Slide 1 Oakdale Irrigation District Water Resources Plan “What We’ve Learned” October 2005.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
May 18, 2005 Oakdale Irrigation District Water Resources Plan.
Advertisements

Sustainable Regional Water Resource Management By: Tucson Regional Water Coalition and Southern Arizona Leadership Council.
Improvement of Water Resources Management in Egypt Hesham Moustafa.
Slide 1 Oakdale Irrigation District Water Resources Plan.
Responses to the New Normal Creative Partnerships for Innovative Water Solutions Colorado Water Workshop – July 17, 2013.
Cuba’s Future Development Needs, Funding Models, and Alternatives. A Perspective of the Operation of a Cuban Water & Sewer Utility. Eduardo Vega-Llort,
Water for Texas 2012 State Water Plan. Water Planning: Legislative Response to Drought  Late 1950s Drought of Record – 1957: Creation of TWDB – $200.
1 U.S. EPA State Revolving Fund: Providing Affordable Financing George Ames U.S. EPA IADF Conference on Financing Municipalities and Sub-National Governments,
Water Conservation in the San Diego Region Bill Jacoby San Diego County Water Authority North Bay Water Association April 2, 2004.
California Recycled Water Plan California Recycled Water Plan A comprehensive approach to California’s long-term water supply By Gregory B. Ryan and Meagan.
Water Trends in Agriculture: Implications for Farms, Cooperatives and Communities James Pritchett Agricultural and Resource Economics Colorado State University.
Slide 1 November 2005 Oakdale Irrigation District Water Resources Plan A Community Plan. A Successful Future. Phase 1 Recommendations Oakdale Irrigation.
North American Natural Gas Infrastructure Needs Donald F. Santa, Jr. President Interstate Natural Gas Association of America The Independent Petroleum.
DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SETTLEMENTS- SANITATION INPUTS ON NATIONAL WASTE MANAGEMENT STRATEGY 29 MAY 2012 By Mandisa Mangqalaza.
Water Resource Division San Joaquin County Water Resource Management Planning Update C. Mel Lytle, Ph.D. Water Resource Coordinator San Joaquin County.
National IWRM plans; links with Water Supply and Sanitation Palle Lindgaard Jørgensen Technical Secretariat Yerevan, 13 December 2006.
Build and maintain democratic and decentralized local government institutions that are capable to participate in the development of social and economic.
The Urban Infrastructure Challenge in Canada: Focusing on Housing Affordability and Choice Presentation by CHBA – [Name] to The Municipal Council of [Name]
Task 3 Institutional Incentives for Efficient Water Use.
One Corps Serving The Army and the Nation Water Supply FY 05 Program Development Ron Conner.
© 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. Principles of Business, 8e C H A P T E R 16 SLIDE Personal Financial Statements Budgeting.
Slide 1 Infrastructure Plan − Existing System Assessment Oakdale Irrigation District July 5, 2005.
Determining an Equitable Crop Share Lease AgLease101.org a product of the North Central Farm Management Extension Committee.
1 Emergency Financial Response: Drought Rates May 15, 2014.
WSNTG Annual Conference September 2006 Water Services National Training Group 10 th Annual Conference 7 th September 2006.
LOCAL GOVERNMENT INFRASTRUCTURE NEEDS vs DEVELOPMENT CHARGES.
Environmental Federation of Oklahoma The City of Oklahoma City Utilities Department October 2, 2008.
Colorado River Basin Water Supply and Demand Study Next Steps: Agriculture Conservation, Productivity, and Transfers Workgroup Urban Water Institute Conference.
Columbia River Water Management Program (CRWMP) Review of Year One Upper Crab Creek Planning Unit Meeting April 17, 2007.
LAKESHASTA LAKEOROVILLE Bay-Delta STATE WATER PROJECT (2.0 MAF) LOS ANGELES AQUEDUCTS (0.5 MAF) COLORADO RIVER AQUEDUCT (1.25 MAF) METROPOLITAN WATER.
FERC Relicensing of the Toledo Bend Project – Hydroelectric Power Generation Drought Hydroelectric vs. Water Supply Sabine River Authority Issues.
