CP Violation in B decays 1 Y.Sakai KEK Jan. 9, 2005  experimental review  KEKB/BellePEP-II/BaBar.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Measurement of  David Hutchcroft, University of Liverpool BEACH’06      
Advertisements

Measurements of the angle  : ,  (BaBar & Belle results) Georges Vasseur WIN`05, Delphi June 8, 2005.
Measurements of the angles of the Unitarity Triangle at B A B AR Measurements of the angles of the Unitarity Triangle at B A B AR PHENO06 Madison,15-18.
Electroweak and Radiative Penguin Transitions from B Factories Paoti Chang National Taiwan University 2 nd KIAS-NCTS Joint Workshop on Particle Physics,
Measurements of sin2  from B-Factories Masahiro Morii Harvard University The BABAR Collaboration BEACH 2002, Vancouver, June 25-29, 2002.
6/2/2015Attila Mihalyi - Wisconsin1 Recent results on the CKM angle  from BaBar DAFNE 2004, Frascati, Italy Attila Mihalyi University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Title Gabriella Sciolla Massachusetts Institute of Technology Representing the BaBar Collaboration Beauty Assisi, June 20-24, 2005 Searching for.
CPV measurements with Belle/KEKB Stephen L. Olsen Univ. of Hawai’i Feb 17, 2003 LCPAC meeting at KEK.
16 May 2002Paul Dauncey - BaBar1 Measurements of CP asymmetries and branching fractions in B 0   +  ,  K +  ,  K + K  Paul Dauncey Imperial College,
.. Gabriella Sciolla Massachusetts Institute of Technology On behalf of the BaBar Collaboration APS/DPF Meeting Philadelphia, April 5 - 8, 2003 Cracking.
Measurements of Radiative Penguin B Decays at BaBar Jeffrey Berryhill University of California, Santa Barbara For the BaBar Collaboration 32 nd International.
Polarization fraction & time-dependent CP analysis of measured at Belle. March 2008 – Geneva Swiss Physical Society – Annual meeting Kim Vervink.
Baryonic decays of B mesons. H.Kichimi, June28-July3, Baryonic decays of B mesons H. Kichimi Representing the Belle collaboration BEACH June28-July3,
Measurements of  and future projections Fabrizio Bianchi University of Torino and INFN-Torino Beauty 2006 The XI International Conference on B-Physics.
Beauty 06, Oxford, 27 Sept Marco Zito1 Measurements of gamma using ADS, GLW and other methods & future projections Marco Zito CEA-Saclay, Dapnia-SPP.
16 April 2005 APS 2005 Search for exclusive two body decays of B→D s * h at Belle Luminda Kulasiri University of Cincinnati Outline Motivation Results.
Sin2  1 /sin2  via penguin processes Beauty 2006 Sep.25-29, Univ. of Oxford Yutaka Ushiroda (KEK)
B Decays to Open Charm (an experimental overview) Yury Kolomensky LBNL/UC Berkeley Flavor Physics and CP Violation Philadelphia, May 18, 2002.
1. 2 July 2004 Liliana Teodorescu 2 Introduction  Introduction  Analysis method  B u and B d decays to mesonic final states (results and discussions)
Moriond EW, 3 Mar 2008Tagir Aushev (EPFL, ITEP)1  B → K S  0  0  B → K S K S  B → K S  0  B → D *+ D *-  B → a 1 , a 1 K, b 1 , b 1 K...  
Belle results relevant to LHC Pheno-07 May 8, 2007 Madison Wisc. S.L. Olsen U of Hawai’i.
1 Disclaimer This talk is not for B physics experts. Taipei101 If you did it, you may check s during my talk. B0B0 B0B0.
The BaBarians are coming Neil Geddes Standard Model CP violation BaBar Sin2  The future.
Page 1 B 0   Ks + quasi 2 body modes Koji Hara (Nagoya University) CKM2006 WG4    from charmless B decays.
Takeo Higuchi Institute of Particle and Nuclear Studies, KEK for the Belle collaboration Oct 14, 2003; Pittsburgh, PA Takeo Higuchi, KEK BEAUTY2003 Hot.
Luca Lista L.Lista INFN Sezione di Napoli Rare and Hadronic B decays in B A B AR.
DPF 2009 Richard Kass 1 Search for b → u transitions in the decays B → D (*) K - using the ADS method at BaBar Outline of Talk *Introduction/ADS method.
CP Violation and CKM Angles Status and Prospects Klaus Honscheid Ohio State University C2CR 2007.
SuperKEKB to search for new sources of flavor mixing and CP violation - Introduction - Introduction - Motivation for L= Motivation for L=
Philip J. Clark University of Edinburgh Rare B decays The Royal Society of Edinburgh 4th February 2004.
1 CP violation in B → ,  Hiro Sagawa (KEK) FLAVOR PHYSICS & CP VIOLATION, Ecole Polytechnique, Paris, France on June 3-6, 2003.
Time-dependent CP Violation (tCPV) at Belle -- New results at ICHEP Masashi Hazumi (KEK) October. 10, 2006.
M. Adinolfi - University of Bristol1/19 Valencia, 15 December 2008 High precision probes for new physics through CP-violating measurements at LHCb M. Adinolfi.
