1 Amy Williams, Senior Procurement Analyst Friday, October 26, 2007 Defense Acquisition Regulations System 703-602-0328

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
0 DFARS Cases of Interest October 2006 Debbie Tronic Senior Procurement Analyst Defense Acquisition Regulations System
Advertisements

0 New Specialty Metals Restriction 10 U.S.C. 2533b (as enacted by Section 842 of the John Warner National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007)
Policies and Procedures for Proper Use of Non-DoD Contracts Revised April 19, 2005 Deidre A. Lee Director, Defense Procurement and Acquisition Policy Office.
© 2014 University of New Hampshire. All rights reserved. Uniform Guidance Highlights What you really need to know.
0 Cost, Price, and Finance FAR Cases of Interest Date: 24 October 2006 Bill Sain Senior Procurement Analyst Defense Procurement and Acquisition Policy,
FEDERAL TECHNICAL DATA SOLUTION (FedTeDS) - FINAL RULE FAR 5.102, Availability of solicitations Implements President’s Management Agenda & eGov Initiative.
Depot Maintenance & Partnering Provisions of Title 10 December 3, 2004.
DCAA – WHO WE ARE and WHAT TO EXPECT
Federal Awardee Performance & Integrity Information System (FAPIIS) Overview J. Lisa Romney Defense Procurement & Acquisition Policy.
CENTRAL CONTRACTOR REGISTRATION (CAGE CODES) DFARS Case 2003-D040 DFARS Parts 204, 212, 213 and 252 are amended to remove policy on Central Contractor.
1 Case Title: Training for Contractor Personnel Interacting with Detainees (DFARS Case 2005-D007)  Type:Final Rule Published 9/8/06 -Received one response.
17 th Contracting Squadron I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e LETTER CONTRACTS 2k7 01 Dec 05 Train and deploy the world’s foremost.
Bayh-Dole Act and Tech Transfer Issues FLC Mid-Atlantic Regional Meeting October 23, 2007 John Raubitschek US Army Patent Attorney.
1 Case Title: Combating Trafficking in Persons ( Implementation of Section 3(b) of the Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act of 2003) (FAR.
Policies and Procedures for Proper Use of Non-DoD Contracts September 29, 2004 Deidre Lee Director, Defense Procurement and Policy Office of the Under.
SEWP Program Manager Meeting June 4, Terms and Conditions  Text A.1.2 Procedures for Orders permits the Government Contracting Officer to negotiate.
Berry Amendment Background NDIA Sarasota, FL February 21, 2006 Terry L. Albertson.
Office of Business Development Training
Partnership Agreements Delegation of SBA’s Contract Execution Authority to other Federal Government Agencies.
0 The Rule-Making Process How It Works and How You Can Get Involved First Annual FAR/DFARS Conference October 24, 2006.
Company Commander Course- Fiscal Law Fiscal Law for the Company Commander & 1SG.
LEGISLATIVE/REGULATORY UPDATES 1 Presented by: Paula Coxon NAVAIR OSBP.
1 Amy Williams, Senior Procurement Analyst February 5, 2008 Defense Acquisition Regulations System
Publication of Agency Procurement Regulations Karen L. Manos Acquisition Reform & Experimental Processes Committee November 30, 2004.
SERVICES ACQUISITION REFORM ACT OF 2003 A STATUS REPORT Alan Chvotkin Senior Vice President and Counsel Professional Services Council DEFENSE ACQUISITION.
The Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards The OMB SuperCircular Information for FTA Grantees.
FAR Part 1 The Federal Acquisition Regulation System.
1 Berry Amendment Perspectives from DCMA 10 USC 2533a, as amended Presented By: Jack D. Olson Associate Counsel Ground Systems & Munitions Division September.
NDIA San Antonio March 12, 2007 What Used to Be the Berry Amendment Presented by Terry L. Albertson.
EXPORT COMPLIANCE NASA Restrictions on Funding Activities with China Robert Phillips Rutgers University Export Compliance Officer.
0 Defense Acquisition Regulations System (DARS): The Rule-Making Process How It Works and How You Can Get Involved Presented to: Philadelphia, PA Date:
0 Defense Acquisition Regulations System (DARS): The Rule-Making Process How It Works and How You Can Get Involved Presented to: Pax River, MD Date Friday,
JFS 3/31/08 COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCUREMENT NDIA Educational Seminar March 31, 2008.
Implementing the Regulatory Flexibility Act. 2 Background The Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601–612) requires Federal agencies to— –Consider the.
Rabbanai T. Morgan Chief, Contingency Contracting 26 May 2005 Commercial Contract Financing.
Federal Acquisition Service U.S. General Services Administration Management Services Center Industry Day Upcoming Changes Affecting the MAS Program Mark.
1 Michael L. Benavides Senior Procurement Analyst March 26, 2008 Defense Acquisition Regulations System
1 And...the Rules-of-the-Road on the Promulgation of Government Contract Clauses/Regulations Are...? Charles E. Rumbaugh Rumbaugh ADR Offices
Small Business Regulation and Legislation Update
Additional Commercial Contract Types FAR Case Summary of Comments from October 19, 2004 Public Meeting Appropriate Use Terms and Conditions Payment.
1 Felisha Hitt, Senior Procurement Analyst March 18, 2008 Defense Acquisition Regulations System
1 DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY AMERICA’S COMBAT LOGISTICS SUPPORT AGENCY DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY AMERICA’S COMBAT LOGISTICS SUPPORT AGENCY WARFIGHTER SUPPORT.
0 Defense Acquisition Regulations System (DARS): The Rule-Making Process How It Works and How You Can Get Involved Presented to: Huntsville, AL Date Wed,
1 Amy Williams, Senior Procurement Analyst March 25, 2008 Defense Acquisition Regulations System
New Specialty Metals Rules for DFARS Compliance Compliance methods under FY 08 law: Use only US or qualifying country specialty metals Make/Sell COTS fasteners.
1 Cost Price and Finance Robin Schulze, Senior Procurement Analyst Friday, October 26, 2007 Defense Acquisition Regulations System
OMB Circular A-122 and the Federal Cost Principles Copyright © Texas Education Agency
Regulation Highlights Kimberly Heifetz May 15, 2012.
DLA's Aviation Supply & Demand Chain Manager Pricing Defense Supply Center Richmond SEPRT 12 April 7-9, 2008.
FAR Part 38 Federal Supply Schedule Contracting 1.
Small Business and Subcontracting. Subcontracting for Small Business 6 steps to successful subcontracting 6. Report Contractor performance 1. Consider.
Ms. Angela Terry (202) Angela. Subcontracting Presentation June 9, 2016.
1 Changes to Regulations Governing Personal Conflicts of Interest and Organizational Conflicts of Interest Breakout Session # C08 Name: Barbara S. Kinosky,
Small Business Regulation and Legislation Update
NATIONAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION ACT OF 2013
SERVICES ACQUISITION REFORM ACT OF 2003 A STATUS REPORT
Commercial Item Acquisitions: A Brief Update
IUID and Government Furnished Property Basics
Administrivia Settings Controls Attendees Record
DRAFT FOUO PRE-DECISIONAL
Commercial Contract Financing
DFARS CASE 2003-D009 Payment and Billing Instructions
THIS IS A GENERAL REFERENCE ONLY – SEE NOAA APG CHAPTERS for specific guidance and references to applicable statute, regulation, DOC policy, and NOAA policy.
Competition Michael L. Benavides Senior Procurement Analyst
A Pricing Perspective on Contract Cost/Price Analyst
Below the SAT Commercial Items
Contract Support Costs
Type: Final Rule Published 9/8/06
Certified Cost or Pricing Data vs
DLAD Procurement Notes & Tech/Quality Requirements
Presentation transcript:

