Carnegie Mellon Rover Concept of Operation Life in the Atacama 2004 Science & Technology Workshop David Wettergreen The Robotics Institute Carnegie Mellon.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 1 Session 5: Focused DiscussionsMissions in Definition Possible Next Decade Major In-situ Exploration Missions: AFL and Deep Drill Andrew Steele, David.
Advertisements

General Concepts for Development of Thermal Instruments P M V Subbarao Professor Mechanical Engineering Department Scientific Methods for Construction.
Centre for Integrated Petroleum Research University of Bergen & Unifob, Norway Walter Wheeler & Simon Buckley Unifob, UiB Bergen, Norway Lidar laser scanning.
Topic 11.3 Diffraction.
ASTEP Life in the AtacamaCarnegie Mellon Limits of Life in the Atacama: Investigation of Life in the Atacama Desert of Chile Solar Panel Configuration.
SCCOOS Web Site Real-time Oil Spill Response Scenario.
Enables future missions such as autonomous geology, life seeking and polar exploration ROBOTIC SEARCH FOR ANTARCTIC METEORITES NASA and CARNEGIE MELLON.
Susanne Biundo, Karen Myers, Kanna Rajan How is Planning & Scheduling Changing the World?
Beyond TAOS: Future Blind Field Surveys Charles Alcock University of Pennsylvania With major contributions from The TAOS Science Team & Ball Aerospace.
Enables future missions such as autonomous geology, life seeking and polar exploration ROBOTIC SEARCH FOR ANTARCTIC METEORITES NASA and CARNEGIE MELLON.
Flying, Hopping and Perching Microbots for Extreme Environment Exploration Deployed Using CubeSats Jekan Thanga 1, Jim Bell 1 Space and Terrestrial Robotic.
Doppler Radar From Josh Wurman Radar Meteorology M. D. Eastin.
World Renewable Energy Forum May 15-17, 2012 Dr. James Hall.
Planning for airborne LIDAR survey Dr.Lamyaa Gamal El-deen.
Zereik E., Biggio A., Merlo A. and Casalino G. EUCASS 2011 – 4-8 July, St. Petersburg, Russia.
Carnegie Mellon Life in the Atacama, Design Review, December 19, 2003 Science Planner Science Observer Life in the Atacama Design Review December 19, 2003.
RET 2013: INFORMATION IN RADIO WAVES Ken Jacobs Tim Scaduto.
Life in the Atacama, Design Review, December 19, 2003 Carnegie Mellon SPI and Context Imagers Life in the Atacama Design Review December 19, 2003 Stuart.
Science Objectives & Investigation Methodology Life in the Atacama 2005 Science & Technology Workshop January 6-7, 2005 Nathalie A. Cabrol NASA Ames.
Life in the Atacama, Design Review, December 19, 2003 Carnegie Mellon SCIENCE OPS [contributions from Peter, Trey, Dom, Kristen, Kristina and Mike] Life.
Science Investigation Life in the Atacama 2004 Science & Technology Workshop Nathalie A. Cabrol NASA Ames.
ASTEP Life in the AtacamaCarnegie Mellon Limits of Life in the Atacama: Investigation of Life in the Atacama Desert of Chile Communication System Design.
Life in the AtacamaCarnegie Mellon Atacama Weather July 29, 2003 Fayette Shaw Michael Wagner Robotics Institute Atacama Weather.
Project Tracking and Monitoring QMS Training. 2 Objective To track and monitor the progress of the project and take appropriate corrective actions to.
THE ROBOTICS INSTITUTE Carnegie Mellon University The University of Pennsylvania Extended Environmental Monitoring via Intelligent Autonomous Airship (NSF.
1 Directed by: Dr. PJ Benfield and Dr. Matt Turner Mentor : Miss Doreen Forsythe.
Esri UC 2014 | Demo Theater | Using ArcPad in the Field Juan Luera.
Carnegie Mellon Zoë Computing Design Design Review December 19, 2003 Michael Wagner 
Cloud Evolution and the Sea Breeze Front
Life in the Atacama Life in the Atacama 2004 Science & Technology Workshop July 14-16, 2004 Carnegie Mellon University.
Chapter 1 – Science and Measurement
ICRA Planetary Rover Workshop / 19 May 2008 / D. Thompson / Carnegie Mellon University A Tale of Two Rovers: Mission Scenarios for Kilometer-Scale Site.
Site B Introduction Life in the Atacama 2005 Science & Technology Workshop January 6-7, 2005 Pre-landing analysis Derived hypotheses Daily planning & program.
The Global Learning and Observation to Benefit the Environment (GLOBE) program is a worldwide hands-on, primary and secondary school-based science and.