1 Multi-body B-decays studies in BaBar Ben Lau (Princeton University) On behalf of the B A B AR collaboration The XLIrst Rencontres de Moriond QCD and.
Search for CP Violation in B 0  h decays and B 0  h decays with B A B AR International Europhysics Conference on High Energy Physics, July 17 th -23.
CP VIOLATION at B-factories A.Bondar (Budker INP,Novosibirsk) Measurements of large CPV in b  c c s modes Search for New Physics: CPV in b  s penguin.
Pavel Krokovny Heidelberg University on behalf of LHCb collaboration Introduction LHCb experiment Physics results  S measurements  prospects Conclusion.
Pavel Krokovny, KEK Measurement of      1 Measurements of  3  Introduction Search for B +  D (*)0 CP K +  3 and r B from B +  D 0 K + Dalitz.
 3 measurements by Belle Pavel Krokovny KEK Introduction Introduction Apparatus Apparatus Method Method Results Results Summary Summary.
CP violation at B-factoris Introduction  1 /   2 /   3 /  Vub, D mixing, Bs Conclusion Pavel Krokovny KEK, Tsukuba, Japan KEK.
David Brown Lawrence Berkeley National Lab BaBar Collaboration CKM phase and CP Violation in B Decays August 14, 2007 Daegu, Korea.
WIN-03, Lake Geneva, WisconsinSanjay K Swain Hadronic rare B decays Hadronic rare B-decays Sanjay K Swain Belle collaboration B - -> D cp K (*)- B - ->
1 Highlights from Belle Jolanta Brodzicka (NO1, Department of Leptonic Interactions) SAB 2009.
Andrzej Bożek nz11Highlights of the Belle Experiment SAB Review Selection of the most important Belle results since last SAB review (2005):  B 0.
Summary of  2 measurements at Super KEKB Hirokazu Ishino Tokyo Institute of Technology 19 Dec., 2006.
1 BaBar & Belle: Results and Prospects Claudio Campagnari University of California Santa Barbara.
1 B Experiments Y.Sakai KEK 28-Sep-2006, Nasu - “B Factories” - - CP Violation & Flavor Physics -
g a b Part 1: Matter-Antimatter Asymmetry
B  K   p  and photon spectrum at Belle Heyoung Yang Seoul National University for Belle Collaboration ICHEP2004.
Semileptonic Decays from Belle Youngjoon Kwon Yonsei Univ. / Belle.
CP Violation Studies in B 0  D (*)  in B A B A R and BELLE Dominique Boutigny LAPP-CNRS/IN2P3 HEP2003 Europhysics Conference in Aachen, Germany July.
1 EPS03, July 17-23, 2003Lorenzo Vitale Time dependent CP violation studies in D(*)D(*) and J/ψ K* Lorenzo Vitale INFN Trieste On behalf of BaBar and Belle.
Maria Różańska, INP Kraków HEP2003 Europhysics Conference –Aachen, July 18th 1 CPV in B → D (*) K (*) (and B → D K  ) in BaBar and Belle Outline: CPV.
1 Koji Hara (KEK) For the Belle Collaboration Time Dependent CP Violation in B 0 →  +  - Decays [hep-ex/ ]
Measurement of  2 /  using B   Decays at Belle and BaBar Alexander Somov CKM 06, Nagoya 2006 Introduction (CP violation in B 0   +   decays) Measurements.
 1 measurements with tree-level processes at Belle O. Tajima (KEK) Belle collaboration ICHEP06 July 28, 2006.
The CKM Angles a and b a/f2 g/f3 b/f1 Introduction Measuring b/f1
Update on Measurement of the angles and sides of the Unitarity Triangle at BaBar Martin Simard Université de Montréal For the B A B AR Collaboration 12/20/2008.
5 Jan 03S. Bailey / BaBar : B decays to Measure gamma1 B Decays to Measure  Stephen Bailey Harvard University for the BaBar Collaboration PASCOS 2003.
15/12/2008from LHC to the UniverseP. Chang 1 CP Violation and Rare R Decays CP Violation and Rare R Decays Paoti Chang Paoti Chang National Taiwan University.
Chunhui Chen, University of Maryland PASCOS CP Violation in B Physics Chunhui Chen University of Maryland The 12 th International Symposium on Particles,
HQL04 - Maria Chiara Simani (LLNL) B A B AR Measurements of the CKM angle  with the B A B AR experiment Maria Chiara Simani (Lawrence Livermore Nat. Lab)
DCPV/Rare George W.S. Hou (NTU) Beauty Assisi 1 Direct CP and Rare Decays June 21, 2005 B Physics at Hadronic Machines, Assisi.
ICHEP 2004, Beijing 1 Recent Results on B decays Y.Sakai (Belle/KEK) - Rare B Decay Highlights + Belle b  sqq Time-dependent CPV - -
1 Belle & BaBar “Competition” Y.Sakai, KEK ASEPS 24-March-2010.
BNM Summary of Present Experimental Results 13-Sep-2006, Y.Sakai (KEK) Based on ICHEP06 results (highlights) CKM:  1 ( & b  s),  2,  3,... Decays.
Measurements of  1 /  Flavor Physics and CP Violation 2010, May 25, 2010, Torino, Italy, K. Sumisawa (KEK)
Tagir Aushev For the Belle Collaboration (EPFL, Lausanne ITEP, Moscow)
Measurements of a and future projections
Attila Mihalyi University of Wisconsin-Madison
Presentation transcript:

