Self Assessment SELF ASSESSMENT FOR YOU Ann Pike 30 th September 2010.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Model Refreshing Review INTRODUCTION. Content Explain the Process used Talk about changes at different levels Question and Answer session What next?
Advertisements

Post 16 Citizenship Liz Craft Valuing progress Celebrating achievement.
Assessment Adapted from text Effective Teaching Methods Research-Based Practices by Gary D. Borich and How to Differentiate Instruction in Mixed Ability.
The Aged Care Standards and Accreditation Agency Ltd Continuous Improvement in Residential Aged Care.
Developing Employees ACC's Mission & Principles  "Create an Environment for Employees that fosters personal Growth and allows Individuals to achieve their.
Alternative Assesment There is no single definition of ‘alternative assessment’ in the relevant literature. For some educators, alternative assessment.
©2006 OLC 1 Process Management: The Foundation for Achieving Organizational Excellence Process Management Implementation Worldwide.
Improvement Service / Scottish Centre for Regeneration Project: Embedding an Outcomes Approach in Community Regeneration & Tackling Poverty Effectively.
FedEx Corporation Must be included:
Business Excellence within The University of Bolton Strategic Planning Process 17 th October 2006.
Benchmarking as a management tool for continuous improvement in public services u Presentation to Ministry of Culture of the Russian Federation u Peter.
Empowering Staff Through Institute Planning (ESTIP) Executive Workshop Institute Name: XXXXXX Presenter: XXXXXX Date: XXXXXX.
Project Management Basics
Self-Assessment for Continuous Improvement: Tools and Techniques 16 September 2009.
Setting the success criteria to evaluate project success Tiina Lell
School Development Planning Initiative “An initiative for schools by schools” Self-Evaluation of Learning and Teaching Self-Evaluation of Learning and.
Project Human Resource Management
Employee Performance Management
SC21 Project Plan Overview. What is SC21? SC21: Is an industry change programme designed to accelerate the competitiveness of the aerospace, defence and.
Integrated Capability Maturity Model (CMMI)
COMPGZ07 Project Management Presentations Graham Collins, UCL
Organization Mission Organizations That Use Evaluative Thinking Will Develop mission statements specific enough to provide a basis for goals and.
Presenter-Dr. L.Karthiyayini Moderator- Dr. Abhishek Raut
Session 1: Getting started on the PSQM Journey.
Session 1: Getting started on the PSQM Journey.
Certificate IV in Project Management Introduction to Project Management Course Number Qualification Code BSB41507.
Quality Management.  Quality management is becoming increasingly important to the leadership and management of all organisations. I  t is necessary.
EFQM Excellence Model & Levels of Excellence Learning Edge - July 05.
Birmingham Primary Strategy Team Subject Leader Training Literacy Co-ordinator Session Monitoring Progress - Book Trawls/Scrutinies.
Developing people, growing organisations 1 Delivering change through effective governance Care & Repair Cymru Stephanie Bamford Thursday 20 September 2012.
Inspire Personal Skills Interpersonal & Organisational Awareness Developing People Deliver Creative Thinking & Problem Solving Decision Making, Prioritising,
The Future of Public Sector Quality Management with CAF The CAF External Feedback Procedure 2010.
Commissioning Self Analysis and Planning Exercise activity sheets.
© 2002 Systex Services1 BUSINESS EXCELLENCE - using the European Foundation for Quality Management (EFQM) self- assessment process.
