CAMPUS AND COMMUNITY OPEN SESSION MARCH 25 Higher Learning Commission Re-accreditation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ACCREDITATION Community Day February 1, Significance of Accreditation Accreditation – Accreditation – Allows the students at KC to apply for Federal.
Advertisements

Cedarville University Accreditation Self-Study Plan Presented by Dr. Thomas Mach.
Summer Institute, May16,  Peer review process that evaluates educational programs and services for quality.  Transferability of credit hours.
Higher Learning Commission of the North Central Association of Colleges and Schools Continuing Accreditation 2005 Self-Study and Site Visit.
AIHEC 40 th Anniversary Conference. Distinctive and Connected: Tribal Colleges and Universities and HLC Accreditation.
AQIP: “Academic Quality Improvement Program” Same Great Quality, Less Filling.
Understanding AQIP (Academic Quality Improvement Project) Some slides and/or information have been borrowed with permission from their originators: 1.
A Presentation for Peralta Community College District Governing Board By Thomas E. Henry, PCCD Fiscal Adviser November 10,
Why Institutional Assessment is Important for Middle States Adapted (with permission) From Andrea Lex, Who Presented at Stockton September 20, 2010 Facilitated.
Institutional Accreditation Review Christine M. Ladisch Vice Provost for Academic Affairs Getting Prepared:
Orientation to the Accreditation Internal Evaluation (Self-Study) Flex Activity March 1, 2012 Lassen Community College.
Institutional Accreditation Review by Christine M. Ladisch Vice Provost for Academic Affairs Getting Prepared:
 The Middle States Commission on Higher Education is a voluntary, non-governmental, membership association that is dedicated to quality assurance and.
University of Toledo Reaffirmation by the Higher Learning Commission Self Study Dorothea Sawicki, Vice-Provost Health Science Affairs and University.
Accreditation What should you know?. What is accreditation? Accreditation assures quality through a peer review process that verifies that an institution:
HLC PATHWAYS The New Accreditation Model And the tasks ahead for Drake University Fall 2012.
Outline Introduction to accreditation by the Higher Learning Commission (HLC) of the North Central Association (NCA) The criteria and process for accreditation.
Overview Changes in the re-accreditation process since 2007 Assessment Resources.
Continuing Accreditation The Higher Learning Commission provides institutional accreditation through the evaluation of the entire university organization.
Campus Forum on Institutional Accreditation HLC Team December 3, 2013.
HLC- Regional Reaccreditation Dr. Joseph Frizado Vice Provost for Academic Operations & Assessment Reaccreditation under Open Pathways.
University-wide Accreditation Academic Leadership Program February 18, 2010.
CEPA Programs – Accrediting Concerns Presenters: Dr. Deborah Loper, Assistant Vice President of Institutional Effectiveness at Colorado Mountain College.
ACCREDITATION Goals: Goals: - Certify to the public and to educational organizations that the school is recognized as an effective institution of learning.
SMSU University Mission Southwest Minnesota State University prepares students to meet the complex challenges of this century as engaged citizens in their.
1 HLC Open Pathways Process Dev Venugopalan UW-Milwaukee December 2, 2011.
AdvancED District Accreditation Process © 2010 AdvancED.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report District Accreditation Bibb County Schools February 5-8, 2012.
Building and Recognizing Quality School Systems DISTRICT ACCREDITATION © 2010 AdvancED.
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
Reaffirmation of Accreditation Update Timelines Who’s who Progress report Lessons learned How can you help?
Higher Learning Commission North Central Association Accreditation Visit April 2016.
Quality Assurance and Quality Improvement.  Standard Pathway - Required for all institutions granted initial accreditation, institutions in significant.
1 SCU’s WASC Reaccreditation Diane Jonte-Pace, Self Study Steering Committee Chair Don Dodson, Academic Liaison Officer Winter 2007.
HLC- Regional Reaccreditation Dr. Joseph Frizado Vice Provost for Academic Operations & Assessment Reaccreditation under Open Pathways.
Accreditation: What we learned about ourselves College Forum Talk August 19, 2015 Patricia A. Fleming, Ph.D. Provost/ Senior Vice President for Academic.
Cleveland State University Self Study 2010 North Central Association/Higher Learning Commission Accreditation.
Mission and Accreditation Strategic Planning Steering Committee March 9, 2009 Dr. Richard Beck.
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District School Facilitator Training October 7, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
Yes, It’s Time!  10 years after the most recent visit ( )  (probably spring semester)  SMSU proposes dates; HLC replies  Much to be.
UW-Platteville Vision UW-Platteville will be recognized as the leading student-focused university for its success in achieving excellence, creating opportunities,
Response due: March 15,  Directions state that the report must “focus on the institution’s resolution of the recommendations and Commission concerns.”
HLC Re-accreditation Update GENERAL FACULTY MEETING JANUARY 15, 2014.
Gordon State College Office of Institutional Effectiveness Faculty Meeting August 5, 2015.
Higher Learning Commission Accreditation Process Update.
Higher Learning Commission Accreditation Process Update.
Criterion 1 Mission A. The institution's mission is broadly understood within the institution and guides its operations. B. The mission is articulated.
HLC? What does this stand for? Who are they? What do they do?
Cleveland State University Self Study 2010 North Central Association/Higher Learning Commission Accreditation.
CREATING A CULTURE OF EVIDENCE Student Affairs Assessment Council October 2013 Dr. Barbara Copenhaver-Bailey Assistant Vice President for Student Success.
DEEP DIVING INTO THE REVISED MSCHE STANDARDS FOR RE-ACCREDITATION ​ Brigitte Valesey, Ph.D. Widener University ​ Drexel Assessment Conference ​ September.
UW-Platteville Vision UW-Platteville will be recognized as the leading student-focused university for its success in achieving excellence, creating opportunities,
Higher Learning Commission (HLC) Re-affirmation of accreditation in
HLC Criterion One Primer Criterion One. Mission August 27, 2015.
Standard Two Les Steele Executive Vice President.
Higher Learning Commission Accreditation Process Update
1 Institutional Quality and Accreditation: A Workshop on the Basics.
Dutchess Community College Middle States Self-Study 2015
Data You Can Use for Accreditation
Kate Miller, Anne Alexander
HLC- Regional Reaccreditation
HLC/Strategic Planning Update Professional Development and Assessment Day August 15, 2017.
Pathways 2017: HLC Accreditation Overview
HLC- Regional Reaccreditation
Middle States Update to President’s Cabinet October 8, 2018
Donna Kragt: HLC Liaison April 11, 2017
HLC Update: Progress and Preparation for the Visit
Reaccreditation and Illinois
Higher Learning Commission Accreditation
CUNY Graduate School and University Center
Presentation transcript:

CAMPUS AND COMMUNITY OPEN SESSION MARCH 25 Higher Learning Commission Re-accreditation

What is accreditation? Voluntary process of self-regulation and peer review ensuring that higher education institutions provide high-quality education and continuously seek to improve.  Assures the public that UW – Platteville meets clearly communicated criteria and regulations.  Ensures that faculty and students are eligible for federal funding.

Guiding Values of Accreditation 1. Focus on student learning. 2. Education as a public purpose 3. Education for a diverse, technological, globally connected world 4. A culture of continuous improvement 5. Evidence-based institutional learning and self- presentation 6. Integrity, transparency, and ethical behavior and practice

Two Components for Re-accreditation Quality Assurance - verifies that we are meeting threshold standards  Federal Compliance  Assumed Practices  Criteria for Accreditation Quality Initiative – demonstrates that we are committed to continuous improvement

Criterion One Mission (Team Leader: Dr. Christina Curras)  UW – Platteville’s mission is clear and articulated publicly; it guides our operations.  In our educational role, we serve the public and are committed to the public good.  We engage with our external constituencies and community and respond to their needs, as our mission and capacity allow.

Criterion Two Integrity: Ethical and Responsible Conduct (Team Leader: Mr. James Mueller)  UW – Platteville acts with integrity; our conduct is ethical and responsible.  UW-P presents itself clearly and completely to its students and public with regard to programs, requirements, faculty and staff, costs to students and accreditation relationships.

Criterion Three Teaching and Learning: Quality, Resources, and Support (Team Leader: Dr. Shane Drefcinski)  UW- Platteville provides a high quality education, wherever and however its offerings are delivered.  We fulfill claims we make for an enriched educational environment that includes opportunities for research, community engagement, service learning and economic development.

Criterion Four Teaching and Learning: Evaluation and Improvement (Team Leaders: Dr. Colleen McCabe and Dr. Laura Bayless)  UW – Platteville demonstrates responsibility for the quality of our educational programs, learning environments, and support services, and we evaluate their effectiveness for student learning through processes designed to promote continuous improvement.

Criterion Five Resources, Planning and Institutional Effectiveness (Team Leader: Dr. Matthew Roberts)  UW – Platteville’s resources, structures, and processes are sufficient to fulfill our mission, improve the quality of our educational offerings, and respond to future challenges and opportunities. We plan for the future.

Quality Initiative An institution-wide project designed to suit our present concerns or aspirations.  Can continue an initiative already in progress or achieve a key milestone in the work of a longer initiative  Must have scope and significance QI – oversee implementation and assess success of the Academic Planning Council’s new academic program review process

What do we have to do? Submit written Quality Assurance Arguments (Years 4 and 10)  Articulate claims for how we meet standards  Provide evidence files for all claims made  Evidence files accumulate continuously Carry out Quality Initiative (Years 6 – 9)  Proposed in Years 6-7  Report filed in Year 9 Host Campus Visit (Year 10)  Peer-review team validates claims made in the Assurance Argument, confirms Federal Compliance and Assumed Practices

Separate Timelines

How are we preparing? Applied for and obtained approval to participate in the Open Pathway HLC Steering Committee  Attend HLC Annual Conference  Manage access to HLC’s electronic Assurance System  Develop and enforce timelines  Establish and train Criterion Teams  Oversee Quality Initiative On-going campus communication

Campus Resources HLC Steering Committee  Regular meetings that all are welcome to attend  College liaisons  Dr. Curras (EMS), Dr. Klavins (BILSA), Dr. McCabe (LAE) Communication  College representatives  Presentations to campus groups  Website (  General information  Timelines  Contact us