LOW D.O. OPERATION: EFFECTS ON BIOLOGICAL PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL, OXYGEN TRANSFER EFFICIENCY, DENITRIFICATION, AND ENERGY SAVINGS.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SPRINGETTSBURY TOWNSHIP.
Advertisements

NEW YORK WATER ENVIRONMENT ASSOCIATION WINTER MEETING – FEBRUARY 10, 2003 MAXIMIZING CSO CAPTURE THROUGH WET WEATHER OPERATIONS.
Operator Observations
Metro Wastewater Reclamation District Digester Complex What works and what doesnt.
CE 370 Sedimentation.
1 Seair Diffusion Systems Inc. Pulp & Paper Solutions June 2009.
ENVE 420 Industrial Pollution Control EQUALIZATION Dr. Aslıhan Kerç.
Anne Arundel County Department of Public Works
Biological waste water treatment
An-Najah National University Civil Engineering Department
Nutrient Removal and Power Savings in Wastewater Treatment Systems
Trickling Filters and Rotary Biological Contactors
INTRODUCTION TO THE TREATMENT OF TANNERY EFFLUENTS
Nitrification and Denitrification
Activated Sludge Aeration Control Systems Do We Need 2.0 mg/L?
Chlorination Chemistry; Considering Chloramines and Free Chlorine
Innovations in Oxidation Technologies to treat difficult wastewaters Dr Peter Barratt Business Manager Environmental & Clean Technology Air Products (Europe)
Municipal Wastewater Treatment Preliminary Seventh Power Plan Energy Efficiency Estimates October 14, 2014 West Point Wastewater Treatment Plant, Seattle.
Activated Sludge Plants: Dimensioning Eduardo Cleto Pires.
Oxygen control in a wastewater treatment plant using adaptive predictive controllers Gregor Kandare, Jozef Stefan Institute, Slovenia.
Municipal Wastewater Treatment Preliminary Seventh Power Plan Energy Efficiency Estimates November 18, 2014 West Point Wastewater Treatment Plant, Seattle.
ROTATING BIOLOGICAL CONTACTOR (RBC) PROCESS
Domestic Waste Water Treatment
ERT 417/4 WASTE TREATMENT IN BIOPROCESS INDUSTRY CH 8 - Suspended Growth Biological Treatment Process Prepared by: Pn. Hairul Nazirah Abdul Halim.
Municipal Wastewater Efficiency Improvements Potential Savings for the 6 th Power Plan September 30, 2008 Regional Technical Forum South Treatment Plant.
Nutrient Removal Project Dissolved Oxygen Control Algorithms Dale Meck Roslyn Odum Nick Wobbrock.
Monroe L. Weber-Shirk S chool of Civil and Environmental Engineering NRP 3: Let’s get started.
Folic Acid A member of vitamin B-complex. Slightly solubility in water. Odorless. Antianemic, “food addictive “ and reproduction optimizer. C 19 H 19.
Aerobic and Anaerobic Reactor Configurations
 UAB Vilniaus waters - the largest water company in Lithuania, which operates not only in the city of Vilnius, but also the district, Svencionys and.
1 IV. Wastewater Treatment technologies Topic IV. 9. Wastewater Treatment Facilities with Suspended Biomass - Aerated Tanks: Kinds, Structures, Basic Technological.
Pennsylvania Water Environment Federation PennTEC Annual Technical Conference June 4, 2013 Altoona Westerly Wastewater Treatment Facility BNR Conversion.
Overview of AIRE-O2 Triton® Technology
Prevention of filaments with aluminium or ozone at Klagshamn WWTP? Marika Wennberg*, Ulf Nyberg* and Karin Jönsson** * VA SYD **Lund University.
Secondary Treatment Processes
Increasing Energy Efficiency at the Allegan WWTP MWEA/AWWA Joint Annual Conference August 19, 2010.
McMaster Innovation Park 114A-175 Longwood Road South Hamilton, ON L8P 0A1 Canada Brazil Water and Wastewater Mission.
The Living Machine & Leachate
Biological Aerated Filtration (BAF) at the Denver Water Recycling Plant 2006 Water Reuse Workshop Golden, CO Russell Plakke, Denver Water.
Wastewater Treatment Processes
Recirculating Systems
Using the CPE Approach to Optimize Industrial Waste Treatment Facilities Ronald G. Schuyler and Michael Rothberg Rothberg, Tamburini, and Winsor, Inc.
1 Case Study Managing Aeration Energy Usage (Analyzing BOD load removal per kilowatt hour)
Adjusting N:P ratios in liquid dairy manure through nitrification and chemical phosphorus removal to match crop fertilizer requirements Background Nutrient.
DESIGN OF WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT
Figure 2. Decrease in K and NO 3 over time in (a) AN1, (b) AN2, (c) CA2. Best fit determined by moving average. Potential for using anaerobic settling.
Status update presentation #1 for the Cayucos Sustainable Water Project Status update presentation #1 for the Cayucos Sustainable Water Project November.
Relative Performance of Grit Removal Devices Matthew Bodwell Hydro International November 16, 2015.
Construction OF AMMONIA REMOVAL UPGRADES FOR FIRST BROAD RIVER WWTP
November 17, 2015 NC AWWA-WEA Annual conference
Good at the First Drop: Start-up of the Western Wake Regional WRF Meets Summer Permit Limits 95 TH Annual Conference | November 2015 | Raleigh Convention.
NYWEA ENERGY SPECIALTY CONFERENCE November 20, 2014 Towards Net-Zero Energy in Wastewater Treatment Demonstration of ClearCove’s Enhanced Primary Treatment.
APC-MB05 IS ADVANCED IN WASTEWATER TREATMENT SYSTEMS APC Wastewater Treatment System.
CEE 426 October :05 PM UW Madison Room 1209 Engineering Hall
Presentation by Chelsea Smith March 11, My Background Southern Wells (K-12) Graduated in 2010 Ball State University ( ) BS in Environmental.
COMPARISON OF MBBR AND Suspended growth BNR Performance at the HRWTF
1 JCI 1 1 Energy can be neither created nor destroyed, but only converted from one form to another. First Law of Thermodynamics Karl Friedrich Mohr In.
© 2014 Evoqua Water Technologies LLC INTRODUCING THE CAPTIVATOR George Smith; Director of Biological Processes.
Tools to Control Energy Use through O&M Practices Wastewater/Water Sustainable Energy Cohort, October 11, 2012 Presentation by Walt Mintkeski, P.E.
Aeration System Opportunities Dave Reardon, PE, ENV SP HDR National Director - Water Sustainability WW/W Sustainable Energy Cohort-Session 5 January 31,
Energy Efficiency and Competitiveness with Advanced Wastewater Treatment How a wastewater treatment plant can be more efficient and achieve better results?
WATER MANAGEMENT.
Basic Process Design Parameters Food to mass ratio (F/M) = Q x BOD MLSS x V Where Q = average daily sewage flow to aeration (Ml/d) BOD = Average settled.
City of Farmersville Wastewater Project January 26, 2016 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
Modified Ludzack-Ettinger Wastewater Plant
Secondary Treatment Processes
Wastewater Facilities Upgrade Project
Wastewater Treatment Secondary Treatment.
Nitrogen Removal University of Kansas
Advanced Wastewater Treatment
Presentation transcript:

LOW D.O. OPERATION: EFFECTS ON BIOLOGICAL PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL, OXYGEN TRANSFER EFFICIENCY, DENITRIFICATION, AND ENERGY SAVINGS

IN 1980 THE PLANT WAS DESIGNED FOR 50 MGD NITRIFICATION IN 1996 THE PLANT WAS MODIFIED FOR BIO-P ABOUT 20% OF THE TANKAGE WAS REMOVED FROM AERATION IT WAS STILL ESTIMATED THE PLANT CAPACITY WAS 50 MGD TOO GOOD TO BE TRUE???

2002 UW SPONSORED STUDY STUDY POSSIBILITY FOR INCREASED SIMULTANEOUS NITRIFICATION AND DENITRIFICATION INCREASED TANK LOADINGS TO ACCOMPLISH GOAL PROVIDED THE OPPORTUNITY TO EVALUATE PLANT CAPACITY

NITRIFICATION/DENIT UW STUDY IN ‘83 & ‘84 LOW D.O. WAS MAINTAINED IN AERATION TANKS (<0.5 MG/L) DENITRIFICATION WAS THE GOAL FILAMENTOUS GROWTH (TYPE 021N) AND NOCARDIA INTERRUPTED STUDY FILAMENTOUS CONTROL WAS A CONSTANT BATTLE UNTIL BIO-P

-The plant is a Modifed UCT process without mixed liquor recycle -Prior to study the D.O. setpoint for pass 2 was set at 1.5 mg/l and air flow controlled in passes 1 & 2 to meet it. The study setpoint was set at 0.3 mg/l -The D.O. setpoint in pass 3 controlled air flow to pass 3 and was normally set at 2.5 mg/l. The study setpoint was 1.0 mg/l.

