What we can learn from the intensity-time profiles of large gradual solar energetic particle events (LGSEPEs) ? Guiming Le(1, 2,3), Yuhua Tang(3), Liang.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory SHINE 2005, July 11-15, 2005 Transient Shocks and Associated Energetic Particle Events Observed.
Advertisements

On the link between the solar energetic particles and eruptive coronal phenomena On the link between the solar energetic particles and eruptive coronal.
아리랑 위성 1 호 (KOMPSAT-1) 궤도 변화와 우주환경 변화 비교 박진영 1,2, 문용재 2, 조경석 2, 김해동 3, 김관혁 2, 김연한 2, 박영득 2, 이유 1 1 충남대학교, 2 한국천문연구원, 3 한국항공우주연구원 한국우주과학회 춘계 학술대회 2005.
Extreme CME Events from the Sun Nat Gopalswamy NASA/GSFC Extreme Space Weather Events (ESWE) workshop, Boulder, CO May 14-17, 2012.
Solar and Interplanetary Sources of Geomagnetic disturbances Yu.I. Yermolaev, N. S. Nikolaeva, I. G. Lodkina, and M. Yu. Yermolaev Space Research Institute.
On the Space Weather Response of Coronal Mass Ejections and Their Sheath Regions Emilia Kilpua Department of Physics, University of Helsinki
ESS 7 Lecture 14 October 31, 2008 Magnetic Storms
Identification and Analysis of Magnetic Substorms Patricia Gavin 1, Sandra Brogl 1, Ramon Lopez 2, Hamid Rassoul 1 1. Florida Institute of Technology,
STEREO AND SPACE WEATHER Variable conditions in space that can have adverse effects on human life and society Space Weather: Variable conditions in space.
Coronal IP Shocks Nat Gopalswamy NASA/GSFC Elmau CME Workshop, 2003 February 7 Plenary talk Sun Earth.
Progenitors to Geoeffective Coronal Mass Ejections: Filaments and Sigmoids David McKenzie, Robert Leamon Karen Wilson, Zhona Tang, Anthony Running Wolf.
Solar Activities and Halloween Storms Ahmed Hady Astronomy Department Cairo University, Egypt.
Space Science MO&DA Programs - December Page 1 SS Interplanetary Propagation of Ions From Impulsive Solar Flares: ACE/ULEIS Data Impulsive solar.
Magnetospheric Morphology Prepared by Prajwal Kulkarni and Naoshin Haque Stanford University, Stanford, CA IHY Workshop on Advancing VLF through the Global.
The “cone model” was originally developed by Zhao et al. ~10 (?) years ago in order to interpret the times of arrival of ICME ejecta following SOHO LASCO.
EFFECTS of the TERRESTRIAL MAGNETOSPHERE on RADIATION HAZARD on MOON MISSIONS R. Koleva, B. Tomov, T. Dachev, Yu. Matviichuk, Pl. Dimitrov, Space and Solar-Terrestrial.
Your text would go here. Introduction References Current in geomagnetic storms By: J. Martínez 1 Faculty Advisors: J. Raeder 2, H. Vo 1, D. Cramer 2 University.
CR variation during the extreme events in November 2004 Belov (a), E. Eroshenko(a), G. Mariatos ©, H. Mavromichalaki ©, V.Yanke (a) (a) IZMIRAN), ,
A Catalog of Halo Coronal Mass Ejections from SOHO N. Gopalswamy 1, S. Yashiro 2, G. Michalek 3, H. Xie 3, G. Stenborg 2, A. Vourlidas 4, R. A. Howard.
Magnetic Storm Generation by Various Types of Solar Wind: Event Catalog, Modeling and Prediction N. S. Nikolaeva, Yu.I. Yermolaev, and I. G. Lodkina Space.
