Modeling Procedure SOLID186 – Ten-Noded Tetrahedral 198 Elements 5247 Elements *Needed mid-nodes to model curves.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Introduction to CAD/CAM/CAE
Advertisements

3/8/2002, Friday Toughness.
1 Analysis of Test Results 2 What we’ll have to do: Load-Deflection curve. Load Vs Strain curve for steel and concrete Find yield load (  s = 0.002)
Synchronised IRT and DIC capture to measure the strain rate dependency of fibre reinforced composites Duncan A. Crump 1, Janice M. Dulieu-Barton 1 and.
An Experimental Study and Fatigue Damage Model for Fretting Fatigue
1 ASTM : American Society of Testing and Materials.
1 THE ACCURACY OF FEA. 2 REALITY MATHEMATICAL MODEL FEA MODEL RESULTS Discretization error Modeling error Solution error Discretization error is controlled.
The effect of crystal orientation on the indentation response of commercially pure titanium: experiments and simulations by T. B. Britton, H. Liang, F.
MANE 4240 & CIVL 4240 Introduction to Finite Elements Practical considerations in FEM modeling Prof. Suvranu De.
Chapter 17 Design Analysis using Inventor Stress Analysis Module
Prediction of Load-Displacement Curve for Weld-Bonded Stainless Steel Using Finite Element Method Essam Al-Bahkali Jonny Herwan Department of Mechanical.
Experimental Study on the Damage Evolution of Re-bar Concrete Interface Lu Xinzheng SCE, THU CSE, NTU 1999/2000.
Nut, washer and locking device removed from model.
Ken Youssefi Mechanical & Aerospace Engr., SJSU Discontinuity in Cross Section Stepped shafts Discontinuity.
The problem to be solved is specified in a) the physical domain and b) the discretized domain used by FEA Governing principle law :
LMAF / EPFL What's new? Tested 9 specimens (3 plates, 1mm joint): 2 cameras -> local / global deformations 2 cameras -> local / global deformations variability.
Constraining and size effects in lead-free solder joints
Characterization of 1mm lead-free joints. Test results (DIC 2D)
© 2011 Autodesk Freely licensed for use by educational institutions. Reuse and changes require a note indicating that content has been modified from the.
Finite Element Modeling and Analysis with a Biomechanical Application Alexandra Schönning, Ph.D. Mechanical Engineering University of North Florida ASME.
Relationship of Product function with Dimensional tolerance Student : Irfan Anjum Manarvi Supervisor: Prof. Neal Juster.
Chapter Outline Shigley’s Mechanical Engineering Design.
Application of ESPI in investigating the static deformation of a lead-free joint D. Karalekas 1, J.Cugnoni 2, J. Botsis 2 1 Lab. Adv. Manufact. and Testing,
CHE 333 Class 11 Mechanical Behavior of Materials.
ES 240 Project: Finite Element Modeling of Nano- Indentation of Thin Film Materials.
14th Crisp user meeting at UCL1 Numerical analysis of a piled foundation in granular material using slip element Yongjoo Lee Soil Mechanics Group Department.
CHE 333 Class 14 True Stress True Strain Crystalline Processes During Deformation.
Thongwichean T. a, Phalakornkule C. b and Chaikittiratana A. b Finite Element Analysis for Thermoforming Process of Starch/ Biodegradable Polyester Blend.
Ken Youssefi Mechanical & Aerospace Engr., SJSU Concept of Stress Concentration Theoretical stress concentration factor, K t Maximum stress at the discontinuity.
Density of a Gas Problem/Question Problem/Question Prediction Prediction Experimental Design Experimental Design Procedures Procedures Data Data –Group.
 Introduction of research project  Solidification of casting alloys  Stresses and strains  Crystal lattices  Diffraction  Neutrons  Experimental.
Steel Rebar Test Conducted by: Christian Chang Ty Dempsey 5/9/00.
1 TERMINOLOGY ISSUES. 2 The finer is the mesh the better are your results true ?false ? Geometry should be represented as accurately as possible true.
1 HOW MANY ELEMENTS? How to choose element size? –Critically important in obtaining good results –Mesh refinement improves solution accuracy. –How small.
MAE 322 Machine Design Lecture 2
ME450 Project. Gearbox Analysis  ME450 Finite Element Analysis  Fall Semester, 2007  Prof: Dr. K. Nematollahi  Team Members  Aaron Huesman  Jae.
