June 2015 K-3 Reading Countywide Data. Results Collected.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Scott Linner Aimsweb Trainer Aimsweb support

Advertisements

Presented to NHC Human Relations Commission January 26, 2009 John S. Rice & Jessica L. MacDonald Learning to Read at Hillcrest.

DIBELS Progress Monitoring Instructions and Video Testing Samples

DRAFT ELP STANDARDS SURVEY RESULTS August Geographic Distribution of Respondents n = 49.

Data in Reading Club: Understanding scores, goals, & more Fall 2013 Marcy Buergler Assistant Coordinator for Curriculum & Special Services Licensed Reading.

Everything We Need to Know for Intervention Notebooks.

An Introduction to Response to Intervention

Goal Setting Valerie O’Connor Bassett Elementary School.

Dominie Overview and SWS Training

Assessment Dashboard January 2013 Page Unified School District Curriculum AssessmentInstruction Data.

EOY Reading 3D NC Comparison Templates The following slides contain a combination of state-level EOY mCLASS reports paired with blank templates.

Aligning Interventions with Core How to meet student needs without creating curricular chaos.

/ Building Improvement Update / May School Board Meeting.

Project MORE Independent Evaluation Completed by The Center for Evaluation Services Bowling Green State University Updated 11/12.

Hawthorne Elementary Board Report 2008 – 2009 Kennewick School District.

Title I Parent Meeting Miami Elementary School

Assessment Dashboard August 2012 Page Unified School District Curriculum AssessmentInstruction Data.

ROYAL SCHOOL DISTRICT ELL DATA WALK Language Development Opportunities LLC

Dynamic Measurement Group (DMG) Part 2.

Aligning Interventions with Core How to meet student needs without creating curricular chaos.

The Law  Section , paragraph 3… A requirement that a pupil not be promoted from the third grade if the pupil obtains a score on the reading portion.

Antelope Hills First Grade Back to School Night August, 2010.

Are You Smarter Than a 5 th Grader? 1,000,000 5th Grade TOPIC 1 5th Grade TOPIC2 4th Grade TOPIC3 4th Grade TOPIC4 3rd Grade TOPIC5 3rd Grade TOPIC6.

2008 CRCT Domain Summary Beecher Hills Elementary School Numbers Represent the Average % Correct in Each Domain SRT-1.

HOW DO WE USE DIBELS WITH AN OUTCOMES-DRIVEN MODEL? Identify the Need for Support Validate the Need for Support Plan Support Evaluate Effectiveness of.

JUNE 2014 K-3 COUNTYWIDE READING DATA. RESULTS COLLECTED.

EOY DIBELS Benchmark Data for Intervention Programs Oregon Reading First Schools June, 2009 © 2009 by the Oregon Reading First Center Center on Teaching.

3 rd Grade Parent Meeting Union Cross Elementary October 05, 2010.

Orange County School District Benchmark Three Consultative Session.

Digging Deeper with Screening Data: Creating Intervention Groups Gresham-Barlow School District September 8, 2011.

Overview For Parents Introduce yourself and any co-trainers to your staff.

WILLIAM H. KING ELEMENTARY “TIME IS SLIPPING AWAY” Mr. Flowers, Acting Principal Mr. Millman, Asst. Acting Principal Ms. Breckenridge, 5 th Grade Teacher.

Madison Simis You will be amazed!. Simis is An “A” School.

DIBELS: Doing it Right –. Big Ideas of Today’s Presentation Reading success is built upon a foundation of skills DIBELS (Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early.

The State of Our School Fall, Goals What do we want all children to know and be able to do with text in our school? K – 90% of students will reach.

 Life Expectancy is 180 th in the World.  Literacy Rate is 4 th in Africa.

Kindergarten- 1 st Grade November, Lesson 1 Mouse Control and PowerPoint All clipart from Microsoft PowerPoint.

DRA DEVELOPMENTAL READING ASSESSMENT DeEtte Wick Victoria.

