ITS Calibration Database Requirements Updated By Bjørn S. Nilsen On behalf of the ALICE ITS Sub-detector Group.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Background Virtual memory – separation of user logical memory from physical memory. Only part of the program needs to be in memory for execution. Logical.
Advertisements

Terzo Convegno sulla Fisica di ALICE - LNF, Andrea Dainese 1 Preparation for ITS alignment A. Dainese (INFN – LNL) for the ITS alignment group.
Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne  Operating System Concepts Chapter 10: Virtual Memory Background Demand Paging Process Creation Page Replacement.
Chapter 9: Virtual-Memory Management. 9.2 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005 Operating System Concepts Chapter 9: Virtual Memory Background Demand Paging.
1 Databases in ALICE L.Betev LCG Database Deployment and Persistency Workshop Geneva, October 17, 2005.
Standalone VeloPix Simulation Jianchun Wang 4/30/10.
29 June 2004Paul Dauncey1 ECAL Readout Tests Paul Dauncey For the CALICE-UK electronics group A. Baird, D. Bowerman, P. Dauncey, C. Fry, R. Halsall, M.
28 Feb 2006Digi - Paul Dauncey1 In principle change from simulation output to “raw” information equivalent to that seen in real data Not “reconstruction”,
1 HLT – a source of calibration data One of the main tasks of HLT (especially in the first years) –Monitoring of the detector performance –Analysing calibration.
CFT Calibration Calibration Workshop Calibration Requirements Calibration Scheme Online Calibration databases.
STAR Collaboration Meeting, Nantes, July2002 SVT Analysis/Status Update Jun Takahashi – University of Sao Paulo.
SSD offline status Offline week CERN, 7 July 2008 Enrico Fragiacomo on behalf of ALICE SSD.
7/19/2004FTPC Review - J. Seyboth1 FTPC Review - Software Janet Seyboth for the FTPC group DAQ Online Calibration Databases Offline Documentation FTPC.
1 TPC online  offline calibration November 2002.
The Design and Implementation of Log-Structure File System M. Rosenblum and J. Ousterhout.
Ajit and Dario ALICE offline week 10th June Dario Favretto Ajit Kumar Mohanty ALICE Raw Data Production.
STAR Collaboration Meeting Rene Bellwied – Wayne State University July 2004 SVT Calibration and STI tracking status An update of work since the SVT review.
1 xCAL monitoring Yu. Guz, IHEP, Protvino I.Machikhiliyan, ITEP, Moscow.
CMS pixel data quality monitoring Petra Merkel, Purdue University For the CMS Pixel DQM Group Vertex 2008, Sweden.
1 Behaviour of the Silicon Strip Detector modules for the Alice experiment: simulation and test with minimum ionizing particles Federica Benedosso Utrecht,
4 th Workshop on ALICE Installation and Commissioning January 16 th & 17 th, CERN Muon Tracking (MUON_TRK, MCH, MTRK) Conclusion of the first ALICE COSMIC.
PHOS offline status report Dmitri Peressounko ALICE offline week,
CMS WEEK – MARCH06 REVIEW OF MB4 COMMISSIONING DATA Giorgia Mila
HMPID offline status report D. Di Bari, L. Molnar, G. Volpe ALICE Offline Week, CERN, 22 June 2009.
1 ITS Quality Assurance (& DQM) P. Cerello, P. Christakoglou, W. Ferrarese, M. Nicassio, M. Siciliano ALICE OFFLINE WEEK – April 2008.
ALICE Pixel Operational Experience R. Santoro On behalf of the ITS collaboration in the ALICE experiment at LHC.
TB1: Data analysis Antonio Bulgheroni on behalf of the TB24 team.
1 SDD: DA and preprocessor Francesco Prino INFN Sezione di Torino ALICE offline week – April 11th 2008.
G. BrunoOffline week - February Comparison between test- beam data and the SPD simulations in Aliroot G. Bruno, R. Santoro Outline:  strategy of.
SSD status report Marek Chojnacki, Panos Christakoglou, Enrico Fragiacomo, Marco Van Leeuwen, Massimo Venaruzzo