1 Amy Williams, Senior Procurement Analyst Friday, October 26, 2007 Defense Acquisition Regulations System International Acquisition

2 Specialty Metals – Class Deviation 2006-O0004, Restriction on Procurement of Specialty Metals  Type:Class Deviation – signed December 6, 2006  Source: Section 842, National Defense Authorization Act for FY 2007 (Pub. L )  Synopsis:  6 major product categories – aircraft, missile and space systems, ships, tank and automotive items, weapon systems, ammunition. O New law restricts procurement of the end items and components thereof, that contain specialty metals. O Components are first-tier and second-tier parts and assemblies.  New exceptions. o Commercially available electronic components with de minimis specialty metal content. O Not available in the required form.  Specialty metal (raw stock) acquired directly by the Government or by a Prime Contractor.  One-time waiver.

3 Specialty Metals – PGI Case 0000-P073, Restriction on Acquisition of Specialty Metals  Type: PGI, issued August 2,  Synopsis of PGI: Adds guidance on the use of Class Deviation O0004.  Components and Tiers.  Withholding.  Nonavailability (fair and reasonable prices, when needed, required form).  Commercially available electronic components.

4 Specialty Metals – DFARS Case 2007-D013, Waiver of Specialty Metals Restriction for Acquisition of Commercially Available Off-the-Shelf Items  Type:Proposed rule published 7/2/2007 (41 responses to the proposed rule – 34 support, 7 oppose)  Source: Section 35 of the OFPP Act (41 U.S.C. 431)  Section 35 of the OFPP Act requires that FAR (DFARS) list the statutes that are inapplicable to acquisition of COTS items.  Covered statutes (as determined by OFPP) must be included on the list unless Administrator of OFPP determines that waiver of the statute for acquisitions of COTS items would not be in the best interest of the United States.  Synopsis of rule:  Creates list on laws inapplicable to acquisition of COTS items at DFARS  Adds 10 U.S.C. 2533b to the list.

