Using the PACT Reporting Tools at Lynmore School.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ko te pae tawhiti whaia kia tata
Advertisements

© Crown copyright 2008 Assessing Pupils Progress Spring 2009.
Administration Updates
Fox Covert Primary School
Changes to assessment and reporting of children’s attainment A guide for Parents and Carers Please use the SPACE bar to move this slideshow at your own.
What is moderation and why should we moderate?
Benchmark assessment data generated from the Edusoft Assessment Management System is a powerful tool for informing classroom instruction, and ensuring.
Progress and Consistency Tool (PaCT)
PaCT What is the Progress & Consistency Tool?  The PaCT has two parts:  Frameworks that break down and illustrate aspects of maths, reading and writing.
Supporting Teachers to make Overall Teacher Judgments The Consortium for Professional Learning.
 A New School System A Guide for Parents and Carers.
 A New School System A Guide for Parents and Carers.
NATIONAL STANDARDS. “… the most important thing about a child's performance at school is their progress. So even those children who come in, who are not.
School’s Cool in Childcare Settings
Effective Use of Modelling Books To Support Making an OTJ Lucie Cheeseman.
KARORI NORMAL SCHOOL We encourage our children to be the best they can be “Tino pai ake” Parent Information Meeting Tuesday 26 November 2014 Reporting.
The effective use of tests and tasks to support teacher assessment in Y2 4 th February 2014 Karen Samples.
24 June 2011 Raising standards, improving lives Moving to outstanding post-16 provision Tom Winskill HMI Principal Officer, Framework Development Ofsted.
National Standards and gifted and talented: are they compatible? Presented 10 Nov – 5pm Webinar 4 of a series of 4 Adrienne Carlisle Evaluation.
Overall Teacher Judgements
Overall Teacher Judgements and
Changes to assessment and reporting of children’s attainment Amherst School.
1 Making sound teacher judgments and moderating them Moderation for Primary Teachers Owhata School Staff meeting 26 September 2011.
National Standards Presentation 24 March Format – Background of how the National Standards came about and what the school has done – Where are our.
Making Sense of the Mathematics Standards. Overview: Key messages and introduction to the Mathematics Standards. Assessment and Overall Teacher Judgement.
Assessing Program Quality with the Autism Program Environment Rating Scale.
Reservoir Primary School Literacy Share Day
Mathematics and Statistics Leaders Symposium September 2011 Waipuna Conference Centre Overall Teacher Judgments and Moderation Christine Hardie.
30 th September * The new national curriculum, which was introduced in September 2014, sets high expectations for what teachers should teach, and.
Our assessment objectives
Geelong High School Performance Development & Review Process in 2014.
FEBRUARY KNOWLEDGE BUILDING  Time for Learning – design schedules and practices that ensure engagement in meaningful learning  Focused Instruction.
EPotential ICT Capabilities Resource. The ePotential ICT Capabilities Resource (ePotential) is designed to: Assist teachers to develop their own ICT Professional.
Assessment Online. Assessment Online on TKI offers a wide range of information on how leaders and teachers can use assessment to enhance teaching and.
“A Truthful Evaluation Of Yourself Gives Feedback For Growth and Success” Brenda Johnson Padgett Brenda Johnson Padgett.
Reflection In groups discuss: How you have used material from Workshop 1 or National Standards meeting to support your staff. How useful was it? What was.
Understanding Assessments Welcome to Catsfield CE School: 6 th November 2012.
Assessment Without Levels Parent Information Event.
Mathematics Subject Leader Network Meeting Autumn 2013.
Accuracy in assessment Evidence bundles: tracking Trainee achievement through pupil progress overtime.
Assessment Without Levels December National Curriculum Levels From 1988 until July 2015, National Curriculum Levels were used from Y1 and through.
Mathematics and Statistics Leaders Symposium September 2011 Waipuna Conference Centre Overall Teacher Judgments and Moderation Christine Hardie.
National Standards in Reading & Writing Sources : NZ Ministry of Education websites. G Thomas, J Turner.
1 Scoring Provincial Large-Scale Assessments María Elena Oliveri, University of British Columbia Britta Gundersen-Bryden, British Columbia Ministry of.
Fidelity of Implementation A tool designed to provide descriptions of facets of a coherent whole school literacy initiative. A tool designed to provide.
© Crown copyright 2008 Subject Leaders’ Development Meeting Spring 2009.
BROMWELL COMMUNITY MEETING November 17, SCHOOL PERFORMANCE FRAMEWORK (SPF)
Exploring the mathematics standards through Algebra Mathematics and Statistics, Team Solutions, Northland.
Changes to assessment and reporting of children’s attainment A guide for Parents and Carers Please use the SPACE bar to move this slideshow at your own.
Parent Workshop Year 2 Assessment without levels January 2016.
Assessment Information Evening 17 th September 2015.
Assessing Student Learning Workshop 2: Making on-balance judgements and building consistency.
Lostock Gralam CE Primary School Parent Information Meeting January 2016.
Reading and Writing National Standards Phase 2 Workshop (Updated 2 July 2010)
KARORI NORMAL SCHOOL We encourage our children to be the best they can be “Tino pai ake” 2016 Reporting Cycles Information.
KS1 SATS Guidance for Parents
European Social Fund Promoting improvement 15 th March 2016 Nigel Finch.
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AND TRAINING DET Staff Site.
Year Two New testing arrangements 2016 Presentation to Parents/Carers Friday 29 th April 2016.
EYFS Head Teacher Briefings Summer New EYFS Profile Handbook and Exemplification EYFSP Pilot information.
ASSESSMENT WITHOUT LEVELS IN THE CULM VALLEY FEDERATION.
2015 / 2016 and beyond.  1. High quality leadership drives school improvement  2. Quality of teaching and learning  3. Quality of maths provision 
Assessment without levels
What is moderation and why should we moderate?
Statutory Assessment at SPRINGFIELD PRIMARY SCHOOL
Assessment without levels
School’s Cool Makes a Difference!
Assessment Without Levels
SGM Mid-Year Conference Gina Graham
KS1 SATS Guidance for Parents
Presentation transcript:

Using the PACT Reporting Tools at Lynmore School

PACT CLASS REPORTS Tracks OTJ’s progress  Allows you to see overall class OTJ’s at a glance  Shows the range of students across the OTJ’s  Shows where students are crossing over 2 year levels  Able to see and compare how far above or below students are in comparison to their peers

Class Student OTJ’s

Class Range Across Each Aspect  Identifies areas of strengths/weaknesses in Aspects Areas  Shows the bulk of where students sit within each aspect  Allows teachers to use to group students for each aspect  Clearly identifies class trends and areas of weaknesses.

Class Range Across Each Aspect Bulk of students sitting at Aspect 2 in Statistics

INDIVIDUAL STUDENT REPORTS  Tracks student progression of OTJs  Over previous years  Includes both in cycle and Ad Hoc judgments  Clear indication of NS level – at or how far above or below.  Identifies individual students areas of weakness/strengths  Supports discussions with parents  Supports end of year reports  Supports teachers for individual student learning plans

NS Level Across Years

Individual Report – Areas of strengths / weaknesses

Using Pact Aspect Models to Identify Next Steps  Identifies areas for future planning  National Standard booklet limited exemplars to show expected student ability  PACT has a greater variety and range of illustrations to show and clarify expected student ability.  Has the flexibility of being able to find an exemplar to best fit what the student is capable of.

Using Pact Aspect Models to Identify Next Steps

Reporting Tools in the PACT Principal and BoT perspective

Q. and A.

Implementation of the PACT at Lynmore School

Using PACT  Use PACT to confirm our OTJ’s - resource  Moderate OTJ’s with other data across teams  Stack this up against student evidence  Changed how we collect formative data – more conversations with students around their learning  Used for reporting purposes (completed prior to reports)  Informs planning at both teacher and team level  Identifies areas of teacher development in some areas.

SCHOOL PROCEDURE MODERATION FOR AN OTJ: C lass books form a key evidence base for OTJ’s and as such should be reviewed as a valuable evidence resource. Where children have no demonstrable evidence of work in their books or elsewhere in the classroom it become challenging for the teacher to decide on an overall teacher judgment as that judgment can be challenged when there is a lack of evidence in books (or elsewhere easy to hand). Teachers work alongside their colleagues, PLG leaders, AP/DP and Principal to appraise the evidence of a student’s achievement and progress against National Standards. This is a long and comprehensive process and requires a strong evidence base well beyond one off test scores or the teachers intuition about a child. At key times during each term teachers will engage in a moderation process to form an OTJ. Teachers of children in Years 1-3 (and some in Year 4) will be doing this on a weekly basis for interim and end of anniversary reporting.

MODERATION

AD- HOC PACT JUDGMENTS  Why teachers do AD HOC judgments?  For new students  Special programmes – ALL, ALIM  Teacher discretion – checking a student  Tracking specific children

AD-HOC Judgment

Using Pact Aspect Models to Identify Next Steps  Identifies areas for future planning  National Standard booklet limited exemplars to show expected student ability  PACT has a greater variety and range of illustrations to show and clarify expected student ability.  Has the flexibility of being able to find an exemplar to fit what the student is capable of.

Using Pact Aspect Models to Identify Next Steps

Implementation of the PACT Principal and BoT perspective Links with: School wide assessment procedures School wide planning expectations Team planning Existing moderation processes Assessment schedule Reporting to parents Reporting to BoT

Implementation of the PACT Principal and BoT perspective School Wide Assessment Procedures: PROGRESS ACHIEVEMENT AND CONSISTENCY TOOL (PACT): In 2015 we will be using PACT for mid and end of year Maths and Writing. See Assessment schedule for specific ‘in cycle’ dates’ The purpose of using the PACT in June and November is to support and assist teachers in their professional decision making on making an accurate OTJ. ToD in June 2015 is to review maths (induct new staff) and introduce writing PACT. PACT data will currently sit alongside usual in school moderation processes. PACT data will also be reported to BoT in June and November No current plans to share with parents in Reading PACT will be introduced in 2016 Teachers should use the exemplars and data in PACT to assist planning in Maths and Writing.

Implementation of the PACT Principal and BoT perspective Implementation plan 2014, 2015 and 2016 for PACT A timeline for implementation was carefully established to align with the school wide assessment procedure and other term requirements eg planning and reporting. 3 year roll out recommended Use of Teacher Only Days recommended See handout

Implementation of the PACT Principal and BoT perspective

Anniversary Reporting and PACT: Tricky….. Year mid and end of year Year 1-3 – currently mid and end of year but this is changing in 2016 to align with anniversary and interim reporting. PACT automatically sends teachers/school leaders reminders for anniversary and interim reporting based on time at school which is aligned with your SMS database. Timeframe from in cycle Year 1-3 reporting is also 3 weeks.

Implementation of the PACT Principal and BoT perspective Q. and A.