LM Feb SSD status and Plans for Year 5 Lilian Martin - SUBATECH STAR Collaboration Meeting BNL - February 2005.
RPC DQM status Cimmino, M. Maggi, P. Noli, D. Lomidze, P. Paolucci, G. Roselli, C. Carillo.
21 Sep 2009Paul Dauncey1 Status of Imperial tasks Paul Dauncey.
1 Checks on SDD Data Piergiorgio Cerello, Francesco Prino, Melinda Siciliano.
1 SDD offline status Francesco Prino INFN sezione di Torino ALICE offline week – March 15th 2010.
1 Outline: Update on muon/dimuon AOD production (R. Arnaldi/E. Scomparin) Other ongoing activities: MUON correction framework (X. Lopez) MUON productions.
Anatoli Romaniouk TRT Test manual Some important information p. 2-3Some important information p. 2-3 Noise studies p.4-7Noise studies p.4-7 Operation with.
Page 1 of 18 Bjorn S. Nilsen, ALICE November 16 ITS Software meeting ITS Alignment Status Plus other things By Bjørn S. Nilsen The Ohio State University.
Alberto Colla - CERN ALICE off-line week 1 Alberto Colla ALICE off-line week Cern, May 31, 2005 Table of contents: ● Summary of requirements ● Description.
Computing for Alice at GSI (Proposal) (Marian Ivanov)
1 The status of the SDD detector - OFFLINE - Francesco Prino INFN Sezione di Torino ALICE CLUB – October 14th 2008.
Summary of User Requirements for Calibration and Alignment Database Magali Gruwé CERN PH/AIP ALICE Offline Week Alignment and Calibration Workshop February.
1 SDD offline status Francesco Prino INFN sezione di Torino ALICE offline week – October 20th 2008.
Summary of Workshop on Calibration and Alignment Database Magali Gruwé CERN PH/AIP ALICE Computing Day February 28 th 2005.
Monday 10, March 2003D. Guez - IPN Orsay - Alice week1 Station 1 chambers thickness Detector modeling and multiple scattering studies David GUEZ, Ivana.
AliRoot Classes for access to Calibration and Alignment objects Magali Gruwé CERN PH/AIP ALICE Offline Meeting February 17 th 2005 To be presented to detector.
D. Elia (INFN Bari)Offline week / CERN Status of the SPD Offline Domenico Elia (INFN Bari) Overview:  Response simulation (timing info, dead/noisy.
Calorimeter Task Force Workshop February 10, 2003 Leslie Groer, Columbia UniversityCalorimeter Software Status 1 Past Calorimeter Software Improvements.
AliRoot survey: Calibration P.Hristov 11/06/2013.
4 Dec., 2001 Software Week Data flow in the LArG Reconstruction software chain Updated status for various reconstruction algorithm LAr Converters and miscellaneous.
MAUS Status A. Dobbs CM43 29 th October Contents MAUS Overview Infrastructure Geometry and CDB Detector Updates CKOV EMR KL TOF Tracker Global Tracking.
21 Mar 2007ALICE - Paul Dauncey1 ALICE CR07: Installation and Commissioning Paul Dauncey Material from: L. Leistam: “ALICE Status” W. Riegler: “Commissioning.
CscClusterization and Micromegas Woochun Park Group Meeting.
GLAST LAT ProjectNovember 18, 2004 I&T Two Tower IRR 1 GLAST Large Area Telescope: Integration and Test Two Tower Integration Readiness Review SVAC Elliott.
January 2009 offline detector review - 2 nd go 1 ● Offline – Geometry – Material budget – Simulation – Raw data – OCDB parameters – Reconstruction ● Calibration.
V4-18-Release P. Hristov 21/06/2010.
Peter Chochula Calibration Workshop, February 23, 2005
Tracker Upgrade Simulations Software Harry Cheung (Fermilab)
Massimo Masera INFN sezione di Torino
Status of the CERN Analysis Facility
The Silicon Drift Detector of the ALICE Experiment
SDD Quality Assurance (& DQM)
HLT & Calibration.
Barrel RPC Conditions Database
Francesco Prino INFN – Sezione di Torino
SDD in February ‘08 cosmic run
Preparation for ITS alignment
CMS Pixel Data Quality Monitoring
Analysis Drift velocity of the SDD Detector
Presentation transcript:

ITS Calibration Database Requirements Updated By Bjørn S. Nilsen On behalf of the ALICE ITS Sub-detector Group

Feb ALICE February Offline Week, Calibration Database Workshop 2 Outline Alignment Calibration Data SPD Calibration Data SDD Calibration Data SSD Assess patterns and usage Conclusions

Feb ALICE February Offline Week, Calibration Database Workshop 3 Alignment AliITSgeom & AliITSgeomMatrix 2198 Detectors, 6 degrees of Freedom Must be fast and compact Must allow for multiple instantiations and easily switch between different instantiations easily and quickly Needs to handle different coordinate system Needs to be useful in simulation, reconstruction, tracking, and alignment

Feb ALICE February Offline Week, Calibration Database Workshop 4 Alignment AliITSgeom & AliITSgeomMatrix AliITSgeomMatrix. –Sizeof(AliITSgoemMatrix) = 164Bytes (in memory), 126Bytes on disk uncompressed. –Minimum required 64Bytes (require much computation so slow). AliITSgeom. –Sizeof(AliITSgeom) = 60Bytes + allocated memory ( Bytes) = Bytes total. –Minimum required Bytes.

Feb ALICE February Offline Week, Calibration Database Workshop 5 Response & Calibration Data Can, and should, be different between simulation and reconstruction. Will depend on run/event number in some almost unpredictable way. Will need to be changed with time as newer and better methods are developed. Will need to be able to retrieve and use older values at any point in the future.

Feb ALICE February Offline Week, Calibration Database Workshop 6 SPD Data 240 Detectors, pixels/detector, 4% Simulation Thresholds/cell (16bits) Noise levels/cell (16 bits) List of Dead Pixels and Chips –Bit pattern  5120Bytes/detector –At 2% dead pixels +16σ  2600Bytes/detector A dead Chip  20% Bytes/det  Bytes total Reconstruction List of Dead Pixels and Chips – Bit pattern  5120Bytes/detector –At 2% dead pixels +16σ  2600Bytes/detector A dead Chip  20% List of Extra-noisy pixels? 4 136Bytes/det  Bytes total

Feb ALICE February Offline Week, Calibration Database Workshop 7 SPD Data Dead pixels will not come back to life. Small chance that new dead pixels will be added. Noisy pixels are very unlikely to improve. New noisy pixels very rare.  Data update will be uncommon.

Feb ALICE February Offline Week, Calibration Database Workshop 8 SDD Data 2X256 anodes, ~200 time-bins, 6X33 injectors, 260 detectors For Both Simulation and Reconstruction For each Anode  3 Bytes. –Thresholds (Not needed for Reconstruction). Low (4 bits). High (4 bits). –Baseline (6 bits). –Gain (6 bits). –Noise ( ). Amplitude (4 bits). Pedestals, 2 per detector (8 bits total) Thermal map ( sets drift velocity ). –198 measurements (24 bits/measur. = 8 amplitude + 16 time)  594 Bytes. Dopant concentration map ( shifts in both time and anode mean values ). – measurements (2*10 bits/cell)  Bytes. –Maximum deviation of 500μm Bytes/detector  Bytes for all SDD such a detailed measure of the noise may only be possible for zero non-suppressed data/events

Feb ALICE February Offline Week, Calibration Database Workshop 9 SDD Data Thresholds, baseline, gains. –Set at start of run. Noise. –Tests show to be stable, but may change. Temperature map. –Transient at startup (half life ?). –Then, should remain stable. Dopant map. –Fixed and measured in lab. –In construction data base.  Generally Stable or minimal changes over time.

Feb ALICE February Offline Week, Calibration Database Workshop 10 SSD Data 2X768 Anodes/cathodes, 1698 detectors Simulation and Reconstruction For each Anode and Cathode  4 Bytes. –Pedestal (8 bits). –Threshold (8 bits). –Noise & always-off/on flag (8 bits). –Gain (8 bits) Bytes/det  Bytes total.

Feb ALICE February Offline Week, Calibration Database Workshop 11 SSD Data Pedestal, Threshold, & Gain. –Set at beginning of run. –Will not change during run. Noise. –Measured in special runs. –Should not change much with time.  Generally stable or minimal changes over time. Total ITS reconstruction data volume Bytes

Feb ALICE February Offline Week, Calibration Database Workshop 12 Access Patters My point of view

Feb ALICE February Offline Week, Calibration Database Workshop 13 Access Patters Continued Data Base. –Each Value “separate”, individually queriable. Value may vary by time/event/run Value may even be represented by some function of some time/event/run range –Full history of each value. When last changed Who made change Calibration File. –Specific values needed to analyze specific events/runs at a give sight and/or cpu. –Minimal size and fast access required Ali???Calibration (e.g. AliITSCalibrationSDD). –Class with specific data for a specific event as used inside of AliRoot. –Must be quickly updated from Calibration file for next event (possibly next detectors) –Must be in a form efficiently usable by reconstruction.

Feb ALICE February Offline Week, Calibration Database Workshop 14 Conclusion Alignment takes Bytes Calibration takes Bytes –Calibration data is made up of fixed, slowly changing, and rarely but abruptly changing values. –Generally the changes in the calibration data set is expected to be rather stable. –This is a realistic yet minimum data size ( more likely to rise then drop ). The “master” calibration data is best kept in a data-base. Usage requires much faster access, and therefore a local copy in a form similar to that used in AliRoot. } Bytes