Using the Model for Improvement to Improve Reliability of Care Processes Jennifer Lenoci-Edwards, RN, MPH Director, Patient Safety, Institute for Healthcare.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Heard lots of great concepts and ideas
Advertisements

QI Presentation: Skills and Examples
The Model for Improvement
Developing Learning Cycles. Insights from Science of Improvement Understand interdependencies in the components of the system where the changes are being.
Group Medical Visits For Specialists.
Overview: Plan-Do-Check-Act Cycle.
Supporting NHS Wales to Deliver World Class Healthcare All Wales Stroke Services Improvement Collaborative All Nations Centre, Cardiff 4 th November 2008.
Overview of NIATx & Process Improvement Process Improvement Overview and Basic Training 2008.
NoCVA Readmission Collaborative October 25, 2012.
August 21 st Track One Virtual Meeting Prepared and Presented by Institute for Healthcare Improvement Faculty Sue Gullo, Director Jane Taylor, Improvement.
Family Medicine and Public Health Clerkship Rotation University of Manitoba Amanda Condon MD CCFP.
1 Overview Welcome Ohio NIATx Buprenorphine Study Participants.
Fostering Change: How to Engage the Practice Julie Osgood, MS Senior Director, Operations MaineHealth September 25, 2009.
© 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
PI Model Mike Davies, MD FACP.
PDSA Cycle for Accelerating Improvement
Overview Colorado HIV-STIC NIATx Process Improvement Model Linda J. Frazier November 8, 2011 Colorado Springs, CO.
Model for Improvement Heidi Johns, Quality Leader BCPSQC April, 2013.
The Model for Improvement Dannie Currie SIA for the SHN Atlantic Node.
© 2004 Institute for Healthcare Improvement The Model for Improvement A Method to Test, Implement, and Spread Change Ideas for Improving Care for People.
I have no relevant financial relationships with the manufacturers of any commercial products and/or provider of commercial services discussed in this CME.
Overview Process Improvement. History Founded in 2003, NIATx works with behavioral health care organizations across the country to improve access to and.
Organization of Healthcare: The Art and Science of Managing Change IPC3 Learning Session II Denver, Colorado April 2011 Roger Chaufournier Ann Lewis.
August 21 st Track One Virtual Meeting Prepared and Presented by Institute for Healthcare Improvement Faculty Sue Gullo, Director Jane Taylor, Improvement.
[Facility Name] [Presenter Name] [Date]. Objectives 2 After this session, you will be able to 1. describe Root Cause Analysis (RCA) and Plan-Do-Study-Act.
Leading a Patient Safety Program Madeleine Biondolillo, MD Massachusetts Department of Public Health Gordon Schiff, MD Brigham & Women’s Hospital; Harvard.
Model for Improvement and Tests of Change Denise Remus, PhD, RN Improvement Advisor, Cynosure Health / HRET HEN.
A METHOD TO OUR MADNESS: OUR THEORY OF HOW IMPROVEMENT HAPPENS Ninon Lewis and David Williams Institute for Healthcare Improvement Early Years Collaborative:
Wednesday 10 June 2015 Carrie Marr Executive Director Organisational Effectiveness WSLHD Mobilising People and Leading Sustainable Change.
Steps for Success in EHR Planning Bill French, VP eHealth Strategies Wisconsin Office of Rural Health HIT Implementation Workshop Stevens Point, WI August.
CUSP 4 MVP – VAP Improving Care for Mechanically Ventilated Patients Content 1: Science of Safety & Identifying Defects ARMSTRONG INSTITUTE FOR PATIENT.
Overview NIATx Model. NIATx History RWJF and SAMHSA Supported Evidence-based practices Easy to adopt methods.
Division of Primary Health Care An evaluation of the effectiveness of ‘care bundles’ as a means of improving hospital care and reducing re-admission for.
MA STAAR Learning Session Completing the Transition into Skilled Nursing, Acute Rehabilitation, and Long Term Care Facilities Laurie Herndon and Kate Bones.
Reliability Theory Concepts: (How to be a Coach) Delivering Uniformly Excellent and Highly Reliable Interventions Across a Healthcare System Roger Resar.