CP Violation in B decays 1 Y.Sakai KEK Jan. 9, 2005  experimental review  KEKB/BellePEP-II/BaBar

CP Violation in B decays 2 CP Violation CPV: difference in behavior of particle and anti-particle Universe: almost “matter” only (no anti-matter) Big-Bang  N(particles) = N(anti-particles) Sakalov: 1. baryon number violation 2. CP violation 3. existence of non-equiblium 1964: CPV discovered in K 0 (J.Cronin et. al); O(10 -3 ) 1973: Kobayashi-Maskawa model 3- generation q uark -m ixing : c omplex phase  CPV 1980: Sanda et. al; large CPV in B-meson 1964: CPV discovered in K 0 (J.Cronin et. al); O(10 -3 ) 1973: Kobayashi-Maskawa model 3- generation q uark -m ixing : c omplex phase  CPV 1980: Sanda et. al; large CPV in B-meson

CP Violation in B decays 3 Kobayashi-Maskawa Scheme CPV : due to a complex phase in the quark mixing matrix CKM matrix Wolfenstein representation  1   2   3  V td V tb V cd V cb V ud V ub * * * Unitarity triangle djdj ukuk W-W- V kj

CP Violation in B decays 4 CPV in Decay: 3 types in Decay (Direct CPV) in Mixing (Indirect CPV) in Mixing-Decay Interference _ _ |A(P  f )|  | A(P  f )| _ _ R(P 0  P 0 )  R(P 0  P 0 ) |q/p|  1 WW d b t t b d B 0d0d B 0d0d V td V tb   ’’ Re(  ) Im(  ) K system

CP Violation in B decays 5 made by H. Miyake ( A =  C ) Mixing-induced CPVDirect CPV Mixing-Decay: Time-dependent CPV Sanda Bigi Carter B0B0 B0B0 f cp B0B0 B0B0 A A  = mixing tt

CP Violation in B decays 6 CPV & UT angles ) fB()B( ) fB() fB( A CP 0 d 0 d 0 d 0 d    f = S sin(  m  t) + A cos (  m  t) 2Im   S =       A = qpqp =  f AAAA Mixing induced CPVDirect CPV  1   2   3  V td V tb V cd V cb V ud V ub * * * ( A =  C ) CPV measurements UT angles Determination of UT