In August, ‘01 one half of plant 4 was removed from service in order to increase the organic loading and enable operating at lower D.O.’s Plant 3 was the control plant with the same volume of tankage in service during both time periods.

The goal was to maintain the same sludge age in both plants for both time periods. The higher organic loadings in plant 4 allowed operating at lower D.O.’s. The effluent TN was about 3 mg/l lower in plant 4 than plant 3 and the TP levels about the same. The air usage/lb of BOD removed was 40% less in plant 4 than plant 3.

Operating D.O. Levels & Oxygen Transfer Efficiency

The District owns an off-gas apparatus for testing oxygen transfer efficiency. This tool has been used for several research projects with the UW on fine bubble diffusion. The purpose for these investigations was to check if alpha was suppressed in the tankage as a result of maintaining lower D.O.’s.

The points 1-1 thru 3-6 are points where the off-gas testing was carried out, in both plants 3 & 4, before and during the test period.

-D.O. measurements are continuously recorded and compressed to hourly averages. -Prior to the test period the D.O. setpoint at the first point could be maintained to + or mg/l about 70% of the time, but because of the low organic loadings the D.O.’s were always much higher at the tail end of the tank than the setpoint. -This was because minimum air flow setpoints controlled.

During the test period the D.O. at the first probe in the tank could be maintained very close to the setpoint of 0.3 mg/l and at the tail end of the tank was within 0.2 mg/l of the 1.0 mg/l setpoint 75% of the time. The other 25% of the time were low loading periods and minimum air flow setpoints still controlled.

The profile of alpha in the plant 4 tanks was approximately the same with normal, low loadings and high D.O.’s as during the test with higher loadings and low D.O.’s

The D.O. profiles were much different with the two conditions

-The field transfer efficiencies were much different because of the D.O. profiles. -If the demand can be satisfied in passes 2 & 3 and take advantage of low D.O.’s and high alpha values, significant air can be saved.

BOD Loadings have increased 62% from Jan, ‘88 to Jan, ‘06

TKN Loadings have increased 56% from Jan, ‘88 to Jan, ‘06

Air use has increased 45% from Jan, ‘88 to Jan, ‘06, much less than 60% ’02 The drop in air use was due to changing control strategy following this study--a savings of about $32,000 in ‘03 ‘85-’88 Reduced air use was due to replacement of coarse bubble diffusers with fine bubble and implementation of D.O. control

-Air flow is maintained constant at locations 1-1 & 1-2 regardles of D.O.’s. at about 1.3 cfm/diffuser -The D.O. setpoint for the second probe is 0.5 and controls air to pass #2 -The D.O. setpoint for the final probe is 3.0 mg/l, controls air in the last pass, and is set as such to assure an effluent D.O. of 5.0 mg/l

A real time process calculator/simulator in the plant process control system was used to project plant capacity with the knowledge gained as a result of the study.

The aeration capacity of the plant likely won’t be reached until the average Annual daily flow exceeds 60 MGD.

Plant clarifier capacity may be reached sooner, when the average annual daily flow exceeds 50 MGD.

Operational Observations Diffusers have shown no more of a tendency to plug since Bio-P Occassionally there has been minor foaming organism growth on the tanks A related process, UV disinfection, has benefited from Bio-P; quartz tube are acid cleaned once/year versus every 3-4 weeks prior to Bio-P

SUMMARY Plant was capable of N & P removal at higher loadings and much lower D.O. concentrations Settling remained good Oxygen Transfer efficiency remained high at lower operating D.O. level It appears optimistic projections for future plant treatment capacity look good

A paper prepared and presented at Central States on this project can be found at click on Published Papers, “Effect of Biological Phosphorus Removal On Plant Operations and Capacity at the Nine Springs WWTP