Ocean Dynamics Algorithm GOES-R AWG Eileen Maturi, NOAA/NESDIS/STAR/SOCD, Igor Appel, STAR/IMSG, Andy Harris, CICS, Univ of Maryland AMS 92 nd Annual Meeting,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Experiments with Monthly Satellite Ocean Color Fields in a NCEP Operational Ocean Forecast System PI: Eric Bayler, NESDIS/STAR Co-I: David Behringer, NWS/NCEP/EMC/GCWMB.
Advertisements

1 QPE / Rainfall Rate January 10, 2014 Presented By: Bob Kuligowski NOAA/NESDIS/STAR.
Convective Initiation Studies at UW-CIMSS K. Bedka (SSAI/NASA LaRC), W. Feltz (UW-CIMSS), J. Sieglaff (UW-CIMSS), L. Cronce (UW-CIMSS) Objectives Develop.
Bureau of Meteorology GOES-9 AMVs Generation and Assimilation Bureau of Meteorology GOES-9 AMVs Generation and Assimilation.
Computing motion between images
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 NOAA Operational Geostationary Sea Surface Temperature Products from NOAA.
1 GOES-R AWG Ocean Dynamics Team: Ocean Currents and Offshore Ocean Currents Algorithm June 14, 2011 Presented By: Eileen Maturi 1, Igor Appel 2, Andy.
Analysis of High Resolution Infrared Images of Hurricanes from Polar Satellites as a Proxy for GOES-R INTRODUCTION GOES-R will include the Advanced Baseline.
Dr. Sarawut NINSAWAT GEO Grid Research Group/ITRI/AIST GEO Grid Research Group/ITRI/AIST Development of OGC Framework for Estimating Near Real-time Air.
Introduction and Methodology Daniel T. Lindsey*, NOAA/NESDIS/STAR/RAMMB Louie Grasso, Cooperative Institute for Research in the Atmosphere
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 Image: MODIS Land Group, NASA GSFC March 2000 POES-GOES Blended SST Analysis.
1 GOES-R AWG Hydrology Algorithm Team: Rainfall Probability June 14, 2011 Presented By: Bob Kuligowski NOAA/NESDIS/STAR.
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 CLOUD MASK AND QUALITY CONTROL FOR SST WITHIN THE ADVANCED CLEAR SKY PROCESSOR.
UNCLASSIFIED Navy Applications of GOES-R Richard Crout, PhD Naval Meteorology and Oceanography Command Satellite Programs Presented to 3rd GOES-R Conference.
May 16-18, 2005MultTemp 2005, Biloxi, MS1 Monitoring Change Through Hierarchical Segmentation of Remotely Sensed Image Data James C. Tilton Mail Code 606*
1 GOES-R AWG Hydrology Algorithm Team: Rainfall Potential June 14, 2011 Presented By: Bob Kuligowski NOAA/NESDIS/STAR.
GOES-R ABI PROXY DATA SET GENERATION AT CIMSS Mathew M. Gunshor, Justin Sieglaff, Erik Olson, Thomas Greenwald, Jason Otkin, and Allen Huang Cooperative.
1 The GOES-R Rainfall Rate / QPE Algorithm Status May 1, 2011 Presented By: Bob Kuligowski NOAA/NESDIS/STAR.
© Crown copyright Met Office Plans for Met Office contribution to SMOS+STORM Evolution James Cotton & Pete Francis, Satellite Applications, Met Office,
1 Center for S a t ellite A pplications and R esearch (STAR) Applicability of GOES-R AWG Cloud Algorithms for JPSS/VIIRS AMS Annual Meeting Future Operational.
Advanced Baseline Imager (ABI) will be flown on the next generation of NOAA Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellite (GOES)-R platform. The sensor.
Algorithm and Software Development of Atmospheric Motion Vector Products for the GOES-R ABI Jaime M. Daniels 1, Wayne Bresky 2, Chris Velden 3, Iliana.
Data Extraction using Image Similarity CIS 601 Image Processing Ajay Kumar Yadav.
An Efficient Search Strategy for Block Motion Estimation Using Image Features Digital Video Processing 1 Term Project Feng Li Michael Su Xiaofeng Fan.
11 Ice Cover and Sea and Lake Ice Concentration with GOES-R ABI Presented by Yinghui Liu Presented by Yinghui Liu 1 Team Members: Yinghui Liu, Jeffrey.
December 9, 2014Computer Vision Lecture 23: Motion Analysis 1 Now we will talk about… Motion Analysis.
P1.85 DEVELOPMENT OF SIMULATED GOES PRODUCTS FOR GFS AND NAM Hui-Ya Chuang and Brad Ferrier Environmental Modeling Center, NCEP, Washington DC Introduction.
GOES-R Ocean Dynamics: Ocean Surface Currents From SST Kinematic and Dynamic Approaches Eileen Maturi, Andy Harris: NOAA/NESDIS/STAR Ted Strub, Alexander.
