B Factory D&D Review: March 23, 2009 Page 1 Overview of re-use requests and related issues D. MacFarlane Deputy Director, PPA.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
NSF Experience with Management of Research Infrastructure
Advertisements

Research Instrumentation Special Interest Group Sensors & Instrumentation Knowledge Transfer Network Report on American Light Source Facilities Oliver.
The US 5 Year Muon Acceleration R&D Program To Boldly Go… MICE Collaboration Meeting Harbin January, 2009.
PEP-II Ramp Down to a Minimum Maintenance State J. Seeman DOE PEP-II Ramp Down-D&D Review August 6-7, 2007.
Tom Himel Linac Controls Upgrade Nov SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory 1 Linac Controls Upgrade Status Tom Himel.
PEP-II B Factory Machine Status and Upgrades John T. Seeman for the PEP-II Staff SLAC DOE Site Review April 9, 2003.
February 19, 2008 FACET Review 1 Lab Overview and Future Onsite Facilities Persis S. Drell DirectorSLAC.
David H. Dowell Injector RF Design November 3, LCLS Injector RF Gun: Design, Fabrication & Tuning Plans D. H. Dowell,
This is the last message in this gathering of North American PI’s with an interest in the INFN hosted SuperB project. I will try to deal with issues on.
Accelerator Systems Division FACET Project Management John Seeman for the FACET Study Group PPA Directorate Stanford Linear Accelerator Center DOE FACET.
Page 1 PEP-II D&D Planning & Costing Exercises John Seeman Accelerator Systems Division SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory.
A Possible Strategy Towards a Future Lepton Collider Tor Raubenheimer SLUO Annual Meeting September 17, 2009.
July 7, 2008SLAC Annual Program ReviewPage 1 PEP-II DND Engineering Planning S. DeBarger Accelerator Systems Division.
PEP-II and BaBar DND Review M. Sullivan Mar 23-24, 2009Page 1 PEP-II Overview and MMS Status Michael Sullivan SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory.
SLAC Accelerator Department The PEP-II Accelerator John T. Seeman Assistant Director of the Technical Division Head of the Accelerator Department SLUO.
PEP-II Overview & Ramp Down Plan J. Seeman DOE PEP-II Ramp Down-D&D Review August 6-7, 2007.
March 23, 2009H.J. Krebs1 BaBar D&D Schedule & Budget Overview H. James Krebs March 23, 2009.
Accelerator Systems Division FACET Accelerator Overview John Seeman for the FACET Study Group PPA Directorate Stanford Linear Accelerator Center DOE FACET.
Linac Front-End R&D --- Systems Integration and Meson Lab Setup
Jefferson Lab Status Hall A collaboration Dec. 16, 2013 R. D. McKeown Deputy Director For Science.
Material Disposition Planning Olga Ligeti Radiation Protection Department MARCH 24, 2009.
Muon Campus Projects Jerry Annala Jan 23, µ AIP Scope Recycler RF system to provide needed bunch structure to future Muon Experiments Recycler RF.
August 6, 2007Bill Wisniewski1 D&D Task Force: PEPII team: S.DeBarger, S.Ecklund, A.Hill, D.Kharakh, M.Zurawel BaBar team: H.J.Krebs, S.Pierson, W.Wisniewski.
Mu2e WGM R. Ray Mu2e Project Manager Sept. 14, 2012.
HLRF DRAFT Global Design Effort 1 Defining EDR* Work Packages [Engineering Design Report] Ray Larsen SLAC ILC Division for HLRF Team DRAFT April.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES ASD Procurements Gregory Fries Liaison/Manufacturing Engineer NSLS-II ASAC October 22-23, 2009.
PEP-II Disassembly Technical Systems PEP-II D&D Review 6-Aug-2007 S.DeBarger S.Ecklund, A.Hill, D.Kharakh, M.Zurawel.
July 7, 2008SLAC Annual Program ReviewPage 1 PEP-II in Run 7 and Transition Planning John T. Seeman Assistant Director PPA/LCLS.
US LHC Accelerator Research Program Jim Strait For the BNL-FNAL-LBNL LHC Accelerator Collaboration DOE Meeting 18 April 2003 brookhaven - fermilab - berkeley.
1 SPAFOA Capitol Hill Briefing December 2013 Harry Weerts International Linear Collider - progress & status SPAFOA meeting, Dec 11, 2013, H.Weerts.
0 Universal Pre-Kindergarten (UPK) Planning for FY12 Grant Renewal and FY13 February 2011.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES NSLS-II Overview Satoshi Ozaki Director, Accelerator Systems Division NSLS-II Project March 27, 2007.
Proton Improvement Plan: View from the Directorate (and the DOE) Stuart Henderson PIP Meeting Jan 3, 2012.
SLAC Accelerator Development Program Tor Raubenheimer OHEP Accelerator Development Review January 24-26, 2011.
Plan to go forward Peter Wilson SBN Program Coordinator 27 September 2014.
MICE Funding Update (U.S.) Michael S. Zisman Deputy Spokesmouse Center for Beam Physics Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory CMPB Meeting August 1, 2007.
June 3, 2004G.W.Foster - Proton Driver Proton Driver Project Development, Tactics & Strategy G. W. Foster Fermilab User’s Meeting June 3, 2004.
D&D Review 6 August PEP-II Minimal Maintenance State Upkeep Stan Ecklund (J. Seeman, S. DeBarger, D. Kharakh, M. Zurawel)
B Factory D&D Review: March 23, 2009 Page 1 B Factory D&D: Strategy Overview S. Kahn Director, PPA.
Briefing M&E Parliamentary Portfolio Committee: Radioactive Waste Management Policy and Strategy.
BABAR Overview & Ramp-Down Planning David B. MacFarlane Deputy Director, PPA August 6, 2007.
May 31, 2010Bill Wisniewski1 Mechanical Integration Issues.
RLSR 16/4/2015 UK Financial Plan & Risks. Content Finances – FY 2014/15 – Cost to Completion Risks – Top level to completion – R9 working space – Summary.
October 7, 2009H.J. Krebs1 Super B WorkShop Overview of BaBar Detector Assembly/Installation Documentation Jim Krebs.
TDR and R&D Plans J. Seeman and M. Biagini For Super-B Staff.
WBS – 30 Straight Section Reconfiguration g-2 Accelerator – 30 Straight Section Reconfiguration D. Still Fermilab Muon g-2 IDR, June 5-7.
Mini MAC II PEP-II hardware M. Sullivan Apr 23-24, 2009Page 1 PEP-II Hardware Status M. Sullivan SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory Mini-MAC II Frascati,
Fermilab-India Agreements and Collaboration Shekhar Mishra Project-X, International Collaboration Coodinator Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory Batavia,
June 2, 2008 Bill Wisniewski1 BaBar Disassembly and Disposal Overview.
ELENA installation progress F. Butin / ELENA collaboration.
November 12-13, 2007 Super-B Factory: Accelerator Costing, PEP-II Hardware and Schedule J. Seeman SLAC International Review Committee meeting November.
North Carolina Council on Developmental Disabilities
WP9-SuperB in TIARA M. Biagini, INFN-LNF.
John T. Seeman DOE PEP-II Operations Review April 26, 2006
SuperB Injection, RF stations, Vibration and Operations
Michael Sullivan and John Seeman SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory
Potential Use of PEP-II Magnets by Project X
The first shipment of SPEAR3 magnets (9 dipoles and 12 quadrupoles) arrived April 3. The second shipment (3 dipoles, 7 quadrupoles, and 6 sextupoles)
SuperB RF and Other Components
LAL meeting on e+ studies, Oct. 2010
J. Seeman Assistant Director for PPA/LCLS
FACET Accelerator Overview
North Carolina Council on Developmental Disabilities
Magnet, Support and Infrastructure
Summary of Washington DOE Review
Introduction FY09 Linac Ops Review
Electron Collider Ring Magnets Preliminary Summary
CDR2 – Injection System Injection system overview (Seeman) (2 pages)
SNS-PPU upgrades the existing accelerator structure
WCMHPC Regional Resource Request Plan Review
Presentation transcript:

B Factory D&D Review: March 23, 2009 Page 1 Overview of re-use requests and related issues D. MacFarlane Deputy Director, PPA

B Factory D&D Review: March 23, 2009 Page 2 Outline of Presentation *BABAR –Reusable components (DIRC, EMC, magnet, steel) –Ownership discussions and agreements –Policy on responding to requests after 2009 *PEP-II –Review of PEP-X, Fermilab and INFN requests for equipment –Priorities for disposition and tentative allocation –Timeline and scenarios

B Factory D&D Review: March 23, 2009 Page 3 BABAR detector assets *Major assets of long-term re-use value: –Assets to preserve in the disassembly process: Quartz bars from the DIRC, including existing mechanical structure and horse collar CsI (Tl) crystals from the EMC, with existing mechanical structure Superconducting magnet coil, cryostat and current leads Flux return steel also of potential interest and/or value –Small and easily accessible re-usable components being recovered this year by owners *Possible future re-use interest at the SuperB Factory –Uncertain prospects still for the project, including the timeline –Interest in superconducting coil from future JLAB experiment –BABAR DND project can be executed in a timely manner, while preserving these reuse opportunities

B Factory D&D Review: March 23, 2009 Page 4 Re-use options discussed with BABAR funding agencies *Option 1: Early decision on recovering small accessible components –Have compiled complete list and believe that recovery can be achieved seamlessly without impacting the D&D schedule *Option 2: Early re-use decision by one of the agencies wanting to recover a major component –Would explore ways for foreign partner participation in disassembly, thereby offsetting some of the anticipated D&D costs –Do not expect any agencies will exercise this option at this time *Option 3: Transfer ownership at the end of 2009 to SLAC/DOE, possibly because early decision on owner re-use not possible –Have agreement on interim condition and storage of component where needed, so that we can maintain the D&D schedule –If agency decides it wants to recover equipment after 2009, we would need to negotiate contribution to offset D&D costs –Transfer includes valuable systems, e.g., steel and coil, purchased through construction common fund

