High P T Inclusive Jets Study High P T Inclusive Jets Study Manuk Zubin Mehta, Prof. Manjit kaur Panjab University, Chandigarh India CMS Meeting March,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Monte Carlo tuning using ATLAS data Davide Costanzo (on behalf of the ATLAS collaboration) 1MonteCarlo tuning using ATLAS data23/08/2011.
Advertisements

Maria Jose Costa, CERN DIS 2004 April 14 th -18 th 2004, Slovakia b -mass effects in 3 and 4 jets events with the DELPHI detector at LEP b u,d,s.
Jet and Jet Shapes in CMS
Event Generation with HERWIG Nick Brook University of Bristol Introduction Multiple Interactions in HERWIG Parameter Tuning B-production.
Peter Loch University of Arizona Tucson, Arizona USA
Ursula Bassler, LPNHE-Paris, RUN II MC workshop 1 Monte Carlo Tuning: The HERA Experience Monte Carlo Models for DIS events Description of inclusive hadronic.
Event Simulation Tools in ALICE Andreas Morsch Generator Mini-Workshop CERN, Geneva June 20, 2003.
ATLAS UK Physics meeting
Heavy charged gauge boson, W’, search at Hadron Colliders YuChul Yang (Kyungpook National University) (PPP9, NCU, Taiwan, June 04, 2011) June04, 2011,
CDF Joint Physics Group June 27, 2003 Rick FieldPage 1 PYTHIA Tune A versus Run 2 Data  Compare PYTHIA Tune A with Run 2 data on the “underlying event”.
Irakli Chakaberia Final Examination April 28, 2014.
Jet Studies at CMS and ATLAS 1 Konstantinos Kousouris Fermilab Moriond QCD and High Energy Interactions Wednesday, 18 March 2009 (on behalf of the CMS.
1 A Preliminary Model Independent Study of the Reaction pp  qqWW  qq ℓ qq at CMS  Gianluca CERMINARA (SUMMER STUDENT)  MUON group.
2012 Tel Aviv, October 15, 2012 Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMSPage 1 Rick Field University of Florida Outline of Talk CMS at the LHC CDF Run 2 
Cambridge 19 th April1 Comparisons between Event Generators and Data Peter Richardson IPPP, Durham University.
AcerMC and ISR/FSR systematics at ATLAS Liza Mijovic, Borut Kersevan Jozef Stefan Inst. Univ. of Ljubljana ATLAS approach: Generator level studies Parameters.
W + /W - and l + /l - A Means to investigate PDFs T. Schörner-Sadenius, G. Steinbrück Hamburg University HERA-LHC Workshop, CERN, October 2004.
16/04/2004 DIS2004 WGD1 Jet cross sections in D * photoproduction at ZEUS Takanori Kohno (University of Oxford) on behalf of the ZEUS Collaboration XII.
Ratio of Three over Two Jet Cross Sections: Update 36 pb -1 P.Kokkas, I.Papadopoulos, C.Fountas University of Ioannina, Greece QCD High p T Meeting 17.
Run 2 Monte-Carlo Workshop April 20, 2001 Rick Field - Florida/CDFPage 1 The Underlying Event in Hard Scattering Processes  The underlying event in a.
Fermilab MC Workshop April 30, 2003 Rick Field - Florida/CDFPage 1 The “Underlying Event” in Run 2 at CDF  Study the “underlying event” as defined by.
Update ON the Study of Subjet Multiplicity at CMS 7TeV Manuk Zubin Mehta, Manjit Kaur Panjab University, Chandigarh 11/27/
Study of the Subjet Multiplicity at CMS Manuk Zubin Mehta Prof. Manjit Kaur Panjab University Chandigarh 12/21/2015Inida CMS-Meeting.
QCD Physics with ATLAS Mike Seymour University of Manchester/CERN PH-TH ATLAS seminar January 25 th / February 22 nd 2005.
QCD Multijet Study at CMS Outline  Motivation  Definition of various multi-jet variables  Tevatron results  Detector effects  Energy and Position.
Itamar Roth, Ehud Duchovni Group meeting 19/01/15 1.
DIS Conference, Madison WI, 28 th April 2005Jeff Standage, York University Theoretical Motivations DIS Cross Sections and pQCD The Breit Frame Physics.
Andrei Rostovtsev Moscow, ITEP Low-x, June 2013 (Eilat) On behalf of H1 Collaboration.
