SLO Check-in December 2015 SLOs in LEAP Midyear Conversations.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Understanding By Design: Integration of CTE and Core Content Curriculum Michael S. Gullett.
Advertisements

Teacher Evaluation New Teacher Orientation August 15, 2013.
Student Growth Measures in Teacher Evaluation
Purpose of Evaluation  Make decisions concerning continuing employment, assignment and advancement  Improve services for students  Appraise the educator’s.
Student Learning Objectives Session 3 Denver Public Schools Assessment, Research and Evaluation, 2014.
Leader Evaluation and Professional Growth (LEPG) Model Module 3: Reflection, Rating, and Planning 1.
RHODE ISLAND MODEL Fall 2013 Evaluation Update. 2 Fall Evaluation Educator Update Agenda 1.RI Model Improvements 2.Support Professionals Overview 3. Questions.
Understanding the Process and the Product Professional Development Spring, 2012.
 Teacher and administrator evaluations are governed by Florida Statute and State Board Rule 6A  The Florida Department of Education and.
Student Growth Developing Quality Growth Goals STEPS 3-4-5
Looking at Student work to Improve Learning
Student Learning Objectives: Setting Goals for Student Growth Countywide Professional Development Day Thursday, April 25, 2013.
1 Let’s Meet! October 13,  All four people have to run.  The baton has to be held and passed by all participants.  You can have world class speed.
An Overview of the New HCPSS Teacher Evaluation Process School-based Professional Learning Module Spring 2013 This presentation contains copyrighted material.
Student/School Learning Objectives
Student Learning Objectives The SLO Process Student Learning Objectives Training Series Module 3 of 3.
Professional Performance Process Principal Level Meetings October 19 & 22, 2009.
Leaders with Leaders Summer Institute 2012 JH Rose High School July
Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) Measuring Teacher Effectiveness Through the Use of Student Data SLO Process – Step 4 Monitoring Progress and Refining.
Math Liaison Meeting September 2014 Presenter: Simi Minhas, Math Achievement Coach Network 204.
1 Orientation to Teacher Evaluation /15/2015.
CHANGING ASSESSMENT AND COMMUNICATION. Belief Statement Grades should be an effective means of communicating academic and social progress The language.
Student Learning Objectives: Setting Goals for Student Growth Countywide Professional Development Day Thursday, April 25, 2013 This presentation contains.
Including Student Growth in Educator Evaluation Day 3 Monitoring and Adjusting February,
Citywide Instructional Expectations, Teacher Teams and the QR—Implications for Mary Barton SATIF CFN 204 May 17, 2013.
Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) “101”
Evaluation Team Progress Collaboration Grant 252.
Teacher Evaluation and Professional Growth Program Module 1: MSFE TEPG Rubric.
Summer 2012 Day 2, Session 6 10/13/2015R/ELA.EEA.2012.©MSDE1 Educator Effectiveness Academy English Language Arts And the journey continues… “Transitioning.
The Challenge We must realize that the system is the cause of weak execution due to lack of clarity, commitment, collaboration and accountability resulting.
Professional Performance Process Presented at March 2012 Articulation Meetings.
Teacher Evaluation and Professional Growth Program Module 4: Reflecting and Adjusting December 2013.
Student Growth in the Washington State Teacher Evaluation System Michelle Lewis Puget Sound ESD
MFAS Mathematics Formative Assessment System We shall be using tasks from MFAS.
Geelong High School Performance Development & Review Process in 2014.
Student Learning Objectives The SLO Process Student Learning Objectives Training Series Deck 3 of 3.
Expeditionary Learning Queens Middle School Meeting May 29,2013 Presenters: Maryanne Campagna & Antoinette DiPietro 1.
CCSS Road Map: The goal of implementing the Common Core State Standards is to ensure that instruction in our schools is changing dramatically.
Building and Recognizing Quality School Systems DISTRICT ACCREDITATION © 2010 AdvancED.
March Madness Professional Development Goals/Data Workshop.
The Teacher Evaluation and Professional Growth Program Module 6: Reflecting and Planning for Next Year December 2013.
Changes in Professional licensure Teacher evaluation system Training at Coastal Carolina University.
School Improvement through Data and Best Practices Anytown Middle School Best Practice Audit Report.
Student Learning Objectives 1 SCEE Summit Student Learning Objectives District Professional Development is the Key 2.
Inquiry Team and Student Growth. “Best” Practices Think about some best practices within the last 20 years in the field of science. In the field of education,
NYC DOE – Office of Teacher Effectiveness F. Prioritize Areas for Feedback 1.
Candidate Assessment of Performance CAP The Evidence Binder.
Candidate Assessment of Performance CAP The Evidence Binder.
ACS WASC/CDE Visiting Committee Final Presentation South East High School March 11, 2015.
Inquiry Team and Student Growth. “Best” Practices Think about some best practices within the last 20 years in the field of science. In the field of education,
Math Study Group Meeting #1 November 3, 2014 Facilitator: Simi Minhas Math Achievement Coach, Network 204.
Supporting the Development of Student Learning Objectives How to Create an SLO.
Mid-year Professional Conversations 1. JESA Preparation Process 2 Learn—Engage with the content as a participant and surface questions/hot spots. Internalize—Identify.
The Evaluator's Role in the SLO Process Module Three Summative Conference Presented by the SCDE Office of Educator Effectiveness.
Purpose of Teacher Evaluation and Observation Minnesota Teacher Evaluation Requirements Develop, improve and support qualified teachers and effective.
Differentiation: Follow-Up Designing and providing instruction that meets the differing needs of all students. 1.
Learning Goals, Scales, and Learning Activities Clarity and Purpose.
The Evaluator's Role in the SLO Process Module Two Mid-Course Conference Presented by the SCDE Office of Educator Effectiveness.
Student Growth Developing Quality Growth Goals STEPS Teacher Professional Growth & Effectiveness System (TPGES)
Supporting the Development of Student Learning Objectives Teamwork in Motion.
DECEMBER 7, 2015 Educator Effectiveness: Charter School Webinar.
Instructional Review and School improvement
Measuring Impact Guide
Guest WIFI Password: Back to school!
Evaluating the Quality of Student Achievement Objectives
Instructional Review and School improvement
Student Learning Objectives
SGM Mid-Year Conference Gina Graham
Goal Setting Please sit with a thought partner.
Teacher Evaluator Student Growth Retraining Academy
Presentation transcript:

SLO Check-in December 2015 SLOs in LEAP Midyear Conversations

MATERIALS NEEDED Going through the following presentation, you may find it helpful to have: –A roster of your current staff (preferably as an Excel spreadsheet) –LEAP Handbook And/or –LEAP Conversation Planning Templates The MY Leader toolkit can be found online here:

3 AN EFFECTIVE MID-YEAR CONVERSATION SHOULD INCLUDE: An Introduction that sets the tone for the conversation and establishes a rapport with the teacher. Areas of Strengths that highlight practices that a teacher should continue and possibly leverage to address areas for growth. Areas for Growth that communicate high leverage foci with aligned next steps. Future observation feedback can align to this area. An SLO Check-In with differentiated outcomes based on the teacher’s current SLO implementation.

WHY DISCUSS SLOS AT MIDYEAR? Mid-year conversations are an opportunity to support teachers’ SLO implementation, provide feedback that directly connects to student learning, and communicate the value of data driven instruction and student outcomes. Ideally, a teacher would bring student data and/or student work and discuss the current level of performance of students and next steps for subgroups with the leader. –However, teachers are most likely at different places in their SLO implementation. It is critical to differentiate the SLO check-in based on your teacher. 4

MEET YOUR TEACHERS WHERE THEY ARE WITH SLOS We need to differentiate our SLO Check-In based on each teacher’s current SLO implementation. –Data Action Planning: Teacher has data and can speak to current student learning around the SLO. The purpose of the check-in will be to ensure the teacher has a strong plan to continue progress monitoring and adjusting instruction to maximize student learning. –Implementation Feedback: The teacher does not yet have any student data around the SLO. During the conversation, the goal is to create some concrete next steps to get on track for successful SLO implementation. Recommendation: School leader may want to inquire further regarding barriers to implementation. Set another meeting 2 – 4 weeks from now to check back in on the implementation next steps and look at student data. 5

PREPARING TEACHERS FOR SLO CHECK-IN What evidence will you review prior to your check-in? What do you expect teachers to do to prepare for the SLO Check In? What do you expect teachers to bring to the meeting? –What evidence of student learning? Ex: Data Tracker. Student Work. –What evidence of action planning? Ex: Updated yearlong scope and sequence, upcoming unit plan, an assessment What questions do you want them to have already thought about? –Where are students currently at on their learning progression rubric? –What have been successes and struggles so far? –What are possible next steps to strengthening student learning? 6 How will you communicate these expectations to your teachers?

PRACTICE AND PLAN: HOW TO DIFFERENTIATE SLO CHECK-IN 1.Review a teacher’s SLO in the SLO Application Tool and any evidence that you already have around student mastery of the standards. 2.Determine which type of SLO Check-In that you will need to have with the teacher. Consider: –Do I know where this teacher is with his/her SLO implementation? Do they share a common SLO with their team? –Prior to midyear conversations with each teacher, you may want to consider having an SLO conversation with the team, OR sitting in on a data team/collaborative planning meeting where the team is discussing their SLOs. –Do I want this teacher to submit any other evidence/data prior to our conversation (data tracker, student work, examples of assessments being used, etc.)? –What do I want to be the goal of our SLO Check-In? –What feedback will I provide? –What questions will I ask? 7

ADDITIONAL RESOURCES LEADER MYC Toolkit –Conversation planning templates (Option #1 is below) 8 CONVERSATION PREP: SLO CHECK IN Foundational SLO MilestonesOther SLO MilestonesSLO Check In Goal _____ Teacher has a system to track student mastery of the SLO, including plan for Performance- Based Task. _____ Teacher integrated SLO into yearlong plan. _____ Teacher is actively engaged in collaborating with peers. _____ Aligned instruction -> objectives, learning tasks _____ Aligned formative assessment with Learning Progression Rubrics _____ Student investment in SLOs _____ Participation in Data Teams _____ Whole Class Action Planning _____ Sub Group Action Planning _____ Assessment data _____ SLO and Gradebook Alignment _____ Data Action Planning: Based on his/her data, facilitate conversation that helps teacher determine next steps to increase student outcomes on SLOs. _____ Data Action Planning: Based on his/her data, facilitate conversation that helps teacher determine next steps for students with low command and distinguished command. _____ Implementation Feedback: Provide directive feedback around implementation around SLO and specific next steps for improving. _____ OTHER: ACTION PLANNING: Possible Talking Points Plan Conversation: What questions will you ask? Or what feedback will you provide? ● How are your students progressing in their mastery of the content and language in your Objective? ● How have you been tracking student progress on your SLOs? How are you using the Learning Progression Rubrics to identify students’ current proficiency levels? ● What assessment data are you using as part of your Body of Evidence to track students’ progress on their SLOs? Are you using the Performance-Based Task created for the model SLO or are you creating your own culminating task? ● In what areas of your SLOs are your students struggling? Which students are struggling? How have you adjusted instruction to support those students? What success did you see from those efforts? What might you do in the next few months to continue student growth towards these Objectives?

QUESTIONS/CONCERNS?