Department of Sociology Learning Assessment Development Heather Zaykowski, Ph.D.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Embedding Assessment of Student Learning Outcomes in Regularly Scheduled Assignments Dr. Larry H. Kelley Auburn, Alabama
Advertisements

A Framework for Instruction
1 SESSION 3 FORMAL ASSESSMENT TASKS CAT and IT ASSESSMENT TOOLS.
Differentiation: What It Is/What It Isn’t
Best Practices in Assessment, Workshop 2 December 1, 2011.
Utilization-focused Assessment in Foundations Curriculum: Examining RCLS 2601: Leisure in Society Clifton E. Watts, PhD Dept. of Recreation & Leisure Studies.
Program Evaluation.
MFM1P1 Culminating Performance Task
Annie Michaelian Jill Okurowski Stephen Toto. Tri-State Quality Review Rubric.
Outcomes Assessment Forum October 23, 2009 Queens College Steve Schwarz, Office of the Provost Eva Fernandez, CTL Dean Savage, Dept. of Sociology.
PPA Advisory Board Meeting, May 12, 2006 Assessment Summary.
The Web Institute for Teachers: Engaging Teachers in Developing Web- Based Curriculum Craig A. Cunningham University of Chicago Frada Boxer Evanston Public.
October 22, 2009 Report to the Faculty Senate Professor John Stevenson Senator Sandy Jean Hicks UCGE-Subcommittee on Assessment of General Education (SAGE)
 Getting started  Syllabus  Objectives and Evaluation  Teams and Mentors  Topics Covered  Learning Outcomes  Exams Regulations  Presentations.
Science Inquiry Minds-on Hands-on.
Conducting the IT Audit
Pilot Training for Volunteers General Education Assessment Committee.
Orientation to the Civic Studies 11 Integrated Resource Package (IRP) 2005.
Program Level Outcomes Jessica Carpenter Elgin Community College.
Developing an Effective Evaluation to Check for Understanding Susan E. Schultz, Ph.D. Evaluation Consultant PARK Teachers.
Principles of Assessment
Assessed: 5 Cycles 2006, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2013.
SLO A SSESSMENT S TUDY W ORKSHOP D EVON A TCHISON, SLO C OORDINATOR August 20, :30-10:30 a.m. Room 523.
Unwrapping Standards.
1 Student Success Plans Regional Meeting February 9, 2007 Youngstown State University Office of Assessment Sharon Stringer
T 8.0 Central concepts:  The standards for all lessons should not be treated simply as a “to do” list.  Integration of the disciplines can be effective.
ALISE 2014 Conference Jeonghyun Kim & William E. Moen
Helping Your Department Advance and Implement Effective Assessment Plans Presented by: Karen Froslid Jones Director, Institutional Research.
UA College of Fine Arts School of Art School of Dance School of Media Arts* School of Music School of Theatre Arts* * new merger into School of Theatre,
Susan Agre-Kippenhan, Portland State University Professor, Art Department Evaluating the Effectiveness of Service Learning.
Institutional Planning, Assessment & Research 2010 Institutional Planning, Assessment & Research Assessment Review Committee Report Brody School of Medicine.
Assessing General Education Workshop for College of the Redwoods Fred Trapp August 18, 2008.
Curriculum Mapping November Types of Curriculum Recommended – Standards as defined by experts in their field. Written – State standards, local goals.
IImplementing and Assessing Integrative Learning through eFolios and AAC&U VALUES Initiative at San Francisco State tTTanya Augsburg Assistant Professor.
Pilot Training for Volunteers General Education Assessment Committee.
ScWk 242 Course Overview and Review of ScWk 240 Concepts ScWk 242 Session 1 Slides.
EngageNY.org Session 5: Criteria for Speaking and Listening November, 2013 Network Teams Institute.
1 Proposal for Direct Assessment of Program Outcomes (For Faculty Meeting, Nov. 28, ’05)
“Outcomification”: Development and Use of Student Learning Outcomes Noelle C. Griffin, PhD Director, Assessment and Data Analysis Loyola Marymount University.
FACULTY-LIBRARIAN COLLABORATION TO PROMOTE STUDENT LEARNING.
Assessing Your Assessments: The Authentic Assessment Challenge Dr. Diane King Director, Curriculum Development School of Computer & Engineering Technologies.
PRIJ, 3030 January the 22nd Assessment. Guiding questions… What are the implications for your general practices around planning and assessment? How will.
BLOCK III EDCI 362 Literacy in the Elementary School, Part I Beverly Cox October 19, 2007.
Speaking and Listening Tools:
Texas Tech University PROGRAM-LEVEL ASSESSMENT WORKSHOP WRAP-UP SESSION FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 11,
Deciphering SPA Requirements Kathy Hildebrand, Ph.D., Assistant Dean of Assessment & Continuous Improvement, College of Education Cynthia Conn, Ph.D.,
Assessing Student Learning Workshop for Department Chairs & Program Directors Workshop for Department Chairs & Program Directors January 9, 2007.
Scoring Rubrics: Validity and Reliability Barbara M. Moskal Colorado School of Mines.
Current and future work of the Adaptation Committee in the area of adaptation technologies Workshop on technologies for adaptation Bonn, Germany, 4 March.
Title Slide In the Murky Middle “In the Murky Middle: Assessing Critical Thinking and Integrative Learning Across the General Education/Major Divide” Dr.
Computer Science Department Middle States Assessment 4 different plans in place - one for each program Assessment of some learning outcomes in each program.
Wilmer Arellano  Getting started  Syllabus  Objectives and Evaluation  Teams and Mentors  Topics Covered  Learning Outcomes  Exams Regulations.
Coaching protocol practice Each team select a map (unit) to use for the coaching protocol. Join another person / team not from your grade or department.
Lessons Learned. Communication, Communication, Communication Collaborative effort Support of all stakeholders Teachers, Principals, Supervisors, Students,
1 Capstone design and curriculum renewal Margot McNeill Learning and Teaching Centre Thursday, 2 July 2009.
Assessment and the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning Dr. Anne Marchant, Director Center for Teaching and Learning.
Learning Assessment Techniques
Making assessment in PhD programs more useful for faculty and students
Session 5: Criteria for Speaking and Listening
Accounting 9706.
Assessment Planning and Learning Outcome Design Dr
Consider Your Audience
“Bridging General Education and the Major: Critical Thinking, the Mid- Curriculum, and Learning Gains Assessment” Dr. Jane Detweiler, Associate Dean, College.
Accounting (Foundation)
Closing the Assessment Loop
Mathematics Assessment (Math 321 & Math 334)
Teacher Evaluation “SLO 101”
Assessment of Course and Program Outcomes
Taking the STANDARDS Seriously
Curriculum Coordinator: Kathleen Mahoney
Presentation transcript:

Department of Sociology Learning Assessment Development Heather Zaykowski, Ph.D.

Learning Assessment Process Curriculum committee develops goals and rubric. Assess ability of sources to address rubric criteria. Revise assessment tool and method. Provide suggestions for implementation and revision.

Defining Sociology Learning Goals 1.Understanding Sociology as a distinct discipline. 2.Knowledge of the role of sociological theory. 3.Knowledge of quantitative and qualitative methods in Sociology. 4.Technical skills in retrieving information from electronic sources and data analysis. 5.Knowledge of the basic concepts in sociology and their fundamental inter-relationships.

Testing the Draft Assessment Tool Can the rubric criteria be observed in the sources for assessment? Examined Spring 2012 capstone papers and methods exams.

Observations Criteria could not easily be identified in the capstone papers. Assessment tool too specific or broad/categories inappropriate. Wide range of paper topics, varying connection to learning goals. Methods exams addressed quantitative and qualitative knowledge.

Revising the Assessment Tool 1.Revised descriptions of criteria. 2.Created social-psychology and criminal justice specific rubrics. 3.Developed a sampling method for assessment.

Knowledge of Sociology as a Specific Discipline

Learning goals should known prior to assessment. Make assessment transparent for instructors and students. Provide reviewers with additional guidance. Recommendations for Implementation

Suggestions for Future Revisions Standardize, simply and focus methods assessment. Rotate target rubric criteria each assessment period. Revisit the capstone papers as the most appropriate method to capture learning goals. Continue to engage instructors in developing and revising learning assessments.