Progress Monitoring Goal Setting Overview of Measures Keith Drieberg, Director of Psychological Services John Oliveri, School Psychologist Cathleen Geraghty,

Trigg County Primary School Principal’s Report May 12, 2011.

Somers Public Schools Building and Departmental Goals

RTI Trends & Issues Keith Drieberg Brad McDuffee San Bernardino City Unified School District Keith Drieberg Brad McDuffee San Bernardino City Unified School.

Delaware Statewide DIBELS Results. Statewide K-3 DIBELS Results Fall ,794 Total K-3 Students Tested: 3,794.

K-6 Critical Areas of Focus K-6 Key Fluencies Kindergarten – Critical Areas of Focus.

 have a working knowledge of all available data reports;  have a working knowledge of how to interpret data available from the PMRN; and  be able to.

McBean Elementary School BOY Data

What is AIMSweb? AIMSweb is a benchmark and progress monitoring system based on direct, frequent and continuous student assessment.

Mrs. Calayag Ms. Tsinigine

Assessment-driven Classroom Management Using PALS Results Managing Your Literacy Block Organizing Literacy Centers.

K–3 Literacy Assessment Reporting and DIBELS Reporting

Addition Fact Fluency First Grade.

ALGEBRA SWAG – Mr. Relles

CATCH ME AT MY BEST WHO MADE YOUR DAY SPECIAL?

CATCH ME AT MY BEST WHO MADE YOUR DAY SPECIAL?

School-Wide Achievement Mathematics

Grade one First term Second term Learning unit Learning unit

Are You Smarter Than a 5th Grader?

Ms. Williams Mrs. Taquiso Mrs. Yazzie

Paired Verbal Fluency 3 rounds 1st: Partner A then Partner B

Third Grade EOG Information

Progression of Text Levels Expected in Grades 1 - 5

Data in Reading Club: Understanding scores, goals, & more Fall 2013

Kindergarten Lessons 5-8

K-3 Reading Countywide Data

CATCH ME AT MY BEST WHO MADE YOUR DAY SPECIAL?

October 2014 Star Data Prior to the C.A.F.E. Reading Initiative these were the results attained.

If your time was: Your wpm are: Your wpm are: 1: 3: 1: 3: 1: 3: 3: 1:

End of the Year Data Review

Indicators of Early Literacy Skills: Dibels

Presentation transcript:

June 2015 K-3 Reading Countywide Data

Results Collected

KINDERGARTEN 20 of 24 districts submitted data 1663 students tested

LETTER SOUNDS KINDERGARTEN 1629 Students Number Correct Corresponding Levels 0 to 10Far Below 11 to 29Below 30 to 39On Level 40 to 59Above 60+Well Above

Number Correct Corresponding Levels 0 to 10Far Below 11 to 29Below 30 to 39On Level 40 to 59Above 60+Well Above LETTER SOUNDS KINDERGARTEN 1629 STUDENTS

LETTER NAMES KINDERGARTEN 1661 Students Number Correct Corresponding Levels 0 to 45Far Below 46 to 55Below 56 to 65On Level 66 to 80Above 81 +Well Above

LETTER NAMES KINDERGARTEN 1661 Students Number Correct Corresponding Levels 0 to 45Far Below 46 to 55Below 56 to 65On Level 66 to 80Above 81 +Well Above

LETTER NAMES KINDERGARTEN 1661 Students Number Correct Corresponding Levels 0 to 45Far Below 46 to 55Below 56 to 65On Level 66 to 80Above 81 +Well Above

LETTER NAMES KINDERGARTEN 1661 Students Number Correct Corresponding Levels 0 to 45Far Below 46 to 55Below 56 to 65On Level 66 to 80Above 81 +Well Above

GRADE 1 20 of 24 districts submitted data 1585 students tested

ORAL READING FLUENCY GRADE students Number Correct Corresponding Levels 0 to 15Far Below 16 to 59Below 60 to 79On Level 80 to 99Above 100+Well Above

ORAL READING FLUENCY GRADE students Number Correct Corresponding Levels 0 to 15Far Below 16 to 59Below 60 to 79On Level 80 to 99Above 100+Well Above