Adhesive Bonding of Composite Joints PhD Project Ian Campbell RP/Composites Facility University of the Witwatersrand.
School of Civil Engineering University of Nottingham Predicting the Repeated Load Behaviour of Pavement Subgrades Using the Three- surface Kinematic Hardening.
Date of download: 5/29/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Quantification of Foreign Object Damage and Electrical Resistivity for Ceramic.
Date of download: 5/29/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: The Influence of Friction Stir Welding Process Idealization on Residual Stress.
Date of download: 5/31/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Development and Validation of a Uniaxial Nonlinear Viscoelastic Viscoplastic Stress.
A New Design Custom TMJ Prosthesis Philip McLoughlin Eric Abel Jyothi Chandramohan Peter Bowman Maxillofacial Unit, Ninewells Hospital & Dept of Biomechanical.
Date of download: 6/6/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: A Comprehensive Parametric Finite Element Study on the Development of Strain Concentration.
Date of download: 7/7/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: The Effect of Size and Location of Tears in the Supraspinatus Tendon on Potential.
ISE 311 Tensile Testing Lab in conjunction with Section 3.1 in the text book “Fundamentals of Modern Manufacturing” Third Edition Mikell P. Groover 4/25/2008.
6thPan Hellenic Conference, Patra October 2014
From: Unified Approach for Notch Stress Strain Conversion Rules
ATMIYA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY & SCIENCE MECHNICAL DEPARTMENT
Date of download: 10/6/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: A Numerical Investigation Into Cold Spray Bonding Processes
Hua Liu, Zeqian Li (Student) Lin Yin (Visiting Faculty Advisor)
Sample Problem 4.2 SOLUTION:
Date of download: 10/19/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/25/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/26/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/28/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Imperial College OF SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY AND MEDICINE Department of Aeronautics Failure Analysis of a Composite Wingbox with Impact Damage:- A Fracture.
Nonlinear Analysis: Riks Analysis.
Date of download: 11/9/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Status Update-Backed Tests vs. Simulation Comparison
Characterisation of mechanical properties
Date of download: 12/27/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 1/13/2018 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 1/23/2018 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
An Experimental Verification of Polymer Microcracking
True Stress True Strain Crystalline Processes During Deformation.
ECIV 720 A Advanced Structural Mechanics and Analysis
Sample Problem 4.2 SOLUTION:
Experimental Mechanics - assignment
Figure 1 True strain, e.
Presentation transcript:

Modeling Procedure SOLID186 – Ten-Noded Tetrahedral 198 Elements 5247 Elements *Needed mid-nodes to model curves

Convergence Testing Performed To Ensure Model Precision Meshes under 2000 elements exhibited inconsistent results Mesh Elements Mesh Elements Mesh Elements Mesh Elements Mesh Elements Mesh Elements Mesh Elements Mesh Elements Mesh 1-Refined 5247 Elements

Experimental Strain Testing Averaged Elemental Equivalent Stresses over Gauge Region Applied Load in Instron Machine

Experimental Strain Testing

Photoelastic Comparison Simulated loading in Photoelastic Apparatus Created photoelastic model of cam lobe from clear polymer Stress concentrations closely matched FE predictions

Photoelastic Comparison General stress fields similar Hard to simulate photoelastic stress fringes Would have more success with Material specifications

Failure Analysis 30 kN (6750 lb) 20 kN (4500 lb) 15 kN (3350 lb) Stress Results for 12.5 kN (2800 lb) Loads Exceeding 12.5 kN were found to cause excessive plastic failure Main failure regions were not in the arches UIAA Standards require 12 kN rating for rope Manufacturer Rating: 14.4 kN