Ground-Truth Strategy Life in the Atacama 2004 Science & Technology Workshop Edmond A. Grin NASA Ames.
Aquarius Mission Simulation A realistic simulation is essential for mission readiness preparations This requires the ability to produce realistic data,
Irrigation – Does Variability Matter? Irrigation – Does Variability Matter? Ian McIndoe Fraser Scales.
June 28, 2000 Architecture Review 1 Examples: Implementing Common Solutions within CLARAty.
1 Toward Autonomous Kilometer-Scale Site Survey by Planetary Rovers David R. Thompson Robotics Institute Carnegie Mellon University NASA.
ESA Harwell Robotics & Autonomy Facility Study Workshop Autonomous Software Verification Presented By: Rick Blake.
E 74 Measuring Speed. E74: Measuring Speed Target: Measure the speed of a rolling cart using time and distance Do now: Take out your E74 Write up. Procedure.
1 The Imager/Sounder Paradigm Revisited Third GOES-R Users Conference Broomfield, Colorado May 11 th, 2004 Joe Criscione, Jim Bremer, and Donald Chu Swales.
Rover and Instrument Capabilities Life in the Atacama 2004 Science & Technology Workshop Michael Wagner, James Teza, Stuart Heys Robotics Institute, Carnegie.
Robotics and Autonomy Test Facility - Hardware Verification needs Elie Allouis HRAF Workshop – 28/02/2012.
Science Methods & Approach Life in the Atacama 2004 Science & Technology Workshop Nathalie A. Cabrol NASA Ames.
Remote Operations Methods & Plan Life in the Atacama 2004 Science & Technology Workshop Nathalie A. Cabrol NASA Ames.
Site C Introduction Life in the Atacama 2005 Science & Technology Workshop January 6-7, 2005 Pre-landing analysis Derived hypotheses Daily planning & program.
Pre-decisional – for Planning and Discussion Purposes Only 1 Technology Planning for Future Mars Missions Samad Hayati Manager, Mars Technology Program.
REMOTE SCIENCE INTERFACE DURING THE LIFE IN THE ATACAMA 2003 EXPEDITION Peter Coppin Remote Experience and Learning Lab STUDIO for Creative Inquiry Carnegie.
Autonomy: Executive and Instruments Life in the Atacama 2004 Science & Technology Workshop Nicola Muscettola NASA Ames Reid Simmons Carnegie Mellon.
Autonomous Rover Spectroscopy with Dozens of Targets / iSAIRAS 2008 / Caldeón, Thompson, Wettergreen 1 Autonomous Rover Reflectance Spectroscopy with Dozens.
Astrobiology Science Results Three key microhabitats (but may be others) Salt (“hydrated sulfates,” gypsum) Lithophytic (outcrops, desert pavement, pebbles)
Scenario use cases Szymon Mueller PSNC. Agenda 1.General description of experiment use case. 2.Detailed description of use cases: 1.Preparation for observation.
Life in the Atacama, Design Review, December 19, 2003 Carnegie Mellon Chlorophyll Detector Life in the Atacama Design Review December 19, 2003 David Bradley.
Scarab Autonomous Traverse Carnegie Mellon December 2007 David Wettergreen.
Life in the Atacama, Design Review, December 19, 2003 Carnegie Mellon Life in the Atacama Field Experiments 2004 David Wettergreen The Robotics Institute.
Mission Planning Life in the Atacama 2004 Science & Technology Workshop Paul Tompkins Carnegie Mellon.
1 Predictive Exploration for Autonomous Science David R. Thompson AAAI Doctoral Consortium 2007 Robotics Institute Carnegie Mellon University.
Life in the Atacama, Design Review, December 19, 2003 Carnegie Mellon Software Architecture Life in the Atacama Design Review December 19, 2003 David Wettergreen.
Zoë Cameras: FOV SPI FI Workspace Cams. Zoë Science Cameras Life in the Atacama 2005 Science and Technology Workshop.
BNSC Agency Report to WGISS21 Budapest, May 2006 Wyn Cudlip
Rover Components.
Project and Workshop Objectives
Navigation Life in the Atacama 2005 Science & Technology Workshop January 6-7, 2005 Dominic Jonak Carnegie Mellon.
Mars Rover By Benn Davis.
ECV definitions Mapping of ECV product with OSCAR variables
IEEE ICRA 2005 Planetary Rover Workshop April 22, 2005
GLAS Cloud Statistics and Their Implications for a Hybrid Mission
Main information on the «WORLD SPACE OBSERVATORY» project
The Processes of Science
Presentation transcript:

Carnegie Mellon Rover Concept of Operation Life in the Atacama 2004 Science & Technology Workshop David Wettergreen The Robotics Institute Carnegie Mellon University

2Carnegie Mellon Operational Concept Our operational hypothesis is that planetary astrobiology requires extensive mobility Our operational concept is to conduct survey science over long traverse Some Implications: Time at any individual location limited Sampling will not be exhaustive Some things will be missed More things will be encountered

3Carnegie Mellon Operational Concept Some questions What distances and sampling strategy accomplish the investigation? What rover capabilities are both scientifically productive and technically feasible? How to use mobility as tool for investigation? How precisely to specify rover activities? How are survey and focused samples defined?

4Carnegie Mellon Mobility Hypothesis Mobility is essential to investigation Conjecture that mobility is necessary for life seeking Prove (or disprove) this hypothesis by developing rover capable of an investigation based on mobility Experiments quantify performance while measuring distribution of life Compare rover investigation to ground truth Conduct intensive ground truth to determine rover accuracy Compare traverse strategy to other rover field experiments

5Carnegie Mellon Operating Schedule RoverScience Team 0600Wake up Wake up0700More analysis 0800Specify survey traverse 0955Finalize target selection Charged up / Plan / Downlink1000Uplink rover traverse Begin traverse1100 Subsurface sample option1130 Conclude traverse / hibernate Review strategy Wake up for night observation 2100Study prior data Subsurface sample option2130 Uplink science data 2200Downlink / initial analysis Sleep (low power) 2300

6Carnegie Mellon Science Traverse Rover begins each day with satellite & local information 30m

7Carnegie Mellon Science Traverse Scientists designate areas for detailed investigation

8Carnegie Mellon Scientists pick subsurface sampling location Science Traverse Scientists designate site for subsurface sampling

9Carnegie Mellon Science Traverse Mission planner generates feasible path (1.3km)

10Carnegie Mellon Rover executes traverse collecting survey samples Science Traverse

11Carnegie Mellon Rover collects designated context imaging Science Traverse

12Carnegie Mellon Rover uplinks science data at end of traverse Science Traverse

13Carnegie Mellon Science Traverse Rover wakes up for stationary night sampling operation

14Carnegie Mellon Science Traverse Rover wakes up and downlinks the next traverse plan

15Carnegie Mellon Sampling Metrics YrActivitiesDurationBandwdthDistanceSamplesLocation 03Component Testing 30 days (15 of ops with 2 of autonomy) No a priori limit 10 km10 Detail Samples Site A 04Integrated Testing 60 days (30 of ops with 5 of continuous autonomy) 100 MB / cycle 50 km, 5 km/day on 10 days of traverse (average) 100 Survey 10 Detail Samples Site B Site C 05Long- Duration Testing 100 days (50 of ops with 10 of continuous autonomy) 100 MB / cycle 180+km, 10 km/day on 18+ days of traverse (average) 160+ Survey 16+ Detail Samples Site D Site E Site F

16Carnegie Mellon Sampling Approach Limit data volume to 100MB/cycle (day) Focus on data quality (rather than quantity) Expect low precision in sample designation Rover will not sample features smaller than it’s gross mobility precision (10 cm) or error (5% of distance traveled) Achieve known correlation between data products Samples are not useful if all associated data cannot be correlated (context image, details images, spectra, microscopy). Ideally, sampling of same target. Unless otherwise specified all measurements include calibration and spectral data

17Carnegie Mellon Daily Data Products ItemQuantitySize (Actual sizes WILL vary) Weather log (with 144 samples)1300K Low-res panorama + Spectra13M + 1M = 4M Survey Sampling x (50K + 7.2K) = 5.7M (Low-res underbody + spectra) Night Science 15M + 700K + 10M = 16M (Fluresence Procedure + spectra + macroscopic quilt) Subsurface Science 11M + 10M + 14K = 11M (2 high res SPI + 2 Fluresence Procedure + 2 spectra) Subtotal (1)37 M Focused Sampling, 5m resolution 22 x 4M = 8M (2 corner panoramas + 25 low res + 25 spectra + 25 chlorophyll) Local panorama + Spectra12M K = 2.7 M Forward panorama + Spectra12M + 700K = 2.7M Subtotal (2)51.4 M Calibration data? Magic Telemetry data? Magic Total50 M

