PD 8 OSFI Capital Update Stuart Wason Senior Director Actuarial Division OSFI CIA Appointed Actuary Seminar September 18, 2009.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Benefits and Challenges of Implementation of Basel II in Europe José María Roldán | 27 Sept 2005.
Advertisements

Rizwan Chughtai. Risk exposure arising from business activities Need to effectively manage because of Potential business losses Ensure business continuity.
1 The critical challenge facing banks and regulators under Basel II: improving risk management through implementation of Pillar 2 Simon Topping Hong Kong.
The Development of Enterprise Risk Management and Supervision for Insurance Companies in Taiwan Dr. Huang, Tien-Mu Director General, Insurance Bureau Financial.
Presented by Muhamad Abrar Bahaman W. Fatimatul Akmar Md. Hassan
Introduction to Enterprise Risk Management (ERM)
Investments Institute of Insurance and Risk Management (IIRM) Hyderabad, India 15 November 2005 Arup Chatterjee – Advisor International Association of.
ERM in the Rating Evaluation CAMAR Fall Meeting November 29, 2007 Thomas M. Mount, ACAS, MAAA Andrew Colannino, Vice President A.M.Best Company.
Enterprise Risk Management and the Own Risk Solvency Assessment Act Michelle M. Rogers, JD Director of Financial and Regulatory Policy National Association.
IOR Scottish Chapter Annual Conference Glasgow Caledonian University – 1 st November 2013 Relevance of Operational Risk to the FCA Jill Savager Manager,
Role of actuarial function supporting the FLAOR leading to the ORSA Ian Morris June 2014.
2011 Governance, Risk, and Compliance Conference August 29 – 31, 2011 / Orlando, FL, USA The Top Four Essential Objectives to Auditing ERM Stephen E. McBride,
Risk Management at ANZ Banking Group Jun 18, 2008 Patrick Zhu Head of Retail Risk China Partnerships.
Enhancing Operational Performance while Building Confidence: The Case for Stress Testing Presented by Kevin Greenidge (CBB) & Jide Lewis (BOJ) CAIB 37.
Risk Assessment Frameworks
B RITISH B ANKERS' A SSOCIATION Operational Risk & the Regulatory Environment Simon Hills Director - Prudential Capital team.
Internal Control and Internal Audit
CORPORATE RISK MANAGEMENT & INSURANCE BY R P BLAH D.G.M. INCHARGE THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED REGIONAL OFFICE BHUBANESWAR.
1 Solvency II Part 3: Other pillars Vesa Ronkainen Insurance Supervisory Authority, Finland
Corporate Governance in Financial Institutions OCDE/IAIS/ASSAL Conference on Insurance Regulation & Supervision in Latin America Punta Cana, Dominican.
Sapient Insurance Partners. Overview & Services We have almost four decades of combined experience in the property & casualty insurance and reinsurance.
Practical Implications of Regulatory Convergence – Lessons from Basel II Mary Frances Monroe Division of Banking Supervision and Regulation Board of Governors.
Risk scoring: Risk Based Supervision in Practice Ross Jones Deputy Chairman, Australian Prudential Regulation Authority President of International Organisation.
1.  The views expressed are those of the speaker and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Federal Reserve Board of Governors, or the Federal Reserve.
8 – 12 December 2008 Bruce Le Bransky MAFC / APEC / AFDC Shanghai Conference: Session 7.2: Challenges to Governance Structures.
Finite Reinsurance - Regulator perspective August Chow Senior Director, OSFI Nov 9, 2005.
Equity Housing Group Risk Management. 05 August 2002 © MazarsEquity Housing Group: Risk Management 2 Agenda Introduction: what is Risk Management? The.
OECD Guidelines on Insurer Governance
2007 Annual Meeting ● Assemblée annuelle 2007 Vancouver 2007 Annual Meeting ● Assemblée annuelle 2007 Vancouver Canadian Institute of Actuaries Canadian.
2006 Seminar for the Appointed Actuary Colloque pour l’actuaire désigné Seminar for the Appointed Actuary Colloque pour l’actuaire désigné 2006.
IT Risk Management, Planning and Mitigation TCOM 5253 / MSIS 4253