Solar Energetic Particle Events: An Overview Christina Cohen Caltech.
Outline of WG 2 Sessions: Interplanetary Phenomena Working Group Leaders: Ian Richardson and Ilia Roussev.
Space Weather from Coronal Holes and High Speed Streams M. Leila Mays (NASA/GSFC and CUA) SW REDISW REDI 2014 June 2-13.
Outstanding Issues Gordon Holman & The SPD Summer School Faculty and Students.
K9LA Vancouver 2003 Disturbances to Propagation Carl Luetzelschwab K9LA CQ DX?Where’d everybody go?
National Aeronautics and Space Administration NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Software Engineering Division Overview of Significant SWx Events.
C. J. Joyce, 1 N. A. Schwadron, 1 L. W. Townsend, 2 R. A. Mewaldt, 3 C. M. S. Cohen, 3 T. T. von Rosenvinge, 4 A. W. Case, 5 H. E. Spence, 1 J. K. Wilson,
Arrival time of halo coronal mass ejections In the vicinity of the Earth G. Michalek, N. Gopalswamy, A. Lara, and P.K. Manoharan A&A 423, (2004)
Cynthia López-Portela and Xochitl Blanco-Cano Instituto de Geofísica, UNAM A brief introduction: Magnetic Clouds’ characteristics The study: Event types.
A.V. Belov 1, E. A. Eroshenko 1, H. Mavromichalaki 2, V.A. Oleneva 1, A. Papaioannou 2, G. Mariatos 2, V. G. Yanke 1 (1) Institute of Terrestrial Magnetism,
Nowcast model of low energy electrons (1-150 keV) for surface charging hazards Natalia Ganushkina Finnish Meteorological Institute, Helsinki, Finland.
Statistical properties of southward IMF and its geomagnetic effectiveness X. Zhang, M. B. Moldwin Department of Atmospheric, Oceanic, and Space Sciences,
29 August, 2011 Beijing, China Space science missions related to ILWS in China
Geoeffectiveness of Solar and Interplanetary Events Yuri I. Yermolaev, Michail Yu. Yermolaev, Georgy N. Zastenker, Anatoli A. Petrukovich, Lev M. Zelenyi.
MAGNETOSPHERIC RESPONSE TO COMPLEX INTERPLANETARY DRIVING DURING SOLAR MINIMUM: MULTI-POINT INVESTIGATION R. Koleva, A. Bochev Space and Solar Terrestrial.
2004 September 11CAWSES Theme 2 Meeting, Beijing Solar Sources of Geoeffective Disturbances N. Gopalswamy NASA/GSFC Greenbelt, MD
Project: Understanding propagation characteristics of heavy ions to assess the contribution of solar flares to large SEP events Principal Investigator:
1 SEP “Campaign Events” for SHINE 2003 Question: Can we identify solar/interplanetary factors that drive SEP spectral and compositional variability at.
Forecast of Geomagnetic Storm based on CME and IP condition R.-S. Kim 1, K.-S. Cho 2, Y.-J. Moon 3, Yu Yi 1, K.-H. Kim 3 1 Chungnam National University.
C. J. Joyce, 1 N. A. Schwadron, 1 L. W. Townsend, 2 R. A. Mewaldt, 3 C. M. S. Cohen, 3 T. T. von Rosenvinge, 4 A. W. Case, 5 H. E. Spence, 1 J. K. Wilson,
The Geoeffectiveness of Solar Cycle 23 as inferred from a Physics-Based Storm Model LWS Grant NAG Principal Investigator: Vania K. Jordanova Institute.
