CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley Longitudinal Dynamics of Youth in Foster Care Joseph Magruder Emily Putnam-Hornstein.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
US Berkeley 2/12/2013 linking population-based data to child welfare records: a public health approach to surveillance Emily Putnam-Hornstein, PhD University.
Advertisements

Kinship Care and Behavioral Outcomes for Children in the Child Welfare System David Rubin, MD MSCE Director or Research & Policy Safe Place: The Center.
Using Data to Plan Waiver Strategies and Drive Improvements: Key Indicators and Trends April 11, 2012.
"A Call to Action: Investigating Systematic, Social, and Emotional Predictors of Higher Educational Attainment Among Foster Care Youths"
Foster Care Reentry after Reunification – Reentry in One or Two years – what’s the difference? Terry V. Shaw, MSW Daniel Webster, PhD University of California,
California Department of Social Services Children’s Services Operations and Evaluation PRESENTED TO THE CHILD WELFARE COUNCIL ON DECEMBER 12, 2012 REVISED.
RISK OF RE-REFERRAL AMONG INFANTS WHO REMAIN AT HOME FOLLOWING REPORTED MALTREATMENT Emily Putnam-Hornstein, PhD James Simon, MSW Joseph Magruder, PhD.
Intersections between Child Welfare & Homeless Systems: Results from 2 Research Studies Stephen Metraux, PhD University of the Sciences in Philadelphia.
How do Macon County Children Enter the Child Welfare System? Macon/Piatt Counties Indicated reports FY 2010 SourceNumber Percent of total Law enforcement14833%
CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley Child Welfare in California: 1. A Quick Tour of the Data 2. A Racial Equity Lens.
CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley Child Welfare: Ethnic/Racial Disproportionality and Disparity Barbara Needell,
How do Coles County Children Enter the Child Welfare System? Clark...Shelby Counties Indicated reports FY 2010 SourceNumber Percent of total Law enforcement7136%
How do LaSalle County Children Enter the Child Welfare System? LaSalle County Indicated reports FY 2010 SourceNumber Percent of total Law enforcement20755%
How do Morgan & Scott County Children Enter the Child Welfare System? Morgan and Scott Counties Indicated reports FY 2010 SourceNumber Percent of total.
Who lives in Rock Island County? Rock Island County Demographics by Race and/or Ethnic Group, 2009 estimate N = 148,826 White113, % Black or African.
How do McLean County Children Enter the Child Welfare System? McLean County Indicated reports FY 2010 SourceNumber Percent of total Law enforcement23350%
How do Peoria County Children Enter the Child Welfare System? Peoria County Indicated reports FY 2010 SourceNumber Percent of total Law enforcement19235%
How do Champaign County Children Enter the Child Welfare System? Champaign County Indicated reports FY 2010 SourceNumber Percent of total Law enforcement22548%
How do Sangamon County Children Enter the Child Welfare System? Sangamon County Indicated reports FY 2010 SourceNumber Percent of total Law enforcement21638%
How do Logan County Children Enter the Child Welfare System? Logan, Mason and Menard Counties Indicated reports FY 2010 SourceNumber Percent of total.
CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley Data 201: The Empirical Data Strikes Back* Emily Putnam-Hornstein, MSW Center.
California’s Child Welfare Outcomes & Accountability System: Using Performance Measures to Encourage Improvement Barbara Needell, MSW, PhD Center for.
CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley CFSR2 Data Indicators: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly Center for Social Services.
Foster Care Reentry Going Beyond 12 Months of Follow-up Terry V. Shaw, MSW, PhD Daniel Webster, MSW, PhD University of California, Berkeley School of Social.
An overview of basic California foster care data Joe Magruder, MSW Center for Social Services Research School of Social Welfare University of California.
CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley Data Are Your Friends: California’s Child Welfare Outcomes and Accountability.
CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley Child Welfare: Ethnic/Racial Disproportionality and Disparity Barbara Needell,
Building a Better Child Welfare System for Fresno's Children: Using Data as Our Foundation (and Friend!) Daniel Webster, MSW PhD Center for Social Services.
Reunification for Siblings in Out-of-Home Care Using a Statistical Technique for Examining Non-independent Observations Presented by: Joseph Magruder,
Increasing Child Welfare Permanency Options: The Kinship Guardianship Assistance Payment Program Daniel Webster, MSW, PhD University of California, Berkeley.
The California Child Welfare System: Data Snapshot Barbara Needell, MSW, PhD Emily Putnam Hornstein, MSW Joseph Magruder, MSW Center for Social Services.
Data 101: Numbers, Graphs, and More Numbers
Findings From the Initial Child and Family Service Reviews
Risks of Reentry into the Foster Care System for Children who Reunified Terry V. Shaw, MSW University of California, Berkeley School of Social Welfare.
CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley Child Welfare in California: Ethnic/Racial Disproportionality and Disparity Barbara.
Program Staff Presentation 1 Program Staff Presentation.
CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley Race/Ethnic Disparities in Child Welfare New Research Synthesis from Fluke et.
Foster Care Reunification: The use of hierarchical modeling to account for sibling and county correlation Emily Putnam-Hornstein, MSW Center for Social.
CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley Foster Care in California: What the Data Tells Us Barbara Needell, MSW, PhD Emily.
1 Transitions to Adulthood: Comparing TANF and Foster care Youth Pamela C. Ovwigho, PhD Valerie Head, MPP Catherine E. Born, PhD Paper presented at the.
CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley California’s Child Welfare System: Using Data from CWS/CMS Barbara Needell, MSW,
CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley Black/White and Black/Hispanic Racial Disparity in Child Welfare: Controlling.
PATERNITY ESTABLISHMENT AMONG CHILDREN REPORTED TO CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES Joseph Magruder, PhD Emily Putnam-Hornstein, PhD Wendy Wiegmann, MSW Barbara.
Data Driven Practice for Program Managers: Riverside County Melissa Correia Adam Darnell Casey Family Programs Daniel Webster, MSW PhD Center for Social.
Child Welfare in North Carolina: Ethnic and Racial Disproportionality and Disparity by D. F. Duncan UNC-CH School of Social Work June 10, 2009.
CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley Child Welfare: Ethnic/Racial Disproportionality and Disparity Barbara Needell,
CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley Predictors of Child Welfare Contact Between Birth and Age Five: An Examination.
CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley California’s Child Welfare System: Using Data from CWS/CMS Barbara Needell, MSW,
CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley Black/White Racial Disparity in Child Welfare: Findings from Linkages to Birth.
A POPULATION-BASED ANALYSIS OF RACE AND POVERTY AS RISK FACTORS FOR MALTREATMENT Barbara Needell, PhD Emily Putnam-Hornstein, PhD Bryn King, MSW January.
RISK OF INJURY DEATH FOLLOWING A REPORT OF PHYSICAL ABUSE: EVIDENCE FROM A PROSPECTIVE, POPULATION-BASED STUDY Emily Putnam-Hornstein, PhD January 13,
Quantitative Performance Measures for Juvenile Dependency Court Administrative Office of the Courts March 14, 2008.
When permanency remains elusive: A longitudinal examination of the early foster care experiences of youth at risk of emancipating Joe Magruder, MSW Emily.
Trends in Child Welfare Outcomes CA Blue Ribbon Commission May1, 2013 The Performance Indicators Project is a collaboration of the California Department.
CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley CFSR2 Data Indicators: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly Center for Social Services.
CALIFORNIA’S MOST VULNERABLE PARENTS: WHEN MALTREATED CHILDREN HAVE CHILDREN Emily Putnam-Hornstein, PhD Bryn King, MSW Julie Cederbaum, PhD Barbara Needell,
Midwest Evaluation of the Adult Functioning of Former Foster Youth: Outcomes at Age 19 Chapin Hall Center for Children University of Chicago.
California Child Welfare Indicators Project YOUTH IN EXTENDED FOSTER CARE Center for Social Services Research School of Social Welfare University of California,
Overview of California’s Child Welfare Indicator Data Barbara Needell, MSW, PhD Center for Social Services Research School of Social Welfare University.
The Prevalence of Children with Disabilities in the Child Welfare System: An Analysis of State Administrative Data Elizabeth Lightfoot, PhD Katharine Hill,
CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley California’s Child Welfare System: Data Trends & Child Outcomes Center for Social.
AB 636 presented at the joint hearing between the ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON HUMAN SERVICES and the ASSEMBLY SELECT COMMITTEE ON FOSTER CARE Sacramento, CA.
Increasing Permanency Options in Child Welfare: The Kinship Guardianship Assistance Payment (Kin-GAP) Program Daniel Webster Joseph Magruder University.
RELATIVE GUARDIANSHIPS: INCREASED OPTIONS FOR SUSTAINED PERMANENCY Joseph Magruder, PhD University of California, Berkeley Daniel Webster, PhD University.
CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley Applying Data for System Improvement: Probation Agency Staff Daniel Webster,
Daniel Webster Joseph Magruder University of California, Berkeley
CCWIP Data Analysis Training Using the CCWIP Website to Answer Questions about Key Child Welfare Outcomes Wendy Wiegmann CCWIP August 19, 2016.
Kinship Foster Care in California Testimony to Assembly Select Committee on Foster Care Sacramento, CA 2/15/06 Barbara Needell, MSW, PhD Center for Social.
Society for Social Work & Research New Orleans 1/14/2017
BARBARA NEEDELL, MSW, PhD
Presentation transcript:

CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley Longitudinal Dynamics of Youth in Foster Care Joseph Magruder Emily Putnam-Hornstein Center for Social Services Research University of California at Berkeley Beth Lindley California Department of Social Services The Performance Indicators Project is a collaboration of the California Department of Social Services and the University of California at Berkeley, and is supported by the California Department of Social Services and the Stuart Foundation

CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley Overview… Part I: California’s caseload dynamics in the past decade –Dramatic overall decline, steepest among elementary school aged groups –No decline observed for older youth in care (and entry rates flat) –What explains these different dynamics? what might we expect to see in the years to come? Part II: (Late) placement disruptions of older youth –Cohort of youth who first entered care before their 14 th birthday (and were in care at age 17) –Data suggest that, even for those who have early stable placements, placement disruptions are common between ages 14 and 17 –Why is stability so hard to achieve for these older youth? what are the implications for transitions out of care and into adulthood?

CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley Data All data for this presentation are based on extracts from California’s Child Welfare Services/Case Management System (CWS/CMS) Extracts are configured into a longitudinal database as part of a collaboration between the California Department of Social Services and the Center for Social Services Research (CSSR) at UC Berkeley Data for Part I are from CSSR’s publicly available website: cssr.berkeley.edu/ucb_childwelfare Data for Part II are based on a unique sample created by the presenters to be described later…

CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley Part I Elusiveness of Permanency for Foster Care Youth California’s caseload has declined in dramatic fashion over the last decade: –Over 109,000 children in child welfare supervised placements in 1999 –64,838 children as of January 1, 2009 Yet the number of older teens in care has not followed this downward trend: –Just over 9, year olds in care in 1999 –9, year olds as of January 1, 2009 A point-in-time caseload count changes as a function of entry and exit flows…so we explore annual cohort dynamics over time for clarity

CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley California’s Foster Care Caseload all children

CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley California’s Foster Care Caseload (by age) infants

CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley California’s Foster Care Caseload (by age) yr olds

CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley California’s Foster Care Caseload (by age) yr olds

CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley California’s Foster Care Caseload (by age) yr olds

CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley California’s Foster Care Caseload (by age) yr olds

CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley California’s Foster Care Caseload (by age) yr olds

CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley California’s Foster Care Caseload (by age) yr olds

CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley California’s Foster Care Caseload (by age) yr olds

CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley California’s Foster Care Caseload (by age) yr olds

CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley California’s Foster Care Caseload (by age) yr olds

CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley California’s Foster Care Caseload (by age) yr olds

CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley California’s Foster Care Caseload (by age) yr olds

CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley California’s Foster Care Caseload (by age) yr olds

CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley California’s Foster Care Caseload (by age) yr olds

CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley California’s Foster Care Caseload (by age) yr olds

CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley California’s Foster Care Caseload (by age) yr olds

CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley California’s Foster Care Caseload (by age) yr olds

CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley California’s Foster Care Caseload (by age) yr olds

CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley California’s Foster Care Entries all children

CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley California’s Foster Care Entries (by age) infants

CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley California’s Foster Care Entries (by age) yr olds

CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley California’s Foster Care Entries (by age) yr olds

CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley California’s Foster Care Entries (by age) yr olds

CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley California’s Foster Care Entries (by age) yr olds

CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley California’s Foster Care Entries (by age) yr olds

CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley California’s Foster Care Entries (by age) yr olds

CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley California’s Foster Care Entries (by age) yr olds

CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley California’s Foster Care Entries (by age) yr olds

CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley California’s Foster Care Entries (by age) yr olds

CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley California’s Foster Care Entries (by age) yr olds

CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley California’s Foster Care Entries (by age) yr olds

CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley California’s Foster Care Entries (by age) yr olds

CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley California’s Foster Care Entries (by age) yr olds

CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley California’s Foster Care Entries (by age) yr olds

CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley California’s Foster Care Entries (by age) yr olds

CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley California’s Foster Care Entries (by age) yr olds

CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley California’s Foster Care Entries (by age) yr olds

CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley California’s Foster Care Exits all children

CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley California’s Foster Care Exits (by age) infants

CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley California’s Foster Care Exits (by age) yr olds

CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley California’s Foster Care Exits (by age) yr olds

CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley California’s Foster Care Exits (by age) yr olds

CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley California’s Foster Care Exits (by age) yr olds

CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley California’s Foster Care Exits (by age) yr olds

CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley California’s Foster Care Exits (by age) yr olds

CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley California’s Foster Care Exits (by age) yr olds

CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley California’s Foster Care Exits (by age) yr olds

CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley California’s Foster Care Exits (by age) yr olds

CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley California’s Foster Care Exits (by age) yr olds

CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley California’s Foster Care Exits (by age) yr olds

CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley California’s Foster Care Exits (by age) yr olds

CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley California’s Foster Care Exits (by age) yr olds

CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley California’s Foster Care Exits (by age) yr olds

CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley California’s Foster Care Exits (by age) yr olds

CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley California’s Foster Care Exits (by age) yr olds

CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley California’s Foster Care Exits (by age) yr olds

CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley California’s Foster Care Caseload (by birth year)

CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley California’s Foster Care Caseload (by birth year)

CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley California’s Foster Care Caseload (by birth year)

CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley California’s Foster Care Caseload (by birth year)

CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley California’s Foster Care Caseload (by birth year)

CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley California’s Foster Care Caseload (by birth year)

CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley California’s Foster Care Caseload (by birth year)

CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley July-Dec. First Entries, 8 Days or More in Care California: Status 12, 24, and 48 Months After Entry by Entry Year 48 months after entry24 months after entry12 months after entry

CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley Part I Conclusions The basic intent of PL96-272, ASFA, etc. is being met – children spend less time in care and achieve permanency at earlier ages. We are not seeing the full effect of this on older adolescents yet... However, each age cohort is smaller than the previous one at the beginning of adolescence. Unless there is a sharp increase in the number of children reentering care, we can expect the number of youth in care to decline over the next five years. The caseload will have proportionately fewer youth who have been raised in the foster care system. These changes suggest that the youth in future cohorts will have different service needs.

CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley Part II Elusiveness of Stability for Foster Care Youth Motivation: –This research extends analyses we presented last year in which we noted that relatively few teens were in the same placement at age 17 as they had been at age 14 –This was despite the fact that the median time in the current placement at age 14 was 4.6 years Objective: –Explore factors related to late-adolescent instability for youth who were in care at age 14

CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley Sample Birth In Foster Care at age First Entry to Foster Care Children born in 1989 who entered foster care under the supervision of California child welfare and were in care at age 14 and age 17 under the supervision of either child welfare or probation. Data were drawn from a longitudinal extract of the California Child Welfare Services/Case Management System (CWS/CMS). Youth may have exited and re-entered between age 14 and age 17 In Foster Care at age 14

CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley Who is represented in this Sample? California Caseload Snapshot July 1, 2006: –5,291* 17-year olds in care –63% of these youth had been in care for 3+ years Our Sample (born in 1989, age 17 in care in 2006, in care at 14) 3,027** youth met our sample criteria *Includes only youth currently under child welfare supervision **Includes youth who were under child welfare or probation supervision

CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley Sample Demographics Average age at first entry: 5.8 years Median of 6 years (aggregate) spent in out-of-home care 57% of life through age 17 spent in out-of-home care –7% of life spent in a group home setting –14% of time in care in group home setting 79% eventually emancipated / “aged out” Nearly 70% percent experienced a placement move between age 14 and 17

Age at First Entry Mean: 5.8 yrs Mean: 6.8 yrs Mean: 7.3 yrs Mean: 4.2 yrs

Life in Out-of-Home Care (by Age)

Placements Prior to Age 14 (by move vs. no move after age 14)

Exiting from Care…

CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley Model Specification

CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley Covariates Race : white (ref), black, hispanic, native american, asian/pi Male (0/1) Age at First Entry: <1 yr (ref), 1-2yrs, 3-4yrs, 5-6yrs, 7-8yrs, 9-10yrs, 11-13yrs Placement Type at Age 14: foster (ref), kin, group, guardianship, other Placement Count at Age 14: one (ref), two, three+ Most Recent Removal Reason: neglect (ref), physical, sexual, other First Episode (0/1) Sibling(s) in Same Placement (0/1) Mental Retardation (0/1) Physical Disability (0/1) Visual Hearing Disability (0/1) DSM-III Diagnosis (0/1) Race by Placement Interactions Race by Age Interactions Placement by Age Interactions

CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley Models Three models shown: –basic demographic variables –basic demographic +placement variables –basic demographic + placement + health variables Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals reported (w/robust standard error adjustments) Interaction effects examined (but not shown in handout)…no evidence of improved fit

CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley Findings (see handout of models) Suggestion that some types of disabilities are protective (i.e., mental retardation), while others increase risk of late placement instability (i.e., mental illness, visual/hearing disabilities) –Low correlation between disabilities – the highest was 0.22 between physical disability and mental retardation Placement with Kin or a Guardian is associated with greater placement certainty/stability during adolescent years vs. foster homes (but we cannot rule out selection factors) Placement with a sibling (at age 14) significantly reduced the odds of a later move, even after controlling for placement type and other covariates

CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley Findings (see handout of models) In the first and simpler models (not shown) we found that Black children in this sample were significantly less likely than White children to have experienced a placement move after the age of 14, but this effect disappeared once we controlled for placement type and other variables Increasing age at entry heightened the risk of experiencing a placement move in adolescence versus those who had first entered care as infants Entry for “other” reasons (which included truancy, running away, etc.) was associated with late adolescent placement instability, as was having had 2 or more placements or more than one removal episode prior to age 14

CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley Part II Conclusions Placement stability for adolescents is associated with age at first entry into foster care, placement situation, and health. Future research on foster youth placement stability may continue to show protective effects for youth placed with –kin and guardians –their siblings Other factors that may be examined in future research include changes in schools due to placement and same-neighborhood placement.

CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley Conclusions? Many older adolescent youth in care (or recently exiting care) have spent significant periods of time in out-of-home care (despite common perceptions that emancipating youth are recent entries into foster care) –Trend data would suggest that, moving forward, we should see that this is true for fewer older adolescents –We should also expect to see the number/count of older youth dropping despite a constant entry rate (prior cohorts getting smaller due to shorter stays in care) –Of course, only time will tell!

CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley CSSR.BERKELEY.EDU/UCB_CHILDWELFARE Thank you to our colleagues at the Center for Social Services Research, the California Department of Social Services, and the Stuart Foundation