Investigating the use of Deep Convective Clouds (DCCs) to monitor on-orbit performance of the Geostationary Lightning Mapper (GLM) using Lightning Imaging.
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 Image: MODIS Land Group, NASA GSFC March 2000 Infrared Temperature and.
1 GOES-R AWG Product Validation Tool Development Derived Motion Winds Jaime Daniels (STAR) Wayne Bresky (IMSG, Inc) Steve Wanzong (CIMSS) Chris Velden.
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 Image: MODIS Land Group, NASA GSFC March 2000 Satellite Wind Products Presented.
VALIDATION AND IMPROVEMENT OF THE GOES-R RAINFALL RATE ALGORITHM Background Robert J. Kuligowski, Center for Satellite Applications and Research, NOAA/NESDIS,
As components of the GOES-R ABI Air Quality products, a multi-channel algorithm similar to MODIS/VIIRS for NOAA’s next generation geostationary satellite.
R. T. Pinker, H. Wang, R. Hollmann, and H. Gadhavi Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Science, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland Use of.
1 Developing Assimilation Techniques For Atmospheric Motion Vectors Derived via a New Nested Tracking Algorithm Derived for the GOES-R Advanced Baseline.
Developing Assimilation Techniques for Atmospheric Motion Vectors Derived via a New Nested Tracking Algorithm Derived for the GOES-R Advanced Baseline.
Evaluation of the Real-Time Ocean Forecast System in Florida Atlantic Coastal Waters June 3 to 8, 2007 Matthew D. Grossi Department of Marine & Environmental.
Introduction GOES-R ABI will be the first GOES imaging instrument providing observations in both the visible and the near infrared spectral bands. Therefore.
The Hyperspectral Environmental Suite (HES) and Advanced Baseline Imager (ABI) will be flown on the next generation of NOAA Geostationary Operational Environmental.
Satellite Precipitation Estimation and Nowcasting Plans for the GOES-R Era Robert J. Kuligowski NOAA/NESDIS Center for Satellite Applications and Research.
AMVs Derived via a New Nested Tracking Algorithm Developed for the GOES-R ABI Jaime Daniels 1, Wayne Bresky 2, Steve Wanzong 3 and Chris Velden 3 NOAA/NESDIS,
Retrieval Algorithms The derivations for each satellite consist of two steps: 1) cloud detection using a Bayesian Probabilistic Cloud Mask; and 2) application.
Purpose of project: Reduction of project risks related to quality of cloud detection / masking for multiple applications over land and sea. Will provide.
Yi Chao Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology
Validation of Satellite-derived Clear-sky Atmospheric Temperature Inversions in the Arctic Yinghui Liu 1, Jeffrey R. Key 2, Axel Schweiger 3, Jennifer.
Infrared and Microwave Remote Sensing of Sea Surface Temperature Gary A. Wick NOAA Environmental Technology Laboratory January 14, 2004.
AVHRR Radiance Bias Correction Andy Harris, Jonathan Mittaz NOAA Cooperative Institute for Climate Studies University of Maryland Some concepts and some.
1 GOES-R AWG Product Validation Tool Development Hydrology Application Team Bob Kuligowski (STAR)
Image Quality Measures Omar Javed, Sohaib Khan Dr. Mubarak Shah.
May 15, 2002MURI Hyperspectral Workshop1 Cloud and Aerosol Products From GIFTS/IOMI Gary Jedlovec and Sundar Christopher NASA Global Hydrology and Climate.
Towards Assimilation of GOES Hourly winds in the NCEP Global Forecast System (GFS) Xiujuan Su, Jaime Daniels, John Derber, Yangrong Lin, Andy Bailey, Wayne.
MASKS © 2004 Invitation to 3D vision Lecture 3 Image Primitives andCorrespondence.
Xiujuan Su 1, John Derber 2, Jaime Daniel 3,Andrew Collard 1 1: IMSG, 2: EMC/NWS/NOAA, 3.NESDIS Assimilation of GOES hourly shortwave and visible AMVs.
Assimilating Cloudy Infrared Brightness Temperatures in High-Resolution Numerical Models Using Ensemble Data Assimilation Jason A. Otkin and Rebecca Cintineo.
Shaima Nasiri University of Wisconsin-Madison Bryan Baum NASA - Langley Research Center Detection of Overlapping Clouds with MODIS: TX-2002 MODIS Atmospheres.
Data Distribution/dissemination Method
“CMORPH” is a method that creates spatially & temporally complete information using existing precipitation products that are derived from passive microwave.