St. Andrews, Scotland August 22, 2011 Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMSPage Rick Field University of Florida Outline  Do we need a.
The Underlying Event in Jet Physics at TeV Colliders Arthur M. Moraes University of Glasgow PPE – ATLAS IOP HEPP Conference - Dublin, 21 st – 23 rd March.
7/20/07Jiyeon Han (University of Rochester)1 d  /dy Distribution of Drell-Yan Dielectron Pairs at CDF in Run II Jiyeon Han (University of Rochester) For.
Some recent QCD results at the Tevatron N. B. Skachkov (JINR, Dubna)
Measurement of inclusive jet and dijet production in pp collisions at √s = 7 TeV using the ATLAS detector Seminar talk by Eduardo Garcia-Valdecasas Tenreiro.
Fermilab Energy Scaling Workshop April 28, 2009 Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMSPage 1 1 st Workshop on Energy Scaling in Hadron-Hadron Collisions Rick Field.
24/08/2009 LOMONOSOV09, MSU, Moscow 1 Study of jet transverse structure with CMS experiment at 10 TeV Natalia Ilina (ITEP, Moscow) for the CMS collaboration.
Jet Studies at CDF Anwar Ahmad Bhatti The Rockefeller University CDF Collaboration DIS03 St. Petersburg Russia April 24,2003 Inclusive Jet Cross Section.
CDF Paper Seminar Fermilab - March 11, 2010 Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMSPage 1 Sorry to be so slow!! Studying the “Underlying Event” at CDF CDF Run 2 “Leading.
Calibration of the ZEUS calorimeter for hadrons and jets Alex Tapper Imperial College, London for the ZEUS Collaboration Workshop on Energy Calibration.
Don LincolnExperimental QCD and W/Z+Jet Results 1 Recent Dijet Measurements at DØ Don Lincoln Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory for the DØ Collaboration.
Photon and Jet Physics at CDF Jay R. Dittmann Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory (For the CDF Collaboration) 31 st International Conference on High.
Modern Approach to Monte Carlo’s (L1) The role of resolution in Monte Carlo’s (L1) Leading order Monte Carlo’s (L1) Next-to-Leading order Monte Carlo’s.
Tools08 1 st July1 PDF issues for Monte Carlo generators Peter Richardson IPPP, Durham University.
ICHEP 2012 Melbourne, July 5, 2012 Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMSPage 1 ICHEP 2012 Rick Field University of Florida Outline of Talk CMS at the LHC CDF Run.
Experimental Aspects of soft QCD N. van Remortel Universiteit Antwerpen, Belgium Jet workshop Boston, Jan
Update: Hard QCD jets in Pythia with ATLAS detector simulation Oliver Harris, 15/09/06 (updated 22/09/06)
1 Proton Structure Functions and HERA QCD Fit HERA+Experiments F 2 Charged Current+xF 3 HERA QCD Fit for the H1 and ZEUS Collaborations Andrew Mehta (Liverpool.
Energy Dependence of the UE
Implications of First LHC Data: Underlying Event Measurements
Measurement of jet properties with the ATLAS detector
N. ILINA, V. GAVRILOV (ITEP, Moscow)
Observation of Diffractively Produced W- and Z-Bosons
Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS
Lake Louise Winter Institute
W Charge Asymmetry at CDF
Predicting MB & UE at the LHC
Event Shape Analysis in minimum bias pp collisions in ALICE.
“Min-Bias” and the “Underlying Event” at CDF
Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS
The Tevatron Connection
“Min-Bias” and the “Underlying Event” in Run 2 at CDF and the LHC
CDF Run 2 Monte-Carlo Tunes
“Min-Bias” & “Underlying Event” at the Tevatron and the LHC
Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS
Observation of Diffractively Produced W- and Z-Bosons
Inclusive Jet Production at the Tevatron
PYTHIA 6.2 “Tunes” for Run II
Workshop on Early Physics Opportunities at the LHC
Measurement of b-jet Shapes at CDF
Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS
Presentation transcript:

High P T Inclusive Jets Study High P T Inclusive Jets Study Manuk Zubin Mehta, Prof. Manjit kaur Panjab University, Chandigarh India CMS Meeting March,

Introduction: Inclusive Jets - On the MC side : They are available for QCD jet with leading order (LO) matrix element - In many tests of QCD requires to use NLO calculations - But the absence of generator programs for QCD jet production in next-to-leading order - Necessary to apply additional corrections to account for the effects of multiple parton interactions and the hadronisation process. 2

Herwig++,Herwig&Jimmy and Pythia6 (The process of hadronisation is not at all understood,but there are several models that seem to give good approximation to what is occuring) Herwig and Pythia use different hadronisation model -Lund String Model in Pythia -Cluster Model in Herwig++ and Herwig&Jimmy And also having different Underlying events model (Underlying event is used to tune MC generators to data and measured in transverse region) - Tune D6T for Pythia6 - Herwig++ used with default settings - Herwig+Jimmy tuned that developed in the Atlas Collaboration. - All three are tuned to Tevatron data 3

Analysis Setup - Herwig++ 2.2,Pythia 6.4 in CMSSW_2_1_4 Herwig6+ jimmy in CMSSW_2_2_3 - Selection Criteria for Jets: pt > 50 Gev - Algorithm used : Incl k t,D = 0.6 SisCone,R = Centre of mass energy : 10 Tev - The Phase space sliced into 17 pthat bins. - Number of event : 1Million per bin (to reduce Statistical uncertainties ) 4

cont With this coverage of 50GeV to 4000GeV is achieved. - Binning in rapidity is used according to detector geometry : 0.00<|y|<=0.55, 0.55<|y|<=1.10 barrel region 1.10<|y|<=1.70 transition region 1.70<|y|<=2.50 endcap region 2.50<|y|<=3.20 transition region 3.20<|y|<=5.00 forward region 5

Comparison of Basic Observables Pythia Herwig+Jimmy Herwig++ 6

Number of Jets using three generators 7 With k T D=0.6 With SisCone R= 0.7  Herwig++ seems to gives a higher jet multiplicity.

8 Inclusive Jet spectra from Herwig++,Herwig&Jimmy and Pythia6 Private Production : 17 Million events in 17 pthat bins. CTEQ6L PDF for Pythia and Herwig&Jimmy MRST2001 PDF for Herwig++

Comparision of inclusive jet crossection distribution 9 These are weighted spectra of crossections in the inner central barrel region barrel endcaps farward region  Only Slight differences in the forward region are observed. With k T D=0.6 With SisCone R =0.7

10 Ratio of Herwig++ and Herwig+Jimmy crossections w.r.t Pythia in inner barrel region (0.00 < |y| < 0.55)  Ratio for Herwig +Jimmy deviate slightly from one With SisCone R =0.7 With k T D=0.6

11 Ratio of Herwig++ and Herwig+Jimmy crossections w.r.t Pythia in barrel endcaps region ( 1.70 < |y| < 2.50)  Ratio exceeds one as rapidity increases. With SisCone R =0.7 With k T D=0.6

12 Ratio of Herwig++ and Herwig+Jimmy crossections w.r.t Pythia in forward region ( 3.20 < |y| < 5.00) With SisCone R =0.7 With k T D=0.6

Rapidity Distribution with k T D= 0.6 Low p T hat interval ( GeV) Medium p T hat interval ( GeV)

14 Highest p T hat interval ( GeV)  The rapidity distribution for these intervals are found to be nearly identical for all generators.  The Plots for SisCone R =0.7 also match very well.

Further Plan: 15  Comparisons with simulated MC samples  Comparison of generators and their models allows estimation of systematic uncertainties.  Derive final hadronization+UE corrections including systematic uncertainties from the different MC for inclusive jets and document this in analysis note,we are preparing.

Back Up Slides

Hadronisation PYTHIA(string model) It assumes colour charged strings between the partons coming from the parton shower step. As they move appart,the strings break and new quark antiquark pairs appear at the breaking points. HERWIG(cluster model) Thw colour neutral clusters are formed from neighbouring quarks,which then decay isotropically into hadrons. To preserve energy conservation, a momentum transfer between the cluster is performed, If a cluster is lighter than the lightest hadron of the given quarks flavour

Pythia and Herwig++ Pythia and Herwig++ handle MPI by performing a number of minimum bias parton scatters above a certain threshold in transverse momentum exchange. This threshold together with the chosen parton density function,defines a average number of additional interactions that take place in an event. Other parameter include mattter distribution in the proton and variables that steer the amount of intial and final state radiation that is spread into the event. Herwig+Jimmy Herwig6 natively doesnot include MPI but only simple soft interaction model that is based on approach pioneered by UA5 experiment. The lacking functionality however be completed by linking with JIMMY package that also inspired the model in Herwig++. Multiple Parton Interactions