IRP Approach to Water Supply Alternatives for Duck River Watershed: Presentation to XII TN Water Resources Symposium William W. Wade Energy and Water.
Rodman & Renshaw Conference September 2015 This presentation contains forward-looking statements that are subject to significant risks and.
Slide 1 April 18, 2006 Oakdale Irrigation District Water Resources Plan A Community Plan. A Successful Future. Financial Model and Discussion of Preferred.
1 Transportation Policy and Performance: The challenges and opportunities of performance-based programs Deputy Administrator Therese McMillan Federal Transit.
One Step Ahead: Using a Finance Plan for Regional Water System Operations Deena Hood Central Wyoming Regional Water System Carol Malesky Integrated Utilities.
An Interregional Water Solution with Conjunctive Use of Groundwater Haskell L. Simon President, Coastal Plains Groundwater Conservation District Vice President,
2014 IRWM Drought Grants Sierra Water Workgroup Summit June Tracie L. Billington Department of Water Resources Financial Assistance Branch.
Sustainable Regional Water Resource Management By: Tucson Regional Water Coalition and Southern Arizona Leadership Council SUMBER:
Prepared By: Presented By: Lawrence H. Ernst, PG, CEG, CHG Principal Hydrogeologist/Wood Rodgers November 21, 2014.
1 Financial Indicator Graphs for the Year Ended December 31, 2009 Prepared by Financial Advisory Services Local Government Services Division Municipal.
Slide 1 Infrastructure Plan − Improve Service Projects Oakdale Irrigation District August 17, 2005.
Maximizing Water Supply Sustainability for the Goleta Valley Ryan Drake Water Supply and Conservation Manager 2015 Central Coast Sustainability Summit.
2006 Water Bond & the WRIF Flood Control, Water Reliability, and Water Quality Peer Swan Director, Southern California Water Agency.
Upper San Joaquin River Basin Storage Investigation ACWA Regions 9 and 10 Carlsbad Water Summit U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation State.
Rebuilding the System Reducing the Risk California Water Plan Plenary Session October 22-23, 2007.
Oakdale Irrigation District Agricultural Water Management Plan Briefing on 2015 Update January 5, /5/2016 OID AWMP Update Briefing.
Slide 1 February 21, 2006 Oakdale Irrigation District Water Resources Plan A Community Plan. A Successful Future. Water Supply Reliability Oakdale Irrigation.
City of San Diego’s Recycled Water Study Item W15a October 10, 2012 Presentation to the California Coastal Commission.
California Water Plan Update Advisory Committee Meeting January 20, 2005.
Proposed MMWD Rate Restructure MCOE District Business Officials November 4, 2015.
Borrego Water District Revenue Workshop. Potential Revenue Sources  Background  Service Area Relatively Small  Largely Undeveloped  Absentee Owners.
Santa Rosa Plain Groundwater Management Planning Update Fall 2013.
Water Management Options Analysis Sonoma Valley Model Results Sonoma Valley Technical Work Group October 8, /08/2007.
Slide 1 March 7, 2006 Oakdale Irrigation District Water Resources Plan A Community Plan. A Successful Future. Discussion of Annexation/Expansion Issues.
Strategies for Colorado River Water Management Jaci Gould Deputy Regional Director Lower Colorado Region.
Alan Matheson State Planning Coordinator November 19, 2013 Preparing for an Uncertain Future: Developing a Utah Water Strategy Alan Matheson Executive.
OBJECTIVE 1 Irrigation District Infrastructure Studies
Potholes Supplemental Feed Route Project
Joshua Basin Water District Draft Findings & Rate Scenarios
Municipal Association of Victoria Rate Cap Forum 25th November 2015
Zone 7 And WaterFix March 7, 2018
Water and Sewer Rate Study
Joshua Basin Water District Revised Rate Recommendations
Municipal Association of Victoria Rate Cap Forum 25th November 2015
NRCS Agricultural Water Management Activities in the Southeast US
Washington State Infrastructure Financing
Capital Improvement Plans
California Water Commission
Claude “Bud” Lewis Desalination Plant
Presentation transcript:

Slide 1 Oakdale Irrigation District Water Resources Plan “What We’ve Learned” October 2005

2 Water Resources Plan (Refresher) What is it? w Assesses where we are as an irrigation district w Describes measures needed to make us better w Addresses federal, state and local challenges to our water w Provides mechanisms to protect our water w Tells us what it will cost to meet our needs and how to pay for it A Planning Document that… Technical Analyses Institutional Activities Public Involvement

3 Water Resources Plan-Goals w Provide long-term protection to OID’s water rights. w Address federal, state, and local water challenges. w Rebuild/modernize an out-of-date system to meet changing customer needs. w Develop affordable ways to finance improvements. w Involve the public in the planning process.

4 Understanding OID’s Responsibilities in the Planning Process w Irrigation districts were formed to provide reliable water supplies to the lands they serve and to protect those water resources w Irrigation districts must provide for the long term financial health of the organization – Maintaining affordable rates – Recognizing the need to repair, replace, rehabilitate and modernize the system it operates w Comply with all federal, state and local laws – Be good stewards of our water resources

5 How the Planning Process Works DECISIONS DISCUSSION FACTS DATA Land Use, Water Balance, Infrastructure Evaluation, Modernization Needs, Finances Water Resource Plan CEQA Plan Adoption w Provide long-term protection to OID’s water rights w Address federal, state and local water challenges w Rebuild/modernize an out-of-date system to meet changing customer needs w Develop affordable ways to finance improvements w Involve the public in the planning process

6 Data + Facts = What We’ve Learned Land Use – Between now and 2025, likely to see significant amount of land conversions in OID Service Area Ag to Urban Ag to other ag. (pasture to trees & corn) Ag going to deep wells for better service Idle land coming into Ag – OID could make available over 60 TAF in the next years – Agricultural lands, within OID’s Sphere of Influence, could be recipients of this water if made available Balance additional ag with future urban needs

7 Data + Facts = What We’ve Learned Customer Base – 60% of current customers are on 10 acres or less Most customers in this category have secondary employment Small parcel needs are different than large parcel needs – 4% of current customers farm on 40 acres or more – 36% of current customers farm between acres – Most all participants questioned wanted more flexibility in the services provided by OID

8 Data + Facts = What We’ve Learned Water Balance – Currently about 70K acre-feet leaves OID Service Area 30% of diverted water Water leaves without benefit to OID – Surrounding 9 irrigation districts average 40 inches per acre applied water – OID’s average use is over 60 inches per acre

SURFACE WATER LEAVING DISTRICT DRAINWATER 50,400 AF OPERATIONAL SPILLS 20,000 AF TOTAL 70,400 AF CSJWCD 9,500 AF MID 17,000 AF SSJID 7,100 AF LONE TREE CREEK 11,300 AF DRY CREEK 16,800 AF STANISLAUS RIVER 8,700 AF (other outflow to the river)

10 Data + Facts = What We’ve Learned Infrastructure – 300 miles of Distribution Laterals 100 miles of pipeline 200 miles of open ditch – 40 miles of North and South Main Canals

11 Data + Facts = What We’ve Learned Modernization – 340 miles of system and only 1 reservoir – OID has only 4 automated sites in its system * SSJID and MID have over 60 automated sites each - Access to system is only 60%

12 Data + Facts = What We’ve Learned Finances – In 1979 the Water Rate was $31 per acre – In 2000 the Water Rate was $27.50 per acre – In 2005 the Water Rate is $19.50 per acre – 90% of Water Rate subsidized by power sales and water transfers – The “unsubsidized” water rate is ($10 million budget over 54,000 acres) $ per acre w/o power or water transfers

13 Knowing what we know... What will “the Plan” be Recommending? w Capital Replacement Projects-”Gotta Have” Projects – To replace a 93 year old system w Enhanced Service Standards – To better provide for evolving customer needs w Regulating Reservoir Projects - Recommendations – Designed to meet enhanced Service Standards w Automation Projects - Recommendations – Intended to enhance water deliveries and service w Drainwater Rec Projects - Recommendations – Integrated with above to increase operational efficiency

14 Enhanced Service Standards- Recommendations  Arranged water deliveries for those that want them  Fixed head rotations available for corn and pasture  “Water on Water off” capabilities  Revised Operating Standards for Consistency in Service  Changes to be supportive of WRP Goals

15 Regulating Reservoir - Recommendations Van Lier Reservoir Woodward Reservoir New Reservoir

16 Automation and Flow Control Projects - Recommendations

17 Drainwater Reclamation Projects - Recommendations

18 Sounds Good(!) (?) What’s the cost?

19 Automate Portions of the System plus Reservoirs Rebuild the Old System Drainwater Rec. Systems $ $ Integrate with Finances Revenue Options Power Contracts Water Transfers Water Rates Annex Lands and Charge More Future Land Use Direction is to Develop “Pay as you Go” Financial Plan

20 Water Resources Plan - Contents w Present all data and facts we’ve collected and analyzed w Present a range of alternatives (12-16) w Recommend a “Preferred Alternative” that... – Improves water supply reliability – Achieves an enhanced level of service – Keeps water rates affordable – Provides a level of drought protection – Secures OID’s financial position into the future w Go Public and seek input

Slide 21 Oakdale Irrigation District Water Resources Plan A Community Plan. A Successful Future Oakdale Irrigation District Water Resources Plan A Community Plan. A Successful Future October 2005