Beam position instabilities in the PSB injection line J. Tan, M. Bozzolan, L. Søby, B. Mikulec, G.P. Di Giovanni, O. E. Berrig, E. Benedetto BI Technical.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Machine Physics at ISIS Proton Meeting 24 th March 11 Dean Adams (On behalf of ISIS Accelerator Groups)
Advertisements

Beam-based Measurements of HOMs in the HTC Adam Bartnik for ERL Team, Daniel Hall, John Dobbins, Mike Billing, Matthias Liepe, Ivan Bazarov.
Beam Dynamics in MeRHIC Yue Hao On behalf of MeRHIC/eRHIC working group.
M.Gasior, CERN-AB-BIBase-Band Tune (BBQ) Measurement System 1 Base-Band Tune (BBQ) Measurement System Marek Gasior Beam Instrumentation Group, CERN.
Measurements of adiabatic dual rf capture in the SIS 18 O. Chorniy.
Linac4 BPM and Phase Pickup L. Søby08/ LINAC4 Beam Position, Phase and intensity Pick-ups.
Beam Loss Analysis Tool for the CTF3 PETS Tank M. Velasco, T. Lefevre, R. Scheidegger, M. Wood, J. Hebden, G. Simpson Northwestern University, Evanston,
Space Charge meeting – CERN – 09/10/2014
ALPHA Storage Ring Indiana University Xiaoying Pang.
STRIPLINE KICKER STATUS. PRESENTATION OUTLINE 1.Design of a stripline kicker for beam injection in DAFNE storage rings. 2.HV tests and RF measurements.
KICKER LNF David Alesini LNF fast kickers study group* * D. Alesini, F. Marcellini P. Raimondi, S. Guiducci.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, N.Kazarinov.
M.Gasior, CERN-BE-BIBE-KT Innovation Day, 3 June Base Band Tune (BBQ) measurement systems - observing beam oscillations with sub-micrometre amplitudes.
H. Bartosik, K. Cornelis, A. Guerrero, B. Mikulek, G. Rumolo, Y. Papaphilippou, B. Salvant, E. Shaposhnikova June 16 th, 2011.
1 Status of EMMA Shinji Machida CCLRC/RAL/ASTeC 23 April, ffag/machida_ ppt & pdf.
CLIC Drive Beam Beam Position Monitors International Workshop on Linear Colliders 2010 Geneva Steve Smith SLAC / CERN
History and motivation for a high harmonic RF system in LHC E. Shaposhnikova With input from T. Argyropoulos, J.E. Muller and all participants.
Linac4 FBCT’s 18/ L4 BI BCT review Lars Søby On the behalf of: M. Andersen, D. Belohrad, L. Jensen, Franco Lenardon and J. C. Allica Santamaria.
Basic BPM Hardware Theory Jim Steimel. Wall Current Charge in a cylindrical perfectly conducting pipe produces an equal and opposite image charge at the.
Elias Métral, APC meeting, 02/02/2006 1/35 E. Métral, G. Arduini and G. Rumolo u Observations of fast instabilities in the SPS (1988 and 2002/3) and PS.
Measurement opportunities with the LHC transverse damper W. Hofle, D. Valuch.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, A.Drozhdin, N.Kazarinov.
Managed by UT-Battelle for the Department of Energy Analysis of 2008 Beam Instability Data S. Cousineau, V. Danilov, M. Plum HB2008.
1 FFAG Role as Muon Accelerators Shinji Machida ASTeC/STFC/RAL 15 November, /machida/doc/othertalks/machida_ pdf/machida/doc/othertalks/machida_ pdf.
PS (electron cloud?!) instability at flat top Mauro Pivi Gianni Iadarola, Giovanni Rumolo, Simone Gilardoni 05/06/2012 LIU-PS meeting, CERN.
The Quadrupole Pick-up in the CPS -intro and progress report PPC 3 Dec 1999 A. Jansson.
BI day /12/00 1 PIPOS Project (TT2 & TT10) (Beam performances) G. Vismara  Present situation  Proposals  Beam parameters  Technical solution.
Overview of Booster PIP II upgrades and plans C.Y. Tan for Proton Source group PIP II Collaboration Meeting 03 June 2014.
Chromaticity dependence of the vertical effective impedance in the PS Chromaticity dependence of the vertical effective impedance in the PS S. Persichelli.
BEPCII Transverse Feedback System Yue Junhui Beam Instrumentation Group IHEP , Beijing.
