1 Beam Extinction and Monitoring at the Upcoming Mu2e Experiment Ryan J. Hooper on behalf of the Mu2e Collaboration DPF 2015 August 5th, 2015.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Pion beam tracker for HADES Jerzy Pietraszko CBM Collaboration Meeting, March 9-13, 2009, GSI, Darmstadt.
Advertisements

MTest Facility Low Energy Beam Erik Ramberg AEM 15 October, 2007.
Hall D Photon Beam Simulation and Rates Part 1: photon beam line Part 2: tagger Richard Jones, University of Connecticut Hall D Beam Line and Tagger Review.
LHCf: a LHC Detector for Astroparticle Physics LHCf: a LHC Detector for Astroparticle Physics Lorenzo Bonechi on behalf of the LHCf Collaboration * University.
30 March Global Mice Particle Identification Steve Kahn 30 March 2004 Mice Collaboration Meeting.
Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments.
The COherent Muon to Electron Transition (COMET) Experiment
MICE: The International Muon Ionization Cooling Experiment Diagnostic Systems Tracker Cherenkov Detector Time of Flight Counters Calorimeter Terry Hart.
The Design of MINER  A Howard Budd University of Rochester August, 2004.
Timing Properties of T0 Detectors At PHOBOS Saba Zuberi, Erik Johnson, Nazim Khan, Frank Wolfs, Wojtek Skulski University of Rochester.
The Tagger Microscope Richard Jones, University of Connecticut Hall D Tagger - Photon Beamline ReviewJan , 2005, Newport News presented by GlueX.
The Transverse detector is made of an array of 256 scintillating fibers coupled to Avalanche PhotoDiodes (APD). The small size of the fibers (5X5mm) results.
The PEPPo e - & e + polarization measurements E. Fanchini On behalf of the PEPPo collaboration POSIPOL 2012 Zeuthen 4-6 September E. Fanchini -Posipol.
Ivan Logashenko for Mu2e Collaboration
 A GEANT4-based simulation was performed of the production target, solenoid, selection channel, and spectrometer.  The acceptance was found to be 8.3x10.
The Mu2e experiment Zhengyun You University of California, Irvine (for the Mu2e Collaboration) 08/21/2013.
Mu2e Experiment and Issues Rick Coleman, Fermilab RESMM’12, February 2012.
Setup for hypernuclear gamma-ray spectroscopy at J-PARC K.Shirotori Tohoku Univ. Japan for the Hyperball-J collaboration J-PARC E13 hypernuclear  -ray.
Scintillation hodoscope with SiPM readout for the CLAS detector S. Stepanyan (JLAB) IEEE conference, Dresden, October 21, 2008.
Stopped Muon/Pion Measurements Jim Miller, BU May 2012 UW Test Beam Meeting.
NanoPHYS’12 – December 17-19, 2012 K. Nakano, S. Miyasaka, K. Nagai and S. Obata (Department of Physics, Tokyo Institute of Technology) Drift Chambers.
Stopped Muon/Pion Measurements Jim Miller, BU May 2012 UW Test Beam Meeting.
Eric Prebys, FNAL HB2012, Beijing, China.  Representing the Mu2e Collaboration  24 Institutions  ~120 Collaborators  This talk has direct contributions.
Shashlyk FE-DAQ requirements Pavel Semenov IHEP, Protvino on behalf of the IHEP PANDA group PANDA FE-DAQ workshop, Bodenmais April 2009.
Μ→e search using pulsed muon beam μ -  e - νν nuclear muon capture Muon Decay In Orbit  π - +(A,Z)→(A,Z-1)*, (A,Z-1)* →γ+(A,Z-1), γ→e + e - Prompt.
Instrumentation and Simulations for Target Test MICE Collaboration Meeting 22 October Bill Murray 1, Paul Soler 1,2, Kenny Walaron 1,2 1 Rutherford.
Mu2e Mu2e CD-2 Review Template Eric Prebys Extinction October 21-24, 2014.
FSC Status and Plans Pavel Semenov IHEP, Protvino on behalf of the IHEP PANDA group PANDA Russia workshop, ITEP 27 April 2010.
Magnetized hadronic calorimeter and muon veto for the K +   +  experiment L. DiLella, May 25, 2004 Purpose:  Provide pion – muon separation (muon veto)
COMET and DeeMe. Mu-e conversion search at J-PARC COMET Target sensitivity 10 C.L. using aluminum target – SINDRUM II 7x – MEG 2.4x
COMET. μ-e conversion search from muonic aluminium J-PARC pulsed proton beam to produce pulsed muon beam Forbidden in the Standard Model  clue to the.