ENERGY ESTIMATION OF THE INTERPLANETARY PLASMA DURING STRONGEST GEOMAGNETIC STORMS OF THE CURRENT 24 SOLAR CYCLE ON MARCH 2015 The geomagnetic storms.
GEOEFFECTIVE INTERPLANETARY STRUCTURES: 1997 – 2001 A. N. Zhukov 1,2, V. Bothmer 3, A. V. Dmitriev 2, I. S. Veselovsky 2 1 Royal Observatory of Belgium.
The Suprathermal Tail Properties are not well understood; known contributors Heated solar wind Interstellar and inner source pickup ions Prior solar and.
The ICME’s magnetic field and the role on the galactic cosmic ray modulation for the solar cycle 23 Evangelos Paouris and Helen Mavromichalaki National.
SEP Event Onsets: Far Backside Solar Sources and the East-West Hemispheric Asymmetry S. W. Kahler AFRL Space Vehicles Directorate, Kirtland AFB, New Mexico,
ITT: SEP forecasting Mike Marsh. Solar radiation storms Solar energetic particles (SEPs)
Analysis of 3 and 8 April 2010 Coronal Mass Ejections and their Influence on the Earth Magnetic Field Marilena Mierla and SECCHI teams at ROB, USO and.
Shocks in the IPS Wageesh Mishra Eun-kyung Joo Shih-pin Chen.
Multi-Point Observations of The Solar Corona for Space weather Acknowledgements The forecasting data was retrieved from NOAA SWPC products and SIDC PRESTO.
The CME geomagnetic forecast tool (CGFT) M. Dumbović 1, A. Devos 2, L. Rodriguez 2, B. Vršnak 1, E. Kraaikamp 2, B. Bourgoignie 2, J. Čalogović 1 1 Hvar.
Bringing 93,000,000 Miles to 40,000 Feet: Space Weather & Aviation An introduction to Space Weather What is it? Where does it come from? What does it do?
1 Test Particle Simulations of Solar Energetic Particle Propagation for Space Weather Mike Marsh, S. Dalla, J. Kelly & T. Laitinen University of Central.
1 Pruning of Ensemble CME modeling using Interplanetary Scintillation and Heliospheric Imager Observations A. Taktakishvili, M. L. Mays, L. Rastaetter,
Interplanetary proton and electron enhancements associated with radio-loud and radio-quiet CME-driven shocks P. Mäkelä 1,2, N. Gopalswamy 2, H. Xie 1,2,
George C. Ho1, David Lario1, Robert B. Decker1, Mihir I. Desai2,
Introduction to Space Weather Interplanetary Transients
Suprathermal Particle Density Variations over the Solar Cycle
Consequences of the Anomalous Expansion of CMEs in Solar Cycle 24
Solar Wind Transients and SEPs
Organizers: Mihir Desai, Joe Giacalone, Eric Christian
SIDC Space Weather briefing
Yuki Takagi1*, Kazuo Shiokawa1, Yuichi Otsuka1, and Martin Connors2  
Quantification of solar wind parameters from measurments by SOHO and DSCOVR spacecrafts during series of Interplanetary Coronal Mass Ejections in the.
Forbush and GCRDs First rigorous experimental observation of Cosmic Ray Flux Decrease was obtained by S. E. Forbush in , after deep statisitcal.
The properties of CMEs embedded in extreme solar wind
Introduction to Space Weather
SEP EVENTS AND THE ROLE OF FLARES AND SHOCKS
SIDC Space Weather Briefing
Added-Value Users of ACE Real Time Solar Wind (RTSW) Data
Presentation transcript:

What we can learn from the intensity-time profiles of large gradual solar energetic particle events (LGSEPEs) ? Guiming Le(1, 2,3), Yuhua Tang(3), Liang Zheng(4), Yang Zhang(3) Yuting Zhu(1) 1: National Center for Space Weather, China Meteorological Administration, : Institute of High Energy Physics, Chines Academy of Science, : Department of Astronomy, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China, : Graduate School of Chinese Academy of Science, Beijing, , China ICRC 2011 Beijing 13/08/2011

1 introduction Solar energy particles (SEPs) may be accelerated by both CME-driven shock and solar flare. When the CME enters the interplanetary space, the ICME- driven shock was the only one acceleration source of SEPs. When a ICME moved close to L1 point, the accelerated particles by the ICME driven shock can be observed by satellite located at L1 point. This property can be used to predict the occurrence of a geomagnetic storm.

Energetic ion data show enhancements in flux that herald the approach of interplanetary shocks, usually for many hours before the shock arrival. We present a technique for predicting large geomagnetic storms (Kp  7) following the arrival of interplanetary shocks at 1 AU, using low energy energetic ions (47–65 keV) and solar wind data measured at the L1 point. Smith, Z., Murtagh, W., Smithtro, C. Relationship Relationship between solar wind low-energy energetic ion enhancements and large geomagnetic storms. J. Geophys. Res. 109, A01110, doi: / 2003JA010044]

However, as there are many more large EIEs than large geomagnetic storms, other characteristics were investigated to help determine which EIEs are likely to be followed by large storms. An additional parameter, the magnitude of the post-shock total magnetic field at the L1 Lagrangian point, is introduced here. This improves the identification of the EIEs that are likely to be followed by large storms. (Z.K. Smith *, W.J. Murtagh,2009)

E. Valtonen, T. Laitinen, K. Huttunen-Heikinmaa. Advances in Space Research 36 (2005) 2295–2302

The energetic particles enhancement observed at L1 point indicate an IP shock will reach L1 point. What kind of solar wind structure will pass the earth? Or ICME will pass the earth with what manner? 1 directed away from the Earth? 2 only the limb of ICME will pass the earth, 3 the ICME core will pass the earth? Is still not answered

The ICME moving direction changes always. The predication of the geoeffectiveness of a CME is the problem of how to judge the moving direction of the ICME and the ICME will pass the earth with what manner. The intensity time profile of LGSEPEs reveals the variation of the relative position between the ICME and the observer. Here, we investigate the three types of large gradual solar energetic particle events (observed by GOES satellites)and the associated CMEs will pass the earth with what manner.

The first type: A LGSEPE has only one peak, which occurs no longer after the relative solar flare and the eruption of the associated CME

From top to bottom are the solar x-ray flare, solar wind speed, proton density, magnetic field, z-component of IMF, Tp/Tex ratio, proton , He/p ratio, log Fp (E>10MeV), SYM-H index. The SPE began on 6 May 1998 and the associated geomagnetic activity No shock and sheath observed: The CME directed away the earth

The LGSEPEs occurred on 28/01/2001, and the geomagnetic activity caused by the associated the CME. Only the Shock passed the earth

The second type: A LGSEPE has two peaks with the SEP flux decreasing after the first peak and the second peak lower than the first peak

Both the Shock and ICME passed the earth. However, only the ICME limb passed the earth. The main phase of the geomagnetic storm were only caused by the sheath The LGSEPE began on May 2, 1998

Both the Shock and ICME limb pass the earth. The main phase of the geomagnetic storm was mainly caused by the magnetic cloud(MC) The LGSEPE began on December 13, 2006

The third type: The intensity-time profile of a LGSEPE increased with sustained manner and the solar proton flux peak time basically coincided with the IP sock time, or a LGSEPE has two peaks with the second peak higher than the first one

Both the Shock and ICME passed the earth. the ICME core passed the earth. The main phase of the geomagnetic storm was mainly caused by the magnetic cloud The LGSEPE began on July 14, 2000

Both the Shock and ICME passed the earth. the ICME core passed the earth. The main phase of the geomagnetic storm was mainly caused by the magnetic cloud The LGSEPE began on October 28, 2003

Statistical result: Type 1 Total: no storm, 9 minor storm 8 moderate storm Type 2 total: 12 (-53nT, -205nT, -96nT, -114nT,-288nT,-187nT,-127nT,-383nT,- 84nT,-121nT,-216nT,-147nT) The IP sources for the main phase of the geomagnetic storms are Sheath (9), MC(1), Sheath+ICME(2) Type 3 total: 17 (-155nT,-207nT,-90nT,-301nT, -387nT,-271nT,-102nT,-292nT,- 221nT,-181nT,-109nT,-144nT,-353nT,-197nT,-263nT, -147nT, one followed no storm) Most of the geomagnetic storms were caused by ICME or MC.

Summary 1Type 1: most of them are followed no storm, only small part followed minor or moderate storm. 2Type 2: most of them are followed intense storms, only small part followed moderate storms. Most of the case: shock+sheath+ICMElimb pass the earth 3 Type 3: almost all of them are followed intense storms. Most of this case: shock+sheath+ICMEcore pass the earth

Discussion: 1Total 90 intense geomagnetic storms occurred during solar cycle 23 2LGSEPEs can only predict about 1/3 of them. 3LGSEPEs provide important information of ICMEs propagation in interplanetary space.

Thanks for your attention!