Establish a Culture Where Safety is Always Visible Establish a Command Climate That Manages Tactical and Accidental Risk 1.1 Standards Handbook New Horizon’s Day Training Cdr’s Safety Councils Suicide Prevention Model Leader / Soldier Behavior Through Personal Example Harness the Power of Our Junior Leaders Strengthen Unit Readiness Programs Through Awareness & Enforcement of Standards As of: 30 Dec 05 (Ver. 1) 8 th Army Safety Campaign “ZERO FATALITIES - R U Committed!!” Accident Reduction Plan Empower leaders to have the knowledge and personal courage to lead by example in order to reduce the potential of accidental injury and death among our Soldiers, civilian employees, family members and Korean citizens and to preserve combat readiness Command Climate QTRLY Accident Trend Analysis IG Programs Hold Leaders Accountable for Unit & Soldier Safety Readiness Develop Executable Plans Inculcate Composite Risk Management in All Activities Integrate Control Measures That Eliminate Hazards or Reduce Risk Identify/Assess Individual Risk Factors & Take Action to Apply Controls to Protect the Soldier Army/Unit Accident History 2.3 Cmd Inspection Program Purpose Objectives Lines of Operation Tasks Leader Integration Training & Readiness Leader Accountability Composite Risk Management Force Health Protection Veh Cdr/ Drvr Tng Program Junior Leader Safety Education Crew Coordination Training CRM Training 5.2 Cdr/1SG Course Accident Review Boards Establish a Culture of Force Health Protection Instill Preventive Practices and Responsible Behavior at the Individual and Unit Level MEDPROS Medical Readiness Responsible Sex, Alcohol, Drug & Tobacco Use Environmenta l Injury & Disease Prevention Fitness & Wellness

Objective: Inspire Soldiers and civilians assigned to 8 th Army to live the Army values and avoid dangerous and questionable behavior. Measures of Effectiveness: Decrease the number of on and off duty accidents and incidents within 8 th Army during FY 06 Soldier and military civilian infractions against UCMJ and Host Nation laws decrease. Measures of Performance: 100% of Soldiers and civilians are briefed on safety, PHT, SAPR and Korean culture. Increased Soldier participation in safe GNP activities. (Quarterly GNP reports) LO 1.2: New Horizons Day Training Lines of Operation: Policy Implementation Execution Assessment Supporting Information: USFK Good Neighbor Policy 8 th Army OPORD New Horizons Day VIII Website G G G G A G ARB On-track On-track; Changes Off-track; Requires Decision Requires External Decision As of DEC 05

LO 1.3: Accident Reduction Plan Lines of Operation: Policy – Implementation Execution Assessment Objective: Identify safety issues that effect readiness and develop and implement appropriate countermeasures Measures of Effectiveness: Soldiers are aware of safety information, policies, and guidance Measures of Performance: Percent of safety program assessment completed Supporting Information: Army Regulation th Army Command Safety Office Alerts and Bulletins 8th Army Tactical Safety Training Website A A A A A G ARB On-track On-track; Changes Off-track; Requires Decision Requires External Decision As of DEC 05

LO 2.1: Commander’s Safety Council Lines of Operation: 2.1 Policy 2.1 Implementation 2.1 Execution 2.1 Assessment Objective: To enhance readiness by reviewing safety performance, sharing lessons learned and directing the use of the risk management process to detect and eliminate or control risk to mission, equipment, facilities, and personnel. Measures of Effectiveness: Countermeasures implemented Measures of Performance: Percent of members attended Number of countermeasure / program guidance developed Supporting Information: Army Regulation th Army Command Safety Office Alerts and Bulletins 8th Army Tactical Safety Training Website 8 th Army Commanders Safety Council Video / minutes G G G G A G ARB On-track On-track; Changes Off-track; Requires Decision Requires External Decision As of DEC 05

LO 2.2: Army/Unit Accident History Lines of Operation: 2.2 Policy Implementation Execution Assessment Objective: Develop and disseminate lessons learned /PLRs to lowest level Measures of Effectiveness: Percent of Soldiers at the lowest level receiving lessons learned /PLRs. Soldiers are applying lessons learned Measures of Performance: Soldiers at the lowest level are receiving lessons learned /PLRs. Supporting Information: The Army Combat Readiness Center Website (Risk Management Information System) 8 th Army Command Safety Office Trend Reports 8th Army Tactical Safety Training Website 8th Army Tactical Safety Training Website G G G G A G ARB On-track On-track; Changes Off-track; Requires Decision Requires External Decision As of DEC 05

LO 3.3: Crew Coordination Training Lines of Operation: 3.3 Policy Implementation Execution 3.3.5Assessment Objective: Improve crew coordination Measures of Effectiveness: Reduction of accidents involving improper crew coordination Measures of Performance: Percent of aircrew personnel trained using the Army’s Aircrew Coordination Training Enhancement Program Percent of aircrews evaluated during simulator periods. Percent of drivers and vehicle commanders trained using the elements outlined in 2ID REG Supporting Information: The Army’s Aircrew Coordination Training Enhancement Program 2ID REG 56-4 R R R R R G ARB On-track On-track; Changes Off-track; Requires Decision Requires External Decision As of DEC 05