PERFORMANCE OF THE PHENIX SOUTH MUON ARM Kenneth F. Read Oak Ridge National Lab & University of Tennessee for the PHENIX Collaboration Quark Matter 2002.
First CMS Results with LHC Beam
Mu2e and Project X, September 3, 2008 E Prebys Background: Proton Economics in Project X Era* Assume  9mA*1ms = 5.3x10 13 protons/linac “blast”  Main.
Giovanni Onorato Fermilab University of Rome “Guglielmo Marconi” INFN Lecce Mu2e general presentation.
Progress in the construction of the MICE cooling channel and first measurements Adam Dobbs, EPS-HEP, 23 rd July 2011.
Physics with the COMET Staging Plan Satoshi MIHARA IPNS, KEK.
 A model of beam line built with G4Beamline (scripting tool for GEANT4)  Simulated performance downstream of the AC Dipole for core of beam using  x.
The MECO Experiment Coherent µ  e Conversion in the Field of a Nucleus P. Yamin, BNL.
1 Methods of Experimental Particle Physics Alexei Safonov Lecture #9.
Mu to e Meeting BNL, June 2006 Extinction requirement relaxation (Kevin O’Sullivan) Stopping Target Geometry (Cenap Ozben, David Morse) Yannis Semertzidis.
NUMI NUMI/MINOS Status J. Musser for the MINOS Collatoration 2002 FNAL Users Meeting.
The physics of Mu2e Bertrand Echenard California Institute of Technology Mu2e computing review doc-db XXXXX.
Mu2e Mu2e Backgrounds and Computing Robert Bernstein 5 March 2015 Mu2e-docdb 5223.
Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments.
The Mu2e Experiment at Fermilab Jim Miller Boston University for the Mu2e Collaboration.
Extinction Eric Prebys Mu2e Extinction Technical Design Review 2 November 2015.
The Mu2e Experiment at Fermilab: Giovanni Onorato, Fermilab - INFN Lecce – Universita’ G. Marconi Mu2e Member Institutions: Boston University; Brookhaven.
The Mu2e experiment at Fermilab Finding a needle in a trillion haystacks Bertrand Echenard California Institute of Technology APS Meeting – April 2013.
Study of the MPPC for the GLD Calorimeter Readout Satoru Uozumi (Shinshu University) for the GLD Calorimeter Group Kobe Introduction Performance.
The Mu2e Experiment at Fermilab: Robert K. Kutschke, Fermilab Within the Standard Model, muons decay in a way that almost perfectly conserves lepton family.
Simulation of Extinction Channel Eric Prebys Mu2e Extinction Technical Design Review 2 November 2015.
Tracker Neutron Detector: INFN plans CLAS12 Central Detector Meeting - Saclay 2-3 December 2009 Patrizia Rossi for the INFN groups: Genova, Laboratori.
The Mu2e Experiment A search for charged lepton flavor violation at FNAL For the Mu2e Collaboration Kevin Lynch Boston University 2010 Fermilab Users'
New cLFV search experiments using the mu-e conversion process Satoshi MIHARA KEK, Japan.
Straw Tracker Crystal Calorimeter Stopping Target Robert K. Kutschke [1], Fermilab The Mu2e experiment at Fermilab is in the midst of its R&D and approval.
The Mu2e Experiment at Fermilab Mu2e-doc-3227-v4
Measuring Nuclear Effects with MINERnA APS April Meeting 2011 G. Arturo Fiorentini Centro Brasileiro de Pesquisas Físicas On behalf of the MINERnA collaboration.
A New Sensitive Search for Muon to Electron Conversion Mu2e Experiment at Fermilab Mu2e Collaboration: Boston U, BNL, UC Berkeley & LBNL, UC Irvine, CUNY,
SELEX (SEGMENTED LARGE-X BARYON SPECTROMETER) Fermilab 96-97
The MiniBooNE Little Muon Counter Detector
The New CHOD detector for the NA62 experiment at CERN S
Mu2e : 10 Minutes in Questions
The Transition Radiation Detector for the PAMELA Experiment
The COMET Experiment Ajit Kurup, Imperial College London, on behalf of the COMET Collaboration. ABSTRACT The COherent Muon to Electron Transition (COMET)
大強度
The Mu2e experiment at Fermilab
COherent Muon to Electron Transition (COMET)
PHYS 3446 – Lecture #18 Monday ,April 9, 2012 Dr. Brandt Calorimeter
Presentation transcript:

1 Beam Extinction and Monitoring at the Upcoming Mu2e Experiment Ryan J. Hooper on behalf of the Mu2e Collaboration DPF 2015 August 5th, 2015

The What and How The What: Looking for (Charged Lepton Flavor Violation) The How: Muon beam into a target of atoms (Aluminum) Muon transition down to 1s orbitals, where they have a lifetime of 864 ns 2  e Electrons with this energy (105 MeV) indicate signal!

3 The How: The Mu2e Experiment An Overview Production Solenoid (PS) Transport Solenoid (TS) Proton beam (used to create muon beam) Detector Solenoid (DS) Production Target Stopping Target Tracker Calorimeter For further details please see these DPF 2015 talks: Marc Buehler: “The Mu2e Experiment at Fermilab” Craig Dukes: “A Cosmic Ray Veto Detector for the Mu2e Experiment at Fermilab” Jim Popp: “A Straw Tube Tracker for the Mu2e Experiment” Daniel Ambrose: “Straw Leak Testing for the Mu2e Tracker” Tomonari Miyashita: “The Mu2e Electromagnetic Calorimeter” Yuri Oksuzian: “Studies of Beam Induced Radiation Backgrounds at the Mu2e Experiment and Implications for the Cosmic Ray Veto Detector” Single event sensitivity of 2.4× protons on target (POT) ~ 3 years of running Less than 1 background event

4 The Issue Photon energy spectrum from radiative pion capture in Mg Particles produced in the primary target (pions, neutrons, antiprotons) which interact with the stopping target just after reaching it. Radiative pion capture (RPC)  - N →  N’,  → e + e -  - N → e + e - N’ Pion/muon decays in flight These electrons can have energies close to our 105 MeV signal candidates!

5 The Pulsed Proton Beam Selection Window, defined at center plane of the tracker Shapes are schematic, for clarity Solution: Use pulsed proton beam based on muonic aluminum lifetime of 864 ns Selection window turns on late enough “prompt” backgrounds are reduced significantly!

6 The Pulsed Proton Beam Selection Window, defined at center plane of the tracker Shapes are schematic, for clarity Out-of-time tails  backgrounds leaking into selection window But, what if protons are not well localized in time!

7 The Pulsed Proton Beam Allow sufficient time between pulses to reduce backgrounds 31 Mp = 31,000,000 protons/pulse Must enforce strict beam extinction!

8 Make Extinction … Even More Extinct Beam into the M4 beamline from the Recycler + Delivery Ring will already supply an extinction of or better The g-2 Fermilab’s

9 The How: M4 Beamline Extinction Further Extinction in the M4 beamline will be achieved via 2 AC Dipoles coupled to collimators Primary harmonic = 300 kHz = (3.333  s) -1

10 The How: The AC Dipoles Half-meter prototypes already built and tested (CMD10 ferrite)  s Some measured properties at Requisite field strength

11 The How: Simulation Results Green = ESME simulation of extracted beam from Delivery ring Black = G4Beamline simulation of external AC dipole + collimators Blue = Convolution of the two 1.0E ns Better than extinction for beam outside the 230 ns transmission window!