Multibunch beam stability in damping ring (Proposal of multibunch operation week in October) K. Kubo.
28-May-2008Non-linear Beam Dynamics WS1 On Injection Beam Loss at the SPring-8 Storage Ring Masaru TAKAO & J. Schimizu, K. Soutome, and H. Tanaka JASRI.
Beam stability in damping ring - for stable extracted beam for ATF K. Kubo.
Update on injection studies of LHC beams from Linac4 V. Forte (BE/ABP-HSC) Acknowledgements: J. Abelleira, C. Bracco, E. Benedetto, S. Hancock, M. Kowalska.
J. TAN, M. SORDET, L. SØBY, F. GUILLOT-VIGNOT, D. GERARD, M. LUDWIG, D. STEYAERT BE/BI Linac4 Instrumentation Review 18th October 2011.
Andreas Jansson, "Quadrupole Pick-ups", LHC BI-Review, November 19-20, Quadrupole Pick-ups  What is a quadrupole pick-up?  PS pick-ups and experimental.
An Inductive Pick-Up (IPU) for Beam Position and Current Measurement
SPS proton beam for AWAKE E. Shaposhnikova 13 th AWAKE PEB Meeting With contributions from T. Argyropoulos, T. Bohl, H. Bartosik, S. Cettour.
DaMon: a resonator to observe bunch charge/length and dark current. > Principle of detecting weakly charged bunches > Setup of resonator and electronics.
The Introduction to CSNS Accelerators Oct. 5, 2010 Sheng Wang AP group, Accelerator Centre,IHEP, CAS.
PSB H- injection concept J.Borburgh, C.Bracco, C.Carli, B.Goddard, M.Hourican, B.Mikulec, W.Weterings,
E. Benedetto, 24/04/14, LIU-PSB Meeting, MDs planning for 2014 MDs planning for 2014 E. Benedetto Thanks: G. Rumolo, B. Mikulec and the RF, OP, ABP, BI.
UPDATE ON KICKERS LNF David Alesini for the LNF fast kickers study group* * D. Alesini, F. Marcellini P. Raimondi, S. Guiducci.
F Project X: Recycler 8.9 GeV/c Extraction D. Johnson, E. Prebys, M. Martens, J. Johnstone Fermilab Accelerator Advisory Committee August 8, 2007 D. Johnson.
Experience with Novosibirsk FEL Getmanov Yaroslav Budker INP, Russia Dec. 2012, Berlin, Germany Unwanted Beam Workshop.
Beam Diagnostics Seminar, Nov.05, 2009 Das Tune-Meßverfahren für das neue POSI am SIS-18 U. Rauch GSI - Strahldiagnose.
MTE commissioning status S. Gilardoni, BE/ABP With C. Hernalsteens and M. Giovannozzi.
Summary of ions measurements in 2015 and priorities for 2016 studies E. Shaposhnikova 3/02/2016 Based on input from H. Bartosik, T. Bohl, B. Goddard, V.
CLIC Beam instrumentation work shop, CERN, 2 nd & 3 rd of June 2009, Lars Søby BPM overview CLIC instrumentation work shop 2-3 June BPM overview.
6 July 2010 | TU Darmstadt | Fachbereich 18 | Institut Theorie Elektromagnetischer Felder | Sabrina Appel | 1 Micro bunch evolution and „turbulent beams“
Longitudinal Limitations of Beams for the LHC in the CERN PS 0.
Review of Alignment Tolerances for LCLS-II SC Linac Arun Saini, N. Solyak Fermilab 27 th April 2016, LCLS-II Accelerator Physics Meeting.
RF acceleration and transverse damper systems
Linac4 Beam Characteristics
402.5 MHz Debunching in the Ring
Space charge studies at the SPS
Andrei Shishlo ORNL SNS Project Florence, Italy November 2015
Wideband, solid-state driven RF systems for PSB and PS longitudinal damper.
Saturday 21st April 00:33 Interlock during ramp on BLM HV
Acknowledgments: LIU-PT members and deputies, H. Bartosik
Controls CBETA controls will extend existing EPICS control system
Upcoming longitudinal MDs
G. Arduini, R. Calaga, E. Metral, G. Papotti, G. Rumolo, B. Salvant, R
Bunch Tiltmeter Steve Smith SLAC Snowmass July 16, 2001 Update date
The LHC25ns cycle in the PS Triple splitting after 2nd injection
LHC (SSC) Byung Yunn CASA.
Beam Current Monitoring with ICT and BPM Electronics
Introduction to LHC beam production in PSB and PS
Observation of Transverse Mode Coupling Instability at the PS and SPS
Linac Diagnostics Commissioning Experience
Presentation transcript:

Beam position instabilities in the PSB injection line J. Tan, M. Bozzolan, L. Søby, B. Mikulec, G.P. Di Giovanni, O. E. Berrig, E. Benedetto BI Technical Board 17 th July 2015

Outline The Linac2 transfer line The trajectory measurement system Position instabilities Discussion Summary

Transfer lines LT-LTB-BI Beam diagnostics devices along 130m long TLs BPMs FBCTs BLMs Scintillating screens Measurement lines for emittance and energy

Longitudinal beam phase Courtesy A. Lombardi LT Line LTB Line BI Line Debuncher cavity time T=4.95ns, f= 202.5MHz 150mA, a few 10 9 ppb LT line BI line

Vertical distribution in BI line A pair of quadrupoles acting as vertical dipoles

IF 25 MHz Linac4-based monitor and Acq. system Acquition system BPM 202 MHz bunch freq LO 177 MHz ADC FESA Calibration Position Options: Intensity, , TOF Machine BOR F ADC 4xF IF Network I+ Q+ I- Q- I+ Q+ I- Q- M+ M- FESA Class: I/Q demodulation ADC input signal IF = 25MHz 25 MHz M R -M L M R +M L +M U +M D  H =  beam -  LO I  M R +M L +M U +M D TOF =  PU2 -  PU1 S × Cal

POSITION vs TIME (NOMINAL BEAM) H PLANE BI LINE BEFORE DISTRIBUTOR V PLANE BI LINE BEFORE DISTRIBUTOR V PLANE LT LINE: instabilities are present from the Linac2 output. Spike is present all along the transfer line

Beam Trajectories : 30 x LHCINDIV cycles R1 R2 R3 R4 Horizontal plane Vertical plane Beam position [mm]

Beam Trajectories: Standard Deviations R1 R2 R3 R4 Standard Deviation [mm] Horizontal plane Vertical plane LTB and part of BI line cross the PS ring. The 50MeV beam travelling there is perturbed horizontally by the stray magnetic field of the PS magnets. Well understood & mitigated Stray Field Compensation

Beam Trajectories: Standard Deviations R1 R2 R3 R4 Standard Deviation [mm] Horizontal plane Vertical plane In BI line where vertical distribution takes place: We observe large position fluctuations !! Why?

Can we trust the Shorted Stripline? BPM characteristics are CST-based simulations Single bunch and multi-bunch for time domain Gaussian distribution: transverse & long. Parameters: , bunch length, transverse beam size, boundary conditions, power dissipation, electrode coupling, geometry Lab conditions: stretched wire, step response

Can we trust the Shorted Stripline? Simulation conditions: o E kin = 50 MeV o F RF = MHz o I linac = 150mA o 10 Gaussian bunches, 5mm off-centered o Mesh cells: ~ 6.5 M o Variables =  t and beam size Courtesy A. Lombardi LT LineLTB Line BI Line 0.094ns 0.493ns 0.8ns 1.26ns 140mm 60mm or 30mm