Joint GRWG and GDWG Meeting February 2010, Toulouse, France
Plans for Met Office contribution to SMOS+STORM Evolution
Using SCIAMACHY to calibrate GEO imagers
Mark A. Bourassa and Qi Shi
A study of the AMV correlation surface
Assimilation of GOES-R Atmospheric Motion Vectors
Analysis of the Wind Resource off New Jersey for Offshore Wind Energy Development Hugh Roarty, Joe Riscica, Laura Palamara, Louis Bowers, Greg Seroka,
Initialization of Numerical Forecast Models with Satellite data
Validation for TPW (PGE06)
Physical Description; Estimating Atmospheric Motion
Satellite Wind Vectors from GOES Sounder Moisture Fields
G16 vs. G17 IR Inter-comparison: Some Experiences and Lessons from validation toward GEO-GEO Inter-calibration Fangfang Yu, Xiangqian Wu, Hyelim Yoo and.
Presentation transcript:

Ocean Dynamics Algorithm GOES-R AWG Eileen Maturi, NOAA/NESDIS/STAR/SOCD, Igor Appel, STAR/IMSG, Andy Harris, CICS, Univ of Maryland AMS 92 nd Annual Meeting, New Orleans, Louisiana, January 22-27, 2012 Background ●At present, there is no NOAA real-time single- sensor (imager) algorithm for ocean currents ●However, feature tracking is performed to derive Atmospheric Motion Vectors on an operational basis ●Difference for ocean currents is that speeds are 1-2 orders of magnitude slower than for winds ●Thus image-to-image registration becomes critical  Note: All AWG algorithms are developed under the assumption of accurate calibration and navigation ●Substantial “from scratch” development effort required for this Day 2 product GOES-R ABI – key aspects ●Imaging every 15 minutes (full-disk) ●16 bands, including several in thermal IR “window” ●Spatial resolution of 2 km (for thermal IR) ●Image navigation accuracy specification 750 m Meteosat-8/9 SEVIRI – selected proxy ●Chosen as best proxy data upon which to develop and test algorithm for this task:  “Similar” thermal bands  Resolution 3 km (for thermal IR)  15-minute full-disk imaging  Spin-scan stabilization (vs. 3-axis for GOES-R Platform) – not clear what the actual image-to- image navigation accuracy is, but is thought to be “good” ●Obviously not easy to test for regions of interest specific to US coastal waters  N.B. requirement is for 2 products: “Ocean Currents” and “Ocean Currents: Offshore” – the latter has US Exclusive Economic Zone masked Methodology ●Required accuracy is 0.3 m.s -1 for ocean current U & V components, 3-hour refresh rate The GOES-R ocean surface vector approach consists of the following general steps: 1.Locate and select a suitable target in second image (middle image; time=t 0 ) of image triplet 2.Use a pattern matching algorithm to locate the target in an earlier and later image. Track target backward in time (to first image; time=t- Δ t) and forward in time (to third image; time=t+ Δ t) and compute corresponding displacement vectors. Compute mean vector displacement valid at time = t 0 3.Perform quality assurance on ocean surface vectors. Flag suspect vectors. Compute and append quality indicators to each vector 4.Apply mask to get Offshore Currents Validation ●SEVIRI data centered at 12 UTC were selected for 8 days in each season (total 32 days) ●A variety of target sizes were evaluated Compare with currents from the global version of the Navy Coastal Ocean Model (NCOM)  Advantage of using model field is that vectors are available “everywhere”  Potential for model-related biases (e.g. displaced currents, errors in forcing fields). However, NCOM does assimilate data (e.g. Altimetry) and is therefore constrained by it  “Global” NCOM is high resolution (at least eddy-resolving) Read GOES-R IR & SST data Ocean Currents Algorithm (feature detection, pattern matching – SSD*, vector derivation, QC) *SSD = Sum of Squared Differences Apply Cloud Mask & Land Mask Output Ocean Current Vectors I 1 =Temperature at pixel (x 1,y 1 ) of the target scene I 2 =Temperature at pixel (x 2,y 2 ) of the search scene Sum-of-Squared Differences (SSD) Summation is carried out for all possible target scene positions within the search region The matching scene corresponds to the scene where the function takes on the smallest value Search Region Original Target Scene Matching Scene North Africa July 8, 2005 Example Ocean Current Vectors derived from MSG-SEVIRI image triplet centered at 12Z Vector length indicates derived current strength (1 degree = 1 m.s -1 ) Shows upwelling off N Africa, combined with complex current pattern in the vicinity of the Canary Islands Median = 0.13 R.S.D. = Median = 0.06 R.S.D. = Orange = gaussian curve represented by S.D. Green = gaussian represented by R.S.D. Blue = histogram of errors (MSG – NCOM) 5×5 Target Note: green curve matches peak & central distribution 80% 100%  =0.3  =0.5 Inclusion of “weak” gradient targets degrades accuracy One solution to achieve 100% requirement is to QC output using gradient strength ●Validation against HYCOM assimilation runs ●Investigate: 1) impact of geolocation errors in proxy data; 2) alternative cloud mask; 3) alternative pattern matching & data assimilation approaches (OSU/CIOSS)