OSFI Update November 19, 2009 Bernard Dupont Director, Capital Division.
Basel II – Implications for Insurers and Actuaries
Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) ABN AMRO Business Unit North America (BU NA) Overview for ERM Committee April 11, 2007.
Chapter 5 Internal Control over Financial Reporting
CDS Operational Risk Management - October 28, 2005 Existing Methodologies for Operational Risk Mitigation - CDS’s ERM Program ACSDA Seminar - October 26.
ICAAP – what you really need to know
Who is Responsible for Risk Management?
1 IFRS in the Banking Sector A supervisor’s perspective REPARIS Workshop Marc Pickeur Vienna CBFA March 2006 Belgium.
Private & Confidential1 (SIA) 13 Enterprise Risk Management The Standard should be read in the conjunction with the "Preface to the Standards on Internal.
SUERF Annual Lecture Risk Management – A supervisor’s approach Gabriel Bernardino EIOPA Chairman Helsinki, 22 September 2011.
B RITISH B ANKERS' A SSOCIATION Implementing Basel II a trade association view Simon Hills Director Prudential Capital & Risk.
The ultimate responsibility for governance over a covered credit union’s capital planning and analysis process rests with the credit union’s board of.
PD 38 Stress Testing for Insurers Stuart Wason Senior Director Actuarial Division OSFI CIA Annual Meeting, Halifax June 26, 2009.
PD-34: Capital Models OSFI Guidance Canadian Institute of Actuaries General Meeting Ottawa November 2009.
Future of Credit Risk Management: Supervisory Approach to Basel II CIA Annual Meeting Session 4405 Ben Gully Director, Basel Implementation Division Office.
Managing Market Risk. Board of Directors The Boards defines –Market risk –Management policies –Procedures –Prudential risk limits –Review mechanisms –Reporting.
Divisional Chief Executives Supported by Divisional Risk Committees Executive Committee Group Chief Executive Group Functions Group Finance Director Group.
Solvency II Andrew Mawdsley. Overview The challenges in preparing for Solvency II Adequate financial resources Supervisory Review Process Disclosure Timeline.
TREASURY REGULATIONS’ CHANGES AND POTENTIAL IMPACT
Credit risk in banks - importance of appraisal and monitoring PRESENTED BY : KRATI VERMA (09bshyd0390)
Developing an Investment Governance Framework
Sapient Insurance Partners. Overview & Services We have almost four decades of combined experience in the property & casualty insurance and reinsurance.
1  The objective of operational risk management is the same as for credit, market and liquidity risks that is to find out the extent of the financial.
December 29, 2010 Satyan Jambunathan Prudential requirements A Life industry perspective.
Update on the future regulation of insurance John Tiner Managing Director, FSA.
2007 General Meeting Assemblée générale 2007 Montréal, Québec 2007 General Meeting Assemblée générale 2007 Montréal, Québec Canadian Institute of Actuaries.
Office of the SuperintendentBureau du surintendant of Financial Institutions Canadades institutions financières Canada A Regulator’s Perspective on ERM.
Implementation of Insurance Core Principles and FSAP Evaluations The Portuguese FSAP experience Gabriel Bernardino Instituto de Seguros de Portugal.
The Use of Actuaries as Part of a Supervisory Model Michael Hafeman – Consultant World Bank May 2004.
OSFI Role and Profile Financial Stability Institute Regional Seminar for Insurance Supervisors in Latin America Panama City, Panama May 24-26, 2016 Stephen.
JMFIP Financial Management Conference
Principles for Recovery and Resolution of a Financial Market Infrastructure ACSDA Senior Leadership Summit – November 16 & 17, 2015.
Chris Lintern Co-operative Financial Services
Legislative Compliance Management Insurance Industry Workshop 1 – 2 November 2005 Bangkok, Thailand Kim Norris Managing Director International Advisory.
Kuveyt Turk Participation Bank
4. Solvency II – Own Risk and Solvency Assessment (ORSA)
Risks in Banking Operations
Operational Risk Management
APRA PAIRS Model Ross Jones
Presentation transcript:

PD 8 OSFI Capital Update Stuart Wason Senior Director Actuarial Division OSFI CIA Appointed Actuary Seminar September 18, 2009

2 Capital Update Agenda:  Stress Testing  Life - Standard Approach QIS  Life - Segregated Funds  P&C MCT and internal models  Q&A

3 Stress Testing  OSFI Guideline E-18 on stress testing has been issued for consultation  Applies to all federally regulated financial institutions  Purpose is to share best practices, to ensure consistency as well as make clear OSFI expectations  Market events over the past two years have reinforced the merits of stress testing to address the fact that past events are not always a perfect predictor of the future

4 Lessons from financial crises  Insufficient consideration of extreme events – “It is hard for us without being flippant, to even see a scenario within any kind of realm of reason that would see us losing one dollar in any of those transactions.” August 2007, Joseph Cassano, a former AIG executive –“Almost no one expected what was coming. It’s not fair to blame us for not predicting the unthinkable.” Daniel Mudd, former chief executive of Fannie Mae

5 Stress Testing  OSFI’s guidance is based in part on principles established by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision as well as best practices in insurance  OSFI expects all institutions to follow this guidance but also recognizes that each institution’s risk profile and investment strategy may be different  Stress testing has been done by OSFI for many years and is an integral part of our ongoing supervisory regime - OSFI asks financial institutions about their risk exposures and stress tests are done to help identify potential risks  Stress testing is done by most prudential financial regulators

6 What is stress testing?  Stress Testing: Risk management technique used to evaluate the potential effects on an institution’s financial condition, of a set of specified changes in risk factors, corresponding to exceptional but plausible events.  Scenario Testing: Form of stress testing which uses a hypothetical future state of the world to define the changes in the risk factors affecting the insurer.  Sensitivity Test: Form of stress testing which typically involves an incremental change in a risk factor to determine the impact on an insurer.

7

8 Guideline E-18  Broad purpose of stress testing –Stress testing should be embedded in enterprise wide risk management –It should be actionable, playing an important role in development of risk mitigation or contingency plans –It should feed into the institution’s decision making process (e.g. setting risk appetite, exposure limits, and evaluating strategic choices) –Stress testing should be clearly documented & available for review

9 Guideline E-18  Specific purposes of stress testing –Risk identification and control –Complementary perspective to other RM tools –Supporting capital management –Improving liquidity management  Role of the Board and senior management –Board has ultimate responsibility for the overall stress testing program and that it is “fit for purpose” –Senior management is accountable for the program’s implementation, management and oversight.

10 Guideline E-18  General considerations –Stress testing should take account of views from across the organisation and cover a range of perspectives and techniques –Written policies and procedures governing the stress testing program - Appropriate operating documentation –Robust and flexible infrastructure for changing stress tests –Regular and independent assessment  Methodology and scenario selection –Deliver a complete picture of institution-wide risk –Cover range of scenarios, including non-historical scenarios, and take into account system-wide interactions and feedback effects –Include range of severities, including events capable of generating the most damage (e.g. size of loss or reputation) - determine what scenarios could challenge viability of institution (reverse stress tests)

11 Guideline E-18  Supervisory considerations –In assessing stress testing programs OSFI may: –Evaluate consistency with risk appetite –Assess whether scenarios appropriate –Assess frequency and timing –Ask for specific scenarios –Examine future capital resources and requirements –Take account of capital transferability within groups –Review range of management actions –Recommend remedial action to address weaknesses –From time to time, OSFI may conduct analysis of system- wide stress scenarios

12 Implications for DCAT  Annual DCAT report expected to be integral part of overall stress testing program as well as the risk management & strategic planning process  Starting in 2010, OSFI expects the DCAT report to be presented to Board no later than 6 months after year end  The reports must be filed with OSFI within 30 days after presentation to Board.  OSFI expects DCAT report to be used to identify risks that must be addressed in planning process - not the other way around

13 In conclusion…  Stress testing is an important risk management tool  Guideline E-18 outlines OSFI expectations for stress testing for all FRFI’s  OSFI expectations are broader and more fundamental than DCAT alone  OSFI will continue to work with the industry and the CIA to strengthen risk management

14 Other topics  Life - Standard Approach QIS –OSFI, AMF and Assuris are preparing to issue a QIS on the topics of market and credit risk this fall –Purpose is to test feasibility of new standard approach for determining capital – calibration will come later –Separate mortality QIS under consideration  Life - Segregated Funds –Fundamental OSFI review of SF policy liability and capital is underway  P&C MCT and internal models

15 Questions and Answers ?????