Phase IIb (8-week) studies D A Mitchison St George’s, University of London
Comparison of the bactericidal activities of the Fluoroquinolones: Gatifloxacin, Moxifloxacin and Ofloxacin, substituted for Ethambutol in the 2- Month initial phase of standard treatment Oflotub phase 2 surrogate marker study South African Medical Research Council, Durban Dr R Rustomjee; Dr F Sirgel; Prof W Sturm; Dr B Fourie and staff Prof D Mitchison; Dr C Lienhardt (Co-ordinator); Dr C Merle (Trial Monitor) Supported by European Commission WHO TDR
Design Open label Phase II Randomised Controlled Trial Aims Compare three fluoroquinolones substituted for ethambutol in 2HRZE initial phases using serial sputum colony counting (SSCC) Compare the use of different surrogate endpoints in Phase II studies
Screening Newly diagnosed smear +ve 412 Willing to collaborate 226 Excluded 11 HRZE Control 54 HRZO Oflo 55 HRZG Gati 54 HRZM Moxi 54 8-weeks RH continuation 4 months Summary of recruitment
hour sputum collection Sputum colony counts on selective 7H11 medium without decontamination at 10 time points during initial 8-week phase Standard 7H11 culture + Liquid culture (MGIT) Comparative bactericidal assessments Standard 7H11 culture Standard 7H11 culture + indirect susceptibility tests
Analysis Jonathan Levin (Durban): Proportions +ve at 2 months Survival analysis using SSCC Polynomial / spline mixed effects modelling of SSCC Geraint Davies (Bangkok): Non-linear mixed effects modelling of SSCC Denny Mitchison (London): Summary regression estimates on SSCC
Summary of SSCC results Limit of detection
Days on therapy Log 10 CFU /ml Summary statistics & regression models of colony counts Proportion positive at 2 months Survival analysis & time to conversion Relapse Analytical approaches to Phase II surrogate endpoint studies Limit of detection
Proportion positive at two months Chi-square test 2 (3)=2.63 p= 0.451
Survival analysis Log rank test 2 (3)=10.69 p=
Hazard Ratio for culture conversion* z-test HRZO (p=0.393) HRZG (p=0.284) HRZM (p=0.063) Survival analysis * vs. HRZE
Regression modelling of serial sputum colony counts Limit of detection
Model Log likelihood Akaike Information Criterion Likelihood Ratio Test (p value) Monoexponential Biexponential (<0.0001) Biexponential + Random effects (<0.0001) Biexponential + Random effects + Treatment (0.026) Model fitting sequence
Regression estimates Signs of coefficients reversed ) * <0.05 M vs.E **<0.01 M vs.E * <0.05 M&G vs. E&O **<0.01 M&G vs. E&O
Limit of detection Estimated treatment effects
Forecasting duration of therapy by effect size % Change in versus control HRZO HRZG HRZM (SHRZ) Approximate 95% confidence intervals derived from NLME model
Forecasting duration of therapy by extrapolation 138 days ~100 days ? Biexponential model Triexponential model
Cost assessment (US$) Patients per armCost Standard x (8, ) = 930,000 SSCC5050 x 8,000 = 400,000 Duration of study: 12 months Number of sputum specimens: 2100 Technicians employed: 3
Conclusions 1 When substituted for Ethambutol, both Moxifloxacin and Gatifloxacin killed significantly faster in the early and late phases than control Ofloxacin substitution had no significant effect The observed increases in late phase killing with these regimens support a probable reduction in the duration of therapy of at least one and possibly two months
Conclusions 2 Several different methods of analysis detected a treatment effect but culture conversion at 8 weeks did not It is important that methods discriminate between the early and late phases of killing and avoid overestimating “sterilizing activity” Non-linear mixed effects modelling appears to be both an informative and sensitive approach
Conclusions 3 Modelling using SSCC data has significant advantages over methods based only on culture conversion SSCC is also cheaper as it requires a smaller sample size SSCC modelling should be the basis of future phase II studies aiming to evaluate new regimens suggested by mouse studies.