5 Specialty Metals – Class Deviation 2007-O0011, Waiver of Specialty Metals Restriction for Acquisition of Commercially Available Off-the-Shelf Items  Type: Class Deviation  Synopsis: –OFPP waiver and final rule under 2007-D013 will be implemented through class deviation. – Revision of Class Deviation 2006-O0004 to add exception for acquisition of COTS items (end products or components) and a few other minor corrections:  End product  Date associated with one-time waivers  Future: DFARS Case 2007-D059, Proposed rule – to implement deviation and propose new flexibilities.

6 Berry Amendment—DFARS Case 2006-D006, Berry Amendment Notification Requirement  Type:Interim rule was published in 10/4/2006 (1 response – strongly support) Final rule published 8/2/2007.  Source: National Defense Authorization Act for FY 2006, Sec 833(a).  Synopsis of rule: –Requires posting of notice on FedBizOpps, within 7 days after award of a contract that exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold, when acquiring—  Clothing, tents, tarpaulins, covers, various covered fibers and fabrics, or items of individual equipment containing such fibers or fabrics— If the Secretary of Defense or of the military department concerned determines that satisfactory quality and sufficient quantity of domestic items cannot be procured as and when needed at United States market prices (domestic nonavailability determination).  Chemical Warfare protective clothing— If such procurement is necessary in furtherance of agreements with foreign governments (qualifying countries).

7 Berry Amendment—DFARS Case 2006-D031, Berry Amendment—Clothing Materials and Components Covered  Type: Interim rule was published in 1/22/2007 (No comments) Final rule published 8/2/2007.  Source: National Defense Authorization Act for FY 2006, Sec 833(b).  Synopsis of DFARS rule:  Expands the restriction on clothing to include clothing materials and components.  Does not cover sensors, electronics, or other items added to, and not normally associated with, clothing.  PGI:  Provides examples of Federal Supply classes that contain items of clothing and items that are not clothing.  SAPI Plates are not clothing, but fabrics used in SAPI plates may still be covered.

8 Berry Amendment—PGI Case 0000-P070 and –P071: Reciprocity of Domestic Nonavailability Determinations  Type: PGI  Source: OSD  Synopsis of PGI :  Class DNADs may be used by USD(AT&L) or the Secretary of a military department, provided the same rationale applies and similar circumstances are involved.  Before relying on an existing DNAD, contact the approving office.  DNADs approved by (USDAT&L) that are currently available for reciprocal use are listed at availability_determinations_dnads.html.  Synopsis of PGI :  If application outside the approving military department is appropriate, the approving department shall provide a copy of the DNAD to DPAP/CPIC.

9 Case Title: Prohibition on Acquisition from Communist Chinese Military Companies (DFARS Case 2006-D007)  Type:Interim rule published 9/8/2006 (1 response) Final rule - 3/27/2007  Source: Section 1211 of the National Defense Authorization Act for FY 2006 (Pub. L ).  Synopsis of rule:  Prohibits DoD from acquiring U.S. Munitions List items from Communist Chinese military companies.  Does not apply to components and parts of covered items unless the components and parts are themselves covered by the U.S. Munitions List.  Exceptions: Supplies or services acquired— In connection with a visit to the People’s Republic of China by a vessel or an aircraft of the U.S. armed forces; for testing purposes; or for the purposes of gathering intelligence.

10 Case Title: Restriction on Carbon, Alloy, and Armor Steel Plate (DFARS Case 2005-D002)  Type: Proposed rule published 12/9/2005(2 responses – 1 supported, other raised issues. After close of comment period – received letter signed by 10 members of Congress, expressing concern.) Final rule published & effective 12/19/2006  Source: Section 8111 of FY 1992 DoD Appropriations Act (Pub. L ) and similar sections in subsequent appropriations acts.  Synopsis:  Annual DoD appropriations acts restrict the acquisition of carbon, alloy, or armor steel plate, that is not melted and rolled in the U.S. or Canada.  Applies when the steel plate is for use in any Government-owned facility or property under the control of DoD.  Trying to clarify inconsistent wording.  Raised old issue, as to meaning of “property under the control of DoD.”

11 Case Title: Reporting of Purchases from Overseas Sources (FAR Case and PGI Case 0000-P068)  Type: Interim rule published 9/28/2006 (1 response to the proposed rule – did not suggest any change to the rule) Final rule published 8/17/2007  Source: 41 U.S.C. 10a (as amended by Section 8306 of Pub. L ), and several prior consolidated appropriations acts. –Each Federal agency must report to Congress – dollar value of acquisitions of supplies that are manufactured outside the U.S. (no component test) –Itemized list of all waivers granted with respect to such supplies under the Buy American Act. –Summary of total procurement funds spent on goods manufactured in the U.S.  Synopsis of rule: Add a solicitation provision, when acquiring manufactured end products, to collect data from offeror on whether end products manufactured predominantly in the U.S. or outside the U.S.  FPDS requirements: –Modify FPDS to collect data on whether end products manufactured in the U.S. or outside the U.S. and, if outside the U.S., reason for such acquisition. –Instruction to contracting officer. –Provide uniform report format for use by all agencies.