Escape from Alcatraz Freeing the OPAC from traditional constraints Lloyd Sokvitne Senior Manager (Digital Strategies) State Library of Tasmania

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EXtensible Catalog David Lindahl University of Rochester.
Advertisements

Elephants – Description and travel (Producing a new OPAC using existing MARC data)
Opening the Door: using Endeca for a faceted catalog Emily Lynema NCSU Libraries MLC: Discovery & Access March 2, 2007.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency INIS Collection Search: Introduction and main features INIS Training Seminar 7-11 October 2013, Vienna Domenico.
Users have choices The reality of competition
Information Retrieval in Practice
EXtensible Catalog XC Drupal Toolkit. XC Software Overview User Interface for searching and browsing Library Website (on Drupal) VoyagerUR Research XC.
© Tefko Saracevic, Rutgers University1 digital libraries and human information behavior Tefko Saracevic, Ph.D. School of Communication, Information and.
River Campus Libraries Metadata That Supports Real User Needs David Lindahl Director of Digital Library Initiatives University of Rochester Libraries.
Bielefeld Conference 2006: Academic Library and Information Services: New Paradigms for the Digital Age Hans Geleijnse Director of Library and IT Services.
© Tefko Saracevic, Rutgers University1 digital libraries and human information behavior Tefko Saracevic, Ph.D. School of Communication, Information and.
Rethinking the library catalogue: making search work for the library user Sally Chambers The European Library
© Anselm SpoerriInfo + Web Tech Course Information Technologies Info + Web Tech Course Anselm Spoerri PhD (MIT) Rutgers University
Enhancing traditional media services utilising lessons learnt from successful social media applications - Case studies and framework Asta Bäck & Sari Vainikainen.
© Tefko Saracevic, Rutgers University1 digital libraries and human information behavior Tefko Saracevic, Ph.D. School of Communication, Information and.
Developing PANDORA Mark Corbould Director, IT Business Systems.
The future of the catalogue Warwick Cathro Assistant Director- General, Innovation.
Relevance ranking of results from MARC-based catalogues: from guidelines to implementation exploiting structured metadata Tony Boston and Alison Dellit.
Making sense of the data jumble Trinity College Library Dublin’s Discovery Solution Experience Arlene Healy & Charles Montague Digital Systems and Services.
Maintain and Modify By: Sahar Aftab (1253 ) and Mehboob Nazim (1085) Central Library.
Online Tutorials for Information Services: A Case Study of IIITM-K Sainul Abideen P,Sreekutty TS, Yunus TP Indian Institute of Information Technology &
What difference a good tool? using Endeca for a faceted catalog Emily Lynema NCSU Libraries ACRL Delaware Valley Chapter Fall Program November 3, 2006.
Why create a Gandhara What is it expected to do that the library catalog is not doing? What other benefits can it offer to users? Think of Gandhara as.
Developing a programme of information literacy. Strategy Will you work at an institutional level? Will you work at a course level? Will you work at a.
October 21st, Current trends in library search: From electronic card boxes to large scale, aggregated search engines Till Kinstler,
Why Open-Source? No Vendor-Locking In a proprietary software --- Your supports lock with it. freedom to customize and improvements in software needs,
Connecting users to Collections Collection Development/Resource Sharing Conference March 26, 2009 Jean Phillips Florida Center for Library Automation
Improving the Catalogue Interface using Endeca Tito Sierra NCSU Libraries.
Filipe MS Bento University of Aveiro, Portugal » PhD Research grant by VuFind as a Participatory Scientific Information Discovery, Access, Evaluation.
MAHI Research Database Data Validation System Software Prototype Demonstration September 18, 2001
LIS 506 (Fall 2006) LIS 506 Information Technology Week 11: Digital Libraries & Institutional Repositories.
LIS510 lecture 3 Thomas Krichel information storage & retrieval this area is now more know as information retrieval when I dealt with it I.
Dec 9-11, 2003ICADL Challenges in Building Federation Services over Harvested Metadata Hesham Anan, Jianfeng Tang, Kurt Maly, Michael Nelson, Mohammad.
OpenURL Link Resolvers 101
Enhancing Online Library Catalogs for Today’s Users Heather Payne Savino ILS 506 July 13, 2007.
Libraries in Web 2.0 environment Mihaela Banek Zorica University of Zagreb, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sceinces, Department of information sciences.
University Library System, CUHK 香港中文大學圖書館系統 University Library System The Chinese University of Hong Kong Simple, Flexible and Informative - Personalised.
NCSU Libraries Kristin Antelman NCSU Libraries June 24, 2006.
NCSU Libraries Andrew Pace & Emily Lynema NCSU Libraries May 24, 2006.
OPAC Search & Navigation. “OPAC Complainers” “There is certainly no dearth of OPAC complainers. You have Andrew Pace (OPACs suck), and Roy Tennant (You.
A Future for the Library Catalogue T. Hickey ACRL/DVC Bryn Mawr 3 November 2006.
Digital Volcanoes and Data Flows Carol Hamilton 1VALA 2012.
EBooks Discoverability & Visibility Kristen Fisher Ratan Assistant Director, Business Strategy Online Information 1 December 2009.
Implementing a Faceted Search Framework Emily Lynema & Andrew K. Pace NC State University Libraries ASIS&T Seminar April 9, 2007.
Endeca: a faceted search solution for the library catalog Kristin Antelman & Emily Lynema UNC University Library Advisory Council June 15, 2006.
Planning for Life after OCLC Passport for Cataloging An overview of the new OCLC cataloging service Revised April 2002.
Catalogs for the Future Roy Tennant Future? What Future? Catalogs ain’t got no stinking future!
WebOPAC is computerized online catalogue of the materials held in library. The OPAC consist of an index of the bibliographic data cataloged in the system,
What You Get With Mango Mango is not just your library catalog, it's a set of public access services that are tied around your library's catalog and the.
The Digital Library for Earth System Science: Contributing resources and collections GCCS Internship Orientation Holly Devaul 19 June 2003.
Integrating Access to Digital Content Sarah Shreeves University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Visual Resources Association 23 rd Annual Conference Miami.
The physical parts of a computer are called hardware.
WEB 2.0 PATTERNS Carolina Marin. Content  Introduction  The Participation-Collaboration Pattern  The Collaborative Tagging Pattern.
Web Discovery and Millennium Integrating Millennium with Summon Helen Bronleigh Library Systems Coordinator.
Oct 12-14, 2003NSDL Challenges in Building Federation Services over Harvested Metadata Kurt Maly, Michael Nelson, Mohammad Zubair Digital Library.
WEBSITE. WHAT KIND OF IMPRESSION ARE YOU LEAVING BEHIND? Do you know... 75% visitors make a judgment of your company purely on your website! 94% based.
A Resource Discovery Service for the Library of Texas Requirements, Architecture, and Interoperability Testing William E. Moen, Ph.D. Principal Investigator.
Kevin Gilbertson - Web Services Librarian Jean-Paul Bessou - Systems Librarian Z. Smith Reynolds Library Wake Forest University Growing Your Own Next-Gen.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency INIS Collection Search: Introduction and main features The Role of the International Nuclear Information System.
Discovery Tool Requirements Most important features of nextgen catalog in 2007 survey by David Pattern -- “Stealth OPAC”
Emerging Approaches to Subject Information Terry Willan Talis CIG Conference University of Strathclyde 4.
UW FORWARD UPDATE - Version 0.2 UW System Teleconference - March 16,
Impact of Social networking/Web 2
Information Retrieval in Practice
Library Management System
The Challenge: FRBR in TEL/TELplus
A Future for the Library Catalogue
DIGITAL LIBRARY.
Assessment of Metadata Remediation Efforts
Discovery Tools and Music Library 2.0 Integrated Library Systems
Presentation transcript:

Escape from Alcatraz Freeing the OPAC from traditional constraints Lloyd Sokvitne Senior Manager (Digital Strategies) State Library of Tasmania

Your OPAC Inhospitable Distant Uninviting Information discovery in libraries

Information discovery on the web Inviting Friendly Easy

Today’s presentation Our experience with a new discovery model Based on aggregating metadata from a variety of sources What happens when you actually try to use that metadata for discovery What other challenges emerge

Providing a single search Disillusioned with federated searching Aggregating metadata as preferred approach –NLA, OAI, and other successes –Include both Marc and Non-Marc Metadata –Its our own data anyway Want control over outcomes

Moving outside the ILMS easier web friendly deliverables applications adaptable/flexible client-orientated outcomes –discovery services –interactive web2.0 developments We are seeing a growing need to be able to interact with the ILS in various ways, so that some functionality can be placed in another interface – Lorcan Dempsey, 20 Jan 20, 2006

A 3-tier architecture Uncoupling the data from the applications that create it Providing client services that are not defined by data containers The data should be usable by any or all applications above it Client Service Data Storage Applications MODULES 1.client interaction 2.acquisitions 3.indexing 4.searching 5.circulation 6.DOM

Aggregated Metadata Information System (AMIS) Proof of concept developed –500,000 OPAC Marc records exported Converted to a common XML format –Other records converted (images, etc) –XML records were indexed using Lucene 5 hrs on a desktop pc –Query screen written –All up – 2-3 days effort

Screenshot Fast : Able to add new features : Able to participate in web environment

Screenshot Live query works for live data

Also able to provide facets for format, genre, location, subject, etc

Prototype results Proved concept –Technology part is easy –Tender process almost over, market response good –Identified that we will need to improve the actual data How did we want our portal to work?

To match user behaviour Offline behaviour– browsing Ignored in virtually every library system facets: open-display of content, and refining Online behaviour – satisficing/ranking Ignored in virtually every library system Ranking as the key determinant User interaction – ratings, reviews, etc Now possible because we are outside the ILMS

Aggregator metadata Need appropriate metadata –Valid only if useful to actual searching as performed by our clients Data mining –frequency of use, number of reservations, etc Data sharing –reviews, commentaries, tables of contents, etc Data creation –Libraries – adding more information, discarding unused data –Users – adding ratings, reviews, etc

Next steps Client interaction modules –reviews, –ratings, –wikis, –RSS, –Blogs, etc will be added progressively

Data is just a commodity ILMS integration occurred for efficiency –data storage, consistency, reuse efficiency now possible in other ways –moving data in large quantities is easy –accessing data in real time is easy An OPAC no longer needs to be something provided by an ILMS

Conclusions AMIS – technically easy, doable Need the right metadata to succeed Need the right search interface –not just a slightly modified OPAC –the design is up to us (there couldn’t be a better time to be a librarian)

A connected OPAC Easy Relevant Busy and used The new Alcatraz

Thank you Lloyd Sokvitne Senior Manager (Digital Strategies) State Library of Tasmania

Recommended reading Don't Make Me Think : A Common Sense Approach to Web Usability. Steve Krug, 2 nd Ed, New Riders Press; 2005 Rethinking how we provide bibliographic services for the University of California, Final Report: December 2005, Bibliographic Services Task Force (BSTF). Integrating Information Resources: Principles, Technologies, and Approaches, Heather Christenson and Roy Tenant, Recommendations for urgently needed improvement of OPAC and the role of the National Bibliographic Agency in achieving it. John D Byrum, Jr. Northern Caroline State University Library catalogue – ( browsing using Marc data)