ORAL READING FLUENCY GRADE students Number Correct Corresponding Levels 0 to 15Far Below 16 to 59Below 60 to 79On Level 80 to 99Above 100+Well Above

ORAL READING FLUENCY GRADE students Number Correct Corresponding Levels 0 to 15Far Below 16 to 59Below 60 to 79On Level 80 to 99Above 100+Well Above

Comparison Kindergarten & 1 st Grade “On Level, Above & Well Above” LEVEL PERCENTAGE CORRECT

GRADE 2 20 of 24 districts submitted data 1668 students tested in grade students tested in Comprehension (MAZE) 963 students tested in Comprehension (DAZE) 1651 students tested in Oral Reading Fluency

COMPREHENSION MAZE - GRADE students Number Correct Corresponding Levels 0 to 8Far Below 9 to 15Below 16 to 20On Level 21 to 26Above 27 to 51Well Above

COMPREHENSION Maze - GRADE students Number Correct Corresponding Levels 0 to 8Far Below 9 to 15Below 16 to 20On Level 21 to 26Above 27 to 51Well Above

COMPREHENSION MAZE - GRADE students “BELOW” LEVEL BY NUMBER CORRECT Number Correct Corresponding Levels 0 to 8Far Below 9 to 15Below 16 to 20On Level 21 to 26Above 27 to 51Well Above

COMPREHENSION DAZE - GRADE students Number Correct Corresponding Levels 0 to 6Far Below 7 to 11Below 12 to 16On Level 17 to 26Above 27 to 51Well Above

COMPREHENSION DAZE - GRADE students Number Correct Corresponding Levels 0 to 6Far Below 7 to 11Below 12 to 16On Level 17 to 26Above 27 to 51Well Above

COMPREHENSION DAZE - GRADE students “BELOW” LEVEL BY NUMBER CORRECT Number Correct Corresponding Levels 0 to 6Far Below 7 to 11Below 12 to 16On Level 17 to 26Above 27 to 51Well Above

ORAL READING FLUENCY GRADE students Number Correct Corresponding Levels 0 to 69Far Below 70 to 100Below 101 to 120On Level 121+Above

ORAL READING FLUENCY GRADE students Number Correct Corresponding Levels 0 to 69Far Below 70 to 100Below 101 to 120On Level 121+Above

ORAL READING FLUENCY GRADE students “BELOW” LEVEL BY WPM RANGE Number Correct Corresponding Levels 0 to 69Far Below 70 to 100Below 101 to 120On Level 121+Above

Comparison 1 st Grade & 2 ND grade “On Level & Above” LEVEL PERCENTAGE CORRECT

GRADE 3 20 of 24 districts submitted data 1516 students tested 1395 students tested in Comprehension 1373 students tested in Oral Reading Fluency

COMPREHENSION GRADE students Number Correct Corresponding Levels 0 to 13Far Below 14 to 21Below 22 to 30On Level 31 to 35Above 36+Well Above

COMPREHENSION GRADE students Number Correct Corresponding Levels 0 to 13Far Below 14 to 21Below 22 to 30On Level 31 to 35Above 36+Well Above

COMPREHENSION GRADE 3 “BELOW” LEVEL BY NUMBER CORRECT Number Correct Corresponding Levels 0 to 13Far Below 14 to 21Below 22 to 30On Level 31 to 35Above 36+Well Above

ORAL READING FLUENCY GRADE students Number Correct Corresponding Levels 0 to 96Far Below 97 to 119Below 120 to 130On Level 131+Above

ORAL READING FLUENCY GRADE students Number Correct Corresponding Levels 0 to 96Far Below 97 to 119Below 120 to 130On Level 131+Above

ORAL READING FLUENCY GRADE students “BELOW” LEVEL BY WPM RANGE Number Correct Corresponding Levels 0 to 96Far Below 97 to 119Below 120 to 130On Level 131+Above

Comparison 2 nd Grade & 3 rd grade “On Level & Above” LEVEL PERCENTAGE CORRECT