Definitions in Dyadic Data Analysis David A. Kenny February 18, 2013.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Specification Issues in Relational Models David A. Kenny University of Connecticut Talk can be downloaded at:
Advertisements

University of Connecticut
Dyadic Analysis: Using HLM
Actor-Partner Interdependence Model or APIM David A
Within families: family-wide and child-specific influences on childrens socio-emotional development Jennifer Jenkins, Jon Rasbash, Tom OConnor.
TV Families Since the 1950s. The Cleavers From Leave it to Beaver ( ) White, middle-class family. Only one black family appeared with a speaking.
Test of Distinguishability
Seven Deadly Sins of Dyadic Data Analysis David A. Kenny February 14, 2013.
An Introduction to the Social Relations Model David A. Kenny.
Chapter 11: The American Family
Patterns of Actor and Partner Effects
Living Single: The Effects of Domestic Capital Investments On Men’s Domestic Labor Participation Richard N Pitt, Jr. Vanderbilt University Department of.
Nested Example Using SPSS David A. Kenny January 8, 2014.
Social Relations Model: Estimation Indistinguishable Dyads David A. Kenny.
Do Now: How would you rate your importance in your home?
Social Relations Model: Estimation Distinguishable Dyads
APIM with Distinguishable Dyads: SEM Estimation
Economic Incentives and Foster Child Adoptions Economic Incentives and Foster Child Adoptions Laura Argys and Brian Duncan Department of Economics University.
Dyadic designs to model relations in social interaction data Todd D. Little Yale University.
APIM with Between- and Within Dyads Outcomes David A. Kenny December 11, 2014.
Exchange Theory Power And Intimate Relationships Exchange Theory Power And Intimate Relationships.
Caregiving Lecture 12/1/04. Caregiving Statistics About 64% of older persons living in the community and in need of long-term care depend on informal.
Specifying a Purpose, Research Questions or Hypothesis
Marriage, Intimate Relationships and Society Contemporary Marriage and Intimate Relationships ( )
Kinship Diagrams. Unit Learning Objectives Differentiate between nuclear & extended families. Distinguish between family orientation & family procreation.
Introduction to Multilevel Modeling Using SPSS
Experimental Research Methods in Language Learning Chapter 2 Experimental Research Basics.
Illustrating DyadR Using the Truth & Bias Model
One-with-Many Design: Estimation David A. Kenny June 22, 2013.
Growth Curve Models Using Multilevel Modeling with SPSS David A. Kenny January 23, 2014.
1 Analysis Consequences of Dependent Measurement Problems in Research on Older Couples Jason T. Newsom Institute on Aging Portland State University Presented.
The Opinions of Parents vs. Friends in the Dating Decisions of LGBT Individuals Karen L. Blair, PhD University of Utah Caroline F. Pukall, PhD Queen’s.
One-with-Many Design: Introduction David A. Kenny June 11, 2013.
Actor-Partner Interdependence Model or APIM
The Partisan Sort Chapter 3: Have Voters Sorted?.
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 14: Divorce and Remarriage.
PSYC 2314 Lifespan Development Chapter 13 The School Years: Psychosocial Development.
Stuff I Have Done and Am Doing Now David A. Kenny.
Social Relations Model: Multiple Variables David A. Kenny.
PEERS CHAPTER 8. SOME DEFINITIONS…. Peer – Another child of roughly the same age Short interactions, minimal commitment Friend – A peer with whom the.
Chapter 2 Family Interaction.
Social Relations Model Designs David A. Kenny June 17, 2013.
Anti-Homophobia Initiative NWJS & Stonewall School Champions.
Social influences on gender for example, the influence of parents, peers, schools, media.
Stefano Livi, David A. Kenny Group, Dyadic and Individual Levels in Leadership Perception: A Social Relations Analysis.
China’s Lifestyle Family, Dating, Marriage, Children Policy.
Level 2_family siblingssiblings folksfolks only child in-lawsin-laws.
Family Roles Where we’ve been and where we’re going…
The Family A group of people related by blood, marriage or other connection such as adoption © PDST Home Economics.
Chapter 15, Families and Intimate Relationships Key Terms.
Two-wave Two-variable Models David A. Kenny December 24, 2013.
Actor-Partner Interdependence Model or APIM. APIM A model that simultaneously estimates actor and partner effects on an outcome variable The actor and.
Chapter 1 The Meaning of Marriage and the Family.
Family A group of people related by blood, marriage or adoption.
Parental Investment Behavior: A Spousal Dyadic Analysis Agus Surachman Department of Behavioral Sciences Purdue University Calumet Presented at the Southeastern.
Families and Marriage in the United States Day Three Unit Five Teacher’s Edition.
A Dyadic Approach to Health, Cognition, and Quality of Life in Aging Adults Kyle Bourassa, Molly Memel, Cindy Woolverton, & David A. Sbarra University.
APIM with Distinguishable Dyads: MLM Estimation by Interactions
This is a power point explaining gender roles and what has changed over the past 100 year referring to gender roles.
APIM with Distinguishable Dyads: MLM Estimation (in development)
APIM with Indistinguishable Dyads: MLM Estimation
Claire A. Wood1, Heather M. Helms2, & W. Roger Mills-Koonce2
Unit 1 Lessons 2 and 3.
Repeated Measures Analysis Using Multilevel Modeling with SPSS
APIM with Indistinguishable Dyads: SEM Estimation
Defining, Measuring, and Dealing with Nonindependence
A New Approach to the Study of Teams: The GAPIM
Social Relations Model: Estimation of Relationship Effects
Bell work: 1/27/2016 Write in your notebook. DO NOT TURN IN
Presentation transcript:

Definitions in Dyadic Data Analysis David A. Kenny February 18, 2013

Definitions: Distinguishability Can all dyad members be distinguished from one another based on a meaningful factor? – Distinguishable dyads Gender in heterosexual couples Patient and caregiver Race in mixed race dyads – a systematic ordering of scores from the two dyad members can be developed based on the variable that distinguishes them. 2

All or Nothing If most dyad members can be distinguished by a variable (e.g., gender), but a few cannot, then can we say that the dyad members are distinguishable? No we cannot! 3

Indistinguishability – Examples of indistinguishable dyads Gay couples Twins Same-gender friends – There is no systematic or meaningful way to order the two scores 4

It can be complicated… – Distinguishability is a mix of theoretical and empirical considerations. – For dyads to be considered distinguishable: It should be theoretically important to make such a distinction between members. Also it should be shown that empirically there are differences. – Sometimes there can be two variables that can be used to distinguish dyad members: spouse vs. patient and husband vs. wife. 5

Types of Variables Between Dyads – Variable varies from dyad to dyad, BUT within each dyad all individuals have the same score Length of relationship Gender in homosexual couples Similarity of the members X 1 = X 2 (called a level 2 variable in multilevel modeling) 6

Within Dyads Variable varies from person to person within a dyad, BUT there is no variation on the dyad average from dyad to dyad. – Gender in heterosexual couples – Percent time talking in a dyad – Reward allocation if each dyad is assigned the same total amount X 1 + X 2 equals the same value for each dyad If in the data, there is a dichotomous within-dyads variable, then dyad members can be distinguished on that variable. 7

Mixed Variable Variable varies both between dyads and within dyads. In a given dyad, the two members may differ in their scores, and there is variation across dyads in the average score. – Age in married couples – Motivation of opponents – Gender (if both homosexual and heterosexual couples are included in the study) Most outcome variables are mixed variables. 8

It can be complicated… The same variable can be between- dyads, within-dyads, or mixed in the data. Gender – Between: Same gendered roommates – Within: Heterosexual married couples – Mixed: Friends where some are same gendered and others are mixed gendered. 9

Types of Dyadic Designs 10

Standard Dyadic Design l Each person has one and only one partner. About 75% of research with standard dyadic design Examples: Dating couples, married couples, friends 11

Standard Design 12

Standard Design - Distinguishable 13

One-with-Many Dyadic Design Each person has many partners, but each partner is paired with only one person. 15% of research with dyads Examples: Doctors with patients, managers with workers, egos with alters (egocentric networks) 14

The One-with-Many Design: The Indistinguishable Case All partners have the same role with the focal person For example, students with teachers or workers with managers No need to assume equal N 15

The One-with-Many Design: The Distinguishable Case Partners can be distinguished by roles For example, family members (Mother, Father, Sibling) Typically equal number of partners per focal person = Mother = Father = Sibling 16

Social Relations Model (SRM) Dyadic Design Each person has many partners, and each partner paired with many persons. 13% of dyadic research Examples: Team or family members rating one another 17

SRM Designs: Indistinguishable 18

SRM Designs: Distinguishable = Mother = Father = Younger Child = Older Child 19

Reciprocal Designs Definition: The same variables are measured for the two members of the dyad. Different Designs – Standard Design – One-with-many Design Typically not reciprocal – SRM Design Usually reciprocal 20

Additional Reading Kenny, D. A., Kashy, D. A., & Cook, W. L. Dyadic data analysis. New York: Guilford Press, Chapter 1. Thanks to Debby Kashy! 21