Chapter 14 Rethinking Special Education. Common-Sense Proposals for Reform 1.Focus on improving general education for all students Improved education.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Making RTI Work for Children, Teachers, and Schools Mary K. Lose Assistant Professor Oakland University Rochester, Michigan International Reading Association.
Advertisements

RtI Response to Intervention
Response to Instruction ________________________________ Response To Intervention New Opportunities for Students and Reading Professionals.
Instructional Decision Making
Title I & Title III Annual Parent Meeting
1 Overview: What is “No Child Left Behind”?. 2 Reauthorization of Elementary and Secondary Education Act (“ESEA”) of ’65 Money to states for specific.
NCLB Margaret Werts, Ph.D. Appalachian State University.
Before IDEA One in five children with disabilities was educated. One in five children with disabilities was educated. More than 1 million children with.
IDEA and NCLB Accountability and Instruction for Students with Disabilities SCDN Presentation 9/06 Candace Shyer.
Literacy for All: NCLB, RTI, and Diversity in the Literacy Program
Title I Schoolwide Providing the Tools for Change Presented by Education Service Center Region XI February 2008.
Minnesota Manual of Accommodations for Students with Disabilities Training Guide
Response to Intervention Principles and Strategies for Effective Practice Second Edition Rachel Brown-Chidsey Mark W. Steege From Response to Intervention:
Response to Intervention (RTI) Lindenhurst Schools
No Child Left Behind The Basics Of Title 1 Every Child - Now! Focus on the critical nature of doing what’s right and what’s needed – today - to help every.
National Center on Educational Outcomes June, 2004 How do we keep kids from being stuck in our gap? A frame, a series of discussion questions, and some.
Essential Elements in Implementing and Monitoring Quality RtI Procedures Rose Dymacek & Edward Daly Nebraska Department of Education University of Nebraska-
Minnesota Manual of Accommodations for Students with Disabilities Training Guide
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP FOR DIVERSE LEARNERS Susan Brody Hasazi Katharine S. Furney National Institute of Leadership, Disability, and Students Placed.
Kaitlin White Mark Sanders Megan Davenport Nicole Faulkner.
Response to Intervention: Part 1 September, 2008.
Providing Leadership in Reading First Schools: Essential Elements Dr. Joseph K. Torgesen Florida Center for Reading Research Miami Reading First Principals,
NCCSAD Advisory Board1 Research Objective Two Alignment Methodologies Diane M. Browder, PhD Claudia Flowers, PhD University of North Carolina at Charlotte.
Special Education update to the Board
No Child Left Behind and Students with Disabilities Presentation for OSEP Staff March 20, 2003 Stephanie Lee Director, Office of Special Education Programs.
Special Education in the United States Susie Fahey and Mario Martinez.
0 1 1 TDOE’s accountability system has two overarching objectives and Growth for all students, every year Faster growth for those students who are furthest.
Title II, Part A Improving Teacher and Principal Quality.
Times have changed Iowa has slipped from number 1 or 2 in the nation. Worse… when we compare achievement of students with IEPs to those without, Iowa.
Applying Research to Reading Instruction: What’s Next? Timothy Shanahan University of Illinois at Chicago
Carlas McCauley Educational Program Specialist U.S. Department of Education Office of Elementary and Secondary Education
Putting It All Together Diane Gross USD 261 8/11/06.
Marjorie Hall Haley, PhD - GMU1 NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND The reauthorized elementary and secondary education act.
Title II, Part A Improving Teacher and Principal Quality.
Response to Intervention in KPS Linda Campbell
1 RESPONSE TO INSTRUCTION ________________________________ RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION New Opportunities for Students and Reading Professionals.
Instructional Support Team (IST) By Kelli Reisinger Unit 13 Presentation.
California IDEA Reauthorization Summit California Department of Education Committed to Improving Results Alice D. Parker, Ed.D. Assistant Superintendent.
Lori Wolfe October 9, Definition of RTI according to NCRTI ( National Center on Response to Intervention) Response to intervention integrates assessment.
U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs The Legacy of IDEA 2004: Improving Results for all Students Dr. Alexa Posny.
Dr. Sarah McPherson New York Institute of Technology Adapted from Lora Parks-Recore CEWW Special Education Training and Resource Center SETRC 1 Response.
Federal Support for World-Class Schools Gwinnett County Public Schools 4/18/13.
READING FIRST IN ACTION Knowing and Acting: A Practical 8-Week System to Improve Achievement By Betsy Eaves and Jessica Evans.
Exceptional Lives: Special Education in Today’s Schools, 6e ISBN: © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 2 Ensuring Progress.
No Child Left Behind. HISTORY President Lyndon B. Johnson signs Elementary and Secondary Education Act, 1965 Title I and ESEA coordinated through Improving.
June 15th, 2010 U.S. Department of Education Strategic Use of Title I & IDEA: How to Maximize ARRA, FY09 & FY10 Funds.
South Elementary School Des Plaines, Illinois Mary Ellen Bleeden, Principal Beatriz Cruz-Bradley, 1st Gr. Bilingual Teacher Keys To Success: Assessment,
Read to Achieve Parent Presentation What is Read to Achieve? Read to Achieve was created in legislation and approved by the North Carolina.
What is Title I and How Can I be Involved? Annual Parent Meeting Pierce Elementary
Special Education: Our Future Role and Needed Policy Supports.
1 Building Collaborative Relationships to Improve Student Learning Presented by Auburn Montgomery School of Education.
Interventions Identifying and Implementing. What is the purpose of providing interventions? To verify that the students difficulties are not due to a.
The Leadership Challenge in Graduating Students with Disabilities Guiding Questions Joy Eichelberger, Ed.D. Pennsylvania Training and Technical Assistance.
Minnesota Manual of Accommodations for Students with Disabilities Training January 2010.
1 NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND The reauthorized elementary and secondary education act.
RtI: A Framework for Student Success Janet Graden, PhD University of Cincinnati
Office of School Turnaround Center for Accountability and Improvement, Ohio Department of Education 25 South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio
Anderson School Accreditation We commit to continuous growth and improvement by  Creating a culture for learning by working together  Providing.
Aim: Does the US need to reform the educational system? Do Now: Make a list of the best aspects of the education you receive and make a list of the worst.
1 Leading the Next Generation of Education Reform in New York State New York State Education Department James A. Kadamus September 22, 2005.
Types of Statewide Assessments Currently Used in Grades 3-8.
Chapter 5 Learning Disabilities
Response to Intervention & Positive Behavioral Intervention & Support
American Institutes for Research
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act of 2004
Title III of the No Child Left Behind Act
The Significance of Access to the General Curriculum for Students with Significant Cognitive Disabilities A Review of the Literature Donna Tortu-Rueter.
Resource Allocation and District Action Reports: RADAR
Anderson Elementary School
Title II Preparing, Training, and Recruiting High Quality Teachers and Principals Ismail Ardahanli.
Presentation transcript:

Chapter 14 Rethinking Special Education

Common-Sense Proposals for Reform 1.Focus on improving general education for all students Improved education for all means fewer students identified Schools should develop inclusive programs based on effective teaching practices that improve outcomes for both students with and without disabilities

Common-Sense Proposals for Reform 2.Work to end “medical model” in which IDEA eligibility for services requires a specialist’s diagnosis Model is costly, problematic, and inexact Often kicks in too late Better solution is to provide timely and appropriate education services for all students in our schools, based on their performance, without the need for a label

Common-Sense Proposals for Reform 3.End compliance-based approach to special education Parents and teachers should be liberated from endless form-filling and meetings Compliance does not improve student results Time on task in classrooms improves results

Common-Sense Proposals for Reform 4.End adversarial approach of “private enforcement” by parents and use other dispute resolution models mediators and ombudsmen or federal and state enforcement mechanisms can encourage trust-building and collaboration between schools and parents

Something Has Got to Change: Rethinking Special Education School districts spending an increasing percentage of their total budget on special education, but most districts cannot calculate their total financial commitment to special education Pressure for increased spending is only going to intensify The number of students with special needs is growing The number of students with significant special needs is increasing even faster, requiring more costly services

Something Has Got to Change: Rethinking Special Education Despite rising costs of special education, the Arlington, Massachusetts school district was able to Reduce real special education spending Raise student achievement Increase parent satisfaction Significantly increase reading proficiency Close a large percentage of the achievement gap Reduce per pupil spending

Something Has Got to Change: Rethinking Special Education How districts spend money is more important than how much they spend Three strategies for boosting achievement Relentlessly focus on reading Shift responsibility to general education Maximize student time with content expert teachers

Something Has Got to Change: Rethinking Special Education Relentlessly focus on reading Clear and rigorous grade-level expectations for reading proficiency Frequent measurement of achievement and growth Early identification Immediate and intensive additional instruction for struggling readers Remediation and intervention Balanced instruction in five areas of reading Explicit instruction in phonics in the earlier grades and comprehension in the later Skilled teachers for reading

Something Has Got to Change: Rethinking Special Education Shifting responsibility to general education Key element for reducing special education costs is to help students learn in gen ed If students never fall behind, they are more likely to graduate Special education services are the most expensive form of remediation and intervention By vesting more responsibility in general educators, especially content expert educators, schools can save funds while putting children in front of the best trained teachers

Something Has Got to Change: Rethinking Special Education Maximize student time with content expert teachers Special education teachers are often expected to teach all subjects to their students Most students in special education have already been taught the subject earlier in the day by a certified teacher By shifting resources from special education to general education, students with special needs can take the same class for periods a day

Something Has Got to Change: Rethinking Special Education Rethink how we deploy support staff Co-teaching sounds great but can be difficult to implement Support therapists and paraprofessionals Design and apply measures of effectiveness Manage and track data of services, hours spent, and number of paraprofessionals Ability to compare the data aids in learning from other practices already in place Inconsistent identification criteria causes under/over-identification of students with disabilities

Something Has Got to Change: Rethinking Special Education Align management skills with responsibilities Many instructors are put in a leadership position that differs from their skill set Need to redesign special education’s organizational structure Policy implications Focus regulatory oversight on outcomes, not inputs Do not restrict grant dollars to special education Redefine highly qualified teachers under NCLB Collect different types of data Create unambiguous standards for eligibility and services

Conclusions and Principles for Reform Principles for Reform Make IDEA standards- and Performance-based Streamline the number of special education categories Focus on prevention and early intervention Encourage flexibility, innovation, and choice Provide adequate funding End double standards