CAT 4: How to Read a Prognosis Article Maribeth Chitkara, MD Rachel Boykan, MD.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
How would you explain the smoking paradox. Smokers fair better after an infarction in hospital than non-smokers. This apparently disagrees with the view.
Advertisements

CRITICAL APPRAISAL ON AN ARTICLE ABOUT PROGNOSIS
Critically Evaluating the Evidence: diagnosis, prognosis, and screening Elizabeth Crabtree, MPH, PhD (c) Director of Evidence-Based Practice, Quality Management.
1 Case-Control Study Design Two groups are selected, one of people with the disease (cases), and the other of people with the same general characteristics.
Journal Club Alcohol, Other Drugs, and Health: Current Evidence May–June 2010.
Evidence-Based Medicine Week 3 - Prognosis Department of Medicine - Residency Training Program Tuesdays, 9:00 a.m. - 11:30 a.m., UW Health Sciences Library.
Critical Appraisal for MRCGP Jim McMorran Coventry GP GP trainer Editor GPnotebook (
Journal Club Alcohol and Health: Current Evidence March-April 2007.
Biostatistics ~ Types of Studies. Research classifications Observational vs. Experimental Observational – researcher collects info on attributes or measurements.
Journal Club Alcohol, Other Drugs, and Health: Current Evidence January–February 2009.
Journal Club Alcohol and Health: Current Evidence November–December 2004.
Journal Club Alcohol, Other Drugs, and Health: Current Evidence November-December 2007.
Journal Club Alcohol and Health: Current Evidence March-April 2005.
Journal Club Alcohol, Other Drugs, and Health: Current Evidence May-June 2007.
1.A 33 year old female patient admitted to the ICU with confirmed pulmonary embolism. It was noted that she had elevated serum troponin level. Does this.
Journal Club Alcohol, Other Drugs, and Health: Current Evidence April 2008.
1 Journal Club Alcohol, Other Drugs, and Health: Current Evidence July–August 2011.
Journal Club Alcohol, Other Drugs, and Health: Current Evidence September-October 2007.
Journal Club Alcohol and Health: Current Evidence November-December 2005.
Journal Club Alcohol and Health: Current Evidence May-June 2006.
Journal Club Alcohol and Health: Current Evidence July–August 2004.
Journal Club Alcohol and Health: Current Evidence January-February 2005.
Journal Club Alcohol and Health: Current Evidence September-October 2005.
Chapter 25 Asking and Answering Questions About the Difference Between Two Population Means: Paired Samples.
Vanderbilt Sports Medicine Chapter 4: Prognosis Presented by: Laurie Huston and Kurt Spindler Evidence-Based Medicine How to Practice and Teach EBM.
Journal Club Alcohol, Other Drugs, and Health: Current Evidence May-June 2008.
EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE
Cohort Studies Hanna E. Bloomfield, MD, MPH Professor of Medicine Associate Chief of Staff, Research Minneapolis VA Medical Center.
Critical Appraisal of an Article on Therapy (2). Formulate Clinical Question Patient/ population Intervention Comparison Outcome (s) Women with IBS Alosetron.
Are the results valid? Was the validity of the included studies appraised?
Clinical Appraisal of an Article on Prognosis The Clinical Question Will the prognosis of patients with gout be affected by the administration allupurinol?
DEB BYNUM, MD AUGUST 2010 Evidence Based Medicine: Review of the basics.
CAT 2: Therapy Maribeth Chitkara, MD Rachel Boykan, MD Stony Brook Long Island Children’s Hospital.
Dr Laura Bonnett Department of Biostatistics. UNDERSTANDING SURVIVAL ANALYSIS.
CAT 3 Harm, Causation Maribeth Chitkara, MD Rachel Boykan, MD.
EBCP. Random vs Systemic error Random error: errors in measurement that lead to measured values being inconsistent when repeated measures are taken. Ie:
A short introduction to epidemiology Chapter 2b: Conducting a case- control study Neil Pearce Centre for Public Health Research Massey University Wellington,
Lecture 7 Objective 18. Describe the elements of design of observational studies: case ‑ control studies (retrospective studies). Discuss the advantages.
VSM CHAPTER 6: HARM Evidence-Based Medicine How to Practice and Teach EMB.
Wipanee Phupakdi, MD September 15, Overview  Define EBM  Learn steps in EBM process  Identify parts of a well-built clinical question  Discuss.
Which factors predict outcome in the nonoperative treatment of patellofemoral pain syndrome? A prospective follow-up study Kannus P, Nittymaki S. Med.
1 Lecture 6: Descriptive follow-up studies Natural history of disease and prognosis Survival analysis: Kaplan-Meier survival curves Cox proportional hazards.
Prediction statistics Prediction generally True and false, positives and negatives Quality of a prediction Usefulness of a prediction Prediction goes Bayesian.
Prognosis study EBM questions. Prognostic factors Characteristics of patient that may predict eventual outcome Several types: demographic (eg age) disease-specific.
Critical Appraisal (CA) I Prepared by Dr. Hoda Abd El Azim.
CAT 5: How to Read an Article about a Systematic Review Maribeth Chitkara, MD Rachel Boykan, MD.
EBM --- Journal Reading Presenter :呂宥達 Date : 2005/10/27.
Compliance Original Study Design Randomised Surgical care Medical care.
EVALUATING u After retrieving the literature, you have to evaluate or critically appraise the evidence for its validity and applicability to your patient.
Clinical Epidemiology and Evidence-based Medicine Unit FKUI – RSCM
Understanding lack of validity: Bias
Case Control Studies Dr Amna Rehana Siddiqui Department of Family and Community Medicine October 17, 2010.
Vanderbilt Sports Medicine Evidence-Base Medicine How to Practice and Teach EBM Chapter 5 : Therapy.
بسم الله الرحمن الرحیم.
EBM --- Journal Reading Presenter :林禹君 Date : 2005/10/26.
Corso di clinical writing. What to expect today? Core modules IntroductionIntroduction General principlesGeneral principles Specific techniquesSpecific.
EBM --- Journal Reading Presenter :黃美琴 Date : 2005/10/27.
Article Title Resident Name, MD SVCH6/13/2016 Journal Club.
© 2010 Jones and Bartlett Publishers, LLC. Chapter 12 Clinical Epidemiology.
1 Prediction of survival using absolute lymphocyte count for newly diagnosed patients with multiple myeloma:a retrospective study Hilmi Ege, Morie A.Gertz,
March 28 Analyses of binary outcomes 2 x 2 tables
Epidemiological Studies
Alcohol, Other Drugs, and Health: Current Evidence March–April 2017
Alcohol, Other Drugs, and Health: Current Evidence March–April 2018
PICO model for developing EBM questions
Kantarjian HM et al. Blood 2008;112:Abstract 635.
Alcohol, Other Drugs, and Health: Current Evidence
Appraising Evidence About Prognosis
Evidence Based Diagnosis
Alcohol, Other Drugs, and Health: Current Evidence May–June 2019
Presentation transcript:

CAT 4: How to Read a Prognosis Article Maribeth Chitkara, MD Rachel Boykan, MD

You are on service on 11N and taking care of a 2 year old patient who was admitted with a first time febrile seizure. The parents are understandably shaken by the experience and have many questions for you. The thing they are most worried about, is whether or not their child will have any longstanding neurologic deficits. In other words, will this impair the child’s chances of getting into Harvard?

Prognosis Prognostic factors don’t necessarily cause the outcome, just have a strong enough association to predict the development of the outcome. Prognostic factors don’t necessarily cause the outcome, just have a strong enough association to predict the development of the outcome. Different from Risk Factors - patient characteristics associated with the development of the disease at all. Different from Risk Factors - patient characteristics associated with the development of the disease at all.

Prognostic Factors in ALL Gender Gender Ethnicity Ethnicity Age at diagnosis Age at diagnosis WBC count at diagnosis WBC count at diagnosis Cytogenetic markers Cytogenetic markers Presence or absences of CNS disease Presence or absences of CNS disease Response to initial treatment Response to initial treatment Genetic conditions (Down’s Syndrome ) Genetic conditions (Down’s Syndrome )

Prognosis: Study Designs Cohort (ideal) Cohort (ideal) Investigators follow one or more groups over time to look for specific outcome Investigators follow one or more groups over time to look for specific outcome Case Control Case Control “case” with outcome of interest, “control” without, retrospectively look back for prognostic factors “case” with outcome of interest, “control” without, retrospectively look back for prognostic factors Subject to recall bias Subject to recall bias Appropriate when outcome of interest is rare Appropriate when outcome of interest is rare

Prognosis - Validity Was there a representative and well-defined sample of patients at a similar point in the course of the disease? Was there a representative and well-defined sample of patients at a similar point in the course of the disease? Was follow-up sufficiently long and complete? Was follow-up sufficiently long and complete? Were objective and unbiased outcome criteria used? Were objective and unbiased outcome criteria used? Was there adjustment for important prognostic factors? Was there adjustment for important prognostic factors?

Prognosis - Results Quantitative results from studies of prognosis or risk are the number of events that occur over time How large is the likelihood of the outcome event in a specified period of time? How large is the likelihood of the outcome event in a specified period of time? How precise are the estimates of likelihood? (confidence intervals) How precise are the estimates of likelihood? (confidence intervals)

What are the Results? Outcome Present Outcome Absent Prognostic Factor Present ab Prognostic Factor Absent cd Relative Risk (a/a+b)/(c/c +d) Relative Risk (a/a+b)/(c/c +d) Absolute Risk Increase Absolute Risk Increase (a/a+b) – (c/c+d)

Survival Curves

Prognosis - Applicability Even when valid, a prognostic study provides only an estimate of the true risk. Even when valid, a prognostic study provides only an estimate of the true risk. Will the results help me in caring for my patients? Will the results help me in caring for my patients? Were the study patients similar to mine? Were the study patients similar to mine? Will the results lead directly to selecting or avoiding therapy Will the results lead directly to selecting or avoiding therapy Are the results useful for reassuring or counseling patients? Are the results useful for reassuring or counseling patients?