CP Violation in B decays 7 Asymmetric B Factories PEP-II BaBar ~1 km in diameter Mt. Tsukuba KEKB Belle 8 GeV e - x 3.5 GeV e +  11mrad crossing 9 GeV e - x 3.1 GeV e + Head-on collision KEKB PEP-II

CP Violation in B decays 8 Peak Luminosity

CP Violation in B decays 9 Integrated Luminosity 232M BB KEKB/Belle PEP-II/BaBar 386M BB ~530 fb -1 Summer 2005 ~310 fb -1 [as of 26-Dec-2005]

CP Violation in B decays 10 Belle and BaBar Detectors Si Vertex detector Drift Chamber (small cell) CsI(Tl) EM calorimeter  /K L detector (RPC+Fe) SC solenoid (1.5T) TOF counter & Aerogel Cherenkov DIRC

CP Violation in B decays 11  1 Measurement _ d b _ c c s d _ w B0B0 J/  K0K0  CP : CP eigenvalue V* td __ t d t b b d _ w w B0B0 B0B0 _ = -  cp sin2  1 sin(  m  t) + A cos (  m  t) A CP Mixing induced CPVDirect CPV A  0  1   2   3  V td V tb V cd V cb V ud V ub * * * First observed CPV in B (2001)

CP Violation in B decays 12 Time-dep CPV Measurement Flavor-tag (B 0 or B 0 ?) J/  (  ’) KSKS ee ee zz t=0 f CP Vertexing Reconstruction Extract CPV fit same analysis method applied for all modes B0B0 B0B0 B 0 -tag  t   z/c   eff ~30%   t ~140ps

CP Violation in B decays 13 B-meson Reconstruction Energy difference: Beam-constrained mass:  Utilize special Kinematics at Y(4S) M bc Nsig = 5264 Purity 98 % CP odd 386M BB B 0  J/  K S

CP Violation in B decays 14 B 0  J/  K L : Signals Nsig = 4792 Purity 60 % CP even p KL information is poor  lower purity 386M BB   KLKLKLKL K L direction + 2-body decay kinematics

CP Violation in B decays 15 sin2  1 measurement 386M BB   sin2   =   M BB CP-even CP-odd Preliminary Good tags B 0 tag _ consistent w/ SM expectation WA: sin2  1 = 0.69 ±0.03 < 5% accuracy ! ( A =0.03  0.04 )

CP Violation in B decays 16 New physics Search : b d s d Xs s  KSKS b d s d ts s  KSKS _ B 0 + b  sqq New Physics with New Phase S bs  S bc, A can  0 - SM: b  s Penguin phase = (cc) K 0 - “b  ccs: sin2  1 ” (SM reference) deviation (H.N.Li, W.H.Hou)

CP Violation in B decays 17 b  sqq decay modes - - SM expectation “pure” b  sss Golden mods - b  sdd - f + = 0.91  0.07 [HFAG: Belle(isospin)+BaBar(moment)] * *

CP Violation in B decays 18 B 0   K 0 : result S J/  K 0 fit Good tags - 386M BB Preliminary “sin2  1 ”=+0.44  0.27  0.05 A =+0.14  0.17  0.07 “sin2  1 ”=+0.44  0.27  0.05 A =+0.14  0.17  0.07 “sin2  1 ”=+0.50  0.25  A =  0.23  0.05 “sin2  1 ”=+0.50  0.25  A =  0.23  M BB [PRD71,091102(05)] [hep-ex/ ] Theoretically clean mode 180  16  K s 78  12  K L 114  12  K s 98  18  K L K s                    

CP Violation in B decays 19 B 0   ’  K 0 : result S J/  K 0 fit Good tags Av  0.09: First established b  sqq Penguin CPV ! (>5  ) - 386M BB Preliminary “sin2  1 ”=+0.62  0.12  0.04 A =+0.04  0.08  0.06 “sin2  1 ”=+0.62  0.12  0.04 A =+0.04  0.08  0.06 “sin2  1 ”=+0.36  0.13  0.03 A =  0.09  0.02 “sin2  1 ”=+0.36  0.13  0.03 A =  0.09  M BB [hep-ex/ ] [hep-ex/ ] highest statistics mode 830  35  ’K s 187  18  ’K L 805  67  ’K s 440  54  ’K L _ Preliminary

CP Violation in B decays 20 Summary: Naïve average sin2  1 eff =0.5  0.09 (2.6  from sin2  1 ) b  sqq CPV - - (C f =  A f )