How to design reliable processes in Healthcare Moving to 95% Roger Resar MD Hilton Head June 2012.
Copyright 2012 Delmar, a part of Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. Chapter 9 Improving Quality in Health Care Organizations.
Model For Improvement: Aim Statements Chapter Quality Network Asthma Project Ohio Chapter, AAP Learning Session 1 Keith Mandel, M.D. Vice President of.
Science of Safety and Identifying Defects CUSP 4 MVP-VAP Content Call, Module #2.
Accelerating Improvement Learning Session 2 February, 2005 Angela Hovis Improvement Advisor California Chronic Care Learning Communities Initiative Collaborative.
Developing Concepts of Change & Change Packages. What about Change Concepts? What are they? How can we use them to generate new change ideas when we encounter.
Reduce Waiting & No-Shows  Increase Admissions & Continuation Improving Client Engagement & Retention Lynn M Madden, MPA Reduce Waiting.
I have no relevant financial relationships with the manufacturers of any commercial products and/or provider of commercial services discussed in this CME.
Improvement Model and PDSA Cycles. Organ Donation The Service Improvement Model provides a framework to test, implement and sustain change ideas to overcome.
Testing and Implementing Change Learning Session 2 November 14, 2002 Vicki Grant & Ron Moen.
Using Quality Improvement Strategies to Implement an Intervention Module Created By Population Health Improvement Partners
Mount Auburn Practice Improvement Program (MA-PIP)
Review of Reliable Design QUEST Frank Federico. What does this line graph tell you? Education Standardization.
Chapter Quality Network ADHD Project Jen Powell, MPH, MBA The Model for Improvement: The Three Questions.
Welcome and please sign in! MOUNT AUBURN PRACTICE IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (MA-PIP) Practice Managers Session June 11, 2015.
Welcome and please sign in on the clipboard before you leave! MOUNT AUBURN PRACTICE IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (MA-PIP) Practice Managers Session July 9, 2015.
Implementing the Mount Auburn Practice Improvement Program Paula Griswold, MS Executive Director, Massachusetts Coalition for the Prevention of Medical.
Providing Safe and Effective Care for Patients with Limited English Proficiency This course was developed with the support of the Josiah Macy Jr. Foundation.
I MPROVEMENT J OURNEY Community Learning Session May 8, 2015 Judy Ling Coaching Consultant, MA-PIP.
Introduction to QI West of England Academy David Evans Quality Improvement Programme Manager.
Reliable Process Design LS3 29 th - 30 th September.
Insert name of presentation on Master Slide The Model for Improvement Wednesday 16 June 2010 Presenter: Dr Jonathon Gray.
High Impact Leadership –Safety First Understanding The System, its Influence on Patient Safety and The Leadership Framework to Manage it Successfully David.
Driving to Results: Key Changes and Leadership Behaviors: Management Systems to Deploy & Sustain the Improvements David Munch M.D. IHI Faculty Chief Clinical.
Overview NIATx Model. NIATx History RWJF and SAMHSA Supported and Field Testing Development driven by proven methods and tools –Customer-focused –Use.
Funded by HRSA HIV/AIDS Bureau Using Data for Quality Improvement for Part A & B Grantees Presented by: Barbara M. Rosa, RN, MS NQC Consultant.
Texas Center for Quality and Patient Safety Dennis Cook, MSN, RN, CPPS Senior Director, Texas Center for Quality and & Patient Safety Texas Hospital Association.
Where Do We Go From Here? Joseph J. Abularrage, MD, MPH, M.Phil, FAAP, President, NYS AAP - Chapter 2 Jennifer Powell, MPH, MBA, Quality Improvement Consultant.
Learning System: Engaging the Front-line in Improvement
Improvement 101 Learning Series
Mount Auburn Practice Improvement Project (MA-PIP) Coach/Practice Manager Session Jan 29, 2016.
Introduction to Quality Improvement Methods
Useful QI principles for NELA
Key Themes from the Program
Presentation transcript:

Using the Model for Improvement to Improve Reliability of Care Processes Jennifer Lenoci-Edwards, RN, MPH Director, Patient Safety, Institute for Healthcare Improvement (IHI) Yvonne Cheung, MD, MPH, CPPS Chair, Department of Quality and Patient Safety, MAH September 25, 2015 Mount Auburn Practice Improvement Program (MA-PIP) Community Learning Session #2

Learning Objectives Learners will be able to:  Demonstrate the use of the Model for Improvement and small tests of change to identify and solve problems  Describe strategies to improve the reliability of care processes.  Identify strategies to effectively engage patients in improvement work Using test results management as our example

Disclosure Statement All Presenters and Content Developers have no significant financial interest/arrangement with any organization(s) that could be perceived as a real or apparent conflict of interest with the subject matter of the presentation.

What are we trying to accomplish? How will we know that a change is an improvement? What change can we make that will result in improvement? Model for Improvement Ac t Plan StudyDo Aim of Improvement Measurement of Improvement Developing a Change Testing a Change Adapted from Langley, G. J., Nolan, K. M., Nolan, T. W., Norman, C. L., & Provost, L. P. The Improvement Guide: A Practical Approach to Enhancing Organizational Performance. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass,

Repeated Use of the PDSA Cycle Hunches Theories Ideas Changes That Result in Improvement AP SD A P S D AP SD D S P A DATA Very Small Scale Test Follow-up Tests Wide-Scale Tests of Change Implementation of Change Sequential building of knowledge under a wide range of conditions Spread 5

Plan Compose aim Pose questions/predictions Create action plan to carry out cycle (who, what, when, where) Plan for data collection DoStudy Act Carry out the test and collect data Document what occurred Begin analysis of data Complete data analysis Compare to predictions Summarize learning Decide changes to make Arrange next cycle Adapt, Adopt, or discard Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) Cycle 6

Principles & Guidelines for Testing Changes  A test of change should answer a specific question  A test of change requires a theory and prediction  Test on a small scale  Collect data over time  Build knowledge sequentially with multiple Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles for each change idea  Include a wide range of conditions in the sequence of tests

Getting Started  Select process you want to make more reliable  What keeps you up at night?  How could a patient be harmed in your practice?  Where are the Pain Points for your team?  Select subset or segment of population  Develop a high level flow diagram  Identify defects in each step  Select which defect you will fix first  State your reliability goal  At least 95% reliable 8

Our Test Case: Test Result Management Test Result Management  Delayed Diagnosis  Poor Outcomes to Patients  Medical Malpractice 9

Where do I begin? Let’s break it down  Did patient get the test I requested?  Did the test come back?  Did the team review the test?  Did the Physician interpret the test correctly?  Did the Physician order the correct follow up test or treatment or referral?  Was the test result communicated to the patient?  Did the follow up occur?  Who will watch my test queue when I am on vacation? 10

Back to the Model For Improvement Aim: What is the process we are focused on improving? By what? By when? Measurement: What is a metric that we use to assess our AIM? Tests of Change: What can we test to improve our system? 11

Back to the Model For Improvement Aim: Increase to 80% the number of (Radiology, Echo, High Risk, High Risk Patients) test results that are communicated to patients within 48 hours of receipt, by the end of September. Measurement: Weekly review of 10 random charts with pending test results to determine if information was communicated to patient (via phone or letter.) (On Wednesday check the next 10 test results that came starting Monday, to see if they have been communicated to the patient) Tests of Change: How to identify tests of change 12

Working toward your Tests of Change  Select process you want to make more reliable  What keeps you up at night?  How could a patient be harmed in your practice?  Where are the Pain Points for your team?  Select subset or segment of population  Develop a high level flow diagram  Identify defects in each step  Select which defect you will fix first  State your reliability goal  At least 95% reliable 13

Flow Mapping: Visualize the Steps  High level (work) flow diagram  3 to 5 Steps-keep it simple  Identify defects  Is there a cascade?  Which is the biggest defect?  Identify what you will fix 14

Flow Mapping – Making the Process Visual Make Coffee Make Kids Lunches Pack their Back Packs Wake up the kids 15 Get Up Rock in my Shoe: We keep missing the bus!

