Review of Fare Collection Concept of Operations and High Level Data Requirements FC RSTWG Webinar May 19, 2010 2:30 – 4 pm Prepared by: Paula Okunieff,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
West Michigan Transit Linkages Study Wednesday, June 4 th, :00 a.m. Grand Valley State University Kirkhof Center Conference Room 2266.
Advertisements

Travel Training Program. Planning Your Trip [Insert Image]
Central Puget Sound Regional Fare Coordination System Regional Program Administrator Seattle, WA Cheryl Huston March 18, 2013.
On-board Survey of Bus and Light Rail Customers May 8, 2006 Transit Marketing, LLC CJI Research Corporation.
New Intercity Bus Funding Approach Stephen Abernathy, AICP Intercity Bus Program Manager Public Transportation Division.
Company confidential Prepared by HERE Transit Sr. Product Manager, HERE Transit Product Overview David Volpe.
Class Diagram & Object Diagram
Cheryl Thole, Jennifer Flynn CUTR/NBRTI, Senior Research Associates Transit in GIS Conference September 14, 2011 St. Petersburg, Florida.
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Understanding Changes in Ridership Unit 7: Forecasting & Encouraging Ridership.
Comprehensive Operations Analysis. Background ■On March 6, 2014, Escambia County Board of County Commissioners approved an agreement between Escambia.
InMoSion: Science Shop for Innovative Mobility Solutions for Mobility Challenged Europeans 3rd INTERNATIONAL MEETING ANKARA, TURKEY Partnering: Civil Engineering.
Market Research and Analysis Demand Forecasting Overview May 30, 2013 Agenda Overview of Demand Forecasting Model Demand Forecasting.
Miao(Mia) Gao, Travel Demand Modeler, HDR Engineering Santanu Roy, Transportation Planning Manager, HDR Engineering Ridership Forecasting for Central Corridor.
PROJECTED RIDERSHIP OF THE HOUSATONIC RAILROAD STUDY Presented by Julie Pokela, Ph.D. August, 2010.
1 Travel, Inc.’s Concur Online Travel Booking Training CC-QPL.0023.E01 10/3/2011 TRA-W.0001.
Enjoy Europe Travel by Train! How to book a VIARail ticket in 11 steps?
1 WORLD TOURISM ORGANIZATION (UNWTO) MEASURING TOURISM EXPENDITURE: A UNWTO PROPOSAL SESRIC-UNWTO WORKSHOP ON TOURISM STATISTICS AND THE ELABORATION OF.
Transit Estimation and Mode Split CE 451/551 Source: NHI course on Travel Demand Forecasting (152054A) Session 7.
SKAGIT-ISLAND HSTP Skagit-Island HSTP Committee Meeting #4 October 1, 2014.
PLANNING RSTWG Review of Planning Concept of Operations & Requirements Tasks.
Keeping Harris County Moving.. Background Transit needs study in Commissioned by H-GAC and Harris County Transportation Coordinated Council.
Welcome to the TSIP Project Webinar Planning Technical Working Group 28 July – 3:30 pm.
Welcome to Travel Incorporated’s Concur ‘Experienced User’ Webinar.
1 REGIONAL SERVICE PLANNING WEBSITE
WYDOT Transit Program Reporting 101 June 16, 2011 Taylor J. Rossetti Joni Kithas Harlan.
Business Logistics 420 Public Transportation Lecture 18: Demand Forecasting.
INTEGRATED TSIP DATA SET EXCHANGE PROFILE What is iTSIP?
Prepared by: DECEMBER 2008 Metro Transit Light- Rail and Bus Rider Survey FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS PERISCOPE.
What People Want Technologies to Enhance Life Suzie Edrington Texas A&M Transportation Institute Transportation Works Summit August 17,
Sunflower Project Data Conversion Workshop May 5, 2009.
System Design Zhen Jiang West Chester University
Region X Local Human Service Transit Coordination Plan Public Workshop RDC Title Date Location Insert transit photo from your community here.
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-10/0765r0 July 2012 Carl Kain, Noblis, Inc.Slide 1 Dynamic Mobility Integrated Dynamic Transit Operations Use Case for ISD Date:
Transportation Conformity Overview H-GAC Conformity Workshop May 30, 2007.
1 Palm Tran Transit Survey Coordination Meeting November 18 th, 2008.
Pilot Programs, Fare Products & Transfers. Pass Development Goals/Criteria Increase ridership Increase revenue Convenient for Public Total number of pass.
Slide 1 Wolfram Höpken RMSIG Reference Model Special Interest Group Third RMSIG Workshop Basic Modeling Concepts Wolfram Höpken.
Key Partners Key Activities Value Proposition Customer Relationships Customer Segments Drivers Phone Company Taking calls Scheduling Convenience Safety.
Measuring rail accessibility using Open Data Elena Navajas-Cawood.
Regional Transportation Council Mobility Plan Workshop North Central Texas Council of Governments November 12, 2015.
Community Partnership Program Don Okazaki, Planner Accessible Services King County Metro.
Transit Signal Priority: The Importance of AVL Data David T. Crout Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation District of Oregon (TriMet) Presented at Transportation.
REGIONAL STAKEHOLDER TWG KICKOFF WEBINAR MAY 4 1:30-3:30 PM Next Generation Transit Service Information Portal.
Class Diagrams Revisited. Parameterized Classes Parameterized Classes - are used to represent relationships between templates.
Presented to Toll Modeling Panel presented by Krishnan Viswanathan, Cambridge Systematics, Inc.. September 16, 2010 Time of Day in FSUTMS.
TRANSPORTATION DISADVANTAGED LOCAL COORDINATING BOARD NOVEMBER 12, 2014 VOLUSIA COUNTY.
Service Guidelines and Standards Capital Metropolitan Transportation Authority Board of Directors Meeting September 2015 capmetro.org |1.
FARE STUDY: STRUCTURE & LEVEL RECOMMENDATION Operations & Customer Service Committee February 10,
FARE STUDY RTD Board Study Session April 28,
FARE STUDY ECOPASS Board of Directors Study Session August 25, 2015.
FARE STUDY UPDATE Operations & Customer Service Committee October 21,
FARE COLLECTION RSTWG 23 SEPTEMBER 2009 TSIP: Fare Calculator Profile.
© 2010 Amadeus IT Group SA 1 Shopping Solutions MP Agent Fare Families Elias Zard Product Manager – Transactional Search Availability & Shopping - Distribution.
Demand Response Software and Hardware
CUTA FACT BOOK WORKSHOP
Summary of Outreach Webpage with video & comment form Public meetings
Great Lakes Aviation, Ltd.
Orange County Transportation Authority Micro-Transit Pilot Program
Staten Island Bus Study Public Workshop
Cost Comparison 14-Hour Rule Seat Upgrades
Central Puget Sound Regional Fare Coordination System
Transit Competitiveness and Market Potential
USDOT ADA Service Requirements
Transit Signal Priority: The Importance of AVL Data
Sales & Marketing Sales and Marketing 14 April 2019
Passenger Mobility Statistics 21 May 2015
AC Transit Proposed Fare Structure Revision & Pricing Changes
OCTA’s Microtransit Pilot Project
RTC RIDE Service Improvement Recommendations
Welcome To Allegiant Air. Allegiant Air Reservations Process Every passenger wants to travel but they restrict themselves due to high fare charges. And.
Presentation transcript:

Review of Fare Collection Concept of Operations and High Level Data Requirements FC RSTWG Webinar May 19, :30 – 4 pm Prepared by: Paula Okunieff, ConSysTec

Use Cases / Scenarios Regional Fare Calculator (Appendix B-1) Marketing Study related to Fare Elasticity (Appendix B-2) ◦Operational Scenario #1: Service Improvements for Low Income/Welfare Populations ◦Operational Scenario #2: Ridership Improvement Study

Fare Calculator System Description Trip Plan (API) Rider Characteristics / Usage Promotion / Restrictions Transfer Rules General Cost Interagency Transfer Rules Fare Cost API (for Trip Plan) Fare Calculator Customer Data InputsData OutputsProcesses

Fare Collection: Needs [N-1] Need for a Trip Planning API. [N-2] Need for Customer Characteristics and Usage to describe Rider Characteristics and Preferences. [N-3] Need for information from Providers / Carriers on fares, fare promotions and restrictions. [N-4] Need for information from Providers / Carriers on transfer rules. [N-5] Need for information from two or more Providers / Carriers on their agreements for transfer between services. [N-6] Need for fare cost interface

[N-1] Data Needs Need for Trip Planning API w/Info Trip Planning API will trigger the request for estimated Fare Cost for a specific trip. The information in the API should include the following: Origin (first stop – locationID and related agencyID) Scheduled start time / date Destination (last stop – locationID and related agencyID) Scheduled completion time / date Number of legs Parking (enter and leave) -- optional For each Leg ◦Provider ◦Mode ◦Route, route direction ◦Trip information: tripID, service type, day type ◦Starting trip time and location ◦Ending trip time and location ◦Distance between starting and ending location

[N-2] Data Needs Need for Customer Information and Usage Info Fare information should include information on rider characteristics and usage such as: Rider class Number of riders Preference for fare products Other characteristics Number of people traveling For each person ◦Age (if a child – under 13 yrs old, then the child’s height) ◦Eligibility [disabled, student, senior, regular] ◦Preference for fare product ◦Other criteria (e.g., return trip ticket, frequent traveler, etc.)