B Factory D&D Review: March 23, 2009 Page 5 Considerations for Option 3 *For most systems the only action before 3/2010 is to disconnect services –Have agreement from relevant owners concerning intention to disconnect of utilities, cables, and services –Have identified a list of service disconnect dates for each system, most in first 6 months of 2009 –Have a set of recommendations on how utilities and cables will be disconnected *For a few systems, equipment will be removed from BABAR before 3/2010 –RPCs in forward and rear end doors: owners have stated that these can removed for disposal –Forward EMC will be removed in March, 2009 and stored in IR- 12 at least until Dec 2009

B Factory D&D Review: March 23, 2009 Page 6 BABAR ownership status *Draft bilateral MOU codifying the options discussed at Jan BABAR IFC meeting –Any of these options could be exercised during the course of D&D, with a ownership transfer at the end of calendar 2009 differentiating Options 2 and 3 –Text completed and agreements are now in circulation for signatures *Policy for dispersal after ownership transfer in Dec 2009 –Priority given to requests that benefit the SLAC HEP science program, present or future, e.g., SuperB –Next priority are re-use requests from other US labs & programs –Recycle materials such as steel, if possible, to offset D&D costs –Breakdown of DIRC & EMC costed, but these valuable systems could be stored longer term

B Factory D&D Review: March 23, 2009 Page 7 Requests for PEP-II components *From future on-site PEP-X project –rf stations (7/15), straight section quadrupoles, supports, and vacuum chambers (4/10), and injection hardware (1/2) *From INFN for re-use in SuperB project: –North and south damping rings, injection/extraction lines –Linac accelerating sections (72), klystrons (36), modulators (36), waveguides (72), quadrupoles (36), dipole correctors (40), polarized gun, spin rotators, positron target and capture area –PEP-II LER and HER dipoles & quadrupoles (1022), correctors (836), magnet supports (1000), vacuum chambers (650), rf stations (15), feedback systems (4), diagnostic systems, e  and e  injection hardware, temperature monitors, and power supplies (800) *From Fermilab for Project-X –HER dipoles (100), dipole vacuum chambers (100), and some quadrupoles (unspecified) *Small fraction of power supplies and instrumentation already made available to other facilities on site Outside scope of PEP-II D&D Project

B Factory D&D Review: March 23, 2009 Page 8 Priorities for PEP-II component re-use *Stated policy: –Current or future accelerator facilities at SLAC –Operating or soon to be operate US accelerators at other laboratories –Future US domestic accelerators –Future US contributions to international accelerator programs –Other international accelerator programs –Disposal *Complicating issues –Future accelerator use-cases are not approved construction projects, with uncertain timescales and some lack of clarity on exact needs –While participation in dismantling by partnering institution is likely, to gain first-hand knowledge of equipment, details are not worked out –While not large, source of funding for costs of transportation not understood

B Factory D&D Review: March 23, 2009 Page 9 Current plan for PEP-II re-use disposition *For FACET and on-site PEP-X project –North and south damping rings, injection/extraction lines –Linac accelerating sections (72), klystrons (36), modulators (36), waveguides (72), quadrupoles (36), dipole correctors (40), polarized gun, spin rotators, positron target and capture area –rf stations (7/15), straight section quadrupoles, supports, and vacuum chambers (4/10), and injection hardware (1/2) *From Fermilab for Project-X –HER dipoles (100), dipole vacuum chambers (100), and some quadrupoles (unspecified) *From INFN for re-use in SuperB project: –PEP-II LER and HER dipoles & quadrupoles (up to ~900), correctors (836), magnet supports (1000), vacuum chambers (~550), rf stations (8/15), feedback systems (4), diagnostic systems, injection hardware (1/2), temperature monitors, and power supplies (800) Outside scope of PEP-II D&D Project

B Factory D&D Review: March 23, 2009 Page 10 Possible timelines *Scenario: PEP-X, Project-X and SuperB are all approved –D&D project for PEP-II ramps up in FY12, bulk of removal and transport occurs in FY13-FY14, delivering components to Fermilab and Italy as early as January 2013 –Allows orderly and sequential removal of LER rafts, giving easy access to HER dipoles mounted below –Fits likely time-early on-site need for Fermilab and INFN; rf system components for PEP-X would need to be stored on site for some time –Detector components for SuperB ready well in advance of 2013 *Scenario: Project-X and/or SuperB do not go forward –Italian decision on SuperB expected within the next year, clarifying whether bulk of PEP-II components will be needed for this project [Dosselli] –Project-X decision could occur around 2012 [Kerby] –Major uncertainty is whether and to what extent exemptions to the metals suspension would be possible, impacting the amount of storage required on site and the costs of disposing or storing of components should this be needed [Seeman, Rokni]