Tool: Ask “Why?” Five Times Curiosity! To help you understand the underlying reasons for the defects Why? 16

Your turn – Flow mapping for Test Result Management  Pick one process that you want to improve around test result management  Work with 3-4 people near you to develop a flow map for test results management  Use “stickies” to identify 4-5 key steps in the process  Identify potential defects/problems in process 17

Discussion 18

Principles & Guidelines for Testing Changes  A test of change should answer a specific question  A test of change requires a theory and prediction  Test on a small scale  Collect data over time  Build knowledge sequentially with multiple Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles for each change idea  Include a wide range of conditions in the sequence of tests

20 Selecting a Change to Test Building Systems for Reliability

How Reliable is Your Test Result Process When compared to:  Airline industry  Automobiles  Starbucks 21

Why Are Processes Not Reliable?  Individual Autonomy  Expecting that a policy will result in improved reliability  Focus on benchmark performance  Over-reliance on training, vigilance and hard work 22

QUALITY is Job #1 Lecture at Noon Work harder. Pay more attention. Photo Credit: St. Barb by Matt MacGillivray (CC BY)St. BarbMatt MacGillivray

Changes that can Improve Reliability  Simplification  Are there Steps in your processes that can be eliminated?  Standardization  Best known process to achieve desired results  But known today-may change with new knowledge or new context 24

Why Standardize?  Makes it easier to fix a defect when one occurs  Reduce variation  Makes it easier to train  Supports care we expect our patients receive  Makes it easier to assess competency  Easier for patients to identify when there is a failure in the system 25

How do I make this Reliable? Make Coffee Make Kids Lunches Pack their Back Packs Wake up the kids 26 Get Up Rock in my Shoe: We keep missing the bus! What changes might you test?

Testing on a Small Scale What can you do by Tuesday? What can you by this afternoon? “The Power of One” – one patient, one clinician, one visit 27

Your Turn – Small Tests of Change  What are some changes that could be tested to improve your process?  Who would the tests entail?  Do you have a hunch? Do the reliability principles give you ideas to test?  How do you make sure you are testing on a small scale?

29 Discussion

What Makes an Effective Change? Human Factors Engineering and “Actions”  Warnings and labels (watch out!)  Training (don’t do that)  Procedure changes (work around that)  Interlock, lock-in,, lock-out, etc. (let me design it so you cannot do that – forcing functions)  Is there one right action??? 30 Weaker Stronger Source: NPSF National Patient Safety Foundation See detailed version in handouts: Action Hierarchy

31 Engaging Patients in Your Improvement Work

Engaging Patients How do we engage patients in this work?  Patients’ perspective – identifying defects  Patients’ suggestions for improvements  Patients’ reaction to changes tested  Patients on your improvement team 32 “The greatest asset we have underutilized is all the assets of the patient.” Maureen Bisognano President and CEO Institute for Healthcare Improvement

Your turn Think about your workflow  How could you involve patients in identifying and testing changes? 33

Discussion 34

Plan Compose aim Pose questions/predictions Create action plan to carry out cycle (who, what, when, where) Plan for data collection DoStudy Act Carry out the test and collect data Document what occurred Begin analysis of data Complete data analysis Compare to predictions Summarize learning Decide changes to make Arrange next cycle Adapt, Adopt, or discard Learning from Tests of Change: Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) Cycle 35

Repeated Use of the PDSA Cycle Hunches Theories Ideas Changes That Result in Improvement AP SD A P S D AP SD D S P A DATA Very Small Scale Test Follow-up Tests Wide-Scale Tests of Change Implementation of Change Sequential building of knowledge under a wide range of conditions Spread 36

