Life-history of a population of Cottonmouths in east-central Alabama Scott Boback, Matt Greene, Roger Birkhead, Matt Williams, and Dave Koons
How do organisms respond to environmental variation?
Comparative life-history can help us understand how organisms respond to variation in the environment.
A. p. piscivorus A. p. leucostoma A. p. conanti
Methodology
Results Four years of sampling every two weeks 391 captures of 198 individuals 49% adults
SVL (cm) Number of Snakes Males Females Body Size
Body Mass (g) Number of Snakes Males Females Body Size
Mean Male SVL (cm) ARNCVA AL AR SC 67.9 Body Size
SSD Index Equal ARNCVA ARSCALFL Sexual Size Dimorphism
Sex Ratio (F:M) March – June 15 June 16 – October 1:1 Sex Ratio Sex Ratio
Cormack-Jolly-Seber estimator for open populations Survival = probability that a snake alive in week i survived and did not permanently emigrate from study area in week i+1 Recapture = probability that a marked snake alive in week i did not permanently emigrate and was captured in week i+1 Survival Analysis- MARK
Recapture Probabilities SVL (cm) Weekly Recapture Probability Annual survival = 0.79 Recapture probability higher in first year Strong effect of transient individuals
Litter size = 4.1±1.5 (N=11) RCM = 26.2±9.3 (N=7) Frequency of pregnancy from 91% - 15% Reproduction
Mean Litter Size TXNCVAFLARSCALFLTXVA 4.1 Litter Size
Midpoint SVL (cm) Growth Rate (cm/month) Growth – Field Data Males Females
Midpoint SVL (cm) Growth Rate (cm/month) Growth – Lab Data Males Females
Midpoint SVL (cm) Growth Rate (cm/month) Growth – Field versus Lab Field Lab
J F M A M J J A S O N DA S O N D SVL (cm) J F M A M J J A S O N D Polyphasic Growth
Summary High annual survival Likely a long-lived species Frequency of reproduction highly variable Small litter size Slow growth but capable of extremely rapid growth when resources are abundant
Acknowledgements