Capacity Self-Assessment as a management tool for organisational development planning u A model used for the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and European Integration,
Enterprise Estonia Estonian Tourist Board Kerli Hallikmäe 6. Sept
NHS Education for Scotland Defining A Quality Improvement Framework For A Coordinated Service Model Workshop 27 th May 2003 Dr Ann Wales NHS Scotland Library.
Programme Objectives Analyze the main components of a competency-based qualification system (e.g., Singapore Workforce Skills) Analyze the process and.
Workshops to support the implementation of the new languages syllabuses in Years 7-10.
Copyright  2005 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd PPTs t/a Australian Human Resources Management by Jeremy Seward and Tim Dein Slides prepared by Michelle.
Quality Assuring Deliverers of Education and Training for the Nuclear Sector Jo Tipa Operations Director National Skills Academy for Nuclear.
Chapter 7 Rewards and Performance Management
Open ECBCheck Methods for Quality Development Rafael García Rodríguez University of Augsburg, 2010.
Direct Behavior Rating: Using DBR for Intervention.
Baldrige National Quality Program Baldrige Background l Results l Baldrige Program Impacts Legal Aid Group March 11, 2002.
Validated Self Evaluation of Alcohol and Drug Partnerships Evidencing Implementation: The Quality Principles – Care Inspectorate/The Scottish Government.
Using test data to improve performance Patrick Griffin.
EFQM Levels of Excellence
Independent Enquirers Learners process and evaluate information in their investigations, planning what to do and how to go about it. They take informed.
Kathy Corbiere Service Delivery and Performance Commission
© Crown copyright 2008 Subject Leaders’ Development Meeting Spring 2009.
Workshop For Reviewers Operating the Developmental Engagements Prof. Dr. Hala SalahProf. Dr. Hoda ELTalawy.
Use of Resources Calderdale workshop 18 May 2009 Janet Matthews- Audit Commission Steve Brennan- Calderdale PCT.
© 2011 Royal College of Physicians, JAG Office Global Rating Scale and Knowledge Management System July
WELCOME Challenge and Support. What is challenge and support Table discussion As a governor what do you think Challenge and Support looks like?
National PE Cycle of Analysis. Fitness Assessment + Gathering Data Why do we need to asses our fitness levels?? * Strengths + Weeknesses -> Develop Performance.
Comparison between the EQAVET process and the ISO 9001 and the EFQM Model Hungarian experience Katalin Molnar-Stadler Information Seminar for National.
How Good are you at Managing your Processes? Operational Excellence.
Comparison between the EQAVET Quality Cycle and the ISO 9001 and the EFQM Model Hungarian experience Katalin Molnar-Stadler Information Seminar for National.
Training for organisations participating in Peer Review of Paediatric Diabetes.
© PeopleAdvantage 2013 All Rights Reserved We will Show You How to Easily Conduct Effective Performance Appraisals LCSA Conference 2013.
AGRO PARKS “The Policy Cycle” Alex Page Baku November 2014.
Basic Principles of Good Management
The New Learning Needs Analysis Tool
Self-Evaluation Cycle for Governing Bodies
9/16/2018 The ACT Government’s commitment to Performance and Accountability – the role of Evaluation Presentation to the Canberra Evaluation Forum Thursday,
MOSH Leading Practices Adoption System
Assessment A.E.T. Week 10 Cate Clegg.
C.E.T Cate Clegg Assessment (1).
Enhancing Learning in Practice
Presentation transcript:

Self Assessment SELF ASSESSMENT FOR YOU Ann Pike 30 th September 2010

A comprehensive, systematic and regular review by the organisation of its activities and results referenced against a model of Excellence Allows an organisation to discern clearly its strengths and areas in which improvements can be made and culminates in planned improvement actions that are then monitored for progress Self-Assessment – The EFQM definition

-Compliance against a standard - Can tend to be negative-corrective action - Usually done by an “outsider” or “specialist” - Gives an historical view -Positioning against a framework - Usually positive- strengths and areas for improvements - Best done by yourself, perhaps facilitated by a specialist - Both historical and forward looking - Aim is to be motivating for those involved -Is a competition - Marketing tool/Publicity - Is a way of recognising a level of achievement - Involves a judging process - Gives an historical view - Motivating for those receiving the award Communicating the Message – Possible Issues: Relationship between Audit, Self-Assessment and Award Audit Self- assessment Award

QUESTIONNAIRE ASSESSMENT WORKSHOP Proforma AWARD SIMULATION COMBINATIONS BASED ON YOUR DESIRED OUTCOMES AND BENEFITS, HOW WILL YOU? Collect evidence/data Document evidence/data Assess evidence/data Document results Present results Plan Self-Assessment - Choosing your Technique

QUESTIONNAIRE ASSESSMENT WORKSHOP Proforma AWARD SIMULATION COMBINATIONS MANAGEMENT MEETING / EVENT To consider the S-A outcomes To prioritise actions To produce improvement plan To agree what to communicate To recognise the efforts of others Plan Self-Assessment - Different Techniques, Same Destination

Characteristics: 1.This technique can be one of the least resource intensive. 2. An approach that is completed very quickly, provided an existing and proven questionnaire is used. 3. It is an excellent way of gathering information on the perceptions of people within an organisation. 4. Some organisations use simple yes/no questionnaires, other slightly more sophisticated versions that use a rating scale The Questionnaire Technique

Quick and easy to use - basic awareness training being sufficient to get things started Can readily involve many people within the organisation Enables the organisation to receive feedback which can be segmented by function and by level Can be used in conjunction with an Assessment Workshop to provide a more balanced view of deployment for the management team Can be used to facilitate group discussions between teams on the opportunities for improvement within their unit The Questionnaire Technique - Benefits

A list of strengths and areas for improvement is not necessarily immediately generated Accuracy depends upon the quality of the questions asked Excessive use of questionnaires in an organisation may result in a low return - what response rate is a valid return? Wide circulation can raise expectations which, if unfulfilled, may de- motivate Questionnaires tell you what people think, not why they think it. You must investigate further to find root causes The Questionnaire Technique - Risks

Does not allow for comparison with scoring profiles of Regional, National or European Quality Award Applicants There is no direct link between the questions in the questionnaire and the criteria parts of the Model 3.11 The Questionnaire Technique – Risks (cont’d)

Selection Criteria - Maturity/Effort Differences MATURE ORGANISATION Appropriate Questionnaire Assessment Workshop Proforma supported by Peer evaluation Award Simulation or Award Application ON THE WAYQuestionnaire & Workshop Facilitated Assessment Workshop Proforma Facilitated Assessment Workshop Pilot Award Simulation STARTING ON THE EXCELLENCE JOURNEY Elementary Questionnaire More detailed Questionnaire Customised Questionnaire Facilitated Assessment W/shop LOW EFFORTMEDIUM EFFORTHIGH EFFORT

Benefits From Self Assessment Improved awareness of strengths and areas of concern/weakness across your whole organisation Good way of involving people/improves knowledge of the organisation You are in total control of what you need to do to improve/ no need for others to tell you Linked to strategic & business planning avoids overlap/duplication of effort Linked to strategic planning- feels less like ‘just another initiative’

QUESTIONS? Discussion Example of a short questionnaire to aid discussion Example of HAME guide

Characteristics: 1. An Assessment Workshop is an event, typically 1.0 and 1.5 days that involves members of a team in a discussion and decision making process linked to assessing evidence and data presented and reaching consensus on Strengths and Areas for Improvement. 2. A second discussion and decision-making process would be used to prioritise the list of potential improvement actions, assign ownership and agree timescales for delivery of the improvements. 3. The team involved can consist of anyone from within the organisation – one of main advantages of this self-assessment method is the opportunity to gain the active involvement of the management team. The Assessment Workshop Technique for Self-Assessment

The Assessment Workshop Technique for Self-Assessment (cont’d) Characteristics: 4. Typically, each member of the team will take responsibility for one or more Criteria of the EFQM Excellence Model and will ensure that data and evidence relevant to his/her area of responsibility is gathered before the Assessment Workshop. 5. At the workshop team members present to their peers the data and evidence gathered. This provides the start point for the team to discuss and reach consensus. 6. Consideration needs to be given to the order in which the nine criteria are addressed.

An excellent way to get the team to understand the Model and gain their commitment to it Discussion and agreement by the team on the strengths and areas for improvement helps to build a common view Ownership by the team of the outcomes, subsequent prioritisation and agreement to action plans An opportunity for team building An agreed list of strengths and areas for improvement is produced which will drive improvement actions The Assessment Workshop Technique - Benefits

Needs excellent preparation and facilitation Personal perceptions can make evidence of the deployment of an organisation’s processes difficult to assess There is scope for an unrealistic assessment The Assessment Workshop Technique - Risks