Primary target + production solenoid Beam dump Extinction monitor Filter Pixel detector 12 Trust But Verify! Extinction Monitor: Must measure extinction to precision Good timing resolution Situated downstream and off-axis from target and production solenoid Allows for the detection of a small fraction (10-50 per in-time bunch) of scattered particles from production target Build a statistical profile for in-time and out-of-time beam Measurement done on ~ 1 hour timescale Repurposed dipole magnet Collimators Proton beam

13 The Extinction Monitor Scintillators coupled to PMTs for triggering and additional timing information Spectrometer Magnet: Repurposed dipole magnet bends out low energy elections generated by muons stopping in the upstream silicon Silicon pixels for fast, high resolution tracking

14 The Pixels FE-I4 silicon chips developed for the ATLAS B-layer upgrade Each chip = 26,880 pixels arranged into 80 columns on 250  m pitch by 336 rows on a 50  m pitch. Hits digitized on 24.9 ns cycle (24.9 ns = 1694 ns / 68 ticks) Production expertise already in place

15 Simulated Performance G4Beamline based simulation Momentum (GeV/c) Particle ID: 85% p + 1%  13%  ~0% electrons Efficiency based on hits in all 6 detector planes using protons The 0.83×10 -7 per proton on target (POT) comfortably meets requirements

16Summary  Mu2e a NEW Fermilab based experiment  Will measure muon-to-electron conversions at a level of sensitivity 10,000 times better than current state-of-the-art  To achieve this level of sensitivity the intense proton pulses must have an extinction of ~ between pulses  Extinction at this level is achievable using current plus planed Fermilab accelerator technologies  Extinction monitoring at the level will be achieved via repurposed, piggy backed and well known technologies For Further Details Home page: CDR: New (Jan. 2015) Technical Design Report (TDR):

17 Additional Slides

18 The Accelerator Complex at Fermilab The Accelerator Complex at Fermilab The Where: Fermilab South to Chicago (35 mi) Will supply intense (3×10 7 protons/pulse) pulsed proton beamWill supply intense (3×10 7 protons/pulse) pulsed proton beam

19 The How: What Happens Most of the Time Nuclear Capture (~61% for Al) Muon Decay in Orbit (DIO) (~39% for Al) 27 Al 27 Mg* p n   Hadron and photon final states  e E e (MeV) See e.g. Czarnecki et al., Phys. Rev. D 84, (2011) Notice some contribution in signal region

20 Effect on Mu2e Backgrounds Extinction and Extinction Monitoring is in place to keep the Late Arriving backgrounds low (< levels) Backgrounds based on extinction and ~3 years of running

21 Current Status Calendar Year Critical path: Solenoids Today Assemble and commission the detector We are entering a great time for students to get hands-on experiences!

22 The Device Pre-monitor highlights: Two collimators + Filter/kinematic magnet Note aperture on exit collimator increases to reduce possible interactions just before detectors. Repurposed dipole magnet to select particles with average momentum of 4.2 GeV/c.

23 An Overview of Just One Proton Bunch

24 The Trigger Counters 5 mm thick × 45 mm × 40 mm upstream; 45 mm × 55 mm downstream BC-404 scintillator readout via Hamamatsu ¾” PMT.

25 The Muon ID Range Stack Monitors muon backgrounds to the extinction monitor that were generated around the Production Solenoid Consists of several 40 cm square steel plates arranged into a 180 cm deep stack. Four scintillating planes will be used for readout BC-404 scintillator with embedded Y11 waveshifter fibers + PMT readout

26 Extinction Monitor Backgrounds Cosmic rays Interactions of late arriving particles created by the proton beam Radioactive decays in pixel sensors Electronic noise Only cosmics can produce out-of-time tracks with sufficient momenta to give 6 pixel hits (estimated to be 0.030±0.007 tracks/hour) Late arrivals estimated by MARS+GEANT4 (0.03±0.007 tracks/hour)