Heuristic Strategy and Incentives in Distribution Networks of Competitive Agents STIET Fall Workshop, 2003 Presenter: Thede Loder.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
When a Good Reputation isn’t Good Enough Jonathan Traupman Robert Wilensky U.C. Berkeley.
Advertisements

Infinitely Repeated Games
Cope with selfish and malicious nodes
SOCIAL CAPITAL THE AIMS OF THESE NOTES – Social capital: a controversial concept THREE KEY WORDS – Networks – Trust – Institutions.
Game Theory “Доверяй, Но Проверяй” - Russian Proverb (Trust, but Verify) - Ronald Reagan Mike Shor Lecture 6.
Game Theory “Доверяй, Но Проверяй” (“Trust, but Verify”) - Russian Proverb (Ronald Reagan) Topic 5 Repeated Games.
1 Evolution & Economics No Evolutionary Stability in Repeated Games Played by Finite Automata K. Binmore & L. Samuelson J.E.T Automata.
Infinitely Repeated Games. In an infinitely repeated game, the application of subgame perfection is different - after any possible history, the continuation.
6-1 LECTURE 6: MULTIAGENT INTERACTIONS An Introduction to MultiAgent Systems
The basics of Game Theory Understanding strategic behaviour.
An Introduction to... Evolutionary Game Theory
Infinitely Repeated Games Econ 171. Finitely Repeated Game Take any game play it, then play it again, for a specified number of times. The game that is.
AP Economics Mr. Bernstein Module 65: Game Theory December 10, 2014.
Game Theory. Games Oligopolist Play ▫Each oligopolist realizes both that its profit depends on what its competitor does and that its competitor’s profit.
On the Economics of P2P Systems Speaker Coby Fernandess.
Game Theory Lecture 8.
GAME THEORY By Ben Cutting & Rohit Venkat. Game Theory: General Definition  Mathematical decision making tool  Used to analyze a competitive situation.
Eponine Lupo.  Game Theory is a mathematical theory that deals with models of conflict and cooperation.  It is a precise and logical description of.
Oligopoly Fun and games. Oligopoly An oligopolist is one of a small number of producers in an industry. The industry is an oligopoly.  All oligopolists.
Chapter 12 Choices Involving Strategy McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2008 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
A Memetic Framework for Describing and Simulating Spatial Prisoner’s Dilemma with Coalition Formation Sneak Review by Udara Weerakoon.
Neo-Liberal Institutionalism. The Prisoners’ Dilemma Player 2 Player 1.
Game Theory: Key Concepts Zero Sum Games Zero Sum Games Non – Zero Sum Games Non – Zero Sum Games Strategic Form Games  Lay out strategies Strategic Form.
Lectures in Microeconomics-Charles W. Upton Game Theory.
PROBLEM 4.
Dynamic Games. Overview In this unit we study: Combinations of sequential and simultaneous games Solutions to these types of games Repeated games How.
©John Wiley & Sons, Inc Huffman: Psychology in Action (8e) Evolution of cooperation: Why make friends? Why be nice, making friends must have offered.
Social Choice Session 7 Carmen Pasca and John Hey.
Yitzchak Rosenthal P2P Mechanism Design: Incentives in Peer-to-Peer Systems Paper By: Moshe Babaioff, John Chuang and Michal Feldman.
Agenda, Day 2  Questions about syllabus? About myths?  Prisoner’s dilemma  Prisoner’s dilemma vs negotiation  Play a single round  Play multiple rounds.
Economic Foundations of Strategy Power Point Set #4.
Example Department of Computer Science University of Bologna Italy ( Decentralised, Evolving, Large-scale Information Systems (DELIS)
Presenter: Chih-Yuan Chou GA-BASED ALGORITHMS FOR FINDING EQUILIBRIUM 1.
Imperfect Competition Chapter 9
You are all social scientists: you just don’t know it yet David Hales (University of Bologna, Italy) SASO 2007, Cambridge. Mass.
Evolving cooperation in one-time interactions with strangers Tags produce cooperation in the single round prisoner’s dilemma and it’s.
KRUGMAN'S MICROECONOMICS for AP* Game Theory Margaret Ray and David Anderson Micro: Econ: Module.
© 2007 Worth Publishers Essentials of Economics Krugman Wells Olney Prepared by: Fernando & Yvonn Quijano.
Section 2 – Ec1818 Jeremy Barofsky
How to Analyse Social Network? : Part 2 Game Theory Thank you for all referred contexts and figures.
Mohsen Afsharchi Multiagent Interaction. What are Multiagent Systems?
Repeated Game Modeling of Multicast Overlays Mike Afergan (MIT CSAIL/Akamai) Rahul Sami (University of Michigan) April 25, 2006.
Strategic Management/ Business Policy Joe Mahoney.
Ch. 16 Oligopoly. Oligopoly Only a few sellers offer similar or identical products Actions of any seller can have large impact on profits of other sellers.
Evolving Strategies for the Prisoner’s Dilemma Jennifer Golbeck University of Maryland, College Park Department of Computer Science July 23, 2002.
Game Theory By Ben Cutting & Rohit Venkat.
Game theory basics A Game describes situations of strategic interaction, where the payoff for one agent depends on its own actions as well as on the actions.
Monopolistic Competition And Oligopoly
PRISONER’S DILEMMA BERK EROL
Imperfect Competition Chapter 9
Ch. 16 Oligopoly.
이 장에서는 불완전 경쟁시장에 대해서 학습한다.
UNIT 4. SOCIAL INTERACTIONS
BEC 30325: MANAGERIAL ECONOMICS
Choices Involving Strategy
Computer-Mediated Communication
Strategic Management/ Business Policy
03 Self-interest and the Dilemmas of Cooperation
Game Theory in Wireless and Communication Networks: Theory, Models, and Applications Lecture 10 Stochastic Game Zhu Han, Dusit Niyato, Walid Saad, and.
Learning 6.2 Game Theory.
LECTURE 6: MULTIAGENT INTERACTIONS
Evolution for Cooperation
Game Theory Fall Mike Shor Topic 5.
Economics of Organization
EASTERN MEDITERRANEAN UNIVERSITY DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING IENG314 OPERATIONS RESEARCH II SAMIR SAMEER ABUYOUSSEF
Game Theory Lesson 15 Section 65.
Lecture 10 Coordination and Reputation
Phase transitions to cooperation in the prisoner‘s dilemma
Game Theory Spring Mike Shor Topic 5.
Assume Anarchy? Peter J. Boettke Constitutional Economics
Presentation transcript:

Heuristic Strategy and Incentives in Distribution Networks of Competitive Agents STIET Fall Workshop, 2003 Presenter: Thede Loder

The Problem Agents (peers) provide or receive services Goal is to acquire valuable objects (assets) Agents have varying taste in assets Agent resources are constrained Free for all environment: –No contracts, no numeraire, no centralized or trusted entities Decision problem: what services, to which agents, and when?

Asset Exchange as a Game Roles: Provider and Initiator Game: iterative, half-step Prisoner’s Dilemma Agent controlled finite horizon (either agent may leave game at any time) Provider takes risk: initiator can get payoff and leave Nash Equilibrium: provide nothing

Heueristic Insight: Axelrod and the Evolution of Cooperation Context: Iterated Prisoner’s Dilemma Tit for Tat (with bluffing): –“exploitive cooperation”, but still cooperation Key insight: cooperation requires expectation of future interaction Bottom line: –No identity  No trust  No cooperation

Solution Reputation System –Add Identity (cheap by strong) –Add History (agent gets “memory”) Determine reputation by direct and shared experience Make sticky with incentives: differentiated service

Credibility Ratings Simple online learning Use relationship history (actions, outcomes) and value weights Two ratings: –Desirability, influences proactive actions –Credibility, influences reactive actions Ratings effect actuator operation: –Prioritized service queues –introductions and referrals –proactive connection initiation (for network clustering)

A Candidate Function Properties (Axelrod): –Nice, provokable, forgiving Credibility C for an agent is function of: –Net Exchange Volume V n = events * value/event –Correction Factor f(b), function of flow bias b (relative direction of flow) C = V n * f(b) 100% out 100% in symmetric f(b) flow bias

Progress and Next Steps Progress: –Simulator kernel completed –Dummy Agent completed Next Steps: –Parameterize Strategy –Develop ‘smart’ agent code –Run evolutionary search trials