[N-3] Data Needs Need for Fares, Fare Promotions and Restrictions The fare promotions / restrictions should be tagged to one or more of the following parameters… Note: fare structure may be flat, zone, distance and/or time based From N-1 Data ◦Carrier ◦Mode ◦Origin, destination or both ◦Route, route direction ◦Trip information ◦Departure date / time ◦Day type From N-2 Data ◦Fare product type and use ◦Number of travelers ◦Rider class ◦If available from N-2 data  Frequency of travel  Payment option  Product purchase time / location

[N-4] Data Needs Need for Transfer Rules (for each Provider) Each Provider / Carrier should provide information on Transfer Rules. Information derived from the Trip Plan API [N-1] include… Mode to mode Route direction of previous and next trips [order of trip legs] Arrival (or departure) time of previous trip and departure time of next trip Additional information (derived from fare media): ◦Shared or bundled fare product(s) for trips (trip plan)

[N-5] Data Needs Need for Transfer Rules between Providers Provide information on Transfer Rules between Carriers. Information derived from the Trip Plan API [N-1] include… Carrier to carrier Rider class definition Mode to mode Route, route direction (of previous and next trip legs) Arrival (or departure) time of previous trip and departure time of next trip Additional information (derived from fare media): ◦Shared or bundled fare product(s) for trips (trip plan)

[N-6] Data Needs Need for Fare Cost API Interface that provides information on Fare Cost Trip Plan (from N-1) Total base cost Additional information (derived from fare media): ◦Shared or bundled fare product(s) for trips (trip plan)

Moving towards Requirements Describe Data Requirements ◦Define Data Concepts, entities and attributes ◦Describe relationship model (ERD)

Fare Data Model A CUSTOMER generates a PASSENGER TRIP PLAN (PTP). The PTP is composed of one or more LEGs from the CUSTOMER’s ORIGIN to DESTINATION. Each LEG (start and end points; start and end times) is associated with a segment of an AGENCY’s TRIP. (The TRIP is also associated with a MODE-specific TRANSIT VEHICLE, trip type, and other service features.) The FARE may be based on the GEOGRAPHIC UNITs traversed (e.g., DISTANCE traveled, or number of ZONES passed through) for each LEG (ORIGIN to DESTINATION), and the TIME PERIOD (time, date, and duration) when the LEG is to occur. When the PTP has more than one LEG, the total FARE may be the sum of FAREs for each LEG, or the CUSTOMER may transfer (be granted ACCESS RIGHTs) from one TRIP to another with a DEFAULT FARE or composite FARE based on the implementation of BUSINESS RULEs including DISCOUNTs and USAGE FACTORs. The CUSTOMER may purchase one or more FARE PRODUCTs that allow the CUSTOMER a variety of ACCESS RIGHTS to travel and transfer over different GEOGRAHPIC UNITs (Distance/Zones), TIME PERIODs (day type, length of days, time interval during a day*, date*, month*), and between AGENCYs, SERVICE TYPEs (i.e., express vs. local) and MODEs, sometimes governed by the ORDER OF TRAVEL. A BUSINESS RULE may be applied to the FARE COST based on the FARE PRODUCT used, or different USAGE FACTORS such as round trip fares, restricted geographic region, FARE TRANSACTION LOCATION, or the CHARGING METHOD applied to purchase the FARE. Additionally, a DISCOUNT may be applied based on number of people traveling (group and family “tickets”), rider class type, or marketing campaign. * Associated with a “named” period of time, e.g., 7am-10am, , September

Fare Cost… is the intersection of Passenger Trip Plan (N-1), Fare Structure (N-3) and Access Rights (Business Rules) (N-2 to N-5) and how it applies to the Customer(s) (N-2)

Fare Structure [N-3] Each trip has a “default fare” based on an Agency’s Fare Structure for different classes of riders.

Trip Plan [N-1] Description

Access Rights / Business Rules [N-2, N-3, N-4, N-5] Access rights are one or more business rules

Customer Description One or more customers may be associated with the PTP or the FARE

Next Steps Augment model to map to needs Refine language in ConOps to better express data concepts in Data Requirements Publish Systems Engineering Documents (due late June) ◦Final Concept of Operations ◦Draft Data Requirements for Fare Collection