Using the PDSA form 37 PDSA Worksheet for a Small Test of Change Practice Name: _ _________________ Cycle start date: _________ C ycle end date: __________ PLAN: Area to work on: Describe the change you are testing and state the question you want this test to answer (If I do x will y happen?) What do you predict the result will be? What measure will you use to learn if this test is successful or has promise? Plan for change or test: who, what, when, where Data collection plan: who, what, when, where DO: Report what happened when you carried out the test. Describe observations, findings, problems encountered, special circumstances. STUDY: Compare your results to your predictions. What did you learn? Any surprises? ACT: What will you do next? Adopt, adapt, or abandon the change? AP SD

What are we trying to accomplish? How will we know that a change is an improvement? What change can we make that will result in improvement? Model for Improvement Ac t Plan StudyDo Aim of Improvement Measurement of Improvement Developing a Change Testing a Change Adapted from Langley, G. J., Nolan, K. M., Nolan, T. W., Norman, C. L., & Provost, L. P. The Improvement Guide: A Practical Approach to Enhancing Organizational Performance. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass,

Review: The Key Steps of Improvement Work  Pull together the team and build the will  Set the aim  Be sure to engage patients  Testing, Testing, Testing 1.Select a process you want to improve 2.Develop a high level flow diagram 3.Identify Defects/Select which defect you will fix first 4.State your reliability goal - At least 95% reliable 5.Identify changes to test 6.Test your changes - keep it small 7.Use PDSA cycles to learn from your test change  Measuring, Measuring, Measuring 39

To Be Successful …  Leaders insist that teams focus on developing capable processes/making care safe for patients  Teams include front line workers – experts in the process  Teams engage patients in the improvement work  Teams use the Model For Improvement and Reliability Principles rather than training and education, vigilance and hard work  Teams review share improvement data  Improvement projects have a reasonable time line  Teams ask for help –  Mount Auburn Coaches, Practice Manager Meetings and Community Learning Sessions 40

Keep in mind….  “What keeps you awake at night? (How could a patient be harmed in your practice?)”  “Not all changes lead to improvement; all improvement requires change.”  “What can you do by Tuesday? What can you by this afternoon?”  “The Power of One” – “one patient, one nurse, one visit”  “Just enough measurement to support improvement.”  “See problems, Solve problems.” 41

Those who lead healthcare in patient safety  Do not necessarily have access to some unique or bountiful resource.  Do seek to constantly learn and apply what is learned, along with maximizing the effective use of existing resources.  Their willingness to learn and creatively use available resources allows them to be successful in changing their safety culture Source: Steve Spear Senior Fellow, Institute for Healthcare Improvement Senior lecturer, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Sloan School of Management Faculty for the PROMISES

Organizations that are exceptional create this superior learning dynamic by: 1.Incorporating the detection of problems as part of everyone’s job 2.Being prepared to identify and solve problems 3.When something works, planning how to spread it throughout the organization 4.Leadership that ensures that all staff are actively included, motivated, encouraged and given time Source: Steve Spear

44 Questions/Discussion Thank You!

Wrap up and Next Steps Lora Gross-Kostka, RN, BSN, Ambulatory Risk Manager/Patient Safety Advisor, MAH Paula Griswold, MS Executive Director, Massachusetts Coalition for the Prevention of Medical Errors September 25, 2015 Mount Auburn Practice Improvement Program (MA-PIP) Community Learning Session #2

Ambulatory Risk Management and Patient Safety Program (ARMS)  ARMS major goal- facilitate a Culture of Safety and improve quality of care for patient & providers  How? Integration of existing Q &S initiatives within Office Practice setting with the hospital based infrastructure, i.e.:  Ambulatory Quality and Patient Safety Committee,  Quality Review Committee,  On-line rL Safety Reporting

Mount Auburn-Performance Improvement Project (MA-PIP) How does this work fit into the ARMS program initiative? Empowers the frontline staff at the point of care by: training Coaches and Teams to “see a problem/solve a problem” using the IHI Model for Improvement to standardize systems & processes and shared learning

Next Steps  Please complete your evaluation and suggestions and turn in at registration table (MAH will process CMEs)  Upcoming meetings:  October 30 th – Practice Managers  December 4 th – Community Learning Session  Thank you to teams, coaches, faculty, staff, and to all of you for your focus on safety and improvement