Can we trust the Shorted Stripline? Beam position is not affected by the o longitudinal beam bunching o tranverse beam size [ ns ] Beam current [ A ] Electrode voltage [ V ] ns 0.493ns 0.8ns 1.26ns  t [ns] S [mm] 60mm beam size mm beam size [ GHz ]

Can we trust the Shorted Stripline? Beam aperture: 67mm, 3MeV H- beams Beam aperture: 140mm, 50MeV p beams

Can we trust the acq. chain ? Algorithm – Cross check I/Q demodulation with Hilbert transform and RMS processing – Amplitude difference between algorithms is within a few per mille. Down-mixing board – Process data from fast digitizing oscilloscope: same results as with analogue board – Cross check with a spectrum analyser

Can we trust the acq. Chain ? Sweep 20  s Spectrum analyzer Linear scale, span 0Hz, trigger 1 st harmonic MHz 2 nd harmonic 405 MHz Sweep 20  s Linac2 aqn chain MHz LO=178 MHz 25.5 MHz 405MHz LO= MHz 25.5 MHz Pick-up sensitivity is frequency-dependent: Beam positions are the same for both harmonics. h1 h2 BW: 3 MHz BW: 10 MHz

Comparison with the “half-turn PU” o Section 7L2 o Capacitive PU o S = 27mm (corrected for the gain ratio) o Head amp. provides  and  signals o Acquisition on Oasis Delta: 0.7mm/div 863 ns Position fluctuations in the vertical plane are also seen by capacitive PUs !

Investigation on possible causes EMIs: 50Hz, pulsing elements… – S/N ratio : 60dB – Noise background before and after beam aqc. ~ 2 mVpp, flat – Position variations are < 200 ns Vertical distribution scheme: – Dedicated MD: All vertival pulsed elements BVTs, DIS, SMV were set “disable”. Only ring 3 travelling straight – Beam positions from striplines PUs remainded unstable – Beam positions from scintillating screens seems stable

Investigation on possible causes: Debuncher cavity BI3.BPM50 HARMONICS (MD 27/05/2015) 6 DEBUNCHER PHASES WITH THE NOMINAL CURRENT (140mA) 3 DEBUNCHER PHASES WITH HALF CURRENT (70mA) STRONG RELATION BETWEEN PHASE AND FUNDAMENTAL AMPLITUDE SECOND HARMONIC ALMOST CONSTANT Extrapolation for Linac4: Lower current 64 mA, higher energy 160 MeV  lower space charge Amplitude dependency with debuncher phase is reduced ? To be confirmed.

Investigation on possible causes: Debuncher cavity Debuncher gap voltage along the pulse is pretty flat, phase value  Courtesy R. Wegner Courtesy: GP Di Giovanni “We noticed that the positions recorded in the BPMs became more and more stable as we increased the debuncher phase (from to to degrees).“ “…This is clearly not a Linac2 issue, as it seems to point out that the BPMs are sensitive to the bunching of the beam. “ Misleading statement on the beam bunching: a change of debuncher phase means the bunches are either accelerated or decelerated. BI.BPM30, and Bix.BPM40/50 debuncher phase (MD 17/06/2015)

INTENSITY TRACES 140mA BI3.BCT2 PHASES) BPMs SUM SIGNAL BPMs SUM SIGNAL

Beam phase LT line LT + LTB lines BI lines BI.3.BPM50 Nominal debuncher 274 deg.

Summary  Vertical transverse instabilities exist, and have never been measured before.  Stripline BPM data consistent with o Spectrum analyzer o FBCTs, with some boundary conditions o Half Turn (electrostatic) BPM  Yes, we can trust the new beam trajectory system  MD sessions have ruled out o Vertical distribution scheme o EMIs  Transverse instabilities o Are present from L2 and amplified along the transfer line o Dependencies: debuncher phase setting and L2 intensity  Forthcoming actions o ABP’s simulations on resonances, instabilities and machine impedance o Perform a full Linac2 intensity scan o Understand the debuncher phase dependency o Simulate the Linac4 debuncher action on the beam

Acknowledgement PSB supervisors & OP crew ABP: R. Wegner, R. Scrivens, J.B. Lallement BI: S. Burger, E. Bravin