the photosphere with its final location.
Measurement of the Reconnection Rate in Solar Flares H. Isobe 2004/12/6 Taiyo-Zasshikai.
Long-term Helicity Evolution in AR 8100 A. The relative magnetic helicity content of the coronal field B. The magnetic helicity injected by photospheric.
Is there any relationship between photospheric flows & flares? Coupling between magnetic fields in the solar photosphere and corona implies that flows.
Observation on Current Helicity and Subsurface Kinetic Helicity in Solar Active Regions Gao Yu Helicity Thinkshop Main Collaborators: Zhang, H.
1 Yongliang Song & Mei Zhang (National Astronomical Observatory of China) The effect of non-radial magnetic field on measuring helicity transfer rate.
Helicity-driven sigmoid evolution and its role in CME initiation David Alexander, Rice University SOHO/MDI Magnetograms showing the evolution of a long-lived.
Thought in 2000: Magnetic helicity is an important theoretical concept Pascal Démoulin but there is no way to estimate it from observations.
Magnetic Helicity and Solar Eruptions Alexander Nindos Section of Astrogeophysics Physics Department University of Ioannina Ioannina GR Greece.
What we can learn from active region flux emergence David Alexander Rice University Collaborators: Lirong Tian (Rice) Yuhong Fan (HAO)
2. Method outline2. Method outline Equation of relative helicity (Berger 1985): - : the fourier transform of normal component of magnetic field on the.
Helicity Thinkshop 2009, Beijing Asymmetry of helicity injection in emerging active regions L. Tian, D. Alexander Rice University, USA Y. Liu Yunnan Astronomical.
Thought in 2000: Magnetic helicity is an important theoretical concept Pascal Démoulin but there is no way to estimate it from observations.
CMEs: Taking magnetic helicity from low corona
Studies on Twisted Magnetic Flux Bundles
Magnetic Helicity in Emerging Active Regions: A Statistical Study
Hyewon Jeong, Jongchul Chae Seoul National University
Introduction to Space Weather
Preflare State Rust et al. (1994) 太陽雑誌会.
Big Bear Solar Observatory of NJIT
Magnetic Helicity In Emerging Active Regions: A Statistical Study
Presentation transcript:

Evolutionary Characteristics of Magnetic Helicity Injection in Active Regions Hyewon Jeong and Jongchul Chae Seoul National University, Korea 2. Data and Method 3. Result 4. Conclusion Magnetic helicity in the corona measures the non-potentiality of coronal magnetic field which is essential in the sudden release of magnetic energy such as flares and coronal mass ejections (CMEs). In the present study, we examine the temporal behavior of helicity injection in solar active regions through the photospheric boundary dividing the solar interior and the corona. Active Regions (latitude, degree) Helicity during the early phase [10 42 Mx 2 /5day] Final Total flux [10 22 Mx] Differential rotation contribution [10 42 Mx 2 /5day] AR (+8.16) AR (-7.34) AR (-13.68) AR (-18.66) References Berger, M.A. and Field, G. B., 1984, J. Fluid Mech., 147, 133 Berger, M.A. & Ruzmaikin, A., 2000, J. Geophys. Res., 105, Chae, J., Wang, H. Qiu, J., Goode, P. R., Strous, L.., and Yun, H. S., 2001, ApJ, 560, 476 Chae, J.,Moon, Y.-J., Rust, D. M., Wang,H., and Goode, P. R., 2003, JKAS, 36, 33 Chae, J., Jeong, H., 2005, JKAS, 39, 1 Demoulin, P. and Berger, M. A., 2003, Solar Phys., 215, 203 Demoulin, P., Mandrini, C. H., van Driel-Gesztelyi, L.,Thompson, B. J., Plunkett, S., Kovari, Zs., Aulanier, G. and Young, A. 2002, Astron. Astrophys, 382, 650 DeVore, C. R., 2000, ApJ, 539, 944 Longcope, D. W., Fisher, G. H. and Pevtsov, A. A., 1998, ApJ, 507, 417 Moon, Y. –J., Chae, J. and Park, Y. D., 2003, ApJ, 36, S37 Parker, E. N., 1974, ApJ, 191, 245 Magnetic helicity is supplied intensively during the period of flux emergence, especially during the growth of active regions. Our result implies that the stage of magnetic flux emergence is the most important in helicity injection. It would be interesting to further investigate the detailed process of helicity transfer during flux emergence. We studied five active regions and all of them show a similar behavior of helicity injection, that is, large amount of helicity was injected when magnetic flux emerged. We will present two of the five active regions studied as examples. [Fig.2] Evolution of AR10696 during the 1 st rotation It shows that helicity injection was insignificant during the period when magnetic flux changed little. This example supports our finding from AR10696 that significant helicity injection was correlated with significant flux emergence. We used time series of line-of-sight magnetograms which were obtained from the Michelson Doppler Imager (MDI) on board the Solar and Heliospheric Observatory (SOHO). The time cadence of the data is 96 minutes. We have measured the helicity injection rate through the photospheric boundary with the size of about 400x400 (arcsec 2 ) based on the helicity transfer equation where v is plasma velocity and Ap is the vector potential. This equation is reduced to a simpler form The table below summarizes the injected helicity and magnetic flux we measured, and the estimated helicity contribution of differential rotation for four active regions. The sign of the measured helicity is not necessarily following the well-known hemispheric dependence of the helicity sign (that is, - in the northern hemisphere, and + in the southern one). Differential rotation is responsible for only a small fraction of the total helicity injection to the corona. [Fig.4] Evolution of AR Example 1 : AR Example 2 : AR 8100 with the footpoint velocity of magnetic field line, u. We used Chae’s method to determine the helicity rate (Chae et al. 2001). The method determines the velocity u from line-of-sight magnetogram data using the local correlation tracking (LCT) technique. It also adopts a Fourier transform method to determine Ap. We calculated the helicity injection rate of several active regions during the period they were away from the limb of the solar disk. The length of the period was about 5 days. Figure 1 shows the maps of vector potential and field line footpoint velocity over a magnetogram data of AR … (1) … (2) [Fig.1]vector potential and velocity maps of AR10696 superposed on the corresponding magnetogram It is found from this figure that negative (left-handed) helicity was injected at a significant rate up to 40x10 40 Mx 2 /h while magnetic flux emerged. 3.3 Summary [Fig.3] Evolution of AR10696 during the 2 nd rotation 1. Introduction