CP Violation in B decays 21  2 measurement  1   2   3  V td V tb V cd V cb V ud V ub * * * mixing Penguin d b d _ d u u W B 0d0d  -  + V ud  V ub Tree B 0d0d d b d u u W g  +  - V td  V tb t d S   sin  2

CP Violation in B decays 22 Effect of Penguin on  2 M. Gronau and D. London, PRL 65, 3381 (1990) Isospin relation EW Penguin neglected (isospin breaking)

CP Violation in B decays 23 B 0   +   Signals candidates 467±33 signals 1606±51 K  events Loose cuts  fit with Shape variable in PDF 227M BB 2820 candidates 666±43 signals 247±31 K  events 275M BB (LR>0.86) (<0.86) BBqq Total number of events used for the fit LR [PRL95,101801(05)] [PRL95,151803(05)]

CP Violation in B decays 24 Results good tag A  =  0.12  0.06 S  =  0.67  0.16  0.06  t (ps) 275M BB 227M BB  t (ps) B 0 tagged _ A  =  0.09  0.15  0.04 S  =  0.30  0.17  0.03 Total background [PRL95,101801(05)] [PRL95,151803(05)]

CP Violation in B decays 25 Experiments Summary Belle 275M B A B AR 227M A  ~2.3  difference between Belle and B A B AR S  - A  ( C  )

CP Violation in B decays 26 Significance (A,S)=(0,0) 1-C.L.=5.6x10 -8, 5.4  (A,S)=(0,−0.62) 1-C.L.=5.1x10 -5, 4.0  Large CP Violation, Large Direct CPV confirm previous Belle results (153M) both statistical and systematic errors are taken into account. S  A  275M BB Feldman-Cousins Analysis [PRL95,101801(05)] A  ~  3 A CP (     ) 0.37(Av.) [Gronau-Rosner, PLB 335,339(04)]

CP Violation in B decays 27  2 (  ) with isospin analysis HFAG EPS 2005 B (  +  0 ) 5.5  0.6 B (  +  - ) 5.0  0.4 B (  0  0 ) 1.5  0.3 x10 -6 A (  0  0 ) 0.28  0.4 New BaBar B (  +  - ) [hep-ex/ ]

CP Violation in B decays 28 B 0   +   CPV B (  0  0 ) << B (  +   ), B (  +  0 ) <  6 26  6 x10 -6 (HFAG) small Penguin effect (  ) 22 A 00 A +0 A +- / 2 f L ~ 100%  CP  +1 Similar to  +  , but more complicated … Two lucky cards ! B  VV: not CP eigenstate in general  +   +  0 : wide resonance

CP Violation in B decays 29 B 0   +   signal 232M BB f L =   [PRL95,041805(05)]

CP Violation in B decays 30 B = 24.4  2.2  x M BB B 0   +   signal f L =   Preliminary continuum b  c b  u Helicity M  signal continuum  continuum [hep-ex/ ]

CP Violation in B decays 31 Fit Results 232M BB 275M BB S =  0.42  0.08 A = 0.00  0.30   t (ps) S =  0.24  A = 0.03  0.18  Preliminary Good tag signal background [hep-ex/ ] [PRL95,041805(05)] B 0 tagged _

CP Violation in B decays 32  +   Isospin analysis  2 = 96  13 deg. add new Belle  +   : B, S, A Note: Isospin triangle does not close experimental error ?  2 <116 CL

CP Violation in B decays 33 B 0   +   CPV B 0   +   : not CP eigenstate, same diagram as  +   Mixing CPV with 4 amplitudes (complicated) B 0   +    0 : Dalitz [BaBar PRL 91,201802(’03); Belle PRL94,121801(’05)] s  = m(     ) 2 s + =m(     ) 2 A  = f  A  + f  A  + f  A  f i  (s +, s  ) : form factors (Breit-Wigner) A(  i  j ) = A ij =e i  2 T ij + P ij P  =  (P  +P  )/2 Fit to  t, Dalitz dist.   2 w/o discrete ambiguity ! ++ ++ ++

CP Violation in B decays 34  t-Dalitz Fit Results Preliminary m(     ) 2 m(     ) 2 m’ ’’ transformation 232M BB Square Dalitz [hepex/ ]

CP Violation in B decays 35  +   Dalitz: Constraint on  2  2 = 113   6 deg [hepex/ ]

