ERCOT Guideline for Interim Updates to the Network Operations Model Excerpted from the “Modeling Expectations” whitepaper 7-6-2010 D.W. Rickerson.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Overview of ERCOT Outage Coordination Woody Rickerson Director Grid Coordination January 2015.
Advertisements

February 25, 2011 Demand Side Working Group EILS Update Mark Patterson ERCOT, Manager Demand Integration.
Zonal ADR Resettlement & Data Retention ERCOT CSWG 04/20/2015.
CMWG Update June WMS Meeting CMWG Update 1. CMWG (Vote) Confirmation of new Vice Chair: Greg Thurnher (Representing Luminant/TXU Energy) 2.
1 TSP Nodal Engagement Market Participant Call ERCOT August 04, 2010.
June 12, 2008 ROS SEM Go-Live procedure Linda Clarke.
Texas Regional Entity Update Sam Jones Interim CEO and President Board of Directors July 18, 2006.
NPRR 365 Change in Resource Outage Approvals from 8 to 45 or 90 Days Woody Rickerson Director Grid Coordination
ROS Feb 2006 The Model Curtis Crews Network Model Engineering Supervisor
1 Single Entry Model (SEM) Go-Live Update ROS Update July 16, 2009.
Lead from the front Texas Nodal 1 External Web Services Update Nodal Implementation Team Presentation July 7, 2009.
SPS policy – Information Presentation Presentation to ROS June 16, 2004.
EDS 2 Early Delivery Systems Review and Request for Approval May 2007 John Webb.
Texas Nodal 1 Nodal Operations Model Posting Confirmation TAC May 7, 2009 Matt Mereness, ERCOT.
ROS Meeting – 12/06/071Texas Nodal Program - TPTF Update Texas Nodal Transition Plan Task Force ROS Meeting Stacy Bridges, ERCOT Thursday, 12/06/2007.
1 Nodal Single Entry Model (SEM) Go-Live WMS Update May 18, 2009.
Wholesale Market Rule Monitoring and Enforcement by the Public Utility Commission of Texas Danielle Jaussaud PUCT Wholesale Market Oversight March 23,
1 Cutover Market Call December 01, :30 AM.
CMWG Update to WMS Report of CMWG Meeting of M Wagner Edison Mission Marketing & Trading.
Transmission Outage Process April Purpose In compliance with the Protocols and the Electric Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT) Operating Guides,
January 21, 2008 TPTF 168 Hour Test Initial Approach Discussion.
– 1Texas Nodal Texas Nodal Electrical Buses – 2Texas Nodal Electrical Bus Definition as Proposed in NPRR 63 Electrical Bus A physical transmission element.
Network Model Management System (NMMS)
Texas Nodal © Electric Reliability Council of Texas, Inc. All rights reserved. 1 Nodal Enterprise Data Warehouse Section 8 – Performance Monitoring.
Texas Nodal Market Implementation Metric Sub Group Readiness Advisor January 30, 2006.
1 Submitting a RARF Art Deller, P.E. Supervisor, Model Administration New Generation Workshop November 4, 2014.
1 Market Trials Congestion Revenue Rights Weekly Update September 3, 2010.
Bob Wittmeyer MIG TF Charter Examine and investigate the reliability, and market, impacts as well as the interconnection processes/procedures.
9/17/2012 CSWG CSWG – ERCOT Update ERCOT. 2 Settlements Project & Operational Updates February 27, 2012 NPRR 347: Combined Daily Invoice –Still on track.
1Texas Nodal Texas Nodal NMMS/RARF Data Discussion By John Moseley, ERCOT, Network Modeling Group.
Outage Scheduler Transition Plan Kenneth Ragsdale NATF.
Operating Guide and Planning Guide Revision Requests Blake Williams, ROS Chair September 13, 2012.
TPTF CIM Health Check Raj Chudgar Program Director for Market Redesign.
CMWG NATF 11/02/2010- CCT/DME update + Outages in the CRR Model follow-up Steve Reedy – Market Design and Analysis 1.
Stability Limit Management Chad Thompson Manager, Operations Support Planning Working Group Meeting ERCOT Public January 20, 2016.
October 29, 2012 RARF Workshop 2 Introduction to ERCOT Modeling Process Jay Teixeira Manager, Model Administration.
Texas Nodal © Electric Reliability Council of Texas, Inc. All rights reserved. 1 Nodal Dispute Management System Business Requirements ERCOT.
1 Market Trials Update NATF May 4, 2010.
Scheduling and Operating Transmission Devices in the Nodal Environment.
Model load frequency Discussion John Adams January 5, 2010 Nodal Advisory Task Force.
Resource Registration Update Dana Showalter Patrick Coon May 5, 2008.
Texas Nodal 1 Nodal Operations Model Posting NATF Sep 29, 2009 Matt Mereness, ERCOT.
1 Nodal Stabilization Market Call December 27, 2010.
Lead from the front Texas Nodal 1 Current Telemetry Dashboards NDSWG March 24, 2009.
Texas Nodal © Electric Reliability Council of Texas, Inc. All rights reserved. 1 Verifiable Costs Process Settlement and Data Aggregation Working.
Lead from the front Texas Nodal 1 Nodal Transitional Qualification Approach to Qualifications for the Nodal Market August 16, 2007.
1 TDTWG Update to RMS Wednesday May 6, Primary Activities 1.Reviewed ERCOT System Outages and Failures 2.Reviewed Service Availability 3.Reviewed.
1 Nodal Stabilization Market Call December 16, 2010.
Transition Plan Network Operations Model Change Requests 5/26/2010.
Retail Workshop ERCOT Nodal Update October 06, 2010.
Current Nodal OS Design 1.The NMMS database will have an OWNER and an OPERATOR designation for each piece of equipment in the model. The OWNER and OPERATOR.
Network Operations Model Go-Live Decision Kenneth Ragsdale TAC July 1, 2010.
Day-Ahead Market Discussion/Clarification TPTF April 24, 2006.
Technical Advisory Committee Presentation to the ERCOT Board of Directors July 15, 2008.
ROS Meeting – 06/12/081Texas Nodal Program - TPTF Update Texas Nodal Transition Plan Task Force ROS Meeting Stacy Bridges, ERCOT Thursday, 06/12/08.
1 Market Trials Update NATF January 5, 2010.
1 Single Entry Model (SEM) Go-Live TAC Update May 7, 2009.
August 11, 2008 TPTF Early Delivery Systems Status Daryl Cote.
The Texas Nodal Market Trip Doggett ERCOT Interim President and Chief Executive Officer Mike Cleary ERCOT Chief Technology Officer Executive Briefing 28.
Texas Nodal Electrical Buses and Outage Scheduling.
EDS 2 Early Delivery Systems Approach March 2007.
Nodal Planning Go Live Austin, TX February 3, 2011
1 10/1/2016 Cut-Over Milestones 01 September 2010Market Readiness Seminar.
Special Language Characters in EDI Transactions Options and Considerations July 20, 2016.
ME 3.0 to ME 5.0 ME3.0 review scheduled during the Joint NDSWG/NATF meeting in July. There were approximately 180 comments on the ME3.0 paper. Deadline.
Current Nodal OS Design 1.The NMMS database will have an OWNER and an OPERATOR designation for each piece of equipment in the model. The OWNER and OPERATOR.
Market Trials Update NATF March 2,
Nodal COMS Additional Items Update
Commercial Operations Sub-Committee Update to TAC
CEO Report Thomas F. Schrader ERCOT Board of Directors May 17, 2005
Presentation transcript:

ERCOT Guideline for Interim Updates to the Network Operations Model Excerpted from the “Modeling Expectations” whitepaper D.W. Rickerson

When implementing Transmission Element changes, ERCOT shall correct errors uncovered during testing that are due to submission of inaccurate information. Each TSP shall provide reasonably accurate information at the time of the original submission. ERCOT may update the model on an interim basis, outside of the timeline described in Section , Time Line for Network Operations Model Change Requests, for the correction of temporary configuration changes in a system restoration situation, such as after a storm, or correction of impedances and ratings. Interim updates to the Network Operations Model caused by unintentional inconsistencies of the model with the physical transmission grid may be made. If an interim update is implemented, ERCOT shall report changes to the Public Utility Commission of Texas (PUCT) Staff and the Independent Market Monitor (IMM). ERCOT shall provide Notice via electronic means to all Market Participants and post the Notice on the MIS Secure Area detailing the changed model information and the reason for the interim update within two Business Days following the report to PUCT Staff and the IMM. Interim Updates – Nodal Protocols (5)

Month Target Month Month 15 Model for Week 1 Model for Week 2 Model for Week 3 Model for Week 4 Model for Week 1 Model for Week 2 Model for Week 3 Model for Week 4 Week 1 Week 2 Week 3 Week 4 Initial ValidationMarket ValidationFinal Validation NOMCR Process ing for Target Month Produ ction 10 Period 3Period 2Period 1Period 4 NMG finalizes Model Content for 45-day Posting NMG finalizes Model Content for Production Pre-ProductionProduction Period 1 requests would be submissions that miss the normal deadline by ten days or less. At this point in the validation process ERCOT is still processing the NOMCRs for the Target Month and has not completed the models that will be used in production. Period 2 immediately follows Period 1 and ends on the tenth of the month prior to the Target Month. During Period 2, the Operational Models undergo Initial Validation and are posted. In addition, the information needed to build the CRR models is exported. Period 3 immediately follows Period 2 and ends when the affected model goes into production. At this point in the validation process the final production models have been completed and are being validated for use in production. Period 3 will vary in length depending on when the affected model goes into production. Period 4 immediately follows Period 3, beginning two days prior to the time the affected model is scheduled to be loaded into production. Interim Updates allowed during Period 4 will require an Emergency Data Base load.

Interim Update Classes Class 1 Interim Update requests will have no impact to market or reliability after implementation. Class 2 Interim Update requests will have an impact to market or reliability that can be mitigated in real-time with changes to data in downstream systems that can be managed by ERCOT. In some cases ERCOT may request assistance from the Interim Update requestor in mitigating the effects of the change. Class 3 Interim Update requests will have an impact to market or reliability that cannot be mitigated in real-time with changes to data in downstream systems. Class 4 Interim Update requests are those that if not incorporated in the model at the requested time will have a severe impact to either the market or reliability. Class 4 updates should always be a result of circumstances that could not be reasonably anticipated.

NOMCR R submitted after 3.10 deadline Class 1Class 2Class 3Class 4Class 1Class 2Class 3Class 4Class 1Class 2Class 3Class 4 Class 1Class 2Class 3Class 4 Included in Model, not an Interim Update Period 1 Period 2 Period 3 Period 4 update Not Included in Model, as an Interim Update Included in Model as an Interim Update Included in Model as an Interim Update requiring an Emergency Database Load yes No ImpactMitigatedNo MitigationSevere