18Carnegie Mellon Total Data Products 2 full landing site panorama (1280x960) 2 x 40Mb, 1 per site, 2 sites 10 full stereo panorama (320x240) 10 x 3Mb, end of each day, 10 days 30 forward stereo panoramas (320x240), 30 x 2Mb, 3 per day 30 spectral panorama (18 samples?), 30 x 1.5Mb, 3 per day 1000 survey measurements, 1 per 10m, 1000 x 57Kb 1000 chlorophyll?, 1000 low res images (640x480), 1000 spectra 10 low-angle stereo panorama, 10 x 2.7Mb 10 subsurface science operations, 10 x 11Mb 20 high-resolution images, 20 fluorescence procedures, 20 spectra 10 night science operations, 10 x 16 Mb 10 quilts, 10 fluorescence procedures, 1010 spectra 10 fluorescence microscopic investigations, (all filters, all positions, DOF) 1440 weather samples, 1 per 10 minutes, 10 x 300Kb Temp, pressure, humidity, condensation, UV, wind Total 572Mb

19Carnegie Mellon Scenarios Landing Subsurface Science (“Trench”) Night Science Surface Fluorescence Focused Sampling (“Farming”) Survey Sampling Other

20Carnegie Mellon Data Descriptio nFormatFOVResolutionCompressedTime PanoramaHigh-Res~152 PPM image pairsall but sky and rover1280 x M10 min PanoramaSpectral one spectrum per frameall but sky and rover3-30 nm1.5- Landing Data Products These measurements are taken once per landing site Data Products Total Data Volume: 41.5 M Night before Landing Day: 1700 take high-res pan and send it. Sleep. (Skip night ops) Landing Day: rover receives commands at 1100, traverses

21Carnegie Mellon DataDescriptionFormatFOVResolution Compresse dTime SPIHigh Res2 image21º1280x9602 x 500K1-2 s UnderbodySpectra1 data file25º3-10 nm2 x 7 K1-2 s Underbody Fluorescence Procedure25 images?1280 x 9602 x 5 M< 10 min Subsurface Science “Trench” Scientist selected via DEM and other prior data Sample each sample location before and after plowing (x2) Total Data Volume: 11 M

22Carnegie Mellon DataDescriptionFormatFOVResolutionCompressedTime UnderbodySpectra101 data files25º3-10 nm700 K1-2 s UnderbodyFluorescence Procedure25 images?1280 x 9605 M< 10 min UnderbodyQuilt800 images?320x24010 M1 hr Night Science Macro/Microscopic Fluorescence Sample Scientist selected (may be following subsurface sample) Full deployment of the low mag imaging system and a microscopic quilt. Data Products Quilt: 100 macro or microscopic fluorescence images 1m 2 (developmental) Reduce data Total Data Volume: 16 M

23Carnegie Mellon DataDescriptionFormatFOVResolutionCompressedTime UnderbodySpectra101 data files25º3-10 nm700 K1-2 s UnderbodyFluorescence Procedure25 images?1280 x 9605 M< 10 min UnderbodyQuilt800 images?320x24010 M1 hr Surface Fluorescence Macro/Microscopic Fluorescence Sample Scientist selected (may be following subsurface sample) Full deployment of the low mag imaging system and a quilt Data Products Quilt: 100 macro or microscopic fluorescence images 1m2 (developmental) Reduce data Total Data Volume: 16 M

24Carnegie Mellon Sampling Interval farming interval options:Samples (n)total time?subtotal (M)total (M) 1 m interval62530 min m interval14428 min m interval6426 min m interval3624 min m interval2522 min1.54 DataDescriptionQuantityFOVResolutionCompressedTime PanoramaCorner2 x ~39 image pairs100º320x2402 x 1 M2.5 min PanoramaSpectral2 x ~39 data files100º3-10 nm2 x 280 K- UnderbodySpectran25º3-10 nmn x 7K- UnderbodyLow Resn?320 x 240n x 50 K< 1 min UnderbodyChlorophyll????? Focused Sampling (“Farming”) For 25 m x 25 m area, scientists specify interval and pattern Each Focused Sample:

25Carnegie Mellon DataDescriptionFormatFOVResolutionCompressedTime PanoramaSpectral1 data file25º3-30 nm7 K- UnderbodyLow Res1 image?320 x K< 1 min UnderbodyChlorophyll????? Survey Sampling Periodic or directed sampling of correlated target Need to be stationary Once every 10 m, corresponds to far-field navigation Data Volume Total: 57 K

26Carnegie Mellon Other possible detailed investigations Forward Panorama, 2 M Local Panorama, 2 M Low Angle Panorama, 2.5 M Low Resolution Panorama, 3 M Fluorescence Quilts, 1m2, 10 M