CP Violation in B decays 36 Summary of  2  2 = 99  deg. 13 8

CP Violation in B decays 37  3 measurement  1   2   3  V td V tb V cd V cb V ud V ub * * * u b u u c s W B +d+d  D0D0 V cs  VubVub u b u s u c W B +d+d D0D0 ++ V us  V cb _ f COM interference Simple mixing CPV   3 ( with B d ) + Tree 3 3

CP Violation in B decays 38  3 : GWL & ADS method 1) f COM = D CP Gronau-Wyler-London [PLB 253,483; 265,172(’91)] D 0 /D 0   +  - /  +  - (CP=+1),  S  0 / .. (CP=  1) 2) f COM = D DCSD Atwood-Dunietz-Soni [PRL 91,171801(’03)] ex) B +  D 0 [  -  + ]  + & D 0  -  + ]  + _ _ Measurements have been done, but only give loose constraint on  3 need more data Measurements have been done, but only give loose constraint on  3 need more data

CP Violation in B decays 39 Novel method: Dalitz f COM = D   K S     B+:B+: B-:B-: m + =m(K s  + ), m  =m(K s   ) CPV : Asymmetry in Dalitz dist.: r r |A 2 | |A 1 | r = obtain from tagged D 0 (D *+  D 0  + ) sample

CP Violation in B decays 40 CPV in Dalitz plane MC simulation  3 = 70 deg.  = 0, r = B+B+ BB Sensitivity to  3

CP Violation in B decays 41 Signal yields 232M BB 275M BB D 0 K* D0KD0K D* 0 K [D 0  0 ] 209 signals 58 signals 36 signals 49 signals 90 signals 282 signals [PRL95,121802(05)] [hepex/ ][hepex/ ] EE EE EE

CP Violation in B decays 42 Dalitz Plots: D 0 K 232M BB 275M BB B+B+ BB B+B+ BB

CP Violation in B decays 43  3 Fit Results  3 (deg) rBrB rBrB  3 (deg) D 0 K* D0KD0K D* 0 K [D 0  0 ] r B : different for modes D0KD0K D* 0 K [D 0  0  ]

CP Violation in B decays 44  3 Summary [hepex/ , ]  3 = 63  deg [PRL95,121802(05)]

CP Violation in B decays 45 b u W B 0 ++ VudVud  VcbVcb c d D*D* d d b c W B 0 ++ V cd  V ub u d D*D* d d   (B 0 →D    ) ~ 1 + cos(  mt) – S  sin(  mt)  (B 0 →D    ) ~ 1 + cos(  mt)  S  sin(  mt)  (B 0 →D    ) ~ 1  cos(  mt)  S  sin(  mt)  (B 0 →D    ) ~ 1  cos(  mt)  S  sin(  mt)   Cabibbo favored Cabibbo suppressed CP S  = 2(  1) L R sin(2  1  3  )  : hadronic phase, R = ~0.02 A CF A DCS mixing mixing induced CPV [L=0 (D  ), 1(D   ) R,  not same for D  and D   sin(2  1 +  3 ): B 0  D (*)+  - TCPV 4 2 [I.Dunietz, PLB 427,179(’98)] B0→B0→ mixing A DCS A CF

CP Violation in B decays 46  t Distributions B 0  D   10.6K cand.(96% purity) B0B0 B0B0  152M BB 232M BB partial reconstruction B0B0  B0B0 D    CP Full recon  t(ps) 89.3K signals Good tag Lepton tag background D    D    [hepex/ ][PRL 93,031802(04)] D    D    D   

CP Violation in B decays 47 sin(2  1 +  3 ): Summary D*   DD DD (c~0 if  ~0 or 180 deg.) R D  : estimated form B (B  D s    ) [SU(3) symmetry] No significant constraint on  3 yet !