LO 4.1: Junior Leader Safety Education Lines of Operation: 4 – Policy Implementation Execution Assessment Objective: Educate junior leaders on risk management and maintain safety awareness Measures of Effectiveness: Accidents reported immediately and investigated with root cause identified within 30 days. Junior leaders applying the risk management process during the planning and execution of all operations. Measures of Performance: Number of personnel trained compared to the number of personnel required to be trained. Percent Soldiers counseled on safety performance. Supporting Information: Army Regulation FM th Army Command Safety Office Alerts and Bulletins 8th Army Tactical Safety Training Website A G A A A G ARB On-track On-track; Changes Off-track; Requires Decision Requires External Decision As of DEC 05

LO 4.3: Accident Review Boards Lines of Operation: 4.3 Policy – Implementation Execution Assessment Objective: Develop or reinforce procedures from lessons learned to prevent similar occurrences Measures of Effectiveness: Root cause identified and countermeasures developed. Countermeasures implemented Measures of Performance: Percent of required AARs forwarded to the Command Safety Office within 45 days Supporting Information: Army Regulation FM A A A A A G ARB On-track On-track; Changes Off-track; Requires Decision Requires External Decision As of DEC 05

LO 5.1: Composite Risk Management Lines of Operation: 5.1 Policy 5..1 Implementation Execution 5.1.3Assessment Objective: Educate personnel on composite risk management Measures of Effectiveness: All personnel applying the risk management process during the planning and execution of all operations Measures of Performance: Number of personnel trained compared to the number of personnel required to be trained Supporting Information: Army Regulation FM A G A A A G ARB On-track On-track; Changes Off-track; Requires Decision Requires External Decision As of DEC 05

LO 5.2: Quarterly accident trend analysis Lines of Operation: 5.2 Policy 5.2 Implementation Execution 5.2.3Assessment Objective: Identify specific accident trends that can be targeted for program improvement Measures of Effectiveness: Countermeasures are developed and implemented. Downward trend in accidents Measures of Performance: Quarterly accident trend analysis reports are used to prioritize accident prevention activities Supporting Information: Army Regulation th Army quarterly accident trend analysis reports Unit accident experience G G G G A G ARB On-track On-track; Changes Off-track; Requires Decision Requires External Decision As of DEC 05

LO 6.1: Responsible Sex, Alcohol, Drug, and Tobacco Use G GAR On-track On-track; Changes Off-track; Requires Decision Requires External Decision B As of DEC 05 G G A A Lines of Operation : Supporting Information : Policy Implementation Execution Assessment Objective: Individuals are properly educated to make responsible decisions regarding sex, alcohol, drugs and tobacco. Measures of Effectiveness: Decreased incidents of STD and sexual assault, alcohol related events, positive drug test results, and decreased use of tobacco products. Measures of Performance: FY06 reportable alcohol related incidents decreased by 33% from FY05 Unit FY06 incidence of STDs decreased by 33% from FY05 Unit Soldiers use of tobacco (smoking and smokeless) decreased by 20% in FY06 Army Substance Abuse Program Sexual Assault Prevention Briefing CHPPM Websites Community Health Nurse Services EUSA Driver’s Training Program

LO 6.2: Environmental Injury & Disease Prevention G GAR On-track On-track; Changes Off-track; Requires Decision Requires External Decision B As of DEC 05 G G A A Lines of Operation : Supporting Information : Policy Implementation Execution Assessment Objective: Individuals and leaders are properly educated to make responsible decisions. Measures of Effectiveness: Decreased numbers of weather related and incidents of disease. Trained and equipped unit Field Sanitation and Hygiene Teams. Measures of Performance: No service member or civilian critically injured or killed as a result of an environmental incident FY06 reportable cold and hot weather injuries decreased by 33% from FY04 FY06 incidences of Malaria and Korean Hemorrhagic Fever decreased by 50% EUSA Seasonal Weather Briefings Safety Managers’ Monthly Reports Army Safety Center Website Vector Surveillance Results

LO 6.3: Fitness & Wellness G GAR On-track On-track; Changes Off-track; Requires Decision Requires External Decision B As of DEC 05 G G A A Lines of Operation : Supporting Information : Policy Implementation Execution Assessment Objective: Peak physical fitness and performance for service members, civilians, and their families. New Soldiers are assessed and integrated into unit fitness program. Measures of Effectiveness: Improved physical fitness and stamina based on a sound program of exercise and nutrition. Consistently meeting height/weight standards Decreased profiles for overuse and sports injuries Decreased Medical Attrition Measures of Performance: Improve APFT score by 10% Decrease % of body fat into ideal individual range FY06 overweight program decrease by 20% Decrease Bn level profile & MEB rate by 10% FM AR 600-9

LO 6.4: MEDPROS Medical Readiness G GAR On-track On-track; Changes Off-track; Requires Decision Requires External Decision B As of DEC 05 G G A A Lines of Operation : Supporting Information : Policy Implementation Execution Assessment Objective: All commands can use the MEDPROS tracking tool to identify strengths and weaknesses in unit and individual medical readiness. Measures of Effectiveness: Increased use and understanding by commanders and supervisors Improved Fully Medically Ready (FMR) rate Measures of Performance: Unit FMR at 95% in MEDPROS 100% Annual Hearing Screening Conducted 100% Annual SRP conducted Korea Immunization profile > 95% (Influenza, Smallpox, Anthrax) MEDPROS Tracking tool at ured/ MEDPROS Readiness Coordinator- Korea at or MEDPROS Help Desk at AR 220-1/ Annual SRP

Junior Leader Safety Training Statistics Junior Leader Safety Education th Army 19th TSC 2ID 501 MI 18 MEDCOM 1 SIG 35 ADA 8 MP Percent Trained EXAMPLE ONLY