CP Violation in B decays 48 Solution of sin2  1 Ambiguity sin2  1 : 4-fold ambiguity;  1   /2-  1,  1 +  3  /2-  1 J/  K* 0 : Time-dependent angular analysis interference A // A , A 0 A   cos2  1 BaBar: cos2  1 = 3.32   0.27 (88M BB) Belle: cos2  1 = 0.56  0.79  0.11 (275M BB) _ _ D 0 [K s  +  -  h 0 : Time-dependent Dalitz-plot analysis =  Dh e -i2  1 f (m + 2,m  2 ) / f (m  2,m  2 )  2  1 phase depends on (m + 2,m  2 ) : known 2Im   S = New ! use D (*)  0, D (*) , D ,(309  31 signals)  1 = ( 16  21  12) o 386M BB exclude  1 = 68 o solution >95% CL [PRD71,032005(05)] [PRL95,091601(05)] [hep-ex/ ]

CP Violation in B decays 49  1  2  3 Summary Consistent with  1 +  2 +  3 = 180 o SM constraints

CP Violation in B decays 50 CKM Global Fit  1   2   3  V td V tb V cd V cb V ud V ub * * *  m d b  d  b  c l b  u l

CP Violation in B decays 51 A CP   (B  f)  (B  f)  (B  f)  (B  f) = A 1 A 2 sin(  1  2 )  1  2 ) A 1 2  A 2 2  A 1 A 2 cos(  1  2 )  1  2 ) 2 2 Direct CPV: B   Penguin d b d _ s/d u u W B 0d0d --  + V us/d  V ub Tree Key prediction of Kobayashi-Maskawa model Strong support of KM B 0d0d d b d u u W g  + -- V ts/d  V tb t s/d Observation in B Tree-Penguin interference Direct CP Violation

CP Violation in B decays 52 A CP (B 0  K    ) A CP =    significance ! Signal: 3042  M BB386M BB Signal: 1601  51 A CP =   (4.2  World Average (+CDF/Cleo) [HFAG] A CP =  [hepex/ ] [PRL 93,131801(05)]

CP Violation in B decays 53 A CP for Charmless B decays

CP Violation in B decays 54 A CP : 3-body Dalitz alnaysis 386M BB  (770) 0 K   (782) 0 K  f 0 (980) K  f 0 (1370) K  f 2 (1275) K   c0 (782) K  Non-res.   (892) 0     (1430) 0    =  1 for B  ]

CP Violation in B decays 55 DCPV: B    0 K  [hepex/ ] A CP =30  11  2 % (3.9  ) +11  4 [A CP =34  13  6 % ] BaBar +15  20 1 st DCPV in Charged particle ! [PRD72,072003(05)]

CP Violation in B decays 56 CPV in Mixing  A SL (t)     (B 0   X) B 0   (B 0   X) B 0   (B 0   X) B 0   (B 0   X) B 0  |p/q| 2  |q/p| 2 |p/q| 2 +|q/p| 2 SM: O(10 -3 ) t-independent Belle: A CP =  0.1  0.79  0.70 % 85M BB Babar: A CP =  0.5  1.2  1.4 % 23M BB [PRL 88,321801(02)] World Average (+LEP/Cleo) [HFAG] A LS =  0.30  0.78 % Large A SL  New Physics Not yet observed: only missing peace of SM CPV in B still far away from SM [hepex/ ]

CP Violation in B decays 57 Summary CP Violation in B decays Large CPV [O(1)~O(0.1)] established in Mixing-Decay Interference & Direct CPV not yet in Mixing [O(10 -3 ) in SM] UT angle measurements with CPV  1 = ( 21.7  ) o  1 = ( 99  ) o  1 = ( 63  ) o Great success of KM scheme ! New Physics Search More precision, b  s penguins, new modes… New Physics Search More precision, b  s penguins, new modes… Excitement with more data Now

CP Violation in B decays 58 Future Prospect ~10 10 BB/year !! 1.6x fb -1 5x10 34 ~1 ab -1 5x ~50 ab -1 L peak L int Crab cavities Crab cavities Major upgrade of KEKB & Belle World Highest Luminosity ! (cm -2 s -1 )

CP Violation in B decays 59 backup

CP Violation in B decays 60 Physics Reach SuperKEKB 5ab -1 50ab -1 LHCb Physics at Super B Factory (hep-ex/ ) 2fb -1

CP Violation in B decays 61 b  ccd: J/  , D  D  -

CP Violation in B decays 62 B 0   K 0 386M BB KSKS Nsig=180  16 purity 0.57 Nsig= 78  13 KLKL purity 0.12 Preliminary Event Shape

CP Violation in B decays 63 B 0   ’ K 0 386M BB  ’K S Nsig=830  35 purity 0.61 Nsig= 187  18  ’K L purity 0.66 highest statistics mode Preliminary Event Shape

CP Violation in B decays 64 Extraction of  3 ? estimated form B (B  D s    ) [SU